HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Thursday May 22nd, 2008 7:52 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair

“I have sent the attached e-mail to the DNC members listed,” writes Sen. Barack Obama’s accuser:

From: lws022737@hotmail.com

To: mcryor@mddems.org; gagej@afge.org; phpwiley@yahoo.com; belapadems@comcast.net; coed@pacifier.com; heather@heathermizeur.com; jsweeney@aflcio.org; skmast@att.net; jennifer.dechant@verizon.net; khaleela@collegedems.com; sam@samspencer.org; taylorforsenate@yahoo.com; tinabbo@sbcglobal.net; zellner@russfeingold.org; mbrewer@midemocrats.com; gncasey@lgcr.com; germonda@dnc.org; colemane@co.oakland.mi.us; debbie.dingell@yahoo.com; rficano@co.wayne.mi.us; ndrummond@yahoo.com; jlalonde@mea.org; liv.gibbons@gmail.com; chair@democratsabroad.org; theresa.morelli@gmail.com; michaeltardif@mac.com; lawolfe@gmail.com; nanlars@ll.net; robin@carnahanformissouri.com

Subject: I am Larry Sinclair, I suggest you might speak to me before you call me ‘Rumor’

Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:38:36 -0500

Greetings:

My name is Larry Sinclair, not ‘RUMOR’ as many of you have referred to me as.

I can assure you, that regardless of your desire to keep this story limited to the Internet, I will get the TRUTH about Barack Obama’s drug use and sexual encounters with me in 1999 out to the American Voter.

I can also assure you that I am neither a Clinton ’sore Loser’ supporter, nor am I a ’radical right winger.’

I am a life long openly gay male who while having made mistakes in life, I have always admitted to mine.  That is more than I can say for Barack Obama, and the DNC, who have been given every opportunity to address this matter before it was ever made public.

I doubt any of you will respond directly to me, as the DNC has shown how cowardly it is when anyone comes forward about Barack Obama’s own actions.

Thank you,

Larry Sinclair

http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 213 Comments to 'Larry Sinclair Contacts Democratic Insiders'


  1. 1. Curioso said:


    Sorry Larry, being fucking annoying still isn’t considered proof.

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 8:01 pm | Quote

  1. 2. anonymous said:


    PUT UP OR SHUT UP ALREADY!

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 8:30 pm | Quote

  1. 3. Duck said:


    2. anonymous said:

    PUT UP OR SHUT UP ALREADY!
    ________________________________________________________-

    Mitch is still gonna blow….
    zzzzzzz… is right

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 8:58 pm | Quote

  1. 4. Interested Bystander said:


    Where’s Mitch’s “Proof” of where Obama was on Nov 7, 1999??? Or maybe a “lawyer” told him not to put it out. Yeah, Right. I guess Mitch is a liar also.

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 9:31 pm | Quote

  1. 5. Bobby said:


    That right Larry
    Continue to annoy the DNC.
    This is why no one like you……

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 9:38 pm | Quote

  1. 6. Curioso said:


    Interested Bystander, we had an exchange before, and you seem like a reasonable person. You can feel how you will about Mitch, but it really isn’t his job to prove where Obama was on any occasion. It’s Larry’s job to prove what he has alleged. For MONTHS now he has said he was going to do so, and he hasn’t. Not even a little. He hasn’t even proven he was in Chicago on the given dates. Only that he may (the evidence he offered is circumstancial) have been in a far northern suburb. Closer to Kenosha, Wisconsin than to Chicago. It’s not up to Mitch, Obama, or anyone EXCEPT LARRY to prove or ADDRESS anything. Until Larry adds some substance to his claims, nobody owes him or his supporters a damn thing.

    In the meantime, innocent people are being maliciously sued and tragically deceased people are being smeared by Larry Sinclair.

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 10:01 pm | Quote

  1. 7. Curioso said:


    And he is being fucking annoying.

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 10:03 pm | Quote

  1. 8. xbjllb said:


    NO WAY are the superdelgates going to gamble on Obama now.

    Don’t worry Larry… they are getting the message, and they ALL know about you. At least 40% of the superdelgates pledging Obama are merely FAKING OUT OBAMANATION. Who wants to deal with insane death threats like you do every day? Not them. All they had to do was lie and say they were supporting Obama, and then they get anti-racist points as well!!! And then, at the convention, turn right around and VOTE FOR HILLARY. Their vote is completely secret.

