Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Scoops, Law, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair
Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims to have used drugs with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999, has filed a new defamation lawsuit against several individuals who, he claims, made up and spread lies about his mental state and character after he posted his allegations about Obama in January on YouTube. He is seeking $3 million in damages.
Big Head DC has obtained a copy of the suit, which requests a jury trial to determine the possible liability of three Internet posters in defaming Sinclair. The individuals Sinclair is suing have registered accounts at DemocraticUnderground.com, YouTube.com, and Digg.com, although their real names are not yet known. They are currently listed in the suit by their screen names:
TubeSockTedD, mzmolly and OWNINGLIARS.
The case, filed on Thursday in D.C. District Court, reiterates claims Sinclair has made in the past about Obama.
“On the evening of November 6, 1999, Plaintiff’s limousine driver telephoned then-Illinois State Senator Barrack Obama to set up a introduction of Plaintiff to Mr. Obama,” according to the lawsuit. “Later that evening at a bar which Plaintiff believes was called Alibis, Plaintiff met Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama offered to purchasing cocaine for Plaintiff. Mr. Obama made a telephone call from his cellphone to a presently unknown individual during which Mr. Obama arranged the cocaine purchase.
“Mr. Obama and Plaintiff then departed the bar in Plaintiff’s limousine and proceeded to an unknown location where Mr. Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty dollars ($250) tendered by Plaintiff and returned a short while later with an ‘eightball’ of cocaine and gave it to Plaintiff,” the suit continues. “Plaintiff and Mr. Obama then ingested cocaine.”
A sexual encounter allegedly took place after the drug use.
Each of the individuals involved in the suit have made Internet claims indicating that Sinclair is lying, although the Obama campaign has not publicly commented on the matter.
A PolyScore computer analysis conducted on Sinclair in February indicated that he was being truthful in his drug claims, although experts hired by WhiteHouse.com, the Web site that paid for the polygraph, disagreed with the PolyScore readings.
HAHAHHAHAHAHHA ALL OF THAT AND NO SUIT AGAINST OBAMA?
That’s hysterical.
Way to go, Larry!
Very smart to go the circuitous legal route. That’s how Watergate unfolded. Very smart. I underestimated you, Larry.
[…] Posted on March 13, 2008. SINCE PEOPLE COMPLAIN ABOUT MY SPELLING AND TYPING I AM USING THE BHDC ARTICLE IN THIS POST WITH PERMISSION. Sinclair Files $3 Million Defamation Suit Involving Drug and Sex Allegations Against Obama Thursday March 13th, 2008 4:49 PM by BHDC Staff Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Scoops, Law, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims to have used drugs with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999, has filed a new defamation lawsuit against several individuals who, he claims, made up and spread lies about his mental state and character after he posted his allegations about Obama in January on YouTube. He is seeking $3 million in damages. […]
Is this a joke?
Larry has absolutely no case. Read the suit. He’s suing people for expressing their opinion that Larry is lying. He can’t get any money in damages unless he can prove the peoples comments cost him money.
I cannot believe I just read a lawsuit against three anonymous commenters. If Larry had any case he could have subpoenaed youtube to give him their name and addresses first.
I’ve gotta admit, I’m kind of disappointed. Is this the “big” lawsuit everyone was donating for?
Um..anyone else notice the story changed?
Larry claimed Obama smoked crack while Larry did snorted coke.
Yet, in this lawsuit, it says “Mr. Obama and Plaintiff then departed the bar in Plaintiff’s limousine and
proceeded to an unknown location where Mr. Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty
dollars ($250) tendered by Plaintiff and returned a short while later with an “eightball” of cocaine
and gave it to Plaintiff. Plaintiff and Mr. Obama then ingested cocaine.”
GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT LARRY.
I believe this is part of a wave of lawsuits to come. Drip, Drip, Drip…
Jack and Jon, are you working for the Obama campaign? Seriously?
I’d keep my eye on Jon and Jack. They seem to know my old pal Sawyer. Go Larry!
Drip, drip, drip….
Yes of course. Anyone who doesn’t believe Larry works for the Obama campaign.
Man, he must have a lot of paid employees.
The suit is well-written, and holds much more weight than Larry’s previous suit. It is a first step, I’d say.
Or a lot of young college kinds who are volunteering.
…volunteering to smear Larry…sanctioned by the Obama / Axelrod camp…
HELLO… PRIME TIME!
