And Sinclair reports that the Vince Powers, Nebraska Democratic Party’s National Committeeman, “has not had the guts to respond to my e-mail.” Powers has, however, apparently written to others about Sinclair’s allegations. Full explanation here.
 |
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports
|
................................................................................................................................................................................................
|
|
|
|
e-mail this
 del.icio.us  stumble |
- 33 Comments to 'Larry Sinclair Writes to Obama Superdelegate'
Attack, attack, attack, If the person is not PRO Sinclair they get a 48 hour cycle of ATTACK! ATTACK! ATTACK! Thats why Sinclair’s sheep are so subserviant. He scares them into submission. Older, fixed income people who are inherently racist and will never change. Larry gives them a reason to hate Obama that is more “socially acceptable”. tsk tsk tsk
Who’s attacking whom? Obama is attacking America by not telling the truth.
This is ridiculous.
What are these hordes of angry or accusatory emails to superdelegates doing? They’re backfiring (consider the Taylor Marsh debacle).
If you write in a respectful tone, if you refrain from sarcasm, if you resist calling the superdelegate “unAmerican,” “foolish,” “conned,” or (God forbid) “bought out,” chances are you’ll receive a courteous reply.
P.S.
It also helps if you stick to policy issues and not unproven allegations about a candidate’s personal life, including things like, well…murder.
some woman named cathy o’brien accused Hillary of sexually assaulting her and making her her sex slave. It is a shame that the media and the bloggers give attention to these mentally ill people.
Hey “Anonymous”……..
Are you saying that Larry is mentally ill?
How come NOBODY has proven Larry Sinclair to be lying aboout the Obama allegations?
This is a damn joke.
Joshua, you and your low life, homophobic, cyber-bullies need to be made examples of. You are unamerican, unpatriotic, anti-american, and attempting to use the 1st ammendment and the internet to slander, libel, threaten, and intimidate Larry Sinclair. Your fake and phoney cries of “first ammendment and free speech” can not be used to spread lies and intimidate people. You pretend to be all about frees speech, until you don’t agree with what is being said. You can’t have it both ways.
You and your racist and race obsessed minions have reached an all time low by calling deceased Nate Spencer’s, grieving MOTHER?! Oh, but that wasn’t enough. You also had to lead the group to email a friend of Donald Young, who is still grieving the senseless murder his good friend.
This is internet vigilante behavior, and is a crime. If I were Larry, I would have a “subpenis” reserved with your name all over it. The cesspool, and the societal misfits that choose to comment there, are begging for the courts attention…if you know what I mean.
For future reference, speaking out in disagreement with someone is your 1st amendment as an American. Calling someone names, and spreading lies is not protected in any way, shape, or form in the legal system.
This Larry story is very hard for twp with common sense to endourse.
THE MONEY SHOT WILL BE THE TAPE WHERE MICHELLE”CAMELOT”OBAMA CALLS OUT WHITEY! I AM ON THE EDGE OF MY SEAT..I HOPE I DON”T HAVE TO WAIT TIL OCTOBER.
We white people are able to get our brains around that type of stuff. We still do understand a racial remark, without the help of Russert.
Dave, get off your paper soap box and get a life. That kind of intimidation went out with the neocons when they sold a phoney war to the American People and were exposed. All of the grandstanding and name calling and accusations of being unAmerican (ala McCarthy) simply shows people like you cannot be reasonable about anything. Blind loyalty like yours is what got Hitler and Bush/Cheney into power. I never mentioned anything about 1st amendment. I have not called or contacted anyone. Whatever your problem is Dave, pick the right person to fight. Its not me bub.
Personally, though I don’t believe Sinclair, I don’t think there is any reason NOT to write passionately to the DNC or superdelegates. The problem here is lumping everything in…Sinclair, Ayers, Resko, Odinga…murders, drugs, sex…into the e-mail. It ruins any sense of credibility.
Write with your concerns for the direction of the party. Pick one thing that worries you that is a PROVEN FACT….not innuendo or rumor…and make your case.
I support Senator Obama, but I am a Democrat and I want the Democrats to win in November. I will vote for the nominee. I cannot even begin to understand the venom and hatred for Senator Obama. I don’t particularly like Hillary, but I do know that her platform, much like Barack’s, reflects my views a lot better than John McCain.
Where is the sensibility here?
This is interesting
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/02/larry-sinclair-obama-accuser-hits-youtubers-up-for-cash/
“How come NOBODY has proven Larry Sinclair to be lying aboout the Obama allegations?
This is a damn joke.”
How come NOBODY has proven Larry Sinclair to be telling the truth about the Obama allegations? WHERE is the EVIDENCE? No evidence? Proof of anything? Then you have nothing. The burden of proof is on the ACCUSER. Understand? That’s why nobody takes this story seriously. Want the MSM to break this, to cover this situation? You have to have something to prove that there is substance and validity behind making such outrageous and ridiculous allegations.
I have also written to Vincent Powers. I made him well aware that this is a well orchestrated, organized campaign against him, other super delegates and the media to smear Obama and his wife Michelle by a bunch of Hillary supporters, who are senior citizens for the most part, and are desperate and fanatical to bring Obama down. I also included some racist statements from Larry’s site that his followers have posted.
He has written me back and is well aware. Haha I guess I wasn’t the first one to send him a “heads up” email.
Dear Anonymous,
This site is not a smear site, and your need to turn us all in to Mrs.Obama and her husband is laughable.
The mean ol’ grumpy people who have been proud to be American all their lives are living all over these great United States(57)
We believe in free speech, so I won’t be reporting you to anyone..because alot of people already sacrificed their lives(not their book deal) to make it so you could say whatever you want here!! Ain’t life great in the USA!
I don’t hate Obama . I don’t trust him. I was taught that you are judged by the company you keep. This is so true.Obama’s associations has views that are unacceptable to most.It is what it is.
Yes it is typical white person. And thank God as well for the right to send email so that people can be made aware of this scam. God bless the internet! Hahaha!
You know that famous milk ad encouraging people to drink milk?
Here’s mine for Larry.
GOT PROOF?
I think that Sinclair and those supporters on his website are cult-like - Its like don’t you people have anything to do but praise Larry and each other for how great they are. I also think he just might be telling the truth so let them go on and have their fun. I would donate a bunch to Sinclair myself if he could ever really do anything. He just gets those followers of his all hyped up and they go , Stay safe Larry and we are praying for you. He says he is going to DC to have a press conference with Rev. Manning before the end of May and that he and Pastor Manning have proof of our boy Obama’s wrongdoings so lets just see if that materializes. Nothing sure has not up to now except just bull shit coming from Sinclair.
I read that email that Larry’s supporters sent the SD and I think it is right on target. There are reports released just yesterday in D.C. that substantiate most of what Larry’s people are saying in the email to the SD.
You should all go to http://www.usasurvival.org/ and read the investigative reports that are out today on that site about Obama’s associates and back ground, and these are credible reports done by reputable folks and substantiated. No doubt in my mind that Obama is really, really bad for America and if Sinclair can keep the focus on Obama then it just might provoke the Media into doing the same so the truth will come out on Obama and he will be told to “go away”. Concerned Americans can only hope and “pray” that this happens.
I am a Clinton supporter and I will vote for Mccain come nov.
Joshua,
The link you posted above is old news. From Feb 26, and to my knowledge, Larry didn’t get anyone to give him money. He wanted the money to stay in California after the lie detector test. He did not stay, and went back home as scheduled.
As for the lie detector, I have read many reports that these are not accurate. I would also say that the computer’s findings were that Larry was stating the truth. Humans that read the test said that he was lying. My guess would be that if someone wanted to discredit Larry, they would hire someone that would find the way they wanted. The other issue is, that Whitehouse.com NEVER released the video, or the second opinion. As a matter of FACT, WH.com hasn’t even commented on WHY they didn’t follow through with THEIR promises. Wonder why this is????
Another Sweetie,
I agree with you that Larry’s site has gotten a little “back slappy”, but I would also point out that this is a group of people that have come together for a common goal. I can kind of understand why things have gotten where they have over there.
I also agree that all you have to do is look at Obama’s policies, and his connections that he has made during his rise to where he is now, and you can come to your own conclusions. If people would research Obama, instead of just “blindly following” him, they would learn alot. If people come to the conlusion that he should be President, then they should vote for him. I am confidant that the majority of people will see that he is not.
Joshua Ray,
I guess if no one has proven Larry Sinclair wrong, and nobody has proven he is right, it would be a stalemate.
I think that we all have the right to question the superdelegates, or at least voice our opinion, and it should be done in a clear and polite manner.
The responses from Mr. Powers are poorly written, and border on childish in nature. Hhhmm, perhaps Michel is Mr. Powers!!
It is not the Sinclair story in and of itself that is the Obama problem. Rather, it is the full and total package, including his politics, as well as his lack of experience in the national and international political arena.
The bottomline is that there is so much unknown in this man, and we are at a point in our history that we cannot afford to take the chance that this unknown is not actually who he has portrayed himself to be.
Interested ByStander:
To add to your polygraph analysis, the person who administered it also has questionable credentials with regard to polygraphs, and if I remember correctly, the actual video of the tests were supposed to have been released, and never were. Like the scourging and cleansing of the internet of anything that would be an Obama-negative, there was quite obviously some behind-the-scenes manipulating to get the wanted result.
Another Sweetie,
I had looked at that site yesterday, but have not had the opportunity to check the materials today. The sad part is that their work will be overlooked because the media is enthralled with the idea that this candidate will be so historic in nature.
I believe that this country is ready for a female leader, or a black leader. But I do not feel this is the man for that spot. However, in saying that, one is automatically deemed a racist. On the other side, when Michelle Obama makes her remarks, they are not deemed racist, because, after all, she is the descendant of slaves, and that makes it wright. If this cycle is ever to end, the concept of “politically correct” must be done away with. The fear of being called racist or sexist has played too much of a role in this campaign.
Personally, we either take back our country or find the islands!!
James,
Also on the polygraph issue, WH.com did not publicly release the second reading. I believe it was “leaked”. I was not going to comment on who did the readings, but if you read the second opinion, it states that proper procedure was not adhered too. To me, Larry was “set up”, but the Larry haters continue to bring it up. They only state that Larry failed. They do not give an objective observation of the test results, or the way the test was conducted.
This is ridicolous! The superdelegats do not take Larry seriously…all he needs to do to change that is provide evidence. WHY ON EARTH WOULDN’T HE PROVIDE EVIDENCE ???!! You guys are dumbfucks. A con-man is ripping you off
22. thepotcallingthwkettlewhite said:
This is ridicolous! The superdelegats do not take Larry seriously…all he needs to do to change that is provide evidence. WHY ON EARTH WOULDN’T HE PROVIDE EVIDENCE ???!! You guys are dumbfucks. A con-man is ripping you off
***
The con man is ripping you off??? How could that be?
thepotcallingthwkettlewhite
What a nice name. Larry is not ripping anyone off. The people are giving him money of their own accord. If this story does prove to be true, then the Superdelegates are the ones that were “conned”. Larry has stated that he will give a press conference before the end of the month. If he does not have evidence at this press conference, or if he does not hold one, then I will come back here and admit that Larry is wrong. This will be the last straw for me.
“anonymous said:
Personally, though I don’t believe Sinclair, I don’t think there is any reason NOT to write passionately to the DNC or superdelegates. The problem here is lumping everything in…Sinclair, Ayers, Resko, Odinga…murders, drugs, sex…into the e-mail. It ruins any sense of credibility.”
Anonymous,
You see, for me it is the whole package. Maybe if he only had Ayers, then maybe I could overlook this, or maybe if he only had Rezko, I could overlook this, but the sad fact is, this is Obama’s story. Not just one chapter, but the whole book so far. If he surrounded himself with all of these folks, then you take this in to account.
Interested ByStander:
You are right, it is the whole package. While I hope that a press conference is soon, I’m not sure it can happen in the next 8 days
On the Funny Blog, kstreet67 writes:
kstreet67 Says:
May 22, 2008 at 10:35 pm
I cannot believe each and everytime a super delegate writes back to them, if it is NOT what THEY want to hear, the delegates are DEMONIZED and “exposed”. This seems to be $inclair’s Modus Operendi from day one.
1. Apparently because the Obama camp “ignored” $inclair he EXPOSED Obama and his campaign head.
2. People like the three bloogers didn’t believe him so he exposes them and links them to Obama and sues them!!!
3. The lie detector tests doesn’t believe him (hahahaha) so he exposes the lie detector technicians, Whitehouse.com, the sponsors of the test, and again, links them all to…you got it…Obama.
4. He writes an open letter to Michelle Obama and apparently no word from her made him attack her even more AND he linked…oh forget it, she’s Obama’s wife.
5. The attorneys for the defendants don’t believe him and file papers attesting to that fact and…you guessed it, he exposes them and links THEM to Obama.
6. You, Mitch, Nan, and everyone who blogs on this OPPOSITION site about “The Sinclair Affair” are targets also. We have been linked to the Obama campaign, the attorneys for the defendants’ office and God only knows what else. Those who he CAN get information about has been exposed and demonized simply because WE want to get at the TRUTH.
7. That poor doctor in NY who wrote a blog about not believing $inclair is exposed. His name and address posted on $inclair’s site. As I have stated before, there are racists and skinheads and just plain “my life is bored I need 15 minutes of fame” crazies out there who can actually stalk that poor man and do God knows what to him. (I’ve always told my kids that out of the worst negative, a positive can be found. The positive is, everything that $inclair writes on that blog has been archived and hopefully the defendants’ attorneys will submit every rant and rave ever documented by $inclair.
8. The media has ignored him so he writes a looooong rant about each of them being an “Obama pimp”.
9 Then there are the Super Delegates. Well, thats an ongoing story.
But you get my drift I hope.
**********************************************
These could be answered one by one, but that would be so redundant. Mrs Obama has attacked ALL of US with her racist rants, yet those of us who are deemed “typically white” are the ones that are racist!!
Obama has lied and twisted facts on many issues, and the Sinclair matter is only a small matter in the whole spectrum. His politics are so far to the left that even members of the left are worried. (see USASurvival.com ).
The three “bloogers” as you wrote, are not in litigation because they disagreed with Mr. Sinclair; they posted certains things as “Fact” that were not. Poor mzmolly, and, oh, I saw the democratista say that tubesocktedd was hysterical! Freedom of speech must be protected, but there are still limitations.
The OPPOSITION has used every miserable tactic to force Mr. Sinclair to fold, but to no avail. So to bash Sinclair is just wrong.
I hope that when the truth of all of this comes out, regardless of how the cards fall, that the Sinclair supporters and the Opposition all see how their efforts made the truth a reality.
So Gemini, I hope you revise your tirade into a positive statement that reflects the courage that Mr. Sinclair has shown in this matter.
—–Original Message—–
From: vince powers
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@aol.com
Sent: Wed, 21 May 2008 8:38 pm
Subject: Re: nominee for our party
Please reread your email to me. You slander the wife of a man running for President. You have bought into the sore loser concept that because your candidate does not win you will vote for someone who has positions 100 percent opposite of Sen Clinton, ever though Sen Obama and Sen Clinton have basically the same positions on the issues.
I have recieved dozens of emails from Clinton supporters, only a few made political arguments, the rest were like yours, personal attacks on Sen Obama or his wife.
Honorable is talking about a candidate’s positions, not his spouse. I dealt with your style of politics for a decade in Nebraska defending Hillary and Bill from folks who attack people, not positions.
I have not been personally offended, but I will respond to any personal attack on Hillary, Bill, Barack or Michelle.
Senator Clinton has run a great campaign, it is such a shame that at the end her supporters have tried so hard to tarnish her reputation. As for me, I will not let this foolish email barrage change my opinion of SEnator CLinton, she would have been a great President, she made a mistake by ignoring too many states. It is politics, someone wins, someone loses.
Vince Powers
Mr. Powers made these comments to a life long democrat who’s email follows
On May 21, 2008, at 2:53 PM, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@aol.com wrote:
Mr. Powers:
I am sorry that you have taken this stance against anyone that does not support your favored candidate. I have no intentions of “Rule or Ruin”, as you seem to put it. Although I will congratulate you on fancy slogans, your label doesn’t really apply to me. I actually was an Obama supporter until I started investigating several issues that convinced me that he is not the candidate that our party needs. I feel that I gave several examples to explain why he is not right for our party nominee. I am just a concerned citizen that wants my voice heard. I am just a regular mother with three teenage girls, so please don’t feel threatened by my attempt to ask that you seriously consider your vote. For I had no idea that expressing my concerns with our party would open me up for attack by someone in a position such as yours. Perhaps I am naive to think that any super-delegates would actually want to know what citizens from their own party felt. My intentions were honorable, and they were never meant for you to feel personally offended. Maybe you should brace yourself, because if members of our own party are asking these questions, Obama will most certainly be confronted if he runs as our actual nominee this fall. Although I apologize for personally offending you, I will not accept your insults as valid. For months, I have been personally attacked and ridiculed by many of the Obama supporters like you. I realize that you would like to portray a sense that it has been quite the opposite, but I am use to people like you trying to that for months as well.
With that being said, I do appreciate your willingness to respond to my email. You may have been quite rude, but I am satisfied that you took the time to listen to my concerns.
Thank you
Look at how the moroons are writing away:
Sent: Tue, 20 May 2008 9:17 pm
Subject: nominee for our party
I am here to urge all of you to take the Obama/Sinclair allegations very seriously. We are all intelligent enough to realize that these allegations will surface after the nomination. I suspect that they will be a huge embarrassment to our party, as well as guaranteeing the win for McCain. I have been following the Sinclair allegations off of Larry Sinclairs webblog at larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com. So far, every single allegation seems to be holding up, despite any efforts to discredit them by the Obama supporters.
It isn’t just the Larry Sinclair and the Donald Young allegations that concerns me about Mr. Obama. I have problems with him supporting his cousin’s run (Odingo). I have concerns about his connections to Mr. Ayers that he has downplayed. I believe there is enough damaging evidence with his connections to Rezko as well. Obama’s relationship with Wright is going to continue again in a month or two, in my opinion. All of this and more from a brand new Senator with a slim record to brag about.
I feel Michelle Obama is going to damage the party as well. Her “proud” comment was VERY unpatriotic, no matter what she claims her intentions were. I noticed on Whitehouse.com that there is evidence floating around about her making some VERY derogatory comments. They are bad enough that they are offering $100,000.00 to get their hands on this tape.
I want to express that I am a die-hard Democrat who will switch over this election if Obama is nominated. I feel like he is a plague to our party, and the Republican party is hoping so badly that we nominate Obama. I know that I am not alone. I have seen polls that only around 35% of Hillary supporters will support Mr. Obama. Why? It is not out of being bitter because Hillary didn’t get the nomination nod, but because Barack Obama will destroy our party. We have the best chance of winning this election after Bush’s shortcomings, and I hope that all of you will think very closely about who you will vote.
I realize that both candidates will be attacked by the Republican Party, but Barack Obama has enough new information to damage the democratic party for a very long time. He may be a good man, but he has far too many skeletons in his closet to pull this one off.
I do want to address the three bloggers…because they are pawns. MANY people have said nasty things to and about Larry. I remember when TubeSocksTedd found out that Larry was suing him. He took down everything he posted. He went nuts. He apologized. I don’t know about the others….but I’m sure it is effecting their lives. There was SOMEONE who wrote that Larry was in a mental institution and that he admitted to lying, besides the Washington Post article. These people happen to believe it and quote that stuff before Larry rebutted and said it was not him. It’s cruel for him to sue these people. He didn’t suffer substantially from their words. A lot of people have called him a liar…A LOT OF PEOPLE.
He went after these people MAINLY to get attention to his story and THAT JUST IS NOT RIGHT.
IF HE HAS EVIDENCE, find SOMEONE who can get it out. How about good old Blair Montgomery Sibley? Has he no contacts that could get Larry some publicity?
No…it’s inexcusable that he is suing these people. They may have been wrong…..but I believe that he is more malicious than they are ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.
If someone writes falsehoods that cause you to lose your job, your standing in the community…something…yes, that’s malicious and slanderous. These people did nothing of the sort to Larry. HOPEFULLY, the judge will see this and Larry will be back to square one…but CIVIL case can take years so he better find ANOTHER WAY TO SHOW HIS EVIDENCE.
James: Lets say that I am wrong about 8 of those points from YOUR point of view. I suggest to you that if you can answer this one question in a reasonable and rational way, I will recant all that I have written in that post.
Why did Sinclair post this doctor’s address (see reprint below)? I do not want to hear that someone found it posted on another site. Because that post was meant for HIS audience, NOT Sinclair’s audience, some of whom may be silent and never post but would leap at a chance to attack an Obama supporter. Please tell me why Sinclair posted his address?:
7. That poor doctor in NY who wrote a blog about not believing $inclair is exposed. His name and address posted on $inclair’s site. As I have stated before, there are racists and skinheads and just plain “my life is bored I need 15 minutes of fame” crazies out there who can actually stalk that poor man and do God knows what to him. (I’ve always told my kids that out of the worst negative, a positive can be found. The positive is, everything that $inclair writes on that blog has been archived and hopefully the defendants’ attorneys will submit every rant and rave ever documented by $inclair.
Open Appeal:
Perhaps someone reading this blog for the first or hundredth time may feel an urge to come forward and be counted. Please be brave and come clean if you know anything about the possibility that Barack Obama has used illegal drugs as late as the 1990’s or has engaged in intimate relationships with other men. I would encourage you to contact Mr. Sinclair in confidence at his posted email address, and he and his attorney can arrange your safety and take a statement. Please come forward. The truth is all we seek.
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
Hey…
Iwantmyvoteback…
How many times has this plea gone out now? And I assume Larry has a gaggle of those people who have done drugs with Obama in the 1990’s? Oh…maybe they just don’t use the internet….
Hmmm…no reply from “James” yet I see. I’ll check back later.
Post Your Comment:
WordPress database error: [Server shutdown in progress]
SELECT comment_post_ID, post_title FROM (wp_comments LEFT JOIN wp_posts ON (comment_post_ID = ID)) WHERE comment_approved = '1' AND wp_posts.post_status='publish' AND comment_type<>'pingback' AND comment_type<>'trackback' ORDER BY comment_date DESC;WordPress database error: [Lost connection to MySQL server during query]
SELECT cat_ID, cat_name, category_nicename, category_description, category_parent, category_count FROM wp_categories WHERE cat_ID > 0 AND cat_ID <> 34 ORDER BY cat_name ascLegal/Privacy