HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS


BHDC 'WhiteHouse.com' File:

Monday March 10th, 2008 9:49 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Scandals, Law, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair, Daniel Parisi, WhiteHouse.com

As Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims to have used drugs with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999, has ratcheted up his legal wrangling, it appears he’s having some success.

Sinclair told Big Head DC on Monday evening that he’s been notified by WhiteHouse.com’s Dan Parisi to redeposit a check Parisi wrote for $20,000 to Sinclair on February 22. The payment was in exchange for Sinclair taking a polygraph test that was to be displayed on WhiteHouse.com.

A PolyScore computer analysis resulting from the polygraph ultimately indicated Sinclair had been truthful regarding his drug allegations against Obama. Still, experts hired by WhiteHouse.com discounted the PolyScore results.

Parisi canceled payment on the check soon after Sinclair took the polygraph, leading many observers who’ve been swayed by Sinclair’s claims to believe that Parisi may have been compelled by Obama’s campaign to somehow impede Sinclair’s claims. Adding to the controversy, WhiteHouse.com officials eventually removed any mention of Sinclair from the Web site.

The re-issue of the check has not yet cleared, but bank information should be available soon.

Earlier: EXCLUSIVE Interview With Sen. Obama’s Accuser; Sinclair Discusses Polygraph, Plans

Note: Help Big Head DC’s Investigative Team Grow!

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (197) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink
Sunday March 9th, 2008 7:16 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Scandals, Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair, David Axelrod, Daniel Parisi, WhiteHouse.com

March 9, 2008

Senator Barack Obama
713 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Senator Barack Obama
230 S. Dearborn Street, Ste. 3900
Chicago, IL 60604

Mr. David Axelrod
AKP Message & Media
730 N. Franklin Street, Ste. 404
Chicago, IL 60610

RE: REQUEST FOR CELL PHONE AND EMAIL RECORDS

Dear Senator Obama and Mr. Axelrod:

I am submitting this written request asking that you and Mr. Axelrod authorize the release of the following:

1. Cell Phone numbers, service providers for all personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama for the time period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999.

2. Cell phone numbers, service providers for all personal and campaign phones for Senator Obama, David Axelrod, David Plouffe from January 18, 2008 to current date or at the least through February 29, 2008.

3. All email communication both personal, campaign related and AKP Message & Media’s from January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod and David Plouffe.

4. All payouts made from AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008.

This request is being made based on your statement that you intend to bring a new politics to America, a politics of openness, and accountability. The records being requested here can bring to light and/or put to rest claims made about your involvement with Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com and the rigged polygraph arranged; can if you claim you never met me (as is exactly the claim made by your office directly to John Crewdson of the Chicago Tribune) show you to be lying or telling the truth by releasing your cell phone records etc…

It would seem to me that you would be more interested in getting this matter settled than your continued organized attacks on the Internet.

I respectfully request you respond to this request without delay. I strongly urge you to consider that you yourself can if these things are, as your staff continue to claim, untrue, then your agreeing to release these records should not be a difficult thing for you to do.

Sincerely,

Larry Sinclair

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (164) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink
Thursday February 28th, 2008 4:07 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair, Daniel Parisi, WhiteHouse.com, Lisa Brooks

larry-sinclair-polygraph1.jpgUpdate, 5:22 p.m.: WhiteHouse.com has removed all Larry Sinclair photos and posts. Dan Parisi, owner of the site, has still not returned Big Head DC’s requests for comment. The plot thickens. (Google cache of the site is still available.)

Original post:

Mr. Dan Parisi, President
WhiteHouse.com
295 Greenwich Street, Ste 184
New York, New York 10007-1049

RE: Returned Check

Dear Mr. Parisi,

Be advised that Lisa Brooks and Myself were notified by US Bank of Duluth this afternoon that Walden Federal (the bank in which Whitehouse.com Check Number 2046 is drawn on) has notified them a STOP PAYMENT was placed on your fee payment of $20,000.00 dated 2-21-08.

I have contacted the Financial Crimes Division of the Duluth Police Department this date concerning this matter. US Bank as informed Ms. Brooks and myself that the check has not yet been physically returned to them unpaid, but that if it is it will be returned to me by March 7, 2008.

I am asking that US Bank provide documentation showing Walden Federal has notified them the check is no good and I will begin the criminal complaint process against you and Whitehouse.com immediately upon receipt of the US Bank documentation.