Can someone post all the fox and other email addresses again?? Please?
Do you guys realize how much it takes away from Larry’s case when you start accusing anyone who doesn’t believe Larry of working or volunteering for the Obama campaign?
I do volunteer for the Obama campaign. I make calls. I canvass. I donate.
But no one has told me to be here. I’m here because you people are so damn entertaining.
Oh shoot. I forgot about the personal phone call from Barack telling me to go to bigheaddc and speak out against Larry. DUH. How could I forget THAT?
It would appear to me that Matt does not understand that one posting a post as being fact is far from expressing an opinion.
AHA!!! JACK JUST ADMITTED HE WORKS FOR OBAMA! OMG!!!
PLEASE POST THE ADDRESSES SOMEONE, I WANT TO SEND THEM THIS POST AND LINK.
If you read the case, it seems Larry is suing people for linking to a site that made up a lie about Larry.
Did these people make the site? The person who made the link where it says Larry was in a mental institution may be guilty of something. But if I claim something based on a link I think is true, I am guilty of nothing.
Larry’s case doesn’t seem to have any evidence that these people STARTED the lies about Obama. If not, they can just claim that they thought it was the truth. Since it caused Larry no monetary damages, my guess is that this case will be dismissed.
Again this is just a guess. Wouldn’t want anyone to think I was making up a lie, or I guess y’all could sue me.
Let the truth about Obama be exposed. You gotta love the idea of these Obama cult like followers being named in the lawsuit. GO LARRY!!!
donate to Larry’s legal fund to expose Obama.
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
Actually, i AM Barack Obama.
8)
(that was a joke, for all of you unintelligent readers out there, which I know is most of you).
Let this lawsuit be a clear message to anyone who thinks that they have the right to spread lies as being factual. Expressing an opinion is one thing, but that is not what some of the Larry haters have done.
I am a Larry supporter. The truth WILL come out, and it seems sooner rather than later.
Hey TubeSockTed…what do YOU think??
couldnt larry claim he wasnt given paid interviews or something/appearances because of the insanity claim?
FOX News addresses (SEND THEM THIS POST — they report of far lesser allegations against Bill CLinton that never turned out to be true):
TELL THEM TO READ THIS LETTER ON AIR. TELL THEM TO LISTEN TO CUNNINGHAM TONIGHT. ASK THAT THEY FEATURE CUNNINGHAM TO TALK TO HANNITY BEFORE SEPTEMBER:
adam.housley@foxnews.com; adam.shapiro@foxnews.com; ainsley.earhardt@foxnews.com; alan.colmes@foxnews.com; alexis.glick@foxnews.com; alicia.acuna@foxnews.com; alisyn.camerota@foxnews.com; allison.costarene@foxnews.com; amanda.walker@foxnews.com; americasnewsroom@foxnews.com; amy.kellogg@foxnews.com; andrew.levy@foxnews.com; andrew.napolitano@foxnews.com; andrew.stack@foxnews.com; angela.mcglowan@foxnews.com; anita.mcnaught@foxnews.com; anita.vogel@foxnews.com; ann.burkart@fox.com; anna.botting@foxnews.com; anna.gilligan@foxnews.com; arthel.neville@foxnews.com; ashley.nix@foxnews.com; ashley.webster@foxnews.com; askfox@fox.com; atlarge@foxnews.com; beltway@foxnews.com; ben.stein@foxnews.com; bill.hemmer@foxnews.com; bill.kristol@foxnews.com; bill.mccuddy@foxnews.com; bill.oreilly@foxnews.com; bill.schulz@foxnews.com; bob.novak@foxnews.com; bob.sellers@foxnews.com; bpfeiffer@fox.com; brenda.buttner@foxnews.com; bret.baier@foxnews.com; brian.kilmeade@foxnews.com; brian.knoblock@foxnews.com; brian.lewis@foxnews.com; brian.peterson@fox.com; brian.wilson@foxnews.com; brigitte.quinn@foxnews.com; brit.hume@foxnews.com; brooke.alexander