HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Thursday June 19th, 2008 10:59 AM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Larry Sinclair

From Montgomery Blair Sibley:

“Larry is fine. He is being arraigned this morning. Time will tell if the press conference was worth it.”

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 857 Comments to 'Update on Larry Sinclair'


  1. 1. xbjllb said:


    Let’s see if Rove can keep the limo drive under wraps until September NOW.

    Of course, he’s still got Obama’s drug dealers to pull out of the hat then.

    Larry did a very brave thing yesterday.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:04 am | Quote

  1. 2. McCain 08!!!!! said:


    Anyone who cannot discern that the press conference (press Q & A) was a disaster is intellectually deficient. Larry gets NO mainstream press coverage….he’s ghetto trash….and I’m a McCain supporter. Shut this guy up because the Obama campaign will continue to look serious while we’re focusing on a gay, drug addicted con artist…simpleton! Our best chance to beat Obama is on policies!!!!! Larry is embarrassing! We don’t need him! We’re trying NOT to get blown out Larry!!!!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:12 am | Quote

  1. 3. fay said:


    I have not decided whether his accusations are true or false, but this adolescent attempt to intimidate Mr. Sinclair was the act of desperate people who were not thinking clearly. It only draws attention to that which they wish to sweep under the rug. They have made Mr. Sinclair a martyr, especially to his core of devoted supporters. It shows that they are not very bright.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:18 am | Quote

  1. 4. Mike said:


    LOL! ALL YOU LARRYTARDS ARE FOOLS!!

    LARRY SAID HE WOULD BE PROVIDING EVIDENCE YESTERDAY…DID HE ??

    HE JUST SPENT YOUR MONEY TO GO AND MAKE THE SAME CALIMS (WITH SOME MINOR ALTEATIONS) HE HAS BEEN MAKING FOR MONTHS.

    AND LISTEN TO THE PC, HE SAID HE WOULD RELEASE EVIDENCE AT THE RIGHT TIME! WTF! WAN’T THAT SUPPOSED TO BE THE RIGHT TIME ?

    David Weigel ASKED HIM HAT TIME EXACTLY HE MET OBAMA AND HE REFUSED TO ANSWER, HE ALSO REFUSED TO ANSWER ID THERE WAS ANY IDENTFYING PYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS…ALL THIS IN A PRESS CONFERENCE.

    WHY DID HE CALL THE PC IF HE WASN’T GOING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.

    XBJIB YOU ARE A FOL, DUCK YOU ARE A FOOL, MOMA SAME…

    FACE IT, LARRY WENT WITH NO EVIDENCE AND COULDN’T EVEN ANSWER BASIC QUESTIONS.

    THIS IS WHAT DAVID WEIGEL, A LIBERTERIAN WHO DOES NOT SUPPORT OBAMA HAD TO SAY:

    Should presidential candidates, or any public figures, be expected to release personal information when a criminal accuses them of something? Seriously? If Sinclair answered my question about November 7 - when Obama allegedly spent 3 hours traveling to and from Gurnee for drugs and sex - I would request Obama’s schedule from that day to see if it matched. Since Sinclair puts the burden of proof on Obama, we can safely ignore Sinclair.

    I feel deep sympathy for the people being bilked out of their money by this guy.

    LARRY SPENT ALL YOUR MONEY ON 2 VACATIONS TO DC AND A NEW SUIT. HOPE THE BANANA BUTT BREAD WAS WORTH IT…

    ….

    THIS IS WHAT YOU GET FOR YOUR TROUBLES….

    http://reason.com/blog/show/127093.html

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/trailmix/june08/luridclaims.htm

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/18/obama-accuser-larry-sincl_n_107900.html

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Sinclair_arrested_and_other_notes_from_the_Press_Club.html

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:20 am | Quote

  1. 5. Mike said:


    What desperate attempt to intimidate Larry, Larry was arrested for crimes he commiteed. He bought himself to the public eye and he deserves what he gets. I hope he gets bumfucked by a big black guy screaming yes we can.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:22 am | Quote

  1. 6. Mike said:


    By the way, we knew the name of the fake driver months ago. Larry said that wasn’t the name because we John Crewsdon could not verify Larry’s story with that name. Now Larry claims that is the name…fucking douche.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:29 am | Quote

  1. 7. Mitch said:


    I wrote this three days ago about Larry’s Press Conference

    “No. It signals nothing.

    Larry is still a fatty-tuna, piece of shit, douche.

    You are dreaming.”

    Gee…no truer words were ever spoken…..ooops……except for the fact that we got the douche arrested!

    It is documented on our blog from the time we called the police, till they were en-route…..to the time the cuffs were tightened onto La Rye’s fatty tuna wrists!

    AND WE DID IT JUST FOR THE FUN OF IT…..WE HAVEN’T BEEN PAID A DIME!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:40 am | Quote

  1. 8. Bomas said:


    The idea that someone is trying to “intimidate” or “silence” Larry is laughable. HE committed the crime that got him arrested. HE refused to take responsibility for it. While trying to get another man to take responsibility for actions for which there’s no evidence, Larry was refusing to take responsibility for actions for which there is evidence. You understand that you are defending a (former) fugitive, right?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:43 am | Quote

  1. 9. Beth Anne said:


    Larry’s PC was a complete waste of time and [somebody’s] money. I’ve said for a long time that no serious journalist would touch this story. For one thing, Larry is long on allegations but real short on providing ANY corroborating evidence. Then he has the gall to say that the onus is on the reporter, NOT HIM, to dig up the proof. Simpleton is an understatement. He’s not very well served by his pseudo attorney either. I mean get real, how serious can you take someone if the attorney shows up in a kilt talking about the need to wear it because of his enlarged genitalia. WTF???

    Plain and simple, no one can verify Larry’s story. If you think that Hillary didn’t do everything she could to verify that story, then you are smoking on the crack pipe that Larry seems to be so fond of. If you believe that the Rethug attack machine hasn’t delved as deeply as they could into this story, verified it and then sat on it - waitin’ for the right time - then there is something seriously wrong with you. I would bet money that if you follow the trail to Larry’s deep pocket supporter (who will no doubt throw him under the bus now), you’ll find they are part of the Rethug attack machine up to their usual dirty tricks. And no, I am NOT an Obama supporter. I am a supporter of the truth and frankly, despite Larry’s protestations to the contrary, there hasn’t been much evidence of any truth to his wacky claims. He sure did get lucky though - a trip to LA; $10,000; 2 trips to DC costing in excess of $10,000. Not too shabby for a convicted con artist.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:45 am | Quote

  1. 10. Bomas said:


    Yeah, didn’t Larry say all the money came from the PayPal link on his blog? But wasn’t he whining up until the event that they were still short? So who made up the difference?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:49 am | Quote

  1. 11. Kstreet67 said:


    James I am going to take the advice of Interested Bystander and rescind my challenge to you. You are not worth my time. Ignoring you is the best thing I can do. Self serving narcissists like you and Sinclair deserve each other. Wallow in your own filth together. I’m done.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:54 am | Quote

  1. 12. Interested Bystander said:


    Why does Obama keep meeting with terrorists, or at the least terrorist backers??

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2032877/posts

    Does he think this is going to help him to be elected? Keep up the good work Obama! We need nothing other than stuff like this. These are some of the issues he loses every time.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 11:57 am | Quote

  1. 13. STILLwaitingfortruth said:


    For all of the Larry supports out there, can one of you point to the statement(s), documents or even people present that fulfilled this claim from Larry’s compelling Press Release.

    “Larry will (i) reveal the corroborating evidence for his allegations against Obama”.

    What evidence was provided?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Quote

  1. 14. Interested Bystander said:


    Beth Anne,

    And who might be Rethug? Name calling my good party? Seems to me that Hillary is the one behind this. At least if you go to Larry’s site, it is abundantly clear who is supporting him. This just shows you have nothing but name calling to go on.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:01 pm | Quote

  1. 15. Interested Bystander said:


    Good for you Kstreet. You are way above the likes of James. You are a fine lady.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:16 pm | Quote

  1. 16. Interested Bystander said:


    Still,

    Not the right time yet (yeah right). Probably needs another supporter financed vacation. Maybe to the Bahamas this time. Then he’ll disclose is iron clad “evidence”. He promises.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:18 pm | Quote

  1. 17. Curioso said:


    Interested Bystander,

    I will see your biased website link and raise you a biased website link:

    http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/9677.html

    Debbie Schlussel seems to think everyone is a terrorist. Osama Siblani regularly meets with many politicians, Republican and Democrat. He is regarded as an important go between for the US and Middle Eastern press.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:20 pm | Quote

  1. 18. teresa said:


    None of us know whether or not sinclair is telling the truth. I would feel much better if Obama would respond to this as he has other smears.. One thing we DO know is obamas judgment in his past associates has been poor: Rexko, Ayers, Wright,etc. Just add Sinclair to that list and he fits right in….. just saying….

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:20 pm | Quote

  1. 19. Dave said:


    Whatever you do, do not post over at M&N. They have been logging IP’s and exposing bloggers who may or may not agree with them. Their reputation amoung other “real” blogs precedes them.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:21 pm | Quote

  1. 20. teresa said:


    Another boneheaded mistake, perhaps?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:22 pm | Quote

  1. 21. Murray said:


    Will someone please tell me how many Choice Rewards points Larry earned last night in the D.C. pokey?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Quote

  1. 22. Sam said:


    Although I have read their blog, I have never nor would never post a comment there. Maybe this is why other blogs did not credit them for some of the Sinclair story? They might not want to subject their regular readers to being exposed by them.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:29 pm | Quote

  1. 23. Paul said:


    Time will tell if the press conference was worth it.

    B-b-b-b-but Rense said it was a HUGE SUCCESS!

    THIS THING IS GONNA BLOW ANY DAY NOW!!

    (idiots)

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Quote

  1. 24. Murray said:


    B-b-b-b-but Rense said it was a HUGE SUCCESS!

    THIS THING IS GONNA BLOW ANY DAY NOW!!

    (idiots)

    Say it together with me TWO MORE DAYS!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:32 pm | Quote

  1. 25. Interested Bystander said:


    Curiouso,

    What does this have to do with Obama meeting with members of Hezbollah? You do agree that this man is a member do you not? I say let him keep it up. Your article has nothing about McCain meeting with anyone like this.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:33 pm | Quote

  1. 26. Curioso said:


    As promised yesterday, everything you ever wanted to know about the Obama/Rezko connection.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-080314-obama-audiogallery,0,6793109.audiogallery

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Quote

  1. 27. Paul said:


    Whatever you do, do not post over at M&N. They have been logging IP’s and exposing bloggers who may or may not agree with them. Their reputation amoung other “real” blogs precedes them.

    Oh, you mean that thing that papatard started? Blasting names and street addresses of his detractors? That kind of exposing? M&N expose larrytards only. papatard gives up his own people when they step out of line and ask non-sanctioned questions and make non-sanctioned statements.

    How’s THAT for adding to his credibility?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Quote

  1. 28. Jen said:


    Dipshit, I mean, xbjllb said: “Larry did a very brave thing yesterday.”

    Have fun with that one.

    xbjllb believes his balls are as big as Sibley believes his are. Larry can do no wrong in xbjllb’s eyes. He has been crushing on Larry this whole time and worshipping him the same way he accuses people of worshipping Obama. It’s called projecting. It is pathetic and sad, just like xbjllb.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Quote

  1. 29. xbjllb said:


    I’m a fucking idiot.

    That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:38 pm | Quote

  1. 30. Dave said:


    I guess they didn’t get the memo about blogging protocol and etiquette. Thats a sure way to loose readers, and it looked like their blog was doing well. Too bad.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:40 pm | Quote

  1. 31. Paul said:


    TWO MORE DAYS! TWO MORE DAYS! TWO MORE DAYS! TWO MORE DAYS!

    Hey, kids, Larry is sad because you don’t believe in him! He may wither away if we don’t show him we do! Clap your hands if you believe in Larrys! C’mon! Don’t let larrytard die! Clap your hands! Clap your hands if you believe in Larrys!*
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    (And sign up for direct deposit of your SS check into his paypal account)

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:40 pm | Quote

  1. 32. Jen said:


    Where the hell is Duck?

    You have to use lots of smileys when addressing Duck, it’s the only way he can understand.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:40 pm | Quote

  1. 33. Jen said:


    I guess they didn’t get the memo about blogging protocol and etiquette. Thats a sure way to loose readers, and it looked like their blog was doing well. Too bad.

    Yeah Dave, way to shift the focus of the real story. All of you tools are the same.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:42 pm | Quote

  1. 34. Paul said:


    Oh, and I’ll be working on a “compare and contrast” piece between papatard and Jesus. Any input is welcome.

    Jesus - wrote letters to the Corinthians
    Larry - wrote posts threatening to kill Paul Levy

    You get the idea

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:43 pm | Quote

  1. 35. Paul said:


    Duck’s goose is cooked!

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!

    “Has-been comedian” indeed! I still got it, brother! *laffin*

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:44 pm | Quote

  1. 36. Dave said:


    Uh Paul, regardless of them only exposing “Larrytards”, other serious bloggers and blogs do not look kindly upon it. They won’t want to send their own readers there to be exposed. I for one would never want to blog there for that reason.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:45 pm | Quote

  1. 37. Jen said:


    I guess Dave didn’t get the memo that Larry and his “press conference” were a big fat JOKE!

    Except in Jeff Rense’s fucked-up mind. Everyone takes him seriously, right xbjllb?

    Oh shit, I think a UFO just flew over my house!

    “Hells ya, E.T., come on in!”

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:46 pm | Quote

  1. 38. xbjllb said:


    Hi Everyone!

    Would like to just welcome you to BigHeadDC.com, where a small handful of real people do battle with 400 of the Obama campaign’s paid whore botsquad.

    You see, REAL Obama supporters who don’t believe a word of what Larry Sinclair claims to be true, merely ignore Sinclair and concentrate on higher issues and concerns of the campaign. They don’t make it their 24/7 job to belittle him and those that happen to believe him.

    However, the Obama Campaign has admitted to a paid internet botsquad of 400 shill shrill whores whose sole job it is to quash any negativity regarding their Dear Leader, true or false, and especially any allegations that happen to be true.

    One has to question the need for such a squad, unless allegations are in actuality, true and have to be fought with lies.

    The truth usually speaks for itself, is its own best defense, and usually needs no defense. And fortunately, usually comes out sooner or later. The botsquad’s job is to make it come out later; MUCH later, when it would be considered too late for anyone to do anything about it.

    Such time-buying lies for political advantage and advancement, on the other hand, do need to utilize such tactics.

    Apparently the Obama Campaign had to hire 400 whores because his own supporters weren’t doing a proper job. As I stated in my first premise, MOST REAL Obama supporters are above such nonsensical negative bullshit.

    So when you visit here, KNOW THE ENEMY, and always; CONSIDER THE SOURCE.

    Thanks and enjoy your stay.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Quote

  1. 39. Curioso said:


    Interesting snippit on Osama Siblani. No where have I found any evidence that he is a member of Hezbollah. Right wingers claim that he is an agent for Hezbollah, and he has voiced support for some of their actions, but I am not sure claiming that Obama is meeting with Hezbollah when he is meeting with Siblani is completely honest. It is more likely that he is trying to gains support of Americans that happen to be of Middle Eastern descent. They are an important voting bloc. Especially in Michigan. They vote. They have that right as Americans.

    http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_03/b4017074.htm

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Quote

  1. 40. Mike said:


    I dont agree with Mitch exposing the IP of the Larrytards but he never exposes details of detractors in general…just the Tards.
    But Mitch isn’t a journalist…he is more like Larry’s nemesis.
    Don’t you guys get Mitch at all…he is Parodying Larry, and he has been stand up sice day one.

    Ask Larry why he would never say the exact time he met Obama, he didn’t answer the question then and he didn’t answer in the PC, he knows they know (Mitch and a few others) that Obama was at a certain place at a certain time. If Larry mentions the wrong time he knows he is screwed. This guy conned you all for a long long time and its amazing he did it with no evidence.

    Larry called a press conference to reveal evidence, did he ?

    Interested bystander I replied your post in the last post.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:06 pm | Quote

  1. 41. Paul said:


    Uh…Dave…I’m going to say it again - papatard started the outing of his detractors. Personally, I don’t care or I wouldn’t put out my information. However, to out delegates simply because they voted for Obama? To post the street address of someone for asserting his first amendment right to free speech? M&N never sunk to that level.

    papatard threw the first punch, he shouldn’t bitch because he got his ass kicked. He wanted to fight dirty. It was thrown back in his face. Are you saying that it’s ok for him to fight dirty and everyone else should fight fair?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:09 pm | Quote

  1. 42. Murray said:


    How come I haven’t gotten any paychecks? I’m on the FLOW CHART and everything.

    YES WE CAN pay my ass!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Quote

  1. 43. Patience said:


    I have been following Larry’s story from the beginning, but have remained silent. I was skeptical at first, but now I realize that Larry is telling the truth. Obama had Larry arrested to stop the press conference, but they were too late. Larry was able to tell the world the truth about Hussein, and I for one will be donating to see Larry’s story hit the MSM.

    xbjllb, I admire your work here. I see a lot of the O’bots enjoy attacking you, but there is no way to silence the truth!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Quote

  1. 44. Paul said:


    xjblib, you’re a comic genius! This from the man who shills for papatard and Sibley and who has posted very little except pro-papatard rhetoric since this thing started. Anytime you post non-papatard articles you get shit for traffic.

    Why are you wasting so much time on it?

    Hi-LARRY-ous!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Quote

  1. 45. Kstreet67 said:


    19. Dave said:

    Whatever you do, do not post over at M&N. They have been logging IP’s and exposing bloggers who may or may not agree with them. Their reputation amoung other “real” blogs precedes them.

    Dave thats what Sinclair has been doing since his You Tube days.
    he has done it on his Live Space Blog and his Wordpress Blog. Have you addressed Sinclair about THAT?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Quote

  1. 46. Dave said:


    Paul, I get what you’re saying, but there is a big difference. I saw what Mitch posted on that Cao person. That was very disturbing to see.
    All I am saying is that the word will spread, and people will stay away. That’s all I’m saying.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:14 pm | Quote

  1. 47. Paul said:


    Murray - Axelrod personally dropped off a Rolls Royce Drophead coupe stuffed with hundred dollar bills to me yesterday and lemme tell you that thing is SWEEEEEET!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:14 pm | Quote

  1. 48. Dave said:


    Kstreet67, I won’t post over there either. I see a trend with both blogs and I hope others have noticed it too.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:16 pm | Quote

  1. 49. Patience said:


    If you guys think Larry is such a big joke, why do you pay him any attention? Surely, you wouldn’t pay this much attention to so-called unfounded claims if indeed you truly believed they were completely unfounded? Obama and his bots are trying to silence Larry before he can get his story out! Keep sipping the kool-aid kids, the truth shall prevail.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Quote

  1. 50. xbjllb said:


    This is my hero:

    There is NO bigger black-eye in the truth movement than when somebody is exposed red-handed as being an overt CENSOR. Nothing can be worse, for the act of becoming Big Brother (i.e. a mirror-image of the government and mainstream media) is a permanent kiss of death affixed to the guilty party. Jeff Rense is a big-time CENSOR, and from this point forward he will always be known as such.

    To back-up this sentiment, after we ran our expose Alternative Media Speaks Out: Jeff Rense & Alex Jones Censorship 17 other members of the alternative media spoke out about this latest round of censorship which was begun by Jeff Rense. Ask yourself: if this wasn’t such a serious issue, why would SEVENTEEN members of the alternative media take the time to voice their opinions on it?

    Now, the word we’ve been hearing (via e-mail) is that Jeff Rense has lost so much credibility for partaking in this CENSORSHIP activity that he’s back-peddling like crazy. But it doesn’t seem to be helping. In fact, it seems he’s losing a grip on himself and buckling under the pressure. As one person said, “It looks as if Rense protesteth too much” in his latest article. Why is that? Because he’s freaking out that the entire patriot community and truth movement have seen the way he operates; and guess what – they are not willing to tolerate CENSORSHIP in any way, shape, or form.

    Rense has lost control of himself to such an extent that on Easter Sunday he published an article where he was swearing, blathering, and essentially having a nervous breakdown on the page. Compare his article to the two that we wrote. We were meticulous in our research, very measured, rational, and straight-forward. On the other hand, Rense is bouncing around in every direction calling us names, cursing, and unraveling like a ball of yarn.

    As one e-mailer said to Rense: “What scares you so much about these people that you would go to these extremes in composition, content, and tone? There is nothing even vaguely, what one might consider, ‘journalistic’ about this disjointed blather. Are you even aware of this? Are you experiencing a nervous breakdown, Jeff? Please seek professional counsel, if so.”

    Worse, Jeff Rense couldn’t even muster the courage to put his own name on the article he wrote! Does this peculiar stance somehow fit in with the disguises he always wears (i.e. wig, fake moustache, glasses, etc)?

    Here’s what another person wrote about Rense becoming exactly the same as the mainstream media: “Just like the big editors, Rense feels the need to do people’s thinking for them, judging what information people need in order to maintain … well, maintain what? Rense is in the realm of tyrants, information ministers, and churches.”

    Read all about it!

    http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/rense2.html

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Quote

  1. 51. Murray said:


    Murray - Axelrod personally dropped off a Rolls Royce Drophead coupe stuffed with hundred dollar bills to me yesterday and lemme tell you that thing is SWEEEEEET!

    SWEET. Right now, I’d settle for a genuine SI SE PUEDE breakfast burrito.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:18 pm | Quote

  1. 52. Curioso said:


    Sheeeeeeeit Paul! How’d ya pull that off? All I got was a lousy toaster!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:19 pm | Quote

  1. 53. Murray said:


    Holy shit. I no more than hit Post Comment and the doorbell rang. It was Patti Solis Doyle, with three ginormous breakfast burritos.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Quote

  1. 54. Patience said:


    Nice try Obamabot!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:21 pm | Quote

  1. 55. Paul said:


    Paul, I get what you’re saying, but there is a big difference. I saw what Mitch posted on that Cao person. That was very disturbing to see.
    All I am saying is that the word will spread, and people will stay away. That’s all I’m saying.

    I know what you’re saying, too. I don’t necessarily agree about outing people but what you’re missing is that Sinclair does it to almost anyone that makes a valid point. M&N, to the best of my knowledge, have not outed people simply for posting on their blog. Soldier of Christ is known and she has not been outed. The larrytards that have been outed are (and it’s admittedly subjective) the worst of the worst. They are the ones that post racist crap and act without conscience. Angela, who posted on M&N that she was “prettier than Nan and didn’t miscarry”, was not outed. That’s restraint. I’d say, for the most part, that M&N while solidly anti-Sinclair, gives a modicum of respect to the opposing side that Sinclair is simply incapable of showing.

    Just my opinion.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:22 pm | Quote

  1. 56. Jen said:


    If you guys think Larry is such a big joke, why do you pay him any attention? Surely, you wouldn’t pay this much attention to so-called unfounded claims if indeed you truly believed they were completely unfounded? Obama and his bots are trying to silence Larry before he can get his story out! Keep sipping the kool-aid kids, the truth shall prevail.

    Because Patience dear, like Paul said, it’s Hi-LARRY-ous!

    The fact that you didn’t believe him, but after yesterday’s fiasco, you now do…wow, I mean wow. You better send Larry some $$$$ for bail, genius.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:22 pm | Quote

  1. 57. Jen said:


    After reading about your hero xbjllb, it explains so much. Thank you for the info. You are a real gem!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:25 pm | Quote

  1. 58. Murray said:


    Because Patience dear, like Paul said, it’s Hi-LARRY-ous!

    The fact that you didn’t believe him, but after yesterday’s fiasco, you now do…wow, I mean wow. You better send Larry some $$$$ for bail, genius.

    Yeah. You’re supposed to just shrug your shoulders and look the other way while a con man runs around free. It’s just arrest warrants in numerous states. NO BIG DEAL! I mean, who doesn’t have arrest warrants in Colorado, Delaware, Florida, etc., etc.?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:27 pm | Quote

  1. 59. Paul said:


    This is my hero:

    There is NO bigger black-eye in the truth movement than when somebody is exposed red-handed as being an overt CENSOR.

    So papatard is lying because he censors his comments.

    Thanks for clearing that up.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:28 pm | Quote

  1. 60. Patience said:


    Jen–

    Since when is the truth hilarious? Why would you Obamabots go through so much trouble to stop a crazy man? I heard Larry’s press conference and the subsequent press questions and he sounded very professional and believable! Larry is a true American patriot, that you Obamabots want to silence. Let the man speak, I thought you left-wing idiots were for Freedom of Speech!

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:29 pm | Quote

  1. 61. Murray said:


    I’d be willing to have a bake sale to hire Bon Jovi to go down to the jail and sing “He’s a cowboy. On a black pole he rides… He’s Wanted… WAAAAANTED… DEAD OR ALIVE.”

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:30 pm | Quote

  1. 62. Murray said:


    Jen–

    Since when is the truth hilarious? Why would you Obamabots go through so much trouble to stop a crazy man? I heard Larry’s press conference and the subsequent press questions and he sounded very professional and believable! Larry is a true American patriot, that you Obamabots want to silence. Let the man speak, I thought you left-wing idiots were for Freedom of Speech!

    Freedom of speech includes making fun of a big, fat lying douche, all we want.

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:32 pm | Quote

  1. 63. Paul said:


    Patience - he DID speak. And he said nothing. He’s been saying the same thing for six months - “I’ll prove it whenever I feellike proving it and just because I don’t doesn’t mean I can’t.”

    Would you accept that if it was a check in the mail?

    posted June 19th, 2008 at 1:33 pm | Quote

  1. 64. Kstreet67 said:


    Patience said:
    Let the man speak, I thought you left-wing idiots were for Freedom of Speech!

    I’ll post this again here:

    If I yell: Fire!!! Fire!!! in a crowded theater and there is no fire…I am not protected by Freedom of Speech.

    If I incite a riot with venomous words, agitating and rousing my listeners, I am not protected by FOS.

    If I write som