Ms. Brooks and I will be charged for your dis-honored check and those charges will be included in the criminal complaint against you.

I have given you more than ample opportunity to honor your word and the agreement we had, especially seeing how you have received and engaged in using the very results of the services you paid for. You have chosen to act as if you are above the law and that sir will no doubt be you down fall.

Again, you can avoid this criminal action against you and your company by contacting your financial institution and instructing them to honor the check.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Sinclair
600 W. Superior St., #604
Duluth, MN 55802
218-464-1113

Related: Obama Accuser’s Message to WhiteHouse.com

WhiteHouse.com Won’t Honor Sinclair Check

Obama’s Accuser Releases Hotel Records

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (277) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink
Thursday February 28th, 2008 1:00 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair, Daniel Parisi, WhiteHouse.com

Big Head DC has obtained an e-mail sent from Larry Sinclair, the man who accuses Sen. Barack Obama of using drugs and of having a sexual encounter with him in 1999, to Dan Parisi, owner of WhiteHouse.com. The message was sent early this morning:

Mr. Parisi,

This is to inform you yet again that you continue to have up on your web site photographs and reports concerning me which you have publicly stated you have stopped payment for.

You need to remove those posts and make payment for the use of them which has been billed and sent to your New York office and you must do so within 48 hours make said payment if the original payment is returned by your bank unpaid.

While I clearly state to you making payment will not stop Felony check FRAUD charges from being filed against you if the 2-21-08 check you presented for payment is returned unpaid, your paying the billed amount might save you quite a bit in legal fee’s on the civil end.

I have been informed by the bank I will know if your 2-21-08 check is not honored by 3-7-08 and would have the returned check in my hand by that date if it is not honored. If so than that day I will swear out the warrant against you you check fraud.

Until payment is made you are notified to remove my name, photos and the reports and links from your web site of Whitehouse.com.

Thank you,

Larry Sinclair

Related: WhiteHouse.com Won’t Honor Sinclair Check

Obama’s Accuser Releases Hotel Records

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (258) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink
Wednesday February 27th, 2008 1:13 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Scandals, Tim Russert, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair, WhiteHouse.com, Ed Gelb, Gordan Borland
obama_absent.gif

Update, 1:13 p.m.:

Big Head DC has received a copy of the official November 4, 1999 Illinois General Assembly transcript. The transcript proves that Sen. Barack Obama was absent from the assembly that day due to “personal business.” That date happens to fall near the same time period that Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims he used drugs and had a sexual encounter with Obama, alleges he met in secret with the politician.

A November 2007 Politico report indicates that Obama has repeatedly “dodged questions…about releasing papers from his eight years as an Illinois state senator, and his campaign has not answered records requests from the state’s two largest newspapers.”

Still, the publication noted, “Obama’s campaign has prodded Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) to make available additional records of her communications during her husband’s presidency.”

Later, during a Meet the Press appearance, moderator Tim Russert asked Obama about the missing records. “We did not keep those records,” Obama said at first.

Then Obama changed his answer, beginning with the statement, “Well, let me be clear.” He went on to say, “The stuff that I did not keep has to do with, for example, my schedule. I didn’t have a schedule. I was a state senator. I wasn’t intending to have the Barack Obama State Senate Library. I didn’t have 50 or 500 people to, to help me archive these issues.”

Obama’s campaign has not responded to requests for comment regarding the politician’s whereabouts on Thursday, November 4, 1999 or the weekend thereafter.

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (208) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink
Tuesday February 26th, 2008 8:18 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Scoops, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair, WhiteHouse.com, Ed Gelb, Gordon Barland

obama11.jpg

NOTE: Help Big Head DC’s Investigative Team Grow!

Gordon Barland, a respected polygraph expert, has finished reviewing the Ed Gelb-produced polygraph test administered recently on Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims he used drugs and had a sexual encounter with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999.

Big Head DC has reviewed Barland’s report, which WhiteHouse.com originally commissioned yet failed to post, and Barland indicates there were technical flaws in procedure (including unnecessary interruptions), irregularities in the way the polygraph device was hooked up to Sinclair’s arm, and “uncommon” recording abnormalities involving Sinclair’s truthfulness about Obama’s alleged cocaine use.

