From a blog posting made by Larry Sinclair today:
Lately it seems that people have wanted to focus on my past as if I had been hiding something. Even though I have always stated I do not run from, nor hide from my past actions at any point in my life. Remember, I am not the one running for President. But Obama and I have something in common because HE sold cocaine as well. While attacking my decisions in the past, these same people want myself and others to allow Barack Obama to receive votes without being looked at, questioned, or investigated in any matter that David Axelrod does not submit as allowable to the media. Are Barack Obama’s past decisions not important here?
Now would someone explain to me, your neighbors and the media in general, why is it that I am placed under this microscope by Obama supporters, and Obama surrogates yet we, as a nation , refuse to question the past of a man asking to be President of the United States.
Why is it “a smear campaign” when Obama is asked a direct question regarding his past, yet to question any other candidates past it is called the political process? Why does Obama refuse to answer questions unless they are presented by the campaign’s hand picked media outlets? Why has Barack Obama and David Axelrod refused to turn over records, requested in writing, that are supposed to be open to the public?
Barack Obama IS a liar and Barack Obama DID use crack cocaine in November of 1999, and Barack Obama did SALE COCAINE in November 1999, to me, because I gave the money for the cocaine to BARACK OBAMA, and Barack Obama handed the cocaine to me. That is the transaction, and that constitutes Barack Obama selling me cocaine.
Now people can say the sex issue is the point, I disagree. People have tried repeatedly to make the issue the sexual encounters and it has never been about that. People better start waking up, asking the real questions and stop thinking that Obama is above his past or his associates. History has shown us over and over again, people seeking public office have never really cut their ties from their past. In fact if history is any indication, people seeking power maintain those connections and use them to aide in their efforts to reach their goal.
Barack Obama will either come clean about his past on his own, or the same people pushing him down the throats of others, will, in the end, be the ones to bring him down. Obama either faces these FACTS while he still has time to ask the American people for forgiveness and understanding, or he continues to operate as he and his campaign have and by November 2008 he will have ruined any chance he will ever have for the office he seeks. Not to mention the real chance of losing his Senate seat as well. Barack Obama, David Axelrod, the DNC and the MSM have and continue to, tell the American people that Barack Obama’s actions and decision are not important? I beg to differ.
Prove it.
Poor Larry. He’s been out of the underground “spotlight” for a couple of weeks now. He was circling the drain, so he needed to make himself somehow relevent to ride this thing a little while longer. How amusing that he whines of being under the microscope when he put himself there in the first place. We are all just suppose to believe in him, no questions asked. Well, some people did fall into that trap, but most people, when asked to “face facts” actually have to have facts in the first place, not just some random guy’s word that oh, by the way, has had some truth telling issues in the past. Let’s see how long this gets stretched out. Drip, drip, drip.
Who needs evidence when you have Larry’s word?
Who the hell is Larry Sinclair?
Who needs evidence when Barack Obama has not denied the allegations. When he denies the claims then it will be up to Sinclair to produce the evidence.
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY
Obama has a lot of explaining to do!
Personally, I think Larry should be doing more video blogs for youtube. That’s a great was to get your message out.
He should do a video with all the death threats he got.
Add all the radio interviews to his youtube channel.
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY[/quote
_________________________________________________________
Thanks Jill, now rephrasing…
WHAT IS A LARRY SINCLAIR
Obama will just give a speech explaining how his “white” grandma used to “do a little blow” in the backseat of an old Cadillac.
See? Everybody does it, especially typical white people.
Yeah Jill, that’s how it works. A person has to deny allegations made by some random person before said random person provides proof of allegations. Are you for real?
You are so right ill. Every day that Obama and company ignore the elephant in the room is one more day that Obama looks guilty.
Larry has been completely credible and consistant with his story.
Sure Larry has a dark past of his own but he, unlike Obama, isn’t hiding from it. There is no way Larry would put himself in such personal danger if he were lying. Also, if he were lying it would have ended long time ago.
It’s about time America knew the true nature of Obama.
If these allegations was made public, obama would give some kind of speech trying to explain them away like he did his pastor.I don’t think we have heard the last of pastor wright.As for you Larry, I do think you need proof.
