The window is very small that Odrama painted himself into. He will, of course, be outed for sitting in the church during some of the “lost time” he professes. He can’t have it both ways, and being a native PA , I can tell you that will cost him in the primary. If HRC can run a large margin starting now, and get a revote in one of the 2 states(esp. Fl) she could catch up ..Fl has 210 delegates.
Thank you BHDC for keeping the story going!

Where was Obama on Nov 6, 1999?

A quick check of the facts has Obama in Florida at the same time he was supposed to be in Church. Now Newsmax’s ‘reporter’ says that the date he gave was wrong. If he can’t get the date correct, why should we believe the rest of his story?

Hey Al…
Think Obama’s team is pulling together the dates he WAS in church?? Think they are checking that list to videos??
It’s okay… It’s only Monday… We can wait a couple of days to find out..

Well, the FACTS don’t lie just the man does!

From the Obama website:

“Presidential candidate Barack Obama preaches on the campaign trail that America needs a new consensus based on faith and bipartisanship, yet he continues to attend a controversial Chicago church whose pastor routinely refers to ‘white arrogance’ and ‘the United States of White America.’ In fact, Obama was in attendance at the church when these statements were made on July 22.” FACT: Obama did not attend services on July 22nd.

Glad they cleared all that up..
It’s good to know Obama wasn’t clapping when Rev Wright was a rapping that day (maybe…anyway).

It’s funny that the camp is even responding to the article…
Could it be… they are scared shitless of what’s going to hit them next?? (The cult is in panic mode…

If the numbers in this new Rasmussen poll are an accurate reflection of the electorate’s sentiments, it would seem that Obama has not sufficiently distanced himself from his pastor, Jeremiah Wright, despite an aggressive media push on his part to do just that:

Most voters, 56%, said Wright’s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama. That figure includes 44% of Democrats. Just 11% of voters say they are more likely to vote for Obama because of Wright’s comments…
Overall, voters are evenly divided as to whether Obama should resign his membership in the Church—42% say that he should while 40% disagree. White voters, by a 46% to 33% margin, say that Obama should leave the Church. African-American voters, by a 68% to 16% margin, say he should not.

The poll also finds that Obama’s favorability rating fell to 47%, down five points from last Thursday — a drop that according to Rasmussen shows that the Wright story “has had at least a temporary impact on public perceptions of Obama,” though it strikes me as a stretch to read this as being solely because of Wright.

The poll also finds that Wright has a comically abysmal favorability rating of eight percent.

If the numbers in this new Rasmussen poll are an accurate reflection of the electorate’s sentiments, it would seem that Obama has not sufficiently distanced himself from his pastor, Jeremiah Wright, despite an aggressive media push on his part to do just that:

Most voters, 56%, said Wright’s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama. That figure includes 44% of Democrats. Just 11% of voters say they are more likely to vote for Obama because of Wright’s comments…
Overall, voters are evenly divided as to whether Obama should resign his membership in the Church—42% say that he should while 40% disagree. White voters, by a 46% to 33% margin, say that Obama should leave the Church. African-American voters, by a 68% to 16% margin, say he should not.

The poll also finds that Obama’s favorability rating fell to 47%, down five points from last Thursday — a drop that according to Rasmussen shows that the Wright story “has had at least a temporary impact on public perceptions of Obama,” though it strikes me as a stretch to read this as being solely because of Wright.

The poll also finds that Wright has a comically abysmal favorability rating of eight percent.

__________________________________________________________

Mmmkay….and your point is?

Newsmax has acknowledged the incorrect date, but they stand by their story that Obama was present with Secret Service at the church on the day that Rev. Wright delivered the sermon. It’s interesting that the Obama campaign has denied his presence on July 22, but they have not denied that he was there for the sermon in question.

Obama and his goons news media are trying to figure out a way to blame HILLARY for this NlGGLET

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/03/newsmaxs-kessle.html

This is USATODAY reporting on Obama lying saying he was never at WRIGHT the RACIST jig when he spoke NIGLET stuff

How can you be a church member for 20 years hearing his sermons every sunday, say the church pastor is your advisor on all big decisions in your life, yet you never heard him say anything like this? Of course Obabma’s lying.

You see, he wasn’t “there”, actually in the church while the hate sermon was going on.

No, he was merely “Present”.

Sad to say, Lynne, but while there are still racists like you in America, I would agree with you. Read Obama’s books, listen to his speeches going back 20+ years, and find me *one* example of hatred towards white people in them. You will find none, because there aren’t there.

Perhaps you should listen to some of John Hagee’s sermons sometime — I have, and I’ve rarely seen such bile and vitriol for his fellow Americans being spewed from the pulpit. Hagee even blames the Jews for their own misfortunes, like the Holocaust, and call the Catholic Church the Great Whore of Babylon. Where’s the outrage after McCain’s embrace?

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/17/clinton.war/index.html

If the numbers in this new Rasmussen poll are an accurate reflection of the electorate’s sentiments, it would seem that Obama has not sufficiently distanced himself from his pastor, Jeremiah Wright, despite an aggressive media push on his part to do just that:

Most voters, 56%, said Wright’s comments made them less likely to vote for Obama. That figure includes 44% of Democrats. Just 11% of voters say they are more likely to vote for Obama because of Wright’s comments…
Overall, voters are evenly divided as to whether Obama should resign his membership in the Church—42% say that he should while 40% disagree. White voters, by a 46% to 33% margin, say that Obama should leave the Church. African-American voters, by a 68% to 16% margin, say he should not.

The poll also finds that Obama’s favorability rating fell to 47%, down five points from last Thursday — a drop that according to Rasmussen shows that the Wright story “has had at least a temporary impact on public perceptions of Obama,” though it strikes me as a stretch to read this as being solely because of Wright.

The poll also finds that Wright has a comically abysmal favorability rating of eight percent.

The so-called, polls also had Obama, ahead of Hillary, in New

Hampshire, California, Texas, etc., on the repective days of

the elections.

So much for polls!

Obama has already won the Democratic nomination. It’s over. Regardless of how the remaining primaries and caucuses go, including Michigan and even Florida. Clinton can never catch Obama in elected delegates. His current lead of 170 pledged delegates will not be overcome no matter what happens. Even if Clinton beats him by 10 points in each of these primaries, he will still lead among elected delegates by over 100. The superdelegates will not override the will of the voters unless Obama is in jail. They will not let themselves in for a civil war by overruling a black man who is beloved by the young by going over the heads of the electorate and naming the candidate that lost the primaries as the nominee. Regardless of how damaged Obama may be by the Wright tapes, it will not provide sufficient cover or cause for them to do so