While Barland’s review agrees with Gelb’s “deception” analysis of Sinclair’s sex claims, Barland’s findings regarding Sinclair’s alleged cocaine use with Obama were more murky. In fact, a computer algorithm called PolyScore found “no deception indicated” regarding Sinclair’s claim that Obama used drugs with him in the late 1990s. Ultimately, Barland said he agreed with Gelb’s analysis, despite the divergent PolyScore result.

Sinclair’s conclusion after reading the report is that he may be partially vindicated, and he says he believes the earlier “deception” result might be attributable to the poor testing conditions provided by WhiteHouse.com.

“I think the manner in which this exam was done is questionable,” Sinclair told Big Head DC upon reviewing the results on Tuesday afternoon. “I feel that knowing my medical history, Gelb intentionally prolonged the interview process that he claimed was necessary to form a list of questions, when in fact he already had the list of question printed and sitting on his desk. They knew I cannot sit, stand, walk, or lie down for extended periods of time, and I do believe this was intentional.”

Sinclair also said that “all of my treating doctors will confirm my normal blood pressure always runs on the low side as does my breathing.” Polygraph manuals note that people with medical issues like those of Sinclair can be difficult to test accurately via a lie detector.

DOWNLOAD THE FULL BARLAND REPORT [PDF]

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (178) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink
Tuesday February 26th, 2008 2:08 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair, David Axelrod, Daniel Parisi, WhiteHouse.com, Ed Gelb

NOTE: Help Big Head DC’s Investigative Team Grow!

WhiteHouse.com entered into an agreement to pay Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims he used drugs and had a sexual encounter with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999, a certain amount of money before Sinclair agreed to take a polygraph for the site, but now the site has reneged on the deal. This new twist is revealed within an e-mail sent on Tuesday from WhiteHouse.com founder Dan Parisi to Sinclair, which refers to Big Head DC’s Monday interview with Sinclair.

“I saw this interview this morning and posted your response in regards to another polygraph test,” Parisi writes in the e-mail. “It shows that you are doing another polygraph with results in this afternoon in violation of our agreement. I have instructed bank to stop payment on the $20,000 check this morning. The $10,000 in checks going to the charities are not effected (sic) and will be paid.”

Sinclair has vowed to take legal action against Parisi, if the check is not honored. “No polygraph has been done and you changed the terms of the agreement on your own on 2-21-08 so your refusing to honor your payment sheds light on your intent,” Sinclair wrote in an e-mail to Parisi today. “You have no grounds to stop payment on what you think might happen when it has not happened.”

Several claims WhiteHouse.com has made regarding the posting of the Sinclair polygraph, which was administered by controversial polygraph expert Ed Gelb, have not been honored to date. For instance, videos were supposed to be posted showing the administration of the test, but the site now claims the “incident needs to be laid to rest,” and plans to post the videos have apparently been scrapped.

Parisi and others associated with his business have not yet returned multiple requests for comment.

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (217) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink

larry-sinclair1.pngBig Head DC has conducted an exclusive interview with Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims he used drugs and had a sexual encounter with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999. We caught up with Sinclair just two days after the Web site WhiteHouse.com posted a statement indicating that Sinclair had been deceptive about his Obama claims during a polygraph test conducted by lie detector expert Ed Gelb. Sinclair, feeling the test’s administrator had been biased and that he couldn’t trust the people who arranged the test, decided to answer several of our questions about his complex situation:

Big Head DC: Do you think that Dan Parisi or anyone else who works for WhiteHouse.com is or has been employed by David Axelrod and/or other members of Sen. Obama’s campaign for president?

Larry Sinclair: I believe Dan Parisi and Robert Braddock were acting as agents of David Axelrod and the Obama camp in making the offer for me to take the polygraph. I believe this to be true as I received a tip via phone at 12:43 a.m. instructing me to find help in obtaining financial records from the Obama camp and Axelrod because an account and communications were accessed in which WH.com and Parisi were having a dispute with Axelrod over the payment of the remaining part of $750,000 to get a polygraph stating I was lying posted fast enough.

BHDC: What do you make of the “deception” finding from WhiteHouse.com’s polygraph conducted by Ed Gelb?

LS: I honestly believe that these results and the claims by Gelb are false, I believe he knowingly accepted money to provide WH.com with the desired results. This is based on the request upon arrival by Gelb’s office for payment of an additional amount that I personally heard a receptionist tell Parisi that Gelb said there was an extra charge and Parisi acknowledged he was advised. I believe this based on all the whispering done while I was present and the amount of time the three spent in closed door discussions before, during and after the exam.

BHDC: There have been several claims that Gelb is not a real PhD — did he present himself as one to you? Did he seem professional?

LS: Gelb did in fact represent himself to me as having a PhD that I found out after returning home was in fact not the case. He did appear somewhat professional with a constant shaking, however he did not control anything about the process and in fact was taking his direction from Robert Braddock of WH.com and Dan Parisi.

BHDC: How did Parisi act toward you throughout the polygraph process?

LS: Parisi did not even look me in the face from the time I met him that Friday morning through the entire visit. He continued to look down toward the floor every time I spoke to him or he was in my presence. He did not at any time produce any ID for me to verify he was who he claimed to be. Not even when he wrote out the checks and I asked for ID, he laughed and said, “I am me.” Mr. Parisi and his assistant Robert Braddock were rude and attitude changed considerably after the exam was done. They met behind closed doors for another hour or so with Gelb.

BHDC: What do you make of all of the false information that is being passed around on the Internet about you?

LS: I find it appalling that most of it is being paid for by Axelrod and the Obama camp by use of paid bloggers who are being fed information that Axelrod and Obama know to be false, know not to be me — but know that these kids will sit up and post it as fact and they (Axelrod and Obama) will not have to answer for it. But I say they will.

BHDC: Would you have come forward with your claims had you known what has happened would happen?

LS: I had put out everything about my past from the start, so I did not worry about what they tried to say about me. I will get vindication against all the knowingly false claims made when this is over because slander and libel is easy to prove when they keep repeating it after being told to retract it.

BHDC: Do you stand by your claims about Barack Obama 100 percent, given the polygraph results?

LS: 1,000 percent, and I have stated from day one, polygraph or not, I will not recant or back down because I am stating truthful claims.

BHDC: Some people will say Big Head DC is biased for even interviewing you. What should we say to those people?

LS: What is biased about trying to get to the truth? The bias is on those media outlets who see the false claims made against a U.S. citizen by a candidate for the president of the U.S., and they still do not report anything. The media knows these attacks against me and the claims made in these attacks are false but they ignore it.

BHDC: What do you make of Obama’s increasing popularity?

LS: Does the phrase “snake oil sales man” give you a hint?

BHDC: Do you think Obama has been well enough vetted on the national political stage?

LS: Obama is not even close to being vetted; everyone says I am a kook, well I am not a kook, and I expect that I am not going to be standing here alone much longer. I expect we will see others come forward before this is over.

BHDC: Have you recently spoken to the limo driver you say was with you and Obama in 1999? What does he think about what you’ve been put through? Has it discouraged him from coming forward?

LS: I placed a call to him Saturday that was not returned. I had spoken with him last week, and he thinks I am crazy for going through this over a lying fraud like Barack Obama and David Axelrod. I truly believe he will come forward, and he knows I am not going to back down.

BHDC: Who is your lawyer in the lawsuit against Obama?

LS: The suit will be dismissed, it will be re-filed. It is being dismissed for failing to state a claim in which entitles me to relief, not because as claimed by others I am not credible. I am attaching a copy for your verification of this statement. WH.com leaked that I was in talks with Gloria Allred to discourage her, which they accomplished.

BHDC: Have you heard from anyone in the Obama campaign since you came forward with your claims?

LS: I have not. I received an e-mail via YouTube asking me to confirm or deny claims made by some Ron Allen of the Obama camp, which I stated were false. I will attach. I will forward copy to you.

BHDC: When did you first realize that Obama was a U.S. Senator?

LS: I became aware he was a politician during watching the 2004 DNC speech while residing in Mexico.

BHDC: How is your health? Are you afraid that this publicity is harmful to your health?

LS: I have some very serious heath problems, which I deal with according to decisions that I made. I do not use my health as an excuse for anything. I live alone, I care for myself, I do not reside in any assisted living complex, nor do I receive an assistant in my daily life.

BHDC: What are you going to do next regarding this whole situation?

LS: I will continue to put my story out there. I am getting some assistance in amending the lawsuit for refiling, and please note, it has not yet been dismissed, nor has the recommendation to dismiss been received or written as claimed by the judge identified on the Web. I am not going away, I am not recanting anything, and I am fighting on, especially with the tip I received this date. I will do a polygraph arranged by me, video tape it non-edited and with the findings released before stopping the camera and will post it before Tuesday if all goes well.

