Almost immediately after Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff published his intriguing Friday article about who will be next to testify in the Scooter Libby trial, Wonkette called the piece “short-yet-confusing.” Um, the piece is pretty clear that “deputy chief of staff Karl Rove and counselor Dan Bartlett…may be forced to provide potentially awkward testimony in the perjury and obstruction trial of Lewis (Scooter) Libby.” Why? Because they’ve been subpoenaed. Pretty cut and dry, if you ask us.

We decided to catch up with the freshly married Isikoff this weekend to see if he could understand Wonkette’s analysis. “Do you think there’s any confusion within it?” we asked.

“No,” responded the busy newsman, proving, once again, that brevity is often the best response (especially when you’re still unofficially on your honeymoon).

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comment | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink

WaPo’s Mary Ann Akers tells Big Head DC that Wonkette is blowing the BCC brouhaha way out of proportion. She’s insisting that her e-mail was not a source list.

Her official quote to us: “God, it’s not a big deal.”

Having just gotten married to Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff, this week is turning out to be quite the honeymoon period for a lady who’s usually on the other side of the gossip table.

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comment | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink

The Nation’s David Corn wants to be clear about one thing: his “Hubris” co-author is a dreamboat.

“[F]or the record–lest anyone mistake a quip for something else–working with Michael Isikoff was a highlight of my three decades in journalism,” he told BHR. ”I’m looking forward to our next collaboration: a Broadway musical about Guantanamo. That’s an exclusive. Feel free to run with it.”

We’re looking forward to that, too, but what, is this a virus, or something? First Mary Ann, then Jack and now this?!

But don’t get Corn started on Bob Woodward. You wanna hear gushing…

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comments (1) | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink

Slate’s Jack Shafer is trying to pull the wool over somebody’s eyes.

In yesterday’s column about vain journalists (say what?!), he discloses, “[Mark] Feldstein is a friend—not as good a friend as David Corn, but a lot better than Michael Isikoff,” which some people are interpreting as a fast-on-the-heels new diss of the freshly engaged Newsweek journalist. (Earlier this month, in a review of the new book, “Hubris,” penned by Corn and Isikoff, Shafer also wrote, “Michael Isikoff is a friend, but not so good.”

But does Shafer really hold that much hate in his heart for Isikoff? Not from what he tells Big Head Rob (By the way, does anyone else believe in just flat out asking people about who they hate anymore?).

“On and off, I’ve been dissing Isikoff in print for the last fifteen years in hopes of destabilizing him just enough to prevent him from becoming the best reporter in the universe,” he told us recently. ”Such a development would hurt the feelings of Bob Woodward and Seymour Hersh, and we can’t have that.

“I conduct most of my anti-Isikoff psy-ops in public, towel-snapping him at parties and on the streets of Washington. But once in my Washington City Paper press column I described him as such a good friend that his daughter called me daddy. People still ask him what I meant by that.

“Isikoff’s career didn’t really take off until I left town in 1995 and I could no longer undermine him as part of my daily routine. Since I returned to Washington in 2000, I’ve done my best to cripple his ego, but to little avail. I think my recent diss rolled right off his back.”

Isikoff, indeed, confirmed that there’s no hard feelings between the two during his recent BHR interview, so it seems high time for people to stop speculating about these secret bosom buddies — no matter how well Shafer appears to keep pulling off his schtick.

* * *

Disclosure: We consider Shafer to be a friend, but not as good a friend as Corn, and not as good as Isikoff – and definitely not as good as Hersh and/or Woodward.

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comment | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink

By now you know that the dynamic journalistic duo of Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff and The Nation’s David Corn spent the last year penning a book together. But, while Isikoff remembers the experience all-too-well, even calling Corn “indefatigable” in our exclusive BHR interview last week that doesn’t necessarily mean that Corn has a single fond thought regarding the experience — or any thoughts at all, for that matter.

“I worked on a book with Michael Isikoff this past year?” he recently asked Big Head Rob. “Huh. I barely recall anything of the past twelve months. But if he said so, it must be true. I hope we had a good time.”

We hope so, too. Because “Hubris” was ranked #112 on Amazon when we last checked. And “State of Denial” was still #1. Guess Woodward isn’t that “unreadable,” huh Mike? 

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comment | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink

Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff is a busy boy. He’s not only trying to sell his new book, ”Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War,” he’s also been forced to honeymoon all about Washington with his co-author, The Nation’s David Corn, and to make up with Slate’s Jack Shafer, who dissed him a tiny bit this week.

We have strong feelings, though, that he’d much rather be spending his time planning his impending wedding to Roll Call’s Mary Ann Akers. In this exclusive BHR interview, we take a revealing look inside Isikoff’s head — and his heart: 

BHR: In a nutshell, what’s Hubris about, and who should buy it?

MI: Hubris is a narrative of what was really going on inside the White House, the CIA, the Pentagon, and within Congress — during the run-up to the war in Iraq and how the case for war — a case that turned out to be almost entirely bogus — came to be made. The New York Times Book Review this Sunday calls it “the most comprehensive account of the White House’s political machinations” in the selling of the war. It takes the story through the post-war period focusing on the Valerie Plame investigation — a matter that grew out of the White House’s need to defend its ultimately false pre-war sales pitch.

BHR: Is its contents going to get you labeled as one of those liberal journalists by the likes of Bill O’Reilly? Do you care if it does?

MI: No, I’ve learned not to worry too much about what people like him say about you. In any case, I’m hardly a “liberal journalist.” My co-author may be, but what we end up writing in the book is fully reported and entirely devoid of political ideology or partisanship. (Most of the Democrats don’t come off that well in this story either.)

BHR: How did you and David Corn divvy up who would write what? How did you decide to do the book together?

MI: It’s all a blur. We both reported. We both wrote. Then we rewrote each other and kept doing so until one of us dropped dead from exhaustion.

BHR: Would you have prefered to go it alone?

MI: David never stops so his sheer indefatigability kept us on track and insured that we got it done and out before Woodward did.

BHR: Why are you no longer a “very good friend” of Jack Shafer and now only “somebody” he knows?

Read more…

................................................................................................................................................................................................
comment | digg this | reddit | facebook | del.icio.us | stumble | permalink