Remember when we predicted that the Washington Time’s conservative hatchet job called Insight would decry the NY Times’s liberal biases (and its ugly hair, too) after the paper’s recent negative report on the operation? Well, we were right, and their response is a doozy:
The Times is trying to obscure the real issue: Hillary Clinton’s campaign had been conducting extensive opposition research on her main ‘08 Democratic rival, and they were zeroing in on his Muslim background. This is the truth. This is exactly what we actually reported. This is what actually happened. We got it first and we got it right. No amount of spinning and mud-slinging from the liberal media can change this.
She’s a whore, get it? And the Times is a whore-monger, double-get it? But that’s not all:
In short, Mr. Kirkpatrick has proven that he is a liar, a propagandist and a smear merchant. His judgment as a journalist is also very weak: why does he spend so much time and energy attacking us— fellow journalists who are committed to exposing the truth—instead of applying the same intense effort to pursuing Hillary’s activities further, as any honest reporter would do in this case? It is precisely Mr. Kirkpatrick’s kind of biased, inaccurate, politically motivated reporting that has led The Times to lose circulation and influence—and why “New Media” publications, such as Insight, are surging forward. The New York Times is going the way of disco. And pernicious articles like Mr. Kirkpatrick’s are the reason why.
Yep, he’s a whore, too. All the world’s a whore. Except for Insight.
................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (2) |
digg this |
reddit |
facebook |
del.icio.us |
stumble |
permalink