Earlier: A BHDC Greatest Hit: Interview With the “DC Madam”

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (148) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink
Sunday February 24th, 2008 4:55 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair, WhiteHouse.com

“I am going to continue as I always have said,” wrote Larry Sinclair on his YouTube video page a few minutes ago. “I am not backing down.”

Sinclair, who has previously accused Barack Obama of a drug and sex scandal, also questions the validity of the WhiteHouse.com polygraph tests, which found deception in his answers. “People saying polygraphs were no good are now praising this one,” he added. “I am not backing off and I will continue to push forward and stand by my statements.”

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (20) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink

obama1.jpgLarry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who has accused Sen. Barack Obama of illicit drug use and of having a sexual encounter with him in 1999, has been deceitful, according to results of a polygraph released on Sunday.

The polygraph was performed by Ed Gelb, a world-renowned expert in this arena, and is being examined by a second polygraph expert. Sinclair has already passed a drug test that proves he was not using any substances that could have affected the outcome of the polygraph.

“There were two polygraph tests administered by Dr. Gelb on Friday, the first polygraph asked Mr. Sinclair on his sex claims,” according to WhiteHouse.com, the site that paid for the test and oversaw its administration. “The second polygraph test asked Mr. Sinclair on the drug use claims. There was deception indicated in both tests.”

With such high stakes riding on the outcome, some have questioned whether polygraph results can be trusted. Many respected polygraph experts, however, say that lie detector tests are up to 95 percent accurate and polygraph results are admissible in several states. Polygraphs are also used by the U.S. government in carrying out certain security clearance procedures, as well as in determining parole for some criminals.

Others have questioned the motives of WhiteHouse.com, suggesting that the site’s owner may have sinister political goals. Dan Parisi, the owner, has adamantly maintained in statements on the site and in private conversations that this investigation has not been politically motivated.

WhiteHouse.com originally offered $100,000 to Sinclair if he took the test and the results were positive. Sinclair later agreed to a $10,000 payment and is in the process of donating the money to charities. Sinclair claims he did not come forward with the story for financial gain.

The mainstream media to date has been slow to cover the Sinclair allegations, although several respected journalists from newspapers including The New York Times are believed to be investigating. FOX News personality Bill O’Reilly, without mentioning Sinclair’s name, has hinted about possibly covering the story at a later date, and the Globe tabloid has already featured an interview with Sinclair.

Sinclair’s story first came to national attention via a video he posted on YouTube in January, but he has been making the claims in private for several months — and, possibly, for several years. Sinclair recently said in an online interview that he hadn’t revealed the story in a wide-scale manner previously because Obama had not been Sinclair’s own state or national senator. Now that Obama has the opportunity to be president of the United States, Sinclair says he believes that all American citizens should know about the alleged encounter as they make their voting decisions.

On February 11, Sinclair filed a lawsuit in a Minnesota U.S. District Court claiming that Obama, as well as his campaign adviser David Axelrod and others in the Democratic National Committee have been working behind the scenes to defame Sinclair’s reputation. A blogger posting on the official Obama campaign Web site and other Obama supporters have claimed that Sinclair is mentally ill.

Other Obama supporters have maintained that Sen. Hillary Clinton is somehow behind Sinclair’s accusations. Sinclair adamantly denies this claim, and supporters close to the Clinton camp have told Big Head DC that the campaign is in no way affiliated with Sinclair and that he has made these claims on his own.

Obama has not denied the accusations to date, nor has the campaign responded to Sinclair’s lawsuit.

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (59) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink





Syndication
Subscribe Subscribe to BHDC


Anonymous Tips

Recent Comments

WordPress database error: [Server shutdown in progress]
SELECT comment_post_ID, post_title FROM (wp_comments LEFT JOIN wp_posts ON (comment_post_ID = ID)) WHERE comment_approved = '1' AND wp_posts.post_status='publish' AND comment_type<>'pingback' AND comment_type<>'trackback' ORDER BY comment_date DESC;


BHDC Files

WordPress database error: [Lost connection to MySQL server during query]
SELECT cat_ID, cat_name, category_nicename, category_description, category_parent, category_count FROM wp_categories WHERE cat_ID > 0 AND cat_ID <> 34 ORDER BY cat_name asc