    And then add in THIS LATEST poll, and it’s all over for Obama.

    bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2008/05/19/daily29.html

    POLL: OBAMA UNABLE TO DEFEAT MCCAIN IN OHIO MATCH-UP

    *****

    John McCain: 44%

    Barack Obama: 40%

    *****

    Hillary Clinton: 48%

    John McCain: 41%

    *****

    Percentage of Ohio Democrats who would like to see Hillary the candidate: 50%

    Percentage of Ohio Democrats who would like to see Obama the candidate: 37%

    *****

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 10:10 pm | Quote

  1. 9. fka Mike said:


    Mitch has mounted a hate campaign to discredit Larry Sinclair, but in doing so has actually strengthened his resolve to finish this task. What Mitch has not done is prove that Larry Sinclair is wrong. Every tidbit of Larry Sinclair’s past doesn’t mean he is wrong. Every verbal “LarTard” attack doesn’t make Larry Sinclair any less wrong. Supplying reams of information to the attorneys to protect 3 bloggers who posted blatant false inforamtion about Larry Sinclair doesn’t prove that he is wrong. Even those attorneys posting all of Larry Sinclair’s personal information in violation of the Rules doesn’t prove that Larry Sinclair is wrong. So my question is, what has Mitch done to show that Obama is wright?

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Quote

  1. 10. Interested Bystander said:


    Curioso,

    I agree with you, but you see, trying to be an informed bystander in this, I go to BHDC, Mitch and Nan’s site, and Larry Sinclair’s site to get my information. Mind you I try to go to most links posted also.

    What I will say is that MITCH is the one that gave Larry a deadline to come up with what time Obama came to his room on the 7th, because HE had PROOF. I didn’t ask Mitch to come up with this info, he offered it. Then, he said that someone who was being “sued” by Larry, may not want this out. Larry posted a “program” stating that Obama was in Chicago at Northwestern on the 8th. This puts Obama in Chicago on the 8th. When I inquired about this, Mike posted that “Mitch may have jumped the gun” on this. Gurnee was only a short drive from Northwestern. Maybe one hour, which I would guess is how long it would take to drive just about anywhere around Chicago.

    Mitch also posted on his site about someone contacting the CPD about the Donald Young murder. They had a quite detailed post about this “conversation”. When I inquired about this, I was told that Mitch uses “satire”. There was nothing on this posting to indicated it was “satire”. Seems like a way out to me.

    So my point is, if Mitch wants to be taken seriously, I think he should follow through on his “proof”. The people on Mitch and Nan’s site have fallen in to Mitch’s “game” just as Larry’s people have. I think my “bottom line” on Mitch and Nan’s site is that they are very vile, nasty, and rude. You can call it “satire” all you want, but to have a good debate, these kind of tactics make their site weaker. How can you take seriously some of the stuff they post, you have to read between the personal attacks to get the message.

    I would agree with you about the murders, and Larry dragging them in to this whole mess. I would also say that Mitch’s “group” is the ones that have contacted the families of the dead young men. Maybe this is “satire” also. At least that is what THEY have posted. They also contacted a “Tim”. and “Tim” posted on his site to just let them rest in peace. Seems that would be aimed at both sides.

    I posted on the last two BHDC blogs, that if Larry does not have his press conference before the end of the month, then I will come back here, and in my opinion state that Larry is not credible. But if Larry does have evidence that he puts out, then I will find him credible.

    I guess now Mitch and Nan’s followers can now state that they have been called a “group” like they did on the “other side” thing a couple days ago. I guess I can anticipate them to be calling me names now too. Mitch has already tried to be rude to me. I could care less.

    Larry has every “right” to email the Super Delegates and the DNC, just as any American does. Why is this annoying?? Maybe soon Obama’s “Chickens will be coming home to roost”.

    THIS SAGA HAS GONE ON LONG ENOUGH.

    These are just my opinions, and I have no proof either way. That is why I am an Interested Bystander.

