Good grief, leave poor Larry King alone!

Just wait and see how good you read when you’re 1,200 years old.

BigHeadRob, here is a tip for you! I know how much you love stories of candidates and their extramarital affairs, especially when the story is printed in something as reliable as the National Enquirer, so you need to check out their latest print edition. They are saying that VP Candidate Palin has had an affair with her husbands business partner.

It’s in the Enquirer, so it must be true!

Go fuck yourself Obama slut. No, really. Your boiler room anti-Palin bullshit is backfiring on your sorry asses all over the net.

So unless you’re GOP ops, wise up and shut the fuck up; you’re handing the White House to McCain-Palin on a silver platter.

Fucking morons.

# MysticNinjajayon 05 Sep 2008 at 9:59 pm

Del said:

Mystic… you know for a fact… that behind the satirical nonsense… there has been real work done…. granted we like to have fun in public..

Del,

Satire and LYING are two different things. I have given this blog credit for the credible work it has done but consistency is a virtue. You don’t pass claims off that you know are false. That makes you a liar and isn’t that why we are fighting Sincalair? Because he’s lying?

Does making up lies in an effort to discredit him make it right? Not in my book.

Gilligan said:

Why don’t you save this for a time when Mitch is actually here and can respond to you directly, instead of leaving this hanging for a day. What you’re doing seems like a bit of ratfucking, as well as an underhanded bullshit tactic, and is calculated to be manipulative and divisive, but hey, that’s just me.

Gilligan,

I DO NOT KNOW when Mitch is on and when he’s not and I don’t give a fuck. If I have a concern I am going to express it. If you don’t like it you guys can block me but as a reader of this blog I have a right to ask questions about the credibility of unverified claims just as I challenge Larry about his.

MitchandNan said:

Mystic, if you don’t like the way it’s done, fuck off.

There are reasons things are done the way they are and last I check, you don’t necessarily have to understand all of M1’s decisions. In fact, I don’t remember you being invited to comment on things you don’t know about.

If I’m wrong forgive me, but you have a gift for stirring up shit when M1 is unable to respond. If you are here to fight Larry, stay.

If you are here to fight Mitch, go somewhere else.

M2

I’m not here to fight anyone. I’m here to find out the truth. You want to call me stupid? Let me tell you what is stupid. Stupid is running a blog that’s goal is to expose the lies of someone and then LYING in the process. Now I don’t care who any of you people are in real life. I don’t care for your personal lives. I don’t care if you want to joke around with your photoshops and poems. What I do care about is that when you make a claim related to Larry that what you are saying is truthful just as it has been presented.

If you want to write satire why not put a disclaimer to let everyone know that you are just making shit up?

If you are lying that makes you no more credible than Larry Sinclair. I am not stirring shit up. I have been as fair and polite as possible with people here but I do NOT tolerate lying. If I find out that you are making shit up I will stop posting and I will also tell people not to post here because the bloggers are full of shit.

ROFL: “Stupid is running a blog that’s goal is to expose the lies of someone and then LYING in the process.”

MNJ called it - you can’t argue with that. This is part of the reason I ended up leaving - didn’t want the work I did brought down by the stuff that confused things and called all work into question.

BTW, I had NOTHING to do with that and was also not MNJ’s anonymous source and have not posted a single time at M&N since I left - just in case anyone was wondering.

So, who’s afraid of the big bad wolf?

HA!

PLEASE keep investigating The Sarah Chronicles..PLEASE!

The women of America already hate the MSM, this will just make sure they pore out in droves.

Remember when the MSM beat on Hill in NH????

YEP, the women can out in droves up here,…I know because I was there.

So just keep up the SCANDALS, LIES ,and BO CAMPAIGN…

Oh. ………… Karl Rove called he said he has a few tapes for you to watch too.

Hey All,

I just have a couple of things.

Seems as if Scott is chasing “supporters” away one at a time. It seems to me what this does is ensure that they won’t be back. I want to know where the treating people with “dignity and respect” thing went. But then again, maybe this was satire also.

Larry’s supporters have left, in my opinion, because they are tired of chasing him around, and then on his one blog, you had to have a password to even get in to post.

One thing I would like to know is, how does the Multani “tape” have to do with the bloggers 3 case? How is this relevant as to whether the bloggers 3 posted knowingly false stuff about Larry? To me it does not have anything to do with the case against the bloggers 3. Can someone explain how this is relevant to the case? They aren’t going to try the whole Obama/Sinclair issue in this lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed because Larry wants to know who knowingly posted these false claims against him as truth. Oh yeah, and then he wants a cool mil from each as “compensation”.

I, like Mystic, have called Scott out on many things.

I asked about the CPD “contact” and was told that this was “satire”.

I asked about the Crewdson “contact”, and as I recall, haven’t had a reasonable response.

I have asked about the “ex-lover” email Scott says he received, and also their “contacts” with Larry’s “family member”, and again, have gotten no reasonable response.

I have asked when Scott was going to put out where Obama was on the 7th (which he gave Larry a time limit to respond too, or he was going to put it out), and low and behold, this information has never surfaced.

Scott has been consistant in that he has not once come up with the “proof” that what they post is in any way truthful. The Multani fiasco is just one of the things. First they say there was a limo driver, and posted all of this stuff about his immigration issues. Then they say he doesn’t exist, then they say this “Sherlock” has talked with him, and then Jay posted her assesment of the limo driver issue, and I believe came to the conclusion that there was no limo driver, and then lastly, they claim that Hale put them in contact with this Multani, and that they “taped” the conversation (only if it was legal to do that, if it isn’t legal well then they didn’t tape it).

Scott always claims that they have this or that, and when called out about it, he tells people that if they don’t like it, to leave.

Scott Covington, Mitch, and whoever the “supposed” third Mitch is, are three of the most uncredible people to try to do anything on the web. The people who continue to “cling” to them is wasting time, in my opinion.

One thing that they HAVE NOT done is discredit Larry’s story. They post lie after lie, posting it as fact, and putting “disclaimers” elsewhere on their blog, and say if you didn’t see the “disclaimer”, well that’s too bad for you.

Jeff Barea,

Thank you for all you have done to help discredit Scott/Mitch/whoever.

Chisholm,

You are right about the “show” becoming more vile. They were pretty bad in the beginning, then when they went to their new home, they seemed to settle down a bit, but now they have resorted to grasping at straws, and if you don’t like that, then out come the vile, disrespectful, and insulting remarks from Scott.

By the way, where has Hypocrisy Buster, Enigma been? Or is he/she posting under a different name now?

Dave…

I saw that flag-gate too..

The MSM would have been all over it if the Pubs had done it..

There must have been an absence of TWP and boy scouts @ Barackopolis.

Anyone been yucking it up with the tool shed @ MSDNC?

Spritz, Shyster, Ubermann, Bitchell and “little “Russert are a reality show without artifice. I haven”t seen Butch Maddow lately..is she doing some kind of hair removal??

Catch the action, fights, estrogen fits, and just plain TWP craziness…it is must watch TV…

I saw the Uberjack is interviewing BO on Monday..

Keith will be creaming all over himself..it will be so hard for him to not have “I touch Myself” playing in the background.

Be there!

We can only hope that the conversation leads to Palin.

typical white person..LOL. I’ll be there, with the popcorn. Real butter of course.

BHO is still race baiting and playing the race card. His campaign and thugs continue to attack, attack, attack. My plan is to vote in protest for McCain because of the undemocratic way that BHO was selected by the DNC. The DNC and BHO were too scared to have a full roll call vote on the floor because they didn’t want all of us to see just how close the votes might have been. What if BHO was not the nominee? This means that many of the delegates who represent us were not allowed to vote for the candidate they were supposed to represent. How is that democratic? Hillary and Bill played their role well to support the weakest candidate for president ever–it had to be tough but they did it.

The DNC and BHO are very messed up. The more they attack and get petty, the better McCain starts to look. BHO’s campaign is still going after Palin. He has someone on his staff say something in appropriate to the press, then later BHO denounces it. Same stuff we saw before, however I think this time it will backfire on him.

Obama’s paid bloggers have put out several lies/myths, etc… already, they have engaged in a full smearing campaign…and yet..BHO can’t handle answering a direct question… nobody is perfect…but there is some authenticity to McCain/Palin that I’m not seeing in BHO

Well, TWP who is pro-choice and pro-gay rights here thinks that BO DOES NOT WANT TO REVISIT CRAZY CHURCHES…

losing item for him, it will remind TWP of BO’S racist -nuttier- than -a- peanut- bar REV WRIGHT..

Not good.

BO has to ignore Palin, but he is not able to because she has injured his vanity. She sees him for who he really is, an able to make it stick with voters..

TWP thinks she is the DIE HARD of this election cycle…there are only a very few things she can do that people would be upset…

Americans are prepared to give the biker chick a lot of leeway.

It is truly amazing how much O2 the gal takes up….and the MSM assault will only help her..

The husband who is half Eskimo has not even been exploited yet for political gain..who doesn’t want to love NATIVE AMERICANS?

I just saw on CNN that BO is quotes as saying that he is prepared to fight …that he hasn’t been sleeping in hotels and eating on the road to come in second…….

REALLY? TWP think maybe BO is ready to start clinging to his guns and his religion (whatever on it is)………

face it, that chick has him quaking.

A Comment from CitizenWells blog;

A “Credentialed journalist for the 2008 Republican National Convention” writes about Larry, and includes a pic.

“I mentioned Larry Sinclair, pictured on the right, in an earlier post. He makes the claim that he is a former gay lover of Barack Obama. There were some bizarre people in Rice Park, including Sinclair, but I spoke with him briefly, and he seemed, I repeat, he seemed quite sane. He discussed his dubious story in a sane-sounding, measured tone. Sinclair made attempts to have his poster come into view of the MSNBC cameras, but he wasn’t obnoxious about it like the Paul-ites. Earlier this week I wrote about Code Pink’s visit to Rice Park–Sinclair tried to engage them with some dialogue, but they weren’t interested.”

http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/09/msnbc-rnc-and-rice-park.html

# Gumby on 06 Sep 2008 at 12:34 pm

Anyone who doesn’t think this M&N blog hasn’t been effective against Larry’s scams, needs only to realize that every single radio show he’s been on, when the name of this blog has been raised by the host, Larry does his best to get the host to censor the name or web address.

You’ll notice Larry never refers to M&N on any of his blogs or in any of his discussions. That tells me he wants to shield his lemmings from hearing the truth about him.

Hey Gumby,

I do not think that Scott’s blog has been effective against Larry’s scams. The reason Larry doesn’t want people to go to Scott’s site is because of all of the lies you guys say about him, and post them as the truth. Can you explain about this truth thing? You “people” over there do not seem to care about the truth, remember, this is about “fun”, wouldn’t want facts to get in the way.

I will note, however, you did put up a good fight about the flags that were put in garbage bags from the DNC. Not sure where these flags were made, but if they were from China, then it seems to me that the Dems are more hypocritical than I thought. Spending the American donor’s money to a foriegn country to promote their cause, hmmmmm. You took a beating, and stood firm, this is the first time I have seen something that even resembles logic on your part. Zen put his foot down though, so you’d better stop making sense (at least on the flag issue). Your suggestion to donate them to a Veterans Organization, seemed better than bagging them up for the dumpster though.

But let me make this perfectly clear, I still think you are a worthless human being. You say some of the most off the wall, stupid, ignorant comments that are placed on Scott’s blog.

Now go out and wax that convertible.

23. typical white person said:

As a side bar….

I think that BO is easily spooked by women.. men don’t see to freak him near as much..

Just ask Larry Sinclair!!!

Obama has had a bad press day:

“Flag gate”

Howard Gutman remarks

Speech ratings

Citizens against Government Waste: John McCain voted against wasteful spending nearly 80% of the time, compared to Obama’s 18%.

And, Obama’s earmarks equal $1,000,000 a day for each day he has served in the Senate.

Oh yeah, and Quasi/Victor/Commentator - you also made a stuff up in your earlier posts when you referred to John Freeman as John ‘Freedman’. I think people will find more than adequate evidence on this site alone that the only person who ever misspelled John’s surname like that was Victor.

You’re articulate, I’ll give you that, but not much of anything else. I think you are mercenary.

The following editorial ran in the New York Times:

Where is it written that only senators are qualified to become President? Surely Ronald Reagan does not subscribe to that maxim. Or where is it written that mere representatives aren’t qualified, like **********? Representative Morris Udall, who lost New Hampshire to Jimmy Carter by a hair in 1976, must surely disagree. So must a longtime Michigan Congressman named Gerald Ford. Where is it written that governors and mayors, like Dianne Feinstein of San Francisco, are too local, too provincial? That didn’t stop Richard Nixon from picking Spiro Agnew, a suburban politician who became Governor of Maryland. Remember the main foreign affairs credential of Georgia’s Governor Carter: He was a member of the Trilateral Commission. Presidential candidates have always chosen their running mates for reasons of practical demography, not idealized democracy. One might even say demography is destiny: this candidate was chosen because he could deliver Texas, that one because he personified rectitude, that one because he appealed to the other wing of the party. On occasion, Americans find it necessary to rationalize this rough-and-ready process. What a splendid system, we say to ourselves, that takes little-known men, tests them in high office and permits them to grow into statesmen. This rationale may even be right, but then let it also be fair. Why shouldn’t a little-known woman have the same opportunity to grow? We may even be gradually elevating our standards for choosing Vice Presidential candidates. But that should be done fairly, also. Meanwhile, the indispensable credential for a Woman Who is the same as for a Man Who - one who helps the ticket.
*********************************

Imagine that, the New York Times writing such a nice piece on Gov. Sarah Palin and her run at the Vice-Presidency.

In actuality, this editorial ran on July 3rd, 1984, nearly a quarter of a century ago, when Walter Mondale tapped Geraldine Ferraro to be his running mate. It is her name that fills the “*********” spot! Nonetheless, the editorial applies to every question that was thrown at McCain’s VP choice.

A YouTube message to Sen. Barack Obama:

http://iusbvision.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/video-obama-gets-shredded-by-iraq-vet/

This says more than a 1000 speeches.

James - Obama said it was a mistake to go into the Iraq war in the first place - and we never did find the evidence that was used to justify the war did we? That is quite a separate issue from supporting the troops once they are at war and that message confuses those two points - so I would label it emotionally manipulative propaganda. Sorry, that is just the way I see it.

Jeff also needs to remember that a good deal of the people who went to the M&N site went because they wanted to check the veracity of the claims made by Larry Sinclair - he has made a number of allegations without providing proof of their veracity. Larry created that situation and I feel a legitimate response, when faced with that, is to assess his character and whether or not he has been consistent in his words.

Unfortunately, the site also lost its way over time, when stories that were meant to be satire were not adequately identified as such, and then the focus on trying to prise Larry’s supporters away from him by intimidating them. That is not to overlook that Larry did try and threaten and intimidate some people who only sought to call him out (KStreet and Demo particularly come to mind as clear examples of this).

My concern was that I knew Larry’s former 2IC was coming to have a stronger and stronger influence at M&N and most of the posters there were not aware of that and I felt that was wrong. I watched as M&N became more and more like the problems I had with how Larry’s blog had conducted itself, and yes, I do blame Quasi/Victor for that as I suspect he may have had influence on outing strategies and intimidation in both places.

And Mitch, if you want to know why I gave up trying to talk to you about Quasi directly, your farewell to Quasi might give you an appreciation of why:

QUAS- you are likely the most intelligent person I have ever exchanged ideas with. You have helped me develop my power of observation, my English, my wit and my ability to see through the shit of Larry’s story and get to the truth. You are a man of grace and superb taste as well as a true word artisan. Thank you.

Because I believe you placed too much trust in Quasi and the way he wanted you to see things and wouldn’t listen to others trying to warn you. Did you just believe anything he said? You do know the guy gets stuff wrong a lot don’t you - or did you assume he was always correct?

Did he drive a wedge between you and the other original people that helped set up the original blog with you, seeking to establish himself as someone most valuable to you? I have the content of the original emails that he sent to you back in May, that you sent to myself, Paul and Meesh, in which he outlined his strategy for intimidating Larry’s supporters away from Larry. I also note in those emails that us other posters were called things like idiots, simple-minded, we got things wrong, etc. Did he keep drumming the idea of the rest of us as no use to you over time? Did you buy it? It kinda seems like you did.

James, I don’t think anyone is talking about not treating the soldiers with honor for the service they have done and a good start would be to make sure that there are not 200,000 of them living on the streets and they are given appropriate benefits and care, which you will note that Obama advocates for.

Whether the Iraqi people will be left better off is a very debatable question. Will they ever be able to find peace between the various factions in Iraq - kurds, sunni