Uh Jack a bit tired from all of the hopping you did on the weekend? Thumper rest your feet and then your brains
WTF, looks like you are the only one with a problem.
Thanks, Larry, Thanks BHDC,
Larry has made his case, has an attorney to represent him and a lot of people who had followed this story without too much hassle. I am glad he’s back to the original declaration. This children’s game of gossip that some want to play has gotten us off course. Some want to do their own investigating and are certainly not very professional about it. They want to distort Larry’s declaration. Like I said in the children’s game of gossip; we’re winding up with a narrative that is not the one originally whispered.
For the most part individuals’ privacy is respected when someone says they’ve witnessed an event. Larry’s right to privacy has been anything but respected.
Also, I know this is off topic but I want to mention that Barack Obama has a lot of negatives in questionable patriotism (I can’t believe all the flags on the day of his speech) and underhanded financial dealings whether to line his own pockets, his wife’s employment or to undermine American security from those who wish to us harm, let alone Larry’s story. It’s all out there, MSM doesn’ want to deal with it until hands are forced. Hopefully something will come out of Friday night interview with Oregon talkshow host. I was glad to read about that.
http://www.commonvoice.com/article.asp?colid=8310
Stay tough, Larry —
Watch this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=QhbZoUWBmRA
If someone wants to imitate me when posting, please don’t forget the quetion mark after my name..you stupic f***
LOL,
I commented on this on Larry’s Blog
Now because Obama got his some blow Obama sells drugs?
I guess if my friend gives me some money to get her some gum while I get myself some I guess that makes me a seller of gum?!
LOL!!
1, 2, 3 now REEEEACH!
What Politician you know doesn’t have dirty dealing and isn’t involved or has been involved with now criminals or criminal activity?
Show me one now running for President that is squeeky clean and I’ll call you a gullible fool.
You seem to attribute this to Barack Obama. Like he’s the only one.
I’ll take the word of a convicted criminal, drug dealing, illegal immigrant smuggling, multiple name, fraud over a God himself.
Larry doesn’t have the right to privacy. He has tried his very best to be in the spotlight and when you make claims like he makes, you open yourself up to people investigating your claims. Only idiots take the word of someone they don’t know (much less someone of his character) without proof or doing some fact checking. God help America.
I have been intrigued by the guy J. Tucker who claims to know Larry but Larry keeps denying knowing him. J. Tucker told him his full name on Larry’s blog and wasn’t trying to hide yet Larry keeps pretending not to know him.
Chu - he’s supposed to be the candidate for CHANGE in repudiating the ole’ boy corruptive dealings in Washington politics. This is certainly not a good way to start out. I personally don’t think a person can have it both ways.
He’s running for President of the United States.
His CHANGE is a facade and a questionable talking point. Does he plan to change his ways or sit in judgement of others?
This story makes no sense, because on Rense Larry said that he (Larry) paid for the coke, now how does this make the passenger the seller?
Larry would not be going through all this harrassment if his account of the incident was not true. Obama is a liar with a knack for twisting controversy away from himself. He likes to have it both ways and enjoys the double standard that his campaign puts forward. He is not a good person.
I don’t care what he says. YOu cannot be a politician in America and gain any seat of power without being being involved in some underhanded dealings. Its not possible. That is why Ron Paul and Huckabee aren’t in the picture anymore. There is NO SUCH THING as an honest politician. You need millions of dollars to run for office, you need to manipulate the people to get into office. You do this by calling in favors and making connections.
So you have look at what they do in their job. Hillary had a mediocre senate career and is a partisan figure, Obama has sponsered, written, and passed more bills than her and has proven he is a bipartisan figure. Obama has no foreign policy experience, Hillary foreign policy experience in miniscule including this Bosnia trip she tried to make more than it was. Obama remains consistant in his opinions even though sometimes shit comes out the wrong way. Hillary changes her mind like the change of tide. Barack started off running a clean campaign and sticking to the issues. Billary started a nasty campaign and were effective in dragging Obama down in the mud with them. They were the first to introduce race. They knew what they were doing.
McCain has been involved with corrupt financial dealings and associated with unscrupulous individuals. They all have.
The only “Change” Obama is going to bring is that he will listen to the will of the people. He is a bipartisan figure and can work with both republicans and democrats to get things done. He also crosses the racial divide.
PUT A FORK IN IT LARRY, I THINK YOU’RE DONE
Ok. Since apparently everyone is supposed to stand up and respond every single charge that anybody lodges against them, no matter how stupid or spurious then
JeannieJo - I’ve heard that you rather than flush, you eat your own shit. That’s really disgusting.
Jack - I’ve heard that you have sex with corpses. You’re sick.
Teddy - People tell me that you sell drugs to pre-schoolers. How could you!
Big Head - Your numbers only go up when you post stories for the larrytards so you’ll post anything he says no matter how stupid. You’re disgraceful.
ANYONE WHO DOES NOT RESPOND TO THE CHARGES VIA A VIDEO MESSAGE POSTED ON YOUTUBE IS GUILTY OF THE OFFENSES ALLEDGED. THE RESPONSE MUST BE IN THE FORM OF
“I [YOUR NAME] DO NOT [THE CHARGE AGAINST YOU].”
EXAMPLE - “I, JEANNIEJO, DO NOT EAT MY OWN SHIT OUT OF THE TOILET”.
I WILL HOUND ANYONE WHO DOESN’T RESPOND WITH IN TWO HOURS. I AM GIVING YOU A CHANGE TO CLEAR YOURSELVES. TAKE IT NOW OR YOU WILL END UP IN COURT.
“THE TRUTH AT LAST”
I don’t care what he says. YOu cannot be a politician in America and gain any seat of power without being being involved in some underhanded dealings. Its not possible. That is why Ron Paul and Huckabee aren’t in the picture anymore. There is NO SUCH THING as an honest politician. You need millions of dollars to run for office, you need to manipulate the people to get into office. You do this by calling in favors and making connections.
So you have look at what they do in their job. Hillary had a mediocre senate career and is a partisan figure, Obama has sponsered, written, and passed more bills than her and has proven he is a bipartisan figure. Obama has no foreign policy experience, Hillary foreign policy experience in miniscule including this Bosnia trip she tried to make more than it was. Obama remains consistant in his opinions even though sometimes shit comes out the wrong way. Hillary changes her mind like the change of tide. Barack started off running a clean campaign and sticking to the issues. Billary started a nasty campaign and were effective in dragging Obama down in the mud with them. They were the first to introduce race. They knew what they were doing.
McCain has been involved with corrupt financial dealings and associated with unscrupulous individuals. They all have.
The only “Change” Obama is going to bring is that he will listen to the will of the people. He is a bipartisan figure and can work with both republicans and democrats to get things done. He also crosses the racial divide.
You sir are full of it. Obama usually doesn’t vote or maybe. All you have done is buy into his so called “change”. Why don’t you do some research on him, ie. Odinga, Columbia University affiliates, Tony Rezko, William Ayres and his wife. I could go on, but there is not enough space. Hillary has more sense in her little finger than Obama has in his skinny little lying body. Grow UP!!!!!!
. THE TRUTH AT LAST thank you.
Just so the Larrytards know, you I called the Obama campaign head quarters the other day and I asked if the the Lady who answered if she knew who Larry Sinclair was. She said yes. Then when I started to talk about something else and then mentioned cocaine and the limo driver, she was dumbfounded. So I asked her again, if she had knew who Larry Sinclair was. She said that she seen his name on the Globe magazine. She didn’t know what the story was and asked me. I told her and she busted a gut laughing. That just really convinced me that all the Obama workers are trying to squash Larry Sinclair and keep the limo driver from coming out to the MSM.
My post was not to Chu-I agree with Chu–it was to the other nut telling how wonderful Obama is. Sorry, Chu it came up on yours.
BRENDA IS A PROSTITUTE THAT ONLY SERVICES LESBIANS OVER 75. YOU MUST RESPOND TO THIS CHARGE WITHIN TWO HOURS VIA A YOUTUBE VIDEO OR IT IS ASSUMED THAT YOU ARE GUILTY.
It’s too bad that THE TRUTH AT LAST is having a bad day. The post only refers to what the person has heard. I am referring to valid facts.
I do not know Larry Sinclair, but as I have stated before I give him the benefit of the doubt. I am waiting on his case to be heard. Others have tried to discredit him, and they got caught in a scam.
After this comment, I am leaving this this post. I have made my opinion clear and anything else I say will be met with a negative response. I really don’t want waste anymore energy with this diatribe. We just don’t agree. I get it.
THE TRUTH AT LAST is burning out the few brain-cells left in the typical larrytards
JEANNIEJO HAS NOT STOOD BEFORE US AND TOLD US THAT SHE DOES NOT EAT HER OWN SHIT. THEREFORE SHE DOES. THIS IS THE ONLY LARRY-APPROVED STANDARD OF CLEARING YOUR NAME. JEANNIEJO IS THEN A DISGUSTING PERVERT BECAUSE SHE CHOSE NOT TO ADDRESS THE CHARGES. WE MAY NOW CALL HER A SHIT-EATER AND NOT BE CORRECTED ABOUT IT.
Ohhh,
the Queen Larry you are the tops for drama…!
Drama, Drip,
*snap*
and a little more
*drip*
*drip*
*drip*
and one more *snap*
Please honey get yourself checked you appear inflamed…
I guess the number of hits were fallin’ so you had to speak out AGAIN to revive the dying horse.
CPR here we go
pump,pump,pump,breathe,
pump, breathe,pump
only gets more drip.
Unclean Hands making the American Process Cum Clean.
Larry here my big Salute! I find it impressive how you can air your dirty laundry and wear your unclean hands as some kind of badge of honor…
Here is what will happen…
Sinclair will get no ear until obama is the democratic nominee… and then the entire republican party will support him and get to the bottom of this.
The DEMOCRATS better look into this NOW see if its true or not and have the option of hillary if it is true.
IF THEY DONT AND MARK MY WORDS… the republicans will get back to the bottom of this (with pretty much unlimited funds) and if this is just a little bit true the democrats will lose the presidency AGAIN….
DEMOCRATS WAKE UP and look into this now… MARK MY WORDS
ANONYMOUS I can tell is a larrytard going anonymously
Confusius I don’t give a rat’s ass if its true… fact is from a pr point of view larry either needs to be proven wrong.. and dealt with now then having this liability out if it is true.
All I can tell you is you is Kerry’s swiftboating is a joke compared the sh?t obama and the democrats (and YOU) will be getting when this explodes in their face…
mark my words…
Hey, JeannieJo, what does shit taste like? Does it depend on what you eat?
Anonymous then I would suggest that Larry Sinclair sticks to the original tale and not add lies,his story will never sell, now whoever it was who with him SOLD CRACK??? That’s not how he said it to begin with.
Is obama and pastor wright vacationing together?
THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE or stick with and don’t change it mid-stream
http://www.commonvoice.com/article.asp?colid=8310
How ignorant can the Democrats be to have allowed Obama to enter the race? It’s one thing for the general public to have voted for him because the media has only portrayed him with a halo, but for the party insiders who know what a risk he is (or should know), it is political suicide. The super delegates who ignorantly supported Obama are going to have a lot of explaining to do, and a lot of apologizing.
In a way I want Obama to win the nomination so ALL of his dirt will be on display courtesy of the Republican Party. It is going to be ugly.
Jack,
They must know something you don’t to have “allowed” Obama to enter the race and to also have supported him.
I do not know Truth at last, but I give him the benefit of the doubt. I am waiting to hear more about JeanieJo. Others have tried to discredit Truth, but because I loathe JeanieJo so much, I wouldn’t put shit-eating past her. Those are my “valid facts.”
I don’t know mb, IS they?
I FOR ONE DO NOT KNOW THE MOTIVATION OF lARRY SINCLAIR, BUT IT DOES MAKE ME WONDER WHY THE MAINSTREAN MEDIA DOES NOT TOUCH IT? MCCAIN WAS ATTACKED BY A SO CALLED BOGUS ALLEGATION AND IT WAS PUT TO REST.. BUT I DO AGREE WITH JACK ABOUT THIS NEEDING TO COME OUT NOW. IF OBAMA IS THE NOMINEE THE REPUBLICANS WILL RUN WITH THIS AND IT ALONG WITH REV. WRIGHT AND NOW WITH THE NEW PASTOR OF T.U.C.C. WITH THE LYNCHING COMMENT HE WILL BE MADE A LAUGHING STOCK ALL OVER THE WORLD.
What the heck is this moron talking about? The burden of proof is on Larry the Douche who has yet to prove anything.
Face it folks, this guy made an accusation, failed a polygraph, collected $20K, lied about having a Law Degree and a Master’s Degree (I’m sure he doesn’t even have a Bachelor’s), did not come clean about his criminal history (until backed into a corner), lied about his aliases (until backed into a corner) and lied about having a brain tumor.
Why would anyone in their right mind respond to this idiot?
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have only passed 2 pieces of legislation. It’s 2 to 2. But Hillary has been shot at by snipers, so she definitely wins.
And not to appear too superior, but why would the MSM give this the time of day? I mean c’mon! This is a convicted criminal (fraud) with lots of aliases and not one SHRED of proof who failed a lie detector test!
ARE YOU PEOPLE NUTS?
Yeah, we’ve been in the Virgin Islands tag-teaming a typical homosexual in the back of our limo.
MB….in the plural and in common vernacular and in the interest of good English, “is” is usually replaced with “are”. For example:
Are Obama and Pastor Wright vacationing together?
And the correct riposte to your probing yet impractical quandary would likely be a denial.
Larry who?
Then why don’t you email him an ask him to tell you how he knows me. And while you are at it do the same with Mitch the Bitch since he claims to have been with me on the same day I WAS WITH BARACK OBAMA since you say people making claims that are unknown. Mitch the Bitch continues to post comments here and around the web claiming I do not have a brain tumor yet the Tribune obtained copies of my medical records but I o not see you telling him he has to back it up. He thinks he forced me to post my records and he thinks he is going to get me to post my medical records, but he is mistaken. You seem to say a lot and yet you were not there? Have a good evening.
Mitch you continue to claim I have presented myself under the mis-spelled names so I suggest you contact CBI, because one term at the bottom of the report is advising you it is a FELONY to mis-represent that report. Which by the way you can now go and choke yourself with your own ding. I should just post a separate page of your comments alone and let people see just how ignorant and attention starved you are.
FAKE LARRY SINCLAIR ALERT… THAT ONE CAN ACTUALLY SPELL
And what is this sight that it would post something like this? Can anyone do it?
I went to Bosnia one time and got shot at by snipers while I was trying to sell cocaine. I was trying to dodge the snipers and spilled all the cocaine. It was all Hillary’s fault because she was grabbing at me, trying to kiss me. Now I’m out an eight-ball and somebody’s got to PAY!!!!
MITCH….replace the “M” with a “B” and you get BITCH. MITCH, however, will now be a synonym for anal retentive.
Hey Mitch, don’t be mitch.
I’m amazed that BHDC keeps giving this fruitcake a forum. Is anyone actually sending this little creep money? Hasn’t he raked in enough to buy himself a couple of rocks yet?
Where’s the limo driver, Larry?
Keep asking for the media to investigate and report on these allegations!
letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, conedit@ajc.com, letters@baltsun.com, news@globe.com, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, opinion@charlotte.com, letters@suntimes.com, news@cleveland.com,
letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com, letters@denverpost.com, business@det-freepress.com, letter@detnews.com, viewpoints@chron.com, letters@latimes.com, drudge@drudgereport.com,
HeraldEd@herald.com, politics@startribune.com, letters@newsday.com, letters@nytimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com, letters@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, wsjcontact@dowjones.com, ombudsman@washpost.com, letters@washpost.com, letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, letters@usnews.com, Opinion@phillynews.com,
DailyNews.Opinion@phillynews.com, letters@post-gazette.com, letters@uniontrib.com, chronletters@sfgate.com, letters@examiner.com, letters@sjmercury.com, editpage@seattle-pi.com, opinion@seatimes.com, editor@usatoday.com, letter.editor@edit.wsj.com, Letterstoed@washpost.com, wtnews@wt.infi.net, feedback@cnn.com, editor@AllPolitics.com, info@ap.org, tips@upi.com, feedback@ap.org, jloven@ap.org, kcarroll@ap.org, lmargasak@ap.org, cnn.onair@cnn.com, crossfire@cnn.com, huck.todd@nbcuni.com, public.informa