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 10:48 pm | Quote

  1. 11. Duck said:


    Nice overview on the Barry for President Community blog:
    (Does Barry know that’s posted???)
    I’ll paste it all here as well.. just in case it somehow disappears….
    __________________________________________________________
    http://72.30.186.56/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=%22Larry+Sinclair%22+mainstream&fr=yfp-t-501&u=my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/kellysullivan/gGBfRx&w=%22larry+sinclair%22+mainstream&d=XjpWTjWxQ0Oa&icp=1&.intl=ca
    ___________________________________________________________

    Larry Sinclair, who is he?
    By Clinton Supporter - May 18th, 2008 at 5:11 pm EDT

    Comments | Mail to a Friend | Report Objectionable Content
    Larry Sinclair alleges that on 6th and 7th November 1999 in Chicago, Illinois he met Barack Obama for a social evening which included drinks in a lounge, followed by a drive around town in his hired limousine during which Obama supplied cocaine, smoked crack through his own glass pipe while accepting fellatio from Sinclair.

    The next day Obama took the initiative to visit Sinclair’s Comfort Inn hotel room in Gurney, Illinois for a “quickie” version of the previous night’s activities. Both men were 38 years of age. Larry Sinclair was on parole visiting for a few days from Colorado. Barack Obama was a member of the Illinois Senate.

    These scenes are reminiscent of the Oprah Winfrey’s show in which she featured J.L. King’s book “Men On the Down Low: A Journey into the Lives of Straight Black Men Who Sleep with Men”

    The story has produced some newsworthy reactions most of which can be described as a cover-up:

    1. A virtual internet and media lynch mob composed mainly of Obama supporters is bent on discrediting Sinclair with allegations about his homosexuality, his convictions for check fraud in the 1980’s and his mental and emotional stability. Part of their dirty tricks is to circulate to the media a forged facsimile of a page for the Washington Post which includes numerous lies about Sinclair and to declare that he was in a mental hospital at the time he said he was with Obama, and to attack his family and neighbors.

    A noteworthy participant in the campaign of vilification is Andres W. Lopez an attorney for the Obama campaign in Puerto Rico who is a member of the campaign’s National Finance Committee. He appeared on Puerto Rico’s most popular TV magazine show WAPA TV’s “SuperXclusivo” on April 10th 2008 to denounce Sinclair as a major headache and distraction for the Obama campaign and implied that he was mentally ill and working for the Hilary Clinton campaign.

    Sinclair has hit back against some of the critics with law suits for defamation in the DC district court filed by his attorney Montgomery Sibley most recently noteworthy for his defence of the “DC Madam”.

    On 1st April, 2008 US District Court Judge Henry Kennedy granted a motion for discovery in the matter. The aim of the Sinclair-Sibley legal strategy is eventually to discover Barack Obama on oath.

    2. Larry Sinclair took a polygraph test in February confident that he would pass and he challenged Obama to do the same. The test was arranged by Whitehouse.com an internet site best known for pornography and anti-Clinton political satire.

    The raw computer readings showed that Larry Sinclair passed the test with flying colours. But two testers hired by Whitehouse.com re-interpreted the readings to claim that they showed deception. One of the testers was Edward I. Gelb who has been exposed by specialists in the field for claiming a phony Ph.D.

    Whitehouse.com refused to publish the full results or the video of the test and in many other respects breached good faith undertakings they gave Sinclair to induce him to participate. He claims that he and his attorney are in possession of information that the Obama campaign bribed Whitehouse.com to distort the test and spin the presentation of the results.

    Whitehouse.com has not denied these allegations but has abruptly gone silent on the matter.

    3. Many in the mainstream media are aware of Larry Sinclair’s allegations about Barack Obama and rumours in Chicago restaurant and club land since at least 2001 that Barack Obama has been doing the Down Low with gay men. Some newspaper have interviewed Larry Sinclair and visited his home in Minnesota. He has provided them with his criminal record, his health and financial records and his family history.

    At least one major Chicago newspaper has indicated that it will not proceed yet because it does not want to be accused of racism or of causing problems for the first viable black candidate. Other newspapers have asked for more proof such as access to the limousine driver who witnessed the events of November 6th, 1999.

    Larry Sinclair has said the driver will testify in legal proceedings. But in the meantime he wants to protect him from interference from Obama campaign, from the kind of death threats to which Sinclair has been subjected and from the kind of harrssment that Obama supporters have visited on Sinclair’s elderly mother, his siblings and neighbors. However, Larry Sinclair is willing to provide assurances about his evidence to the media through his lawyer.

    4. When Larry Sinclair first reported his allegations to the Obama campaign in September 2007 he wanted Obama to correct his claim that he had stopped taking drugs in his teens and had never taken crack. He believes crack is addictive and difficult to shake off.

    Over the following months until December, 2007 he was contacted several times by Donald Young who appeared to be Obama’s emissary. He was the choir master at the Trinity Church of Christ which was under the direction of Pastor Jeremiah Wright and where Barack Obama is a member of the congregation. Donald Young informed Larry Sinclair that he, too, had a sex and drugs relationship with Barack Obama similar to his.

    At first he suggested that Obama was seeking the assistance of Jeremiah Wright in making a statement acknowledging his use of crack cocaine as recently as 1999. But he had second thoughts in early December 2007. Donald Young was murdered in his appartment at Christmas 2007.

    Larry Sinclair notified the Chicago police of his contacts with him but received no acknowledgment. Subsequently he has submitted a sworn affidavit which has so far not been acknowledged by the Chicago Police.

    Larry’ Sinclair’s original video on YouTube has received more than 800,000 hits and his blog is in the top ten percentile on WordPress.

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 11:16 pm | Quote

  1. 12. Duck said:


    (thanks Victor…..)

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 11:52 pm | Quote

  1. 13. Ya Don't Say! said:


    Hahaha very very entertaining! Larry STILL never gets even an inch closer to his goal. The same ole same ole over and over again. But not a drop closer to getting the story out. He writes the delegates and gets nada zilch nothing for it. They think he’s annoying and a rumor. LOLOLOL!

    Ok Ok Ok! I’ll let Larry have his press conference at my place.
    Free pizza. Bring yer own beer.

    posted May 22nd, 2008 at 11:56 pm | Quote

  1. 14. BigFraudDC said:


    OMG Larry wrote a dumb letter.

    Tomorrow on BigFraudDC:

    LARRY SINCLAIR SCRATCHES HIS ASSHOLE.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 12:57 am | Quote

  1. 15. STILLwaitingfortruth said:


    Anyone want a loaf of Banana “NUTTY ASS” Bread…

    Dear DNC,

    Barack did this, that and the other in my mouth, do you wanna buy a loaf of Banana Nut Bread?

    LOL

    Gullible Fools, as PT Barnum once stated: “There’s a sucker born every minute”…

    Wanna buy some Bread FOOL?

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 1:21 am | Quote

  1. 16. Donnie Darko said:


    “I agree with you, but you see, trying to be an informed bystander in this, I go to BHDC, Mitch and Nan’s site, and Larry Sinclair’s site to get my information.”

    Now THAT is funny shit!

    Yeah, this is all SO “informative”

    If anyone is getting their info from this, Mitch or Larry’s site, I weep for the future.
    You’re old…you should know better!

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:49 am | Quote

  1. 17. Interested Bystander said:


    Donnie Darko,

    Read the sentence BEFORE the one you bold typed. It says “in this”. You tell me where I should go to get my info “in this”. And the next sentence states that I try to go to most links also.

    Nice try though.

    And who says I’m old? How old is old? I consider myself “middle aged”.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 6:50 am | Quote

  1. 18. AJ said:


    I’d rather see Hillary run with McCain than with Obama! I am through with the Democrat party! They have openly shown how they can be bought, be corrupt, and be criminals right under the noses of all the mainstream.

    It is not a wonder why our congress is such a bunch of low life thugs! Was there ever really any unbiased media? Has it always been the back room support for whoever can give them the most money and favors?

    For F**K sakes, talk about disillusioned!!!

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 8:32 am | Quote

  1. 19. typical white person said:


    TWP will not be inclined to continue to fret about Larry Sinclair..he seems to have no proof. The only damage he has done is to make the superdelegates nervous about what’s coming next.

    Xbjllb I’m with you…the nature of the D’s at this point will be to circle the wagons, and wait. It is exactly what they have been doing.

    I do think it is highly likely that the video of Michelle Obama calling out “Whitey” does exist…it just sounds to me like something she would do. She is the link between Oh!Bama and Rev. Wright.

    Oh!Bama is going to collapse before August.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 8:38 am | Quote

  1. 20. STILLwaitingfortruth said:


    Nobody wants a Loaf Of Banana “Nutty Ass” Bread?

    All of you so called supporters are not supporters if Larry is having a hard time selling 200 loafs of Banana “Nutty Ass” Bread.

    You call yourselves friends…

    Bread, Bread for sale… Nutty Ass Bread…

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 9:43 am | Quote

  1. 21. Bobby said:


    Question:

    Why would anyone want some Bananna Nut Bread made by Larry Sinclair ?

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 11:32 am | Quote

  1. 22. Frank said:


    BigHeadRob, any reason why you didn’t at least blank out the recipient email addresses? Including them adds nothing to the story, but exposes the recipients to a lot of hate mail and threats from some of your wackier readers. What was the point of that? That shows a real lack of class on your part, and that says a lot! You’ve already set the bar really low, yet you’ve managed to limbo under it once again.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 11:56 am | Quote

  1. 23. Amazed said:


    Lame to include all the emails.

    Big Head should be ashamed: they led on this obvious nutjob, and now he’s floundering around. Sad.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 12:34 pm | Quote

  1. 24. Curioso said:


    fka Mike,

    About comment #9. I get the impression that Mitch is more trying to stick up for the people being sued by Larry Sinclair than sticking up for Barack Obama. Obama is the one running for office, it is his job to back himself up. He is clearly doing a good job. Again, Obama doesn’t have any obligation to address baseless, unproven claims against him. It isn’t anyones job to prove Larry wrong, it’s Larry’s job to prove that what he says is the truth. He has failed to do so.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 12:42 pm | Quote

  1. 25. STILLwaitingfortruth said:


    Banana “Nutty Ass” Bread anyone?

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Quote

  1. 26. Alex said:


    Wait, I forgot- what is his proof again?

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Quote

  1. 27. ANOTHER SWEETIE said:


    Stillwaitingfortruth,

    I agree with you, how could anyone eat Banana Nut Bread made by Sinclair? Yuk!!!

    HOWEVER I do think Sinclair is telling the truth and I do think Donald Young did sex and drugs with Obama.

    Go read the article on World Net Dailey out today regarding the meeting in D.C. yesterday http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=65066

    This investigator Cliff Kincaid has a lot of credibility. He has been on Hannity and many other shows and I feel he will be on to tell about this investigation. This is very damming for Obama. If Americans can still vote for Obama and be made aware of all of this evidence then they will deserve what they get however the rest of us will have it forced upon us.
    I just cannot believe that the Media,the politicians and the Americans for Obama won’t believe all of this. What is wrong with these people?

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:08 pm | Quote

  1. 28. ANOTHER SWEETIE said:


    I sometimes do read Sinclairs blog and it is rather amusing but also can be informative for those folks are die hard against Obama and I applaud them for that. As someone on here said it does get a little “back slappy” on his site though.

    I read that some poster on Sinclairs site sent these reports done by Cliff Kincaid that are described in the World net Daily article today to Geraldine Ferraro and that she returned the email to say that she was very interested in this. Ferraro is out to take Obama down too for she knows all of this that is out there and fears what he might do to our country, plus she did not like what his campaign did to her.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:17 pm | Quote

  1. 29. STILLwaitingfortruth said:


    ANOTHER SWEETIE,

    I have no beef with you but after reading your link, I am more convinced that ever that my association with my next door neighbor while growing up was a link to the communist party.

    That was some really, compelling and convincing information.

    High School mentor wow…

    I am convinced, sign me up for as a LS supporter.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Quote

  1. 30. Curioso said:


    Another Sweetie, you are correct. Sinclairs blog is informative to those folks that are die hard against Obama. I think that deep down inside, they also know there is no truth to what Sinclair is alleging. It’s just that they hate Obama. It really isn’t informative to anyone else, except to inform them how gullible some people can be.

    Now, on to World Net Daily. They have an agenda and a long history of being dishonest. Jerome Corsi has a long history of being dishonest to further his agenda. The article that has been linked above does nothing but allege some type of guilt by association. Poorly allege at that. It says that some guy that Obama mentioned in one of his books may or may not be some guy that may or may not have been a communist. Since Obama mentioned being influenced at some point in his life by this person, who possibly was a person who possibly was a communist, Obama is trying to destroy America.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:31 pm | Quote

  1. 31. Curioso said:


    I might add that Larry Sinclair has done very little to actually influence anyone at all regarding their votes. The people posting on his site were never going to vote for Obama.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:35 pm | Quote

  1. 32. Thanks BigheadRob... said:


    For including all of the email addresses to which Larry sent his gibberish! This afforded me the opportunity to also send them factual information (which they undoubtedly already have) about Larry Sinclair i.e. his numerous felony arrests, his outstanding warrants, etc. so they can put his accusations in better perspective. Thanks! It was time consuming but well worth it. I can send you a copy of the email, if you wouldn’t mind posting it!

