HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Wednesday May 7th, 2008 9:06 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Larry Sinclair

…on national television, no less. But will any TV producers/hosts take him up on his offer?

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 374 Comments to 'Larry Sinclair Vows to Make a Big Revelation…'


  1. 1. tofer david said:


    you go larry! can’t wait.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:09 pm | Quote

  1. 2. Dega said:


    It’s time!!!

    Good luck Mr. Sinclair.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:15 pm | Quote

  1. 3. we want the truth said:


    Good Luck Larry

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:16 pm | Quote

  1. 4. MF said:


    For the sake of the country, Larry, we need these stations to air your exclusive. Obama could actually damage the Democratic Party at this point.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:18 pm | Quote

  1. 5. Allaboutthetruth! said:


    Way to go Larry! You ROCK and stand tall.
    Truth will prevail!

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:21 pm | Quote

  1. 6. Mitchisaturd said:


    it might be safer to make this revelation in a court with the media covering it…because it would be under oath. then the driver could be sworn in and questioned on the stand.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:42 pm | Quote

  1. 7. annie said:


    I think we will be seeing you on TV in the very near future Larry. Keep up the fight. There’s a whole lot of people behind you.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:44 pm | Quote

  1. 8. Mitchisaturd said:


    posted May 7th, 2008 at 9:45 pm | Quote

  1. 9. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    Wouldn’t it be just as effective for Larry to have his little press conference on YouTube? Hell, he could have the limo driver right there telling his story? At least THAT would be feasible.

    Of course Larry’s proposal to the MSM is just silly. Never in the history or future of broadcast journalism would such an offer be entertained. How do they know Larry wouldn’t get on there and start performing arm-pit songs.

    Larry might as well say he agrees to release the name of the limo driver on CNN under the condition that Anderson Cooper screws him while he blows Sanjay Gupta.

    Let’s face it kids. There never has, nor will there ever be a limo driver.

    This definately sums up the story well:

    http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/there-will-be-no-driver-verificationever/

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Quote

  1. 10. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    tofer david, Dega, MF, and Annie…

    The only way Larry Sinclair is getting on national television is if he lands a spot on Deal or No Deal. And even that show may be too intellectually taxing for him.

    Regardless, you should free up Tivo space for his big appearance… start deleting those episodes of American Gladiators and/or your favorite fishing show(s).

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 10:12 pm | Quote

  1. 11. Lee said:


    But what can be expected from all this? I thought Sinclair already gave out the driver’s name (a guy with an Indian name??). So what is this about???

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 10:15 pm | Quote

  1. 12. Helter Skelter said:


    Wouldn’t it be just as effective for Larry to have his little press conference on YouTube? Hell, he could have the limo driver right there telling his story? At least THAT would be feasible.

    Of course Larry’s proposal to the MSM is just silly. Never in the history or future of broadcast journalism would such an offer be entertained. How do they know Larry wouldn’t get on there and start performing arm-pit songs.

    Larry might as well say he agrees to release the name of the limo driver on CNN under the condition that Anderson Cooper screws him while he blows Sanjay Gupta.

    Let’s face it kids. There never has, nor will there ever be a limo driver.

    This definately sums up the story well:

    http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/there-will-be-no-driver-verificationever/

    That is the truth, but I admit, it is hilarious seeing all his little followers get so excited. I so enjoy Tofer the Queen that just loves his little Larry *kisses* and Dega, poor, poor Dega, he’s been a follower since the YouTube days. They need this so badly. Can’t you just picture them jumping up and down? Waiting and waiting and waiting. I must give it to Larry. He is a clever one, stringing his minions along like that. Knowing full well it’s never going to happen. Why can’t he just do it without Obama and Axelrod and force them to respond? Because that would be too easy. He’s hosed and he knows it. Hell, even if he did it on YouTube with just him and the limo driver, I might even become a follower. He doesn’t need Obama if he gets on MSM, they would take care of him, as in it would be over for him. Oh well, you gotta play Larry’s way or no way at all.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 10:20 pm | Quote

  1. 13. Mitchisaturd said:


    Lee, you have not been paying attention. Larry has never provided the limo driver’s name to MSM. Many folks have attempted to guess and claim to know the name. Larry’s attorney knows the limo driver. If you want to know about the truth then just wait for court and the MSM…it could be a long wait…but the truth will be revealed…it always comes out.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 10:23 pm | Quote

  1. 14. Interested Bystander said:


    There you are Helter,
    You didn’t respond to my last post on the Palfry blog.

    Come on now, none of us know if Larry knows the Limo driver, but on the other blog, you brought up about McCain couldn’t “keep his zipper up”, and both parties in that incident deny the charges. Come on now. Be objective.

    Why would Larry allow the name to come out without Obama or Axelrod there. They could “spin” it otherwise. I would be an interested bystander waiting to see the look on BO’s face when the name was given. You know 90% of the time, you can tell if someone is lying by their eyes and response to a question.

    I am in no way a Larry supporter, let’s get that straight, but BO has not responded (except through Young if you believe Larry) to any of these allegations either directly or indirectly. At least McCain has denied the accusations on the other issue you raised.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 11:09 pm | Quote

  1. 15. Interested Bystander said:


    Larry supposedly gave the name as P Multani (something like that) in the comment section of one of his you tube videos. That’s probably where they are saying he has given it up. By the same token, I have seen on here where someone who could not be Larry, posts things under Larry’s name. On Larry’s blog he is saying tha Multani (excuse me if I am spelling that wrong) will be in this persons name……very interesting to those of us waiting to see what is going to happen.

    And for the record, I do not think the MSM will pick this up until someone of questionable credibility (someone like Drudge) picks it up.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 11:14 pm | Quote

  1. 16. Back In Black said:


    Can’t wait to see the Obama Perp Walk! And the Wright Perp Walk as well.

    “Mitch” and all its sucklings will have their 10 seconds of fame when they’re filmed being led off to jail in in a chain-gang Keep your heads up now!

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 11:16 pm | Quote

  1. 17. Bama Drama said:


    It’s about to get good!

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 11:27 pm | Quote

  1. 18. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    Here is a typical Larrykrishna:

    Mitchisaturd said:
    Lee, you have not been paying attention. Larry has never provided the limo driver’s name to MSM. Many folks have attempted to guess and claim to know the name. Larry’s attorney knows the limo driver. If you want to know about the truth then just wait for court and the MSM…it could be a long wait…but the truth will be revealed…it always comes out.

    Turd, I’m assuming you’re a retarded person. I was on YouTube the night that Larry gave the name of the limo driver. Here is his statement:

    LarrySinclair0926
    The following is a gift to all in a “pay it forward” dedicated to thedon, the name of the driver for 5 star limo service is P. Multani

    And now Larry’s own post from his blog showed that this is the same name he gave the Chicago Tribune:

    From: Crewdson, John M. (JCrewdson@tribune.com)
    Sent: Mon 5/05/08 6:26 PM
    To: lws022737@hotmail.com

    You’re right. I should have checked with you before I answered Mitch. But I answer all email from readers and my answer would have been the same-because its true.If you’re talking about Multani, I haven’t ‘had him the whole damn time.’ The trail went cold in Tupelo where his wife and son insisted he had returned to India. If you know different please let me know. JC
    John Crewdson
    Senior Correspondent
    Chicago Tribune

    So how can you say that Larry hasn’t given the limo driver’s name to the media?

    Put your helmet back on and pop in your Blue’s Clues DVD. Moron.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 11:49 pm | Quote

  1. 19. Victor said:


    Larry offered to name the driver if he was given a national slot in which he could confront Obama and Axelrod.

    He did not offer to have the driver with him on the show as I read his post (unless he has subsequently edited it).

    No TV producer could arrange a confrontation between Larry and and Obama and Axelrod.

    So the offer would have to be changed if it were to be meaningful.

    Producers would be interested in knowing who the driver is.

    They would be more interested in interviewing him.

    Assuming he provided the ammunition they could then confront Obama and Axelrod directly or indirectly.

    There are many ways the driver’s identity could be protected.

    If the driver did not want to come forward the attorney could take a sworn deposition from him and then release it to the media omitting identifying details.

    posted May 7th, 2008 at 11:55 pm | Quote

  1. 20. Duck said:


    Larry has lied, Larry is lying, and Larry will continue to lie. So what else is new?

    He has had the past 4 months to put up or shut up and he has not proven shit. He is a lying piece of shit and nothing has changed!

    End of story!

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:01 am | Quote

  1. 21. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    BRENDA GIVES VICTOR A GOOD RUN FOR MOST RETARDED LARRY FAN

    From Larry’s blog…

    Brenda Says:
    Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 10:19 pm
    I do not know if this would work or how but just give it a listen and you guys are so smart you can figure a way to do it. A man at his wedding did this. At the reception, at the toast he gave, he told everyone he had a present for them. To look under their chairs and take the envelope and wanted everyone to open at one time. When they did, to everyone’s surprise except the groom was a picture of his bride having sex with his best man. The father of the bride had spent over $30,000 on the wedding and there were 300 guests. He made another toast as he walked out “Fuck you all”. He had suspected something was going on and had a detective check it out. The story goes the bridegroom got an annullment the next day. If there was someway to put the flyers in envelopes at one of his shindigs, people would open them up automatically. I would love to see Obama’s face then–a real Kodak moment. Just a thought.

    Brenda, I’m assuming you were either born stupid or your father smacked you in the head one too many times when you inadequately serviced him.

    Maybe you could come up with some other ideas based on really lame urban legends. Maybe Larry could threaten Obama with pop rocks and Pepsi.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:02 am | Quote

  1. 22. Interested Bystander said:


    Mitch,

    You are a very rude man.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:13 am | Quote

  1. 23. Mitchisaturd said:


    LarryLarryXanaxFairy must be Mitch, as you lack objectivity and do not seem interested in the truth.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:29 am | Quote

  1. 24. Mitchisaturd said:


    get ready for the republican swiftboating of Sen. Obama…its coming soon. This is Obama

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:34 am | Quote

  1. 25. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    Please, turd. Please give me one piece of evidence that shows this “truth” of which you speak. I believed in Larry during the first few weeks of the YouTube days. I no longer do.

    After a while I was smart enough to realize that nothing was happening. He’s been promising the limo driver for months. He kept saying it would be soon. He promised a press conference months ago. He gave the name and now he claims he didn’t. Reporters have followed up on the name and found nothing but a man who’s in India. Now he gives these absurd criteria for releasing a new name?!?!?… criteria that can never be met.

    The fact that you still believe him isn’t “objective” it’s blind hate of Obama based on no evidence.

    If you believe Larry then you should be sending him every spare dollar you have.

    I’m curious to know how much you’ve actually donated to him. I’m guessing it’s not very much. $100? $200? nothing at all? From the pitiful amounts he’s raised, it doesn’t look like his followers believe him enough to give up their hard earned cash in any great way.

    So how much have you given? Tell us. And be proud of it.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:44 am | Quote

  1. 26. James said:


    Re: Victor

    I presume the details have already been ironed out between Mr. Sibley, Mr. Sinclair and the driver. This piece of information would have been among the first ones Mr. Sibley would have checked before filing the claim.

    The press will contact Mr. Sibley. They already knew something was happening, from Mr. Levy’s recent moves.

    It will take a few days for the press to have enough to go public. I don’t believe Mr. Sibley will let them have access to the driver as a matter of right. Mr. Sibley is in the driver’s seat, forgive the metaphor, as he should be.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:46 am | Quote

  1. 27. Helter Skelter said:


    There you are Helter,
    You didn’t respond to my last post on the Palfry blog.

    Come on now, none of us know if Larry knows the Limo driver, but on the other blog, you brought up about McCain couldn’t “keep his zipper up”, and both parties in that incident deny the charges. Come on now. Be objective.

    Why would Larry allow the name to come out without Obama or Axelrod there. They could “spin” it otherwise. I would be an interested bystander waiting to see the look on BO’s face when the name was given. You know 90% of the time, you can tell if someone is lying by their eyes and response to a question.

    I am in no way a Larry supporter, let’s get that straight, but BO has not responded (except through Young if you believe Larry) to any of these allegations either directly or indirectly. At least McCain has denied the accusations on the other issue you raised.

    Sorry, I had stuff to do. Anyway, I am not talking about the NYT article, just in general. It’s how he got with Cindy…adultery. There are skeletons there, that was all I meant, they ALL have them. Go to www.realchange.org, it’s is interesting, got stuff on everyone, including Obama. W. has lots of goodies. Anyway, McCain had to deny, it was in the newspaper. No one should have to deny some underground bullshit. They would be spending half their time dong that instead of more important things because there is a ton of it out there. Larry is just one of many.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:49 am | Quote

  1. 28. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    Mr. Sibley in the driver’s seat?

    The man is joke in the legal community. Do your research, you moron.

    Good day, punk.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:49 am | Quote

  1. 29. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    MORE PROOF THAT LARRY IS A F*CKING IDIOT

    “Maybe there seems to be a sight misunderstanding. I offered them the chance to stand/sit face to face. I do not care if they do or not. I will disclose the drivers name on live TV only and on a nationwide broadcast as these people will do nothing but attack his family and him if it is released on the web.”

    Larry, you claimed that the limo driver was a good friend of Obama. Wouldn’t that mean that Obama already knows who he is? Wouldn’t he have already been in contact with the limo driver about your claims? Wouldn’t he have had him paid off a long time ago?

    Your story doesn’t make any sense.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 12:57 am | Quote

  1. 30. James said:


    28. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:

    Mr. Sibley in the driver’s seat?

    The man is joke in the legal community. Do your research, you moron.

    Good day, punk.

    Answer:

    I do not judge lawyers on their reputation. Mr. Levy has a great reputation, and I happen to believe he is not competent for that kind of case, judging from what I have read (his pleadings).

    Lawyers like Mr. Sibley are not that uncommon. Some are very good, some are not. In any event, he cannot do worse than Mr. Sinclair on his own.

    Lawyers win a case when they have got the facts.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:02 am | Quote

  1. 31. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    Wow, Larry’s campaign must really be working well. Obama has now pulled ahead of McCain in the national polls as of this week.

    GALLUP 5/6/08

    Obama 46%
    McCain 45%

    Looks like Larry and Rev. Wright just can’t stick to Obama (now coated with Teflon)

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:07 am | Quote

  1. 32. STILLwaitingfortruth said:


    When it starts to make sense reach for a weapon and kill yourself as at that moment you will officially have become brain damaged.

    For all of the Larry supports…

    Riddle me this please: IF Obama got head from Larry and did crack in the back of Larry’s Limo (Rented of course). What would be the overwhelming reason for Obama to come on tv and let Larry discredit him? Please explain just why Obama would do it. At this point he is untouchable to Larry and his Lawyer.

    Larry has no legal leg to stand on whatsoever and despite his followers best efforts to hand out flyers and to send email to even the likes of Rush Limbaugh, it has done NOTHING to keep Obama from being the front runner.

    If Larry has no driver and no proof his arguments are in vain.

    We keep hearing over and over that Larry is going to sue someone, come on people, on what grounds? If Obama has totally ignored Larry what legal argument do you think he and Sibley can come up with that would compel Barack to come to court? NONE !!!!

    MORE PROOF THAT LARRY IS A F*CKING IDIOT

    “Maybe there seems to be a sight misunderstanding. I offered them the chance to stand/sit face to face. I do not care if they do or not. I will disclose the drivers name on live TV only and on a nationwide broadcast as these people will do nothing but attack his family and him if it is released on the web.”

    Larry, you claimed that the limo driver was a good friend of Obama. Wouldn’t that mean that Obama already knows who he is? Wouldn’t he have already been in contact with the limo driver about your claims? Wouldn’t he have had him paid off a long time ago?

    Your story doesn’t make any sense.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:11 am | Quote

  1. 33. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    This may be true, James. But where are the facts of this case?

    Larry did an extensive interview with the Chicago Tribune, but the reporter was not able to find any corroborating evidence.

    Nothing has happened with this thing in months. No limo driver. No press conference. Larry said he would retake a polygraph live online. That never happened. He’s never even taken another polygraph. Or if he did, he failed again and hasn’t told us. Not surprising.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:13 am | Quote


  1. […] If the driver did not want to come forward the attorney could take a sworn deposition from him and then release it to the media omitting identifying details. POSTED MAY 7TH, 2008 AT 11:55 PM | QUOTE […]

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:14 am | Quote

  1. 35. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:


    BON FIGHTS FOR LEAD IN MOST RETARDED LARRY FAN RACE

    Bon Says:
    Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 11:50 pm
    Producers may find it astonishing that Larry is volunteering a face to face interview on live TV with Obama/Axelrod. That shows that Larry is not afraid to speak his truth. That’s being really up front.

    Larry wanting to appear live on national television doesn’t prove he’s brave or even sane for that matter.

    Hell, there’s a guy who begs for money on State Street that would gladly go on Chris Matthews and tell everyone how he licked Margaret Thatcher’s tuna taco, that doesn’t mean it happened.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:30 am | Quote

  1. 36. Bomas said:


    LarryLarryXanaxFairy, what you don’t understand is that Larry’s not going to give the name of the driver to just anyone. He will only reveal it to CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX, MSNBC, or anyone who teases him at 3 a.m. on a Saturday on YouTube.

    Are you insane? Asking Larry for proof? Here’s the proof: Larry HAS proof! If he didn’t, why would he SAY he has proof?

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:54 am | Quote

  1. 37. Shee-it said:


    There goes Larry’s spell checker…

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:55 am | Quote

  1. 38. Captain America said:


    i believe there is some truth to Larry sinclair’s story — watch out tripping over that choir guys dead body from Obama’s church

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 1:59 am | Quote

  1. 39. Helter Skelter said:


    Wow, even Victor is questioning the limo driver story? He’s been Larry’s biggest supporter (and smartest…I alway knew that boy was gonna be okay!). Larry better do what he can to hang on to Victor or he’s going to come crashing down. Okay, he’s going to crash anyway, it will just be sooner than later. Of course there will always be the “Squeaky Fromme” of the “Family” that will keep on going, even when it’s so over. My guess is that Laretard would be Allabouttruth. I think he would die for Larry (and hopefully leave all of his money from his disability to him).

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 2:00 am | Quote

  1. 40. Shee-it said:


    Driving home last night before any of this hit, I recall wondering how someone of Victor’s obvious intelligence (of which logic is certainly a function) could possibly not see through this. If I were LS, I’d be grateful; or at LEAST be careful enough not to spank the man publicly.

    Shee-it…

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 2:11 am | Quote

  1. 41. Scary Unclear said:


    Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 11:50 pm
    Producers may find it astonishing that Larry is volunteering a face to face interview on live TV with Obama/Axelrod. That shows that Larry is not afraid to speak his truth. That’s being really up front.

    Hey, Helen Keller, put your fingers on my lips and follow along - you…are…a…fucking…retard.

    Producers will not find this “astonishing”. They’ll scratch their heads and wonder what took him so long and probably smile broadly as they tell him that his moment has passed.

    It’s NOT “being really upfront”. “Being really upfront” would have been giving the media everything they asked for WHEN THEY ASKED FOR IT. Instead, papatard kept refusing to pony up. This story, except for the web and in the Thorazine-addled, fetal alcohol syndrome-clouded, is dead.

    It’s called “timing” folks. We, the PMS Group, have tried repeatedly to tell you this but you won’t and will not listen. Did you know that one of the employees from the database company that Florida hired for the 2000 election testified that they were told to help steal the Florida election in Congress? Think THAT would have made the MSM? It didn’t.

    So before you start believing that “THE TRUTH ™ will always come out, think again. papatard pissed away his chance to derail Obama.

    Boo hoo.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 2:39 am | Quote

  1. 42. Anonymous said:


    9. LarryLarryXanaxFairy said:

    Wouldn’t it be just as effective for Larry to have his little press conference on YouTube? Hell, he could have the limo driver right there telling his story? At least THAT would be feasible.

    Of course Larry’s proposal to the MSM is just silly. Never in the history or future of broadcast journalism would such an offer be entertained. How do they know Larry wouldn’t get on there and start performing arm-pit songs.

    Larry might as well say he agrees to release the name of the limo driver on CNN under the condition that Anderson Cooper screws him while he blows Sanjay Gupta.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

    Whoever you are… you are funnnyyyyyyyy!!!

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 4:02 am | Quote

  1. 43. Larry Sinclair Supporter said:


    (I am reposting this)

    Dear Larry -

    Larry this is getting silly. There is no way Obama and Axelrod are going on national tv with you and the limo driver to refute what you and he has to say. That just isn’t going to happen.

    I don’t really understand you. I believe that you are telling the truth. I believe you. But what I don’t understand is, if you have the limo drivers name and he is willing to speak why don’t you release all this info to someone like Matt Drudge? He broke the Monica Lewinsky story with Bill Clinton. I used to listen to Matt Drudge’s radio show. He is a staunch conservative and would publish your story in a heartbeat. So would Sean Hannity. Why don’t you send them the info or even meet with them. Sean, I’m sure would put you and your lawyer, Mr. Sibley and the limo driver on his show “Hannity and Colmes”.

    Someone else mentioned that you could do a new youtube video with Mr. Sibley and the limo driver. Then the MSM could show that video every half hour for months to come. This would be the biggest story ever. Bigger than the Monica story.

    I don’t understand why you won’t do this. Larry we don’t have that much time left. I have heard that the superdelegates will make up their mind by the middle of June. And it looks like they are leaning towards Obama. We can’t let this happen.

    For the sake of our country Larry, please please please release the information so we can deny Obama the wannabe dictator from destroying America. If he takes office, it might mean the end of the world as we know it.

    I do not know what you are waiting for. I cannot figure it out. But I believe you Larry, so be the hero I know you can be and do the right thing. This will be hard for you but you can save our nation.

    Let the Truth Prevail Larry! Please do the right thing and put an end to Obama. I know you can!

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 4:27 am | Quote

  1. 44. Mike said:


    I have watched this train wreck for too long. My exams start on monday and I feel I would be a lot more confident if I had dedicated myself to my revision as much as I dedicated myself to exposing Larry for the liar I believe he is.

    But maybe I have gone about it the wrong way, maybe we have all gone about it the wrong way.

    The Larry supporters believe Larry is telling the truth and they have closed their minds to the possibility of him lieing, the Larry opposers believe he is lying and they have closed their mind on the possibility of him telling the truth.

    But at the of the day, only one side can be right.

    Now lets look at the facts, for over 5 months, Larry with the help of his supporters have been trying to get this story out on the MSM. Unfortunately the MSM has ignored them repeatedly and they believe that it must be a conspiracy of sort….

    The truth is without proof of his accusation Larry is just another celebrity story, like Mccain’s Black babby or Hillary’s Lesbian etc. Alot of people view Larry’s blog and alot of people have heard about his story but the important thing is ALOT OF PEOPLE DO NOT BELIEVE HIS STORY!!!

    It’s that simple, the majority of people follow the basic tenent that a person is innocent till proven guilty and even republicans, pundits, Obama haters and Obama lovers who are reasonable and objective will never jump to the conclusion that Larry is telling the truth. That is just the way the world is.

    This of cours does not mean Larry is lying, all it means is that most people (even people who hate BO) would not just believe Larry on the strength of his word.

    Put yourself in the average person’s shoes,one day during election period (which is the one time that rumours are free to fly everywhere) you recieve a mail in your inbox about the whole Larry Snclair debacle, this story is not in the news, so what do you do ? a little bit of research. Well your research tuns up Larry’s criminal record and the fact that he might have failed a lie detector test. The average person when they see all this immediately discount Larry’s story. This isn’t me trying to batter Larry its just a fact. Most people are not as passionate as we are and would not bother to immense themselves in all the details all they will do is look at surface details and unfortunately for Larry, the surface evidence are not in his favour.

    We the Larry opposers have been trying to tell the other side that is Larry that needs to prove his allegations but you people have kept up this argument that he doesn’t need to. The fact remains that no matter how much you wish or cry, this story will never go anywhere without real evidence.

    In today’s political climate, there are too many stories about politicans and except your story can be corraborated by a witness or evidence, no body is going to touch it.

    That brings us to Larry. Larry has claimed he doesn’t want to release evidence till he gets to court. The problem with this logic is that Larry is not going to require evidence of his alegations to Obama in court. Larry may sue the bloggers and everyone else but all that does is make him rich, it is never going to give him media attention.

    The case in court is a case of disclosure, that is Larry wants the identity of certain anonymous people to be released so that he could due them. Even if he is succesful, this is going to take an insane amount of time and it is very unlikely that him winning this case would bring media exposure.

    So how can Larry get media exposure ?

    Well the fact is he needs a witness or evidence. No one will touch this story until someone else or something corraborates it. It’s that simple. You can email all the Bill o’REILLY’S and Hannity’s but they would just ignore you till you actually provided a corraborating witness or evidence.

    Now what does Larry have to say about this ?
    Well Larry say’s he would only release the driver’s name on national tv (not he said the drivers name, he never said the driver himself-just his name!). Now anyone would know that this is going nowhere. No reputable media source would ever allow a person on Larry’s character access to live TV just to release a name. They would need much more than that.

    My point is, while all you Larry supporters accuse us of trying to suppress the story, the only person that has the power to break this story is Larry Sinclair.
    Larry has the driver, he has the evidence, he has everything. He doesn’t even need the MSM to break the story he could have an interview with his attorney and the driver and post it on youtube.

    The original Larry video was a success because he got the attention of over a million people, just think about it for a minute, if Larry actuall had all his evidence stacked up, with his Lawyer and the driver with a comprehensive list of questions and answers, I have no doubt that his story will break.

    Larry can also give his evidence and witness to John Crewson who happens to be a Pultizer prize winning journalist, this journalist has made it clear to Larry that he would investigate this thing further if he could get hold of the driver. Yet Larry has failed to provide the driver.

    We can spin it however we want, the fact is Larry hasn’t done all he needs to do to get this story out, his only condition now is that he must release just the drivers name on live tv!! Come on!! that is mega childish, no one has paid him any attention yet and somehow he belives he is powerful enough to broker that kind of deal ?

    Why is Larry protecting the drivers identity ? obama already knows who the driver is, so either the driver is in with Obama, or the driver is in danger from Obama, either way, it makes no sense for Larry to protect the driver’s name.

    It’s really simple,Larry has all the faxts and all the evidence and all the witnesses. We have nothing. For anyone to take him seriously, he needs to provide some corraborationg evidence unconditionally. Larry hasn’t done this. He has made conditions that make it hard for his story to be verified and as a result this is going nowhere.

    SO THIS IS MY PLEA. ALL LARRY FANS AND ALL LARRY OPPOSERS, THE ONLY WAY WE CAN GET THE TRUTH IS TO UNITE AND ASK LARRY TO DO THE RIGHT THING. HE HAS ALL THE FACTS AND EVIDENCE, IF HE REALLY WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA FROM A GAY NEGROE CRACKHEAD THEN HE HAS TO RELEASE THIS INFORMATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. AMERICA CAN NOT AFFORD TO WAIT FOR HIM TO MAKE CONDITIONS THAT WE ALL KNOW WILL NEVER BE MET. THE EASIEST AND QUICKEST WAY FOR THIS TO END IS FOR LARRY TO HAVE HIS EVIDENCE AND HIS WITNESS, GO ON YOUTUBE WITH IT, THEN BEGIN TO CONTACT MEDIA SOURCES. HOWEVER WHATEVER HOPE WE HAVE OF GETTING THIS STORY OUT ON THE MSM WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE FIRST IS JUST A DREAM.

    SO THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT LARRY—-UNLESS OF COURSE YOU DO NOT REALLY CARE ABOUT GETTING THIS STORY OUT AND ALL YOU CARE ABOUT IS THE “FAME”, MONEY, AND ADULATION FROM YOUR SUPPORTERS.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 5:15 am | Quote

  1. 45. xbjllb said:


    Unfortunately, we might all find out long before that. Look for a black limo driver that “hangs himself” in a shed outside his mothers’ house to hit the back pages of the news any day now. The only thing keeping the Enemy from doing it already is the fact THEY want to haul him out on national TV, the very day after they win Obama (the “Obamanation of Desolation” the candidacy and it will be too late and no rules allowing the DNC to revert back to Hillary in time.

    These pricks play for keeps, but someday it will come back on them. If only when a bigger prick comes along and eats them alive.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 5:15 am | Quote

  1. 46. xbjllb said:


    That wink appeared out of nowhere. Apparently the punctuation I chose created an unforseen and most inappropriate smiley.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 5:17 am | Quote

  1. 47. Mike said:


    LARRY SUPPORTER I DO NOT MEAN TO BE RUDE TO YOU BUT IN MY HONEST OPINION LARRY WILL NEVER RELEASE THIS INFO BECAUSE HIS WHOLE STORY IS A LIE. HE KNOWS NO NEWS MEDIA WOULD TAKE UP HIS OFFER, THIS IS JUST A WAY TO DRAG OUT THE PROCESS.

    IF YOU DOUBT ME, GO ON LARRY’S BLOG AND ASK HIM A DIRECT QUESTION, ASK HIM TO PROVE HIS ALLEGATIONS, HE IMMEDIATELY GETS RILED AND INSULTS YOU OR RELEASES YOUR DETAILS OR HE DOESN’T POST YOUR QUESTION OM HIS BLOG.

    IN MY OPINION LARRY IS NOT ACTING LIKE A PERSON WHO WANTS THIS TO END, HE IS MAKING MONEY, HE HAS A LONG LIST OF SUPPORTES THAT ADORE HIM AND CALL HIM BOSS, IF HE NEEDS ANYTHING ALL HE NEEDS TO DO IS GO ON HIS BLOG AND ASK AND THEY ALL BEND OVER BACKWARDS…THAT’S HIS NEW LIFE. LARRY WILL NEVER RELEASE ANY INFO, HE WOULD KEEP SUING PEOPLE LEFT AND RIGHT TILL OBAMA GETS THE NOMINATION.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 5:28 am | Quote

  1. 48. Larry Sinclair Supporter said:


    I don’t know what to say. I am very confused right now. I am very very upset. On Larry’s blog he is fighting with his biggest supporter Victor. So now he doesn’t want to post anymore. I thought he was doing this to keep Obama from getting the nomination. But now I don’t know.

    I am beginning to feel like an idiot. I still think Larry is telling the truth. But if I’m wrong… well I deserve what I get.

    posted May 8th, 2008 at 5:47 am | Quote

  1. 49. Mike said:


    Corrected typos:

    1. I have watched this train wreck for too long. My exams start on Monday and I feel I would be a lot more confident if I had dedicated myself to my revision as much as I dedicated myself to exposing Larry for the liar I believe he is.
    But maybe I have gone about it the wrong way, maybe we have all gone about it the wrong way.
    The Larry supporters believe Larry is telling the truth and they have closed their minds to the possibility of him lying, the Anti-Larry believe he is lying and they have closed their mind on the possibility of him telling the truth.
    But at the end of the day, only one side can be right.
    Now lets look at the facts, for over 5 months, Larry with the help of his supporters has been trying to get this story out on the MSM. Unfortunately the MSM has ignored them repeatedly and they believe that it must be a conspiracy of sort….
    The truth is without proof of his accusation Larry is just another celebrity story, like Mccain’s Black baby or Hillary’s Lesbianism etc. A lot of people view Larry’s blog and a lot of people have heard about his story but the important thing is A LOT OF PEOPLE DO NOT BELIEVE HIS STORY!!!
    It’s that simple, the majority of people follow the basic tenet that a person is innocent till proven guilty and even republicans, pundits, Obama haters and Obama lovers who are reasonable and objective will never jump to the conclusion that Larry is telling the truth. That is just the way the world is.
    This of course does not mean Larry is lying, all it means is that most people (even people who hate BO) would not just believe Larry on the strength of his word.
    Put yourself in the average person’s shoes, one day during election period (which is the one time that rumors are free to fly everywhere) you receive a mail in your inbox about the whole Larry Sinclair debacle, this story is not in the news, so what do you do ? a little bit of research. Well your research turns up Larry’s criminal record and the fact that he might have failed a lie detector test. The average person when they see all this immediately discount Larry’s story. This isn’t me trying to batter Larry its just a fact. Most people are not as passionate as we are and would not bother to immense themselves in all the details all they will do is look at surface details and unfortunately for Larry, the surface evidence are not in his favor.
    We the Larry exposers have been trying to tell the other side that is Larry that needs to prove his allegations but you people have kept up this argument that he doesn’t need to. The fact remains that no matter how much you wish or cry, this story will never go anywhere without real evidence.
    In today’s political climate, there are too many stories about politicians and except your story can be corroborated by a witness or evidence, no body is going to touch it.
    That brings us to Larry. Larry has claimed he doesn’t want to release evidence till he gets to court. The problem with this logic is