HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Friday June 13th, 2008 9:24 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair

Does this signal a turning point in the long-ignored possibility of a Sen. Barack Obama drug/sex scandal? Also, has anyone else noticed that the Obama camp hasn’t debunked Sinclair’s claims on its new Web site devoted specifically to debunking rumors about Obama?

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 459 Comments to 'Shock: Politico Covers Larry Sinclair'


  1. 1. AC said:


    YES ! THE END IS NEAR.

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:37 pm | Quote

  1. 2. Mitch said:


    No. It signals nothing.

    Larry is still a fatty-tuna, piece of shit, douche.

    You are dreaming.

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:40 pm | Quote

  1. 3. Jesse said:


    Its about time there be a turning point in this story

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:42 pm | Quote

  1. 4. Duck said:


    THE Politico.com ???

    I don’t know Mitch…..
    Sounds bigger than just the Globe here !!!!
    Mitch: did you sign the KOS petition yet ???

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:43 pm | Quote

  1. 5. Jesse said:


    Oh Mitch, you’ve crawled from your rock. Can’t do any new posts since WordPress locked you up, so you’ve come here instead of sending one of the lackeys?

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:44 pm | Quote

  1. 6. Marty Lymon said:


    Larry Sinclair is a wanted felon. He is on the run
    from the law and raising money on the internet. After
    you visit the most wanted section of the Pueblo
    Sheriff’s department website, will you let the people
    who are sending money to Larry Sinclair–know what he
    really is? Oh, by the way Silbey had his law license
    suspended in Florida.

    Last Name: Sinclair Last Known Addr: 2033 Jerry Murphy
    Rd #347 First Name:
    Lawrence Pueblo, CO 81001 Middle Name: Wayne Hair
    Color: BLN Height: 5′07″ Eye Color: HAZ Weight: 168
    DOB: 09/26/61 Sex: M Race: W Scars / Tattos:

    Warrant 1 Description: Theft Forgery Degree: F4
    Statute: WAR Court: Bond Type: NO BOND Bond Amount:
    NOT AVAILABLE Disposition: ACT Comments:

    http://www.co.pueblo.co.us/cgi-bin/webpurbroker.wsc/mostoff.html?name=135062

    Your fugitive will be holding a press conference in
    Washington D. C. on June 18, 2008 at 3:00 pm
    529 14th Street NW
    Washington, DC 20045
    http://www.press.org/

    You may want to contact the Washington D.C. police
    department to arrest him.

    pueblocrimestoppers@pueblo.us

    http://www.floridabar.org/names.nsf/0/686B8824E4A5B00185256A8400151BDD?OpenDocument

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:46 pm | Quote

  1. 7. Duck said:


    Hey Mitch….

    Click the link on my little blue “DUCK”….
    There’s a special video just for you buddy…

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:48 pm | Quote

  1. 8. Duck said:


    Jesse…

    Mitch is giving the parking ticket update again.

    WordPress locked Mitch up ??
    Do they have minimum content standards or just minimum traffic requirements???

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:51 pm | Quote

  1. 9. Bitch and Ninnie said:


    Waa Waa…wordpress took my keys away. Now how am I supposed to get any attention? Larry has gotten all MY attention today because me and my Ninnie misbehaved.

    Maybe my minions won’t come back to read my lying sensationalized headlines. What if they NEVER come back…waa waa waa.

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:54 pm | Quote

  1. 10. AMY said:


    Why did they shut mitch down?

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:55 pm | Quote

  1. 11. Duck said:


    Maybe my minions won’t come back to read my lying sensationalized headlines. What if they NEVER come back…waa waa waa.

    _______________________________________________________

    Those five or six minions must be devastated !!!

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 9:57 pm | Quote

  1. 12. James said:


    Marty Marty Marty Marty Please get up to speed. You were told last night that all of this is OLD NEWS.

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 10:18 pm | Quote

  1. 13. Jesse said:


    Hey Duck….. they claim to have more than 5 or 6 minions now. Actually, I think they are each using 3 or 4 names to look like more than is really there.

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 10:20 pm | Quote

  1. 14. Bitch and Ninnie said:


    Hey gang, New Post up at TheMitchandNanShow. Oops. I was wrong

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 10:23 pm | Quote

  1. 15. typical white person said:


    TWP is waiting to see how the (non)smear merchants @ Oh!Bama’s new web site handle the onslaught of the entertaining Larry Sinclair…better than a reality show.

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Quote

  1. 16. Masked Blogger said:


    What the FUCK, Rob??? I go away for a few months, and when I come back, BHDC is in ruins. Well, more in ruins, anyway. 8 posts for the entire month of June? I remember when you used to crank out 8 posts a day.

    Look, if you’re not going to take your job as a DC blogger seriously, I’ll buy the site from you. I’ll give you $15 for it, which as far as I can tell, is triple what it’s worth. Deal? Good. I’ll have my attorneys get started on the paperwork.

    posted June 13th, 2008 at 11:07 pm | Quote

  1. 17. From No Quarter said:


    Stay strong, Larry.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:12 am | Quote

  1. 18. Tragic Passing said:


    As you know…there has been a most tragic death today.

    In loving memory, please send condolences with respect to the untimely demise of Mitch’s blog to WordPress

    P.S. Very sorry about Mr. Russert too (seriously, now)

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:25 am | Quote

  1. 19. beiap said:


    Please travel safe, Lar. They have started to freak me out.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:29 am | Quote

  1. 20. Curioso said:


    I thought it might be useful to point out that if not enough press shows, it’s because people haven’t sent Larry enough money. So please…by all means send as much as you can to Larry.

    I mean, Larry has told you how expensive it is to have live streaming video right? WOW that’s expensive. It’s not like he could use the video camera that he clearly already has and send the video live through just about any laptop on the market today. Hell, most of them already have a camera on them. Haven’t you folks ever done a video chat on the internet? It’s kind of the same thing.

    suckers.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:35 am | Quote

  1. 21. Yawn said:


    Bad timing for Larry. Tim Russert died. The press will be morning him for about a week. I read the Politico article and it said he was not credible. The reason why no other media will pick it up is because there is no proof. Also, they know he is a con. I find it funny and it will not change democrat’s vote. I heard Hillary did it, so she can get the super delegates to change their mind. That will anger a lot of dems.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:56 am | Quote

  1. 22. Yawn said:


    I read about all those signatures to the anti-smear petition. Wow, that’s a lot of foot soldiers for the November election. They are energized, angry and ready to fight for the democratic nominee. This little stunt has backfired on anyone who thinks it hurt Obama.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:58 am | Quote

  1. 23. Captain America said:


    WELL I GUESS OBAMA WONT BE PRESIDENT AFTER ALL

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:59 am | Quote

  1. 24. Enigma said:


    Notice to all Mitch and Nan blind followers,

    I find it very amusing to say the least that you sit on the computer day after day making claims about Larry Sinclair and how much of a liar and quote FAT ASS loser he is and how all those who believe his story to be true are all robots and can’t think for themselves. It’s as if you are superior in intelligence and think you have far more knowledge then any of us so called Larrytards. Those of you who claim that we are racists and ignorant for our belief in Larry and his association with Mr. Obama have been blinded by what truly is going on in our country. How dare you accuse us of racism and hatred when that’s all you do on Mitch and Nan’s site is post hatred and make distasteful comments about Larry his family or anyone that believes his story; you’re all are a bunch of hypocrites.

    You call us blind followers and in the same exact way you all follow every word that comes out of Mitch’s mouth and others that make post on his blog. Mitch uses words like racists and ignorant and in the same breath claims his mighty superiority of being thin and not fat like Larry. Mitch sounds like you have a problem with obese people? Come on Mitch admit it; admit you hate all fat people don’t you? Why, because you’re a stinky slimy Frenchmen. (Take a bath and tell your wife Nan to shave her armpits) How does that feel Mitch? You judgmental arrogant moron!

    I have a few words for your so-called Mitch and Nan followers, and his band of bloggers that write on his post.
    Mitch you claim you are from France and if you truly are then what makes you think we, as Americans would listen to one word out of your mouth. First of all, no Frenchman is going to tell an American what presidential candidate we should embrace and support. You my friend are from a country of cowards and gutless wimps who can’t stand up for anything. Your past leader was a traitor and coward and stood for nothing. Our brave men and Women are fighting and dying in Iraq for the so-called freedoms you enjoy and you gutless Frenchmen sit there on your Asses and do nothing. Your leaders are cowards and you are despicable.

    Your wife just lost a child due to a miscarriage and I’m sorry that happened to you. That’s a very hard thing for a young couple to go through. You would think a young couple like yourselves would want to get away from your hateful website and take a step back and realize there are more important things in life then spouting hatred about Larry Sinclair and his believers day after day after day. But no, you and Nan get right back on your site and continue your disgusting dialog as if nothing happened in your life.

    We are at a crossroads in our country in a battle between right and wrong. The liberals are taking God out of our schools and everything they can. They want us to believe its okay to kill a living human being in a mother’s womb; they want to destroy the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman. They want us to become a socialist country and provide more handouts to those in our country that already take advantage of the system. They want to destroy democracy and the true meaning of free enterprise. They want to take away the rights of parents and how they raise their children. They are indoctrinating our youth in our major universities to hate America and what we stand for as a Nation. In other words they want us to be like the French, lazy and rely for the government to take care of everything. We chose not to have a leader of our great country have current drug related problems, nor do we care to have the leader of our great country live a double standard live style of gay relationships when he is married with innocent children. We who believe Larry don’t hate Obama nor do we feel that a black man doesn’t have a right to be president of the United States. I assure you that there are many great black men in our country that we would all be proud to support.

    We as citizens of the United States have the right just like you do to follow our conscience and believe how we choose. We disprove of Mr. Obama because of his poor judgment in his past, because of his past relationships and those he associates with. (Rev. Wright, Tony Rezko) just to name a few. We are educated Americans who don’t follow everything the press tells us nor to we believe half of what comes out of our press lately and we certainly are not going to listen to a gutless, coward Frenchmen. The problem with you Mitch is you are like so many of our fellow citizens. You are so caught up in this new Messiah (Obama) and the disgusting press that he gets, that you insult the intelligence that you seem to think you have. The majority of Americans have Judaic Christian Values unlike you so-called French. Our Country was built on these principles and we are seeing the moral and spiritual decay taking over our great country. Why do we oppose Obama, because he represents everything that is wrong with our country?

    If the press refuses to take a serious look into Larry’s allegations and truly investigate his documents and records now that he is going to them and lifting up his voice in protest. Then things are far worse then I could even imagine. I fear to think about the ramification of the highest office of this Country going to a man who is now the most Liberal Senator in our country.

    I’m intelligent enough to know and understand that Larry’s allegations might never get out to the American people. Why, because we as a Country have allowed this to happen. To let the press dictate whom they want as President and most of all we have allowed this to happen because we are allowing extreme Liberalism and Socialist thinkers to take us hostage and destroy all that is good about our Great Country.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 2:56 am | Quote

  1. 25. democratista said:


    I don’t believe it signals any change. Same sort of press as when he went to Washington, DC….
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/

    Press Club defends anti-Obama event

    The president of the National Press Club today defended the club’s playing host to allegations against Barack Obama from a fringe figure, Larry Sinclair, whose claims have been widely ignored by the news media.“I’m not aware that we’ve ever turned anybody away for content,” said Sylvia Smith, who is the Washington editor of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette, adding that Sinclair’s allegations — of sex and drug use by Obama — “don’t seem very credible.”

    She said the Press Club, along with staging its own events, also rents space in its downtown Washington, D.C., headquarters to anyone willing to pay the fees.

    “Would I pop my head in to the press conference? I doubt it. I have better things to do,” she said of Sinclair’s gathering.

    A range of liberal blogs, including FireDogLake, DailyKos, TalkingPointsMemo, MyDD, and TaylorMarsh.com — the last a center for pro-Clinton, anti-Obama organizing in the primaries — are pressing the Press Club to cancel the event, which is scheduled for June 18, and circulating a petition with more than 7,000 signatures.

    Be not afraid…since it’s not true, he’s got NOTHING. I don’t understand the big deal. Let Larry talk….it won’t make any difference.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 6:08 am | Quote

  1. 26. Curioso said:


    Agreed Democratista. Bighead DC posted another article asking if Larry’s story had gone mainstream a while back. I think the press conference will be hilarious if it happens. I for one, am looking forward to it. It certainly won’t make Larry’s story any more credible. A press conference doesn’t give a bullshit story any more substance than more bullshit.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 9:46 am | Quote

  1. 27. xbjllb said:


    WELL I GUESS OBAMA WONT BE PRESIDENT AFTER ALL

    Of course not Captain America. Karl planned it that way from the beginning, and that’s how it will go down. If there is a God, the truth will come out BEFORE September.

    Trojan horses always burn up in the fire. No matter how idolic, no matter how fine.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 10:19 am | Quote

  1. 28. Tonya said:


    Will Politico’s Ben Smith cover the press conference? Liberal bloggers have gone crazy, if they think they can suppress free speech, suppress the truth.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 11:01 am | Quote

  1. 29. James said:


    It appears that the WordPress “time out” for the Bitch&NinnieShow….. oopss….. I mean the MitchandNanShow is over.

    At least that will keep Mitch out of here!!

    And Paul Day, be nice to WordPress, and don’t use foul language. In fact, one or two of your blogging buddies actually take offense to some of the offensive language. (Not sure how they get through a post by Mitch though)

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 11:43 am | Quote

  1. 30. Curioso said:


    Tonya, I agree with with you on the supressing of the free speech. Larry has done much to keep people from speaking freely himself. I want this press conference to happen. I really do. I think Politico and Daily Kos and all of them should just let Larry speak. I think that by keeping Larry from speaking will ultimately suppress the truth that he lying. He has nothing to back up his claims, and the press would demand such evidence.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 11:46 am | Quote

  1. 31. Curioso said:


    And don’t expect to see Larry Sinclair on the front page of any newspaper outside of supermarket tabloids. The major press won’t report much on Sinclair to protect their own credibility.

    Fox news won’t even touch his ’story’.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 11:49 am | Quote

  1. 32. xbjllb said:


    Curioso sez:

    And don’t expect to see Larry Sinclair on the front page of any newspaper outside of supermarket tabloids. The major press won’t report much on Sinclair to protect their own credibility.

    Fox news won’t even touch his ’story’.

    Until September, after Obama’s secured the nomination, and Rove trots out the limo driver and a couple of Obama’s drug dealers in a GOP press conference. Right after the GOP convention, where he debuts the Michelle Ma Belle “Whitey” rant GOP attack ad.

    Then the mainstream media will cover it. 24/7, just like their GOP bosses order them to. Will make Monicagate look like Mortimergate in comparison.

    What the hell was Mortimergate?

    Exactly.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:03 pm | Quote

  1. 33. democratista said:


    Curioso…

    We agree again. I want the truth as well. I only hope that after this press conference that it will all be put to rest, but I know better. The major press won’t touch this unless he feeds them something true before the press conference. He’s constantly made excuses for not revealing information and so it’s one big circle of nothing. The truth is that is exactly what it is - NOTHING.

    You ask why doesn’t Barack Obama address it once and for all? There is nothing that drives your enemy more crazy than no reaction. Have you ever had someone trying to egg you on and you don’t respond? Try it sometime. It will eat them up and not you…you don’t have to attend every fight to which you are invited. Pick your battles wisely. You do realize that this “fight” is confined to a very small group of people and there is no reason for the Obama campaign to give it legs.

    And MITCH AND NAN are back up and running:

    http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/

    If Larry kicks you off, here’s a good place to visit. It’s okay to believe we are 5 or 6 people. Truth is since Larry keeps blocking people they seem to be finding M&N. However, numbers don’t matter. One thing you can be sure of….no one will ask you for banana nutty bread money…

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:04 pm | Quote

  1. 34. James said:


    This is good:

    Silencing of Dissent
    VinceP1974 14 Jun 2008 10:06

    The Obamas and their supporters sure don’t want their opposition to say anything.

    Reminds me of this:

    With Obama we started out, we couldn’t talk about his big ears ’cause that made him nervous. We’ve gone from that to this: Not only can we not mention his ears…

    We can’t talk about his mother.

    We can’t talk about his father.

    We can’t talk about his grandmother unless he does, brings her up as a “typical white person.”

    We can’t talk about his wife, can’t talk about his preacher, can’t talk about his terrorist friends, can’t talk about his voting record, can’t talk about his religion.

    We can’t talk about appeasement.

    We can’t talk about color; we can’t talk about lack of color.

    We can’t talk about race. We can’t talk about bombers and mobsters who are his friends. We can’t talk about schooling. We can’t talk about his name, “Hussein.”

    We can’t talk about his lack of experience. Can’t talk about his income. Can’t talk about his flag pin.

    This started out we can’t call him a liberal.

    It started out we just couldn’t talk about his ears.

    Now we can’t say anything about him

    Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:16:04 AM PDT
    Posted in 2008 Campaign, 2008 Election, 2008 Presidential Campaign, 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama, Barack Obama Drug Scandal & Coverp, DemocraticUnderground
    ***************************

    Now, do NOT CALL ME RACIST; Do NOT Call me an OBAMA HATER.

    The fact is that Obama and his band of blind warriors are more hateful and racist than the people that David Duke led under the cloak of darkness.

    The fact that someone does not support Barack Obama for the POTUS does not make the racist. It makes them intellectually informed.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:06 pm | Quote

  1. 35. Curioso said:


    Bullshit James, there isn’t one thing on that list that you “can’t” talk about. Plenty of people are talking about all of those points. When you state your opinion on those issues, expect that there are people that will disagree. Don’t confuse that with “you CAN’T talk about it”. It’s a presidential race, so discussions will get heated. No one is stifling your right to speak, they are simply disagreeing with you.

    oh yeah, and they are probably trying to steer the discussion to important issues like health care, war, economic policy…ets. Ya know, things that ACTUALLY matter.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:15 pm | Quote

  1. 36. Tonya said:


    Since Simclair’s allegations have been covered in the Politico, the New Republic, several political blogs and everyone is vagualy familiar with the YouTube video, why doesn‘t Obama debunk them on his no smear page? Isn’t that what a no smear page is for? By addressing the Whitey rumor on the no smear page, it makes me think he has something to hide involving Sinclair.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Quote

  1. 37. over here said:


    It is very strange that Obama did not have this story debunked on his “No Smear” site, It is a true story and that is why. Obama will not address it because he does not want it to get traction. Sinclair has been trying for nearly a year to get this out and he had tried repeatedly to contact Obama and Axelrod but they won’t talk to him. Sinclair does have proof and he will present it at the Press Conference. Obama will finally have to deal with this or perhaps he will sue Sinclair for libel, BUT I DON’T THINK SO for this will just call more attention to it and Obama cannot disprove Larry Sinclair’s evidence.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:24 pm | Quote

  1. 38. truth said:


    Trying to explain why Obama hasn’t posted anything on this smear on his website is like trying to get someone who refuses to open his eyes to see the world in front of his face. But here goes… If Obama posted something on his website now, it would only make more people aware of the smear. If, however, any new organization writes a story about it, then I can guarantee you that he will put something up on his fightthesmears.com site. But that is not likely to even be necessary. Why? Sinclair claims he’s been trying to get reporters to write stories on this for YEARS, if NO ONE (except tabloid & fringe journalists) have written articles about this yet, what makes you think they will suddenly start now? By the way, Sinclair mentioned that when he was supposedly in contact with some reporters, he refused to give them information they wanted. Why? I mean, if you’re trying to get your story out, and it’s true, wouldn’t you be fully cooperative?

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Quote

  1. 39. Curioso said:


    Politico, the New Republic, and most of the bloggers that have addressed Larry Sinclar have done so in the capacity of debunking him themselves. The ‘Whitey’ tape actually gained some traction. If any respectable media, or even halfway respectable media addressed Larry’s story as possibly being true, the Obama campaign would respond. No such media has given Sinclair any such attention. They won’t either, Larry does a good enough job debunking himself. He hasn’t and won’t have any evidence to back himself up because he is lying.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Quote

  1. 40. Andrew said:


    Democratista:

    Your naivete (sic) shows through if you think for one minute that the Obama people have not been carefully monitoring the Sinclair story. Sinclair is only able to make any appearance at all because he did himself a great favor by posting his initial YouTube. Who knows what would have happened if he had not done that? The Obama team didn’t count on the viral nature of the internet in spreading his story and others. This is very apparent in the massive scourge of everything and anything that remotely negatively impacts this inexperienced legislator who has been hand-picked by the real powerbrokers to lead us toward a more socialist society. Laugh though many may, just look at his band of followers, for many are the Marxist believers among them.

    And if for one minute you think that Michelle Obama didn’t make hateful comments at the 2004 Rainbow Coalition PUSH Convention, why was it abruptly removed from BOTH the TUCC sales order site AND the Rainbow Coalition sales order site SIMULTANEOUSLY? Why was Princeton putting her thesis under “lock” until November 5th, 2008 (and released it only after extreme pressure)? Why, because the thesis ideas of a young college student have now grown into the hateful racist ideals of the wife of the nation’s 6th or 7th multiracial presumptive Presidential nominee.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:30 pm | Quote

  1. 41. Tonya said:


    How has anyone debunked Larry? That is a smear in itself.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:30 pm | Quote

  1. 42. Curioso said:


    What evidence has Larry presented that prove he ever even once met Barack Obama in ANY capacity?

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Quote

  1. 43. Tonya said:


    The hotel receipts proving he was where he said he was, the limo driver to be presented, the fact that obama took off for several days when larry said he did, the fact that obama had lied about smoking cigarettes during this campaign, the fact that obama used drugs many times during his youth, the fact that rev. wright was connected to three gay guys at obama’s former church and now those guys are dead. If obama has been vetted, maybe Larry’s facts would add up less sinisterly.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:38 pm | Quote

  1. 44. Tonya said:


    Also, the phone records prove that at least one of the gay guys who turned up dead called larry after he made his youtube video.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:39 pm | Quote

  1. 45. James said:


    Curioso:

    I didn’t write the list, but hey, Obama has said that everyone of those things are offlimits. Hell, we cannot even question his legislative history.

    Personally, his moronic strategists have led him down many wrong paths, and made mountains out of mole hills, such as the birth certificate issue. Ok, perhaps its no big deal, and probably should not be, but McCain’s citizenship was questioned because he was born in Panama, so there flows the obvious interest in Obama’s birth certificate given the nature of his “changing” stories on his parent’s relationship. Instead of simply releasing a copy of his ORIGINAL certificate, he refuses to do so, and then give Daily Kos a 2003 reissued form copy. Like I said, Mountains out of Molehills, all because of shoddy advisors.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:40 pm | Quote

  1. 46. Curioso said:


    Tonya, nothing you posted constitutes as any sort of proof that Larry has ever met Barack Obama. Take a look at Larry’s evidence:
    Phone records? I haven’t seen any. Just claims made by a convicted fraud.
    Hotel Reciepts? Larry was in Gurnee in 1999. I don’t see anything regarding Obama in those documents.
    Limo Driver? Yeah, what the fuck ever.

    etc. etc.

    again:

    What evidence has Larry presented that prove he ever even once met Barack Obama in ANY capacity?

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:48 pm | Quote

  1. 47. Tonya said:


    What more do you want…pictures of obama’s cock?

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:50 pm | Quote

  1. 48. Curioso said:


    James, I know you didn’t write that list. I have seen it splattered all over the internet. There is no substance to it. Obama never said those issues were off limits. If you think I am wrong, please cite evidence that Obama said those things were off limits.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm | Quote

  1. 49. Curioso said:


    No Tonya, I want one fucking shred of verifiable evidence that Larry Sinclair has ever met Barack Obama.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:53 pm | Quote

  1. 50. HilLIARy said:


    If you listen to LIARy talk for more than two weeks, he debunks himself.

    Hell, he’s changed the dates it supposedly happened at least four times, alone.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Quote

  1. 51. Tonya said:


    All of the evidence above is proof. You disregard it.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Quote

  1. 52. Curioso said:


    No. None of it is proof that Larry Sinclair and Barack Obama heve ever met. A picture of Obama’s cock wouldn’t even be proof unless Larry was in the picture. Please show me the phone records you speak of. I have seen the hotel documents, while you can argue that they place Sinclair in Gurnee, they don’t offer any evidence that Obama and Sinclair have ever met. Until there actually IS a limo driver presented there is no evidence of one.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Quote

  1. 53. HilLIARy said:


    I have hotel receipts from Los Angeles, New York, and Las Vegas. That proves I had sex with Jessica Alba, David Letterman, and Wayne Newton.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:16 pm | Quote

  1. 54. Tonya said:


    Why wouldn’t Obama have Sinclair arrested, then?

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Quote

  1. 55. xbjllb said:


    Tonya said:

    What more do you want…pictures of obama’s cock?

    Tonya, they’d just say it was someone else’s cock.

    You’re dealing with fanatics here, cultheads. The same folks who if they saw video of Michael Jackson going down on a child, or OJ slicing his victims’ heads off, that “those tapes were faked.” And they’d go to great lengths to debunk the tapes, and none of anything they would come up with would make any sense whatsoever.

    You can’t prove ANYTHING to people that are in love with the object of their worship. It’s called FANATICISM. It’s called DENIAL. They will never believe it.

    TO THIS DAY there are poor pathethic duped people who believe that Michael Jackson is not a pedophile, or that OJ Simpson did not murder Nichole and Goldman. And they’ll go to their graves believing that too.

    That’s the difference between white and black celebrity; NO ONE believes Bill Clinton “did not have sex with that woman.”

    Even Clinton WORSHIPPERS have more a grip on reality than ObamaNation fanatics. Clinton fans don’t tell you he didn’t do it; they tell you IT DIDN’T MATTER.

    But with Obama, it goes beyond black fanaticism; often his white supporters are even worse. It is definitely a sexual phenomenon; if he looked like Ruben Studdard he’d be NOWHERE.

    Want proof? Just call them on their sexual attraction and JUST LISTEN TO THEM SCREECH.

    They don’t want him to be their President; they want to be Larry, in that limo, that night so long ago. THAT’S why the irrational hatred of Larry to the point of death threats.

    Jealousy. Envy. At the same time protecting the object of their affection from what they see as complete, total annihilation.

    Never for once facing the fact Obama brought it on himself. With his past, he should have known that even the great and powerful Karl Rove couldn’t make it go away; nor that he would even WANT to make it go away, forever.

    Just until the convention.

    But that’s the overwhelming need and ego of the cult leader and superstar; they believe what they’ve done in the past will never catch up with them, and even if it does, their cult followers and fans will never believe the truth.

    But eventually, enough of them do and walk away into the light of reality, broken, but smarter and wiser. The rest drink the Kool Aid, lay down with Jim Jones at the Peoples’ Temple and die. Better that for them than face reality and the real truth.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:29 pm | Quote

  1. 56. Curioso said:


    Tonya, why would Obama have Sinclair arrested. To prove libel or slander Obama would have to prove that Larry has in some way damaged his reputation. Which he hasn’t.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:36 pm | Quote

  1. 57. Curioso said:


    Well done HilLIARy, Alba AND Newton. Well done indeed.

    posted June 14th, 2008 at 1:38 pm | Quote

  1. 58. xbjllb said:


    continued from 55:

    And some ask “What the heck is the connectio