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Quote

  1. 33. Bobby said:


    I wonder how the gay community feels about Larry Sinclair ?
    I wonder if gays are Embarassed by Larry Sinclair ?

    That would be a great topic for Bigheaddc to explore………

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 2:59 pm | Quote

  1. 34. ANOTHER SWEETIE said:


    These facts were produced through investigations done by Cliff Kincaid and another top investigative reporter. Here is Cliff’s website http://www.usasurvival.org/ and the reports with the facts documented are on Cliff’s website in PDF format, and this is not just from Obama’s High School Days however it started back then and comes all the way forward to “NOW”.
    Cliff Kincaid has nothing to do with World Net Daily. He is also independent politically, however he appears to be very conservative to me.
    I encourage and challenge you, those that are posting on here that are Obama supporters please read these reports, please research this man and PLEASE do not support him.
    Perhaps 1 incident with Rezco or, Wright, or Ayers or Auchi or the multitude of other unsavory and questionable characters that he has been associated with would be understandable but so many of them. That is who he is and what he is about.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:01 pm | Quote

  1. 35. Poor Larry said:


    xbjllb,

    Um…One of the people Larry sent his garbage to just endorsed Obama! Okay…you can now go back to your conspiracies!

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:03 pm | Quote

  1. 36. STILLwaitingfortruth said:


    ANOTHER SWEETIE,

    I applaud you for the work you are doing to support Larry and Hillary or John but I think I will have to go with my gut…

    I can honestly tell you that of the people that you mentioned on the Obama side of the ledger, I find Wright to be the least wicked. You wanna hear some real ministerial speeches buddy, come join me one Sunday and get the straight skinny from my minister.

    I offer you an open invite…

    Now if you want to really do some research, how about pulling up the yet to be fully documented record of the guy that you support and think is above reproach.

    It might take you some time to read it all but, Don’t worry, I will wait right here till you are done.

    Come back and let me know what you think of your inspiration after that.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:18 pm | Quote

  1. 37. xbjllb said:


    xbjllb,

    Um…One of the people Larry sent his garbage to just endorsed Obama! Okay…you can now go back to your conspiracies!

    Of course. After getting an untold number of death threats from you and your wacky insane compadres, I’d lie my ass off to the world too AND DO EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE AT THE CONVENTION.

    BET me.

    Thank God ObamaNation are far too stupid to see into people’s hearts and minds, and GO BY WHAT THEY SAY.

    Meaning the superdelegates, but hey, it goes TRIPLE for Obama hisself.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:24 pm | Quote

  1. 38. PUT UP OR SHUT UP said:


    xbjllb…You stick to that conspiracy theory if it makes you feel better. I know…you think the black population is going to riot if the sd’s endorse Hillary…so it’s going to be better to lie about it and then endorse Hillary? I’ll be out there rioting with them…and again, white, middle aged, middle class woman….WHO VOTES.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Quote

  1. 39. JENNY GREENLEAF FAN said:


    Jenny Greenleaf, one of the recently contact superdeleagtes has endorsed Barack Obama:

    “Breaking from Blue Oregon, Oregon’s DNC Committeewoman and superdelegate Jenny Greenleaf announces her support for Obama..

    The netroots is my political home and where I got started, so I have chosen to announce my endorsement here on BlueOregon.

    The voters of Oregon have spoken, and I have listened.

    I will be supporting Senator Barack Obama at the Democratic National Convention in August. Senator Obama has the vision and leadership ability to move this country forward and to undo the damage done by the Bush administration. I am proud to support him in this endeavor and will do whatever I can to make sure Oregon’s electoral votes are Democratic this fall.

    Our Democratic Party of Oregon will be the hub for the presidential campaign in Oregon. I hope you will join me in volunteering with the DPO to turn Senator Obama into President Obama.

    I have the utmost respect and admiration for Senator Hillary Clinton. She has run a great campaign and has contributed much to our national debate. She deserves our thanks for her service, her leadership and her candidacy.
    Obama now needs just 56 more delegates… We can make this happen. Let’s do our part by making calls to Montana and South Dakota…”

    Plus 4 other superdelegates, one of whom defected from Hillary Clinton….55 more to go!

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm | Quote

  1. 40. JENNY GREENLEAF FAN said:


    Oops..that should say 56 more to go…sorry

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm | Quote

  1. 41. Vietnam marine said:


    you know I read about this sincalir guy here and i finally went over to his site and that mitch site. all of them are a bunch of fanatics. But I was amazed at all the racist implications on that sinclair site and the hate. i spent a many hours looking at what this sinclair guy had to say and then thought, he is full of shit. be it true or not, why would anyone believe it. you have to be half brain dead. now if you really are a bigot or just hate Obama, well it’s possible you believe anything negative. but come on folks. sinclair says he started this campaign back last year some time trying to get a hold of Obama and when his, I assume, extortion didn’t worked, he did that laughable utube thing. and let’s see it is now just about the end of may and he has only flapped his big mouth. and everyone keeps asking for the same thing, show me the beef. and what does he show, a receipt for a motel in Gurnee. oh wow. I just looked through my receipts and have a motel receipt for the Days Inn in Chicago for Nov 19 to Nov 21, 1999 so does that mean I also had sex and did cocaine with whoever I want to accuse. I’m not gay,so don’t accuse me of meeting up with Obama but hey maybe that was Opray with me. I can’t prove it, I don’t have any witnesses, I don’t have proof I actually was in Chicago, I don’t have credit card receipts of the limo I rented or the bar tab and I can’t produce the driver of the limo, but it was a company in Chicago in 1999 that no longer exist, but hey I said it and it must be true. Now Opray deny it. Now I wouldn’t even believe me and I am not a ex con who has extorted, robbed, lied, ran drugs and people, and was basically a leach on society all my life. Is it too much to ask for in this country, a country founded on the principles of law, that if you want to accuse another of a misdeed, you have to prove it with some type of real evidence. evidence that can stand up in the courts. Maybe I fought for the wrong country, because if this is kind of character assassination that can go on and on, we have lost. then I see so many say that sinclair has to be telling the truth cuz why would be put himself in this position” well people, if you live long enough and really look at what people do, liars do sound out the loudest and they don’t care what anyone thinks. The craziest people are the ones who jump up and yell the loudest in a crowd. then I read about, well if Obama didn’t do it then he will say so. that’s a bunch of shit too, why, because it give creditability to sinclair. This internet is great, but much of it is no more than a rag. You defend yourself on this rag against sinclair, then it’s someone else, then another, then another then another, get my drift. You don’t give credence to these types of allegations until the press presents it to you. It’s like the rumor about McCain and the lobbyist, it was going around since last year, but McCain responded only when the real press presented it. Same with Hillary, there are several, including the Globe, that accused her of being a lesbian. Has she ever publically denounced that allegation NO. It’s below her dignity, as this is below Obama’s. sinclair is not even worth a reply from anyone.
    and lastly, this thing about Obama having the connections to have people killed and more, how utterly ridiculous can one get. If that was true how hard would it to be to put this sinclair away. the intelligence of these people just amaze me.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Quote

  1. 42. Vietnam marine said:


    another sweetie- Cliff Kincaid, has went off the deep end a long time ago, he turned into no more than a modern day Joe McCarthy and has been a big conspiracy theorists for years. My two ploy sci porfessors in college were socialist so does that make this old republican marine a socialist, tell me that sweetie.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:45 pm | Quote

  1. 43. PUT UP OR SHUT UP said:


    Vietnam marine…

    very good concise summary…not too passionate, but passionate enough.

    BTW…thank you for all your posts here, which I should have said earlier. I appreciated reading that discourse about John McCain. I was totally in the dark about him. I’m not in line with his policy positions so it didn’t influence me, but it was interesting reading.

    Thank you for your service to our country, even if it allows a lot of inane chatter. It’s better than the lack of freedom any day of the week.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:47 pm | Quote

  1. 44. Curioso said:


    Another Sweetie, do a quick Google search on Cliff Kincaid. You can’t tell me he is independent any more than you can say Fox News is “fair and balanced”. Kincaid is a rabid anti-communist. Much in the same respect as Joe McCarthy. He doesn’t approach issues ‘independently’, he approaches them with a pre-determined agenda. He decides where his investigations are going to go, regardless of where the facts take him. Then he writes in biased language. His “investigation” set out to prove that Obama was a communist, not to prove whether or not he was a communist. The evidence he provides doesn’t conclude anything. ESPECIALLY ABOUT LARRY SINCLAIR!!!

    Sorry Another Sweetie, you are letting your hatred for Obama get in the way of real issues.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 3:52 pm | Quote

  1. 45. Eddie Van Brezinsky said:


    I had sex with Larry Sinclair Barack Obama Rudy Guiliani and Lou Dobbs Dec. 4, 2005 at the Howard Johnson Hotel located at 1922 Boston Rd - Bronx NY one block from the West Farmers Square Station and one mile from the Bronx Zoo. I have hotel receipts to prove it.

    Here are some of the amenities we enjoyed while staying there for 4 days:

    * Cable Television including Adult channels
    * Coffeemakers
    * Complimentary Breakfast
    * Children Stay Free - 12 YEARS AND UNDER
    * Comp newspapers in lobby
    * Rollaway bed - Fees May Apply
    * Cribs - Fees May Apply
    * Wake Up Service
    * Internet public area - wireless
    * Internet public area - comp
    * Parking (secure) - Complimentary

    I paid $59.00 per day for us to stay there. I have a witness, Mr. Jahn Denko who was the taxi driver who took us there. At this time though Mr. Denko has left the country to go back to his native country Slovakia but is willing to return if he can get a spot on the David Letterman show.

    I cannot make banana nut bread but I make a killer chicken pot pie which I will be auctioning off to raise legal funds for $12.99 each plus shipping and tax (if applicable). I have made 627 pies so far. Instructions on how to cook it will be included along with photographic proof that I really baked these pies myself.

    Thank you for your support.

    The truth shall prevail.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 4:32 pm | Quote

  1. 46. Vietnam marine said:


    Put up, thank you, it’s people like you that makes me proud to have served as a marine. the so-called chatter can be annoying, but I rather have the freedom than not. it’s just too bad we get these guys like sincalir that abuse it. all i want is people to look deep, check things out, and don’t play on your fears and prejudices. and when someone does as sinclair does, make him put up or shut up.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 4:37 pm | Quote

  1. 47. Eddie Van Brezinsky said:


    One more thing, we did not do drugs but we did have a case of nitrous oxide, balloons and french ticklers.

    Pleae contact me if you are a lawyer, a press agent, a blogger, a radio host, a tv host, a veternarian, a real estate agent, a pulitzer prize winning newsman, a circus trapeze performer, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Karl Rove, Kevin Spacey or Paul Reubens.

    I am also looking for work.

    Thank you for your support.

    posted May 23rd, 2008 at 4:47 pm | Quote

  1. 48. Gemini said:


    Vietnam Marine your #41 post is an excellent analysis of whats going on. Let me add to it just a bit. I wrote this yesterday on Mitch and Nan’s blog:

    I cannot believe each and everytime a super delegate writes back to them, if it is NOT what THEY want to hear, the delegates are DEMONIZED and “exposed”. This seems to be $inclair’s Modus Operendi from day one.

    1. Apparently because the Obama camp “ignored” $inclair he EXPOSED Obama and his campaign head.

    2. People like the three bloogers didn’t believe him so he exposes them and links them to Obama and sues them!!!

    3. The lie detector tests doesn’t believe him (hahahaha) so he exposes the lie detector technicians, Whitehouse.com, the sponsors of the test, and again, links them all to…you got it…Obama.

    4. He writes an open letter to Michelle Obama and apparently no word from her made him attack her even more AND he linked…oh forget it, she’s Obama’s wife.

    5. The attorneys for the defendants don’t believe him and file papers attesting to that fact and…you guessed it, he exposes them and links THEM to Obama.

    6. You, Mitch, Nan, and everyone who blogs on this OPPOSITION site about “The Sinclair Affair” are targets also. We have been linked to the Obama campaign, the attorneys for the defendants’ office and God only knows what else. Those who he CAN get information about has been exposed and demonized simply because WE want to get at the TRUTH.

    7. That poor doctor in NY who wrote a blog about not believing $inclair is e