@foxnews.com; bullsandbears@foxnews.com; cal.thomas@foxnews.com; carl.cameron@foxnews.com; carol.iovanna@foxnews.com; carol.mckinley@foxnews.com; caroline.shively@foxnews.com; casey.stegall@foxnews.com; cash@foxnews.com; cash@foxnews.com; catherine.herridge@foxnews.com; cavuto@foxnews.com; cavuto@foxnews.com; cheryl.casone@foxnews.com; chris.knowles@foxnews.com; chris.wallace@foxnews.com; claudia.cowan@foxnews.com; cody.willard@foxnews.com; colonelscorner@foxnews.com; comments@foxnews.com; connell.mcshane@foxnews.com; courtney.friel@foxnews.com; courtney.kealy@foxnews.com; craig.mitnick@foxnews.com; craig.rivera@foxnews.com; dagen.mcdowell@foxnews.com; dan.springer@foxnews.com; dana.blanton@foxnews.com; dana.lewis@foxnews.com; dari.alexander@foxnews.com; dave.ramsey@foxnews.com; david.asman@foxnews.com; david.folk.thomas@foxnews.com; david.lee.miller@foxnews.com; david.macdougall@foxnews.com; david.piper@foxnews.com; dmca@fox.com; domenica.davis@foxnews.com; dominic.di-natale@foxnews.com; donna.fiducia@foxnews.com; doug.kennedy@foxnews.com; dr.georgia.witkin@foxnews.com; dr.manny.alvarez@foxnews.com; e.d.hill@foxnews.com; elizabeth.macdonald@foxnews.com; eric.shawn@foxnews.com; erik.liljegren@foxnews.com; fatherjonathan@foxnews.com; fawn.boyd-vigil@foxnews.com; feedback@foxnews.com; fergus@nhgop.org; fncimag@foxnews.com; fncspecials@foxnews.com; fns@foxnews.com; forbes@foxnews.com; foxaroundtheworld@foxnews.com; foxreport@foxnews.com; friends@foxnews.com; geraldo.rivera@foxnews.com; greg.burke@foxnews.com; greg.gutfeld@foxnews.com; greg.kelly@foxnews.com; greg.milam@foxnews.com; greg.palkot@foxnews.com; gregg.jarrett@foxnews.com; greta.van.susteren@foxnews.com; gretchen.carlson@foxnews.com; hannity@foxnews.com; harris.faulkner@foxnews.com; heartland@foxnews.com; heather.nauert@foxnews.com; hemmer@foxnews.com; housecall@foxnews.com; ian.rae@foxnews.com; ian.woods@foxnews.com; irena.briganti@foxnews.com; jackie.gutfeld@foxnews.com; james.brown@foxnews.com; james.rosen@foxnews.com; jamie.colby@foxnews.com; jamie@foxnews.com; jane.skinner@foxnews.com; janice.dean@foxnews.com; jeff.flock@foxnews.com; jeff.goldblatt@foxnews.com; jenna.lee@foxnews.com; jennifer.griffin@foxnews.com; jenny.percival@foxnews.com; jer@foxnews.com; jill.dobson@foxnews.com; jim.angle@foxnews.com; joe.earley@fox.com; john.gibson@foxnews.com; john.kasich@foxnews.com; john.moody@foxnews.com; jon.scott@foxnews.com; jon@foxnews.com; jonathan.hunt@foxnews.com; jonathan.serrie@foxnews.com; judge.andrew.napolitano@foxnews.com; julian.phillips@foxnews.com; julie.banderas@foxnews.com; julie.kirtz@foxnews.com; juliet.huddy@foxnews.com; katherine.creag@foxnews.com; kathy.ardleigh@foxnews.com; kelly.wright@foxnews.com; kim.mcintyre@foxnews.com; kimberly.guilfoyle-newsom@foxnews.com; kitty.logan@foxnews.com; kris.gutierrez@foxnews.com; kristen.sullivan@foxnews.com; laura.ingle@foxnews.com; lauren.green@foxnews.com; laurie.dhue@foxnews.com; linda.vester@foxnews.com; lineup@foxnews.com; lis.wiehl@foxnews.com; lisa.bernhard@foxnews.com; lisonlaw2@foxnews.com; liz.claman@foxnews.com; lou.aguirre@foxnews.com; louise.pennell@foxnews.com; luanne.sorrell@foxnews.com; lucy.noland@foxnews.com; major.garrett@foxnews.com; malini.bawa@foxnews.com; mancow.muller@foxnews.com; marianne.silber@foxnews.com; marny.cavanaugh@foxnews.com; martha.maccallum@foxnews.com; martha@foxnews.com; martin.brunt@foxnews.com; mary.cavanaugh@foxnews.com; mbonnot@watchfox.com; megyn.kelly@foxnews.com; meredith.whitney@foxnews.com; mike.emanuel@foxnews.com; mike.gallagher@foxnews.com; mike.jerrick@foxnews.com; mike.norman@foxnews.com; mike.straka@foxnews.com; mike.tobin@foxnews.com; molly.henneberg@foxnews.com; molly.line@foxnews.com; myword@foxnews.com; neil.cavuto@foxnews.com; neil.sean@foxnews.com; newswatch@foxnews.com; nicole.petallides@foxnews.com; oliver.north@foxnews.com; ontherecord@foxnews.com; orlando.salinas@foxnews.com; page.hopkins@foxnews.com; pat.sajak@foxnews.com; patti.ann.browne@foxnews.com; peter.barnes@foxnews.com; peter.johnson@foxnews.com; phil.keating@foxnews.com; rachel.amatt@foxnews.com; ray.hennessey@foxnews.com; rebecca.gomez@foxnews.com; rebecca.santana@foxnews.com; redeye@foxnews.com; reena.ninan@foxnews.com; rich.edson@foxnews.com; rick.folbaum@foxnews.com; rick.leventhal@foxnews.com; rick.reichmuth@foxnews.com; robert.gray@foxnews.com; rudi.bakhtiar@foxnews.com; sandra.smith@foxnews.com; sarah.hughes@foxnews.com; scott.grogin@fox.com; sean.hannity@foxnews.com; shannon.bream@foxnews.com; shepard.smith@foxnews.com; shibani.joshi@foxnews.com; special@foxnews.com; steve.brown@foxnews.com; steve.centanni@foxnews.com; steve.doocy@foxnews.com; steve.harrigan@foxnews.com; stuart.varney@foxnews.com; studiob@foxnews.com; suzanne.sena@foxnews.com; terry.keenan@foxnews.com; theticker@foxnews.com; thom.bird@foxnews.com; thomas.tyrer@fox.com; tiki.barber@foxnews.com; todd.ciganek@foxnews.com; todd.connor@foxnews.com; tom.sullivan@foxnews.com; trace.gallagher@foxnews.com; uma.pemmaraju@foxnews.com; ursula.errington@foxnews.com; wendell.goler@foxnews.com; william.la.jeunesse@foxnews.com; yourcomments@foxnews.com; yourwordlive@foxnews.com
Totally. He could and should.
Opinions vs. statements of facts? If you read the complaint, it was not an expression of opinion to state that Mr. Sinclair was in a mental institution. If in fact Mr. Sinclairs allegations were totally erroneous, don’t you think that the Obama legal team would have squashed them from the onset when the first youtube video was posted. There are actually two stories here: the allegations against Sen. Obama, and second, the fact that the media has totally ignored any part of the story.
Chris - I doubt it.
Any supposed interviewer of Larry would have been perfectly capable of investigating his past (and probably did). I highly doubt any reputable interviewers canceled their interviews because someone claimed Larry was crazy on his youtube site.
letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, conedit@ajc.com, letters@baltsun.com, news@globe.com, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, opinion@charlotte.com, letters@suntimes.com, news@cleveland.com,
letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com, letters@denverpost.com, business@det-freepress.com, letter@detnews.com, viewpoints@chron.com, letters@latimes.com, drudge@drudgereport.com,
HeraldEd@herald.com, politics@startribune.com, letters@newsday.com, letters@nytimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com, letters@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, wsjcontact@dowjones.com, ombudsman@washpost.com, letters@washpost.com, letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, letters@usnews.com, Opinion@phillynews.com,
DailyNews.Opinion@phillynews.com, letters@post-gazette.com, letters@uniontrib.com, chronletters@sfgate.com, letters@examiner.com, letters@sjmercury.com, editpage@seattle-pi.com, opinion@seatimes.com, editor@usatoday.com, letter.editor@edit.wsj.com, Letterstoed@washpost.com, wtnews@wt.infi.net, feedback@cnn.com, editor@AllPolitics.com, info@ap.org, tips@upi.com, feedback@ap.org, jloven@ap.org, kcarroll@ap.org,
lmargasak@ap.org, cnn.onair@cnn.com, crossfire@cnn.com, huck.todd@nbcuni.com, public.information@cnn.com, viewer@c-span.org, comments@foxnews.com, hardball@cnbc.com, letters@msnbc.com, opinion@msnbc.com, joe@msnbc.com, mtp@msnbc.com, TheNews@msnbc.com, dateline@news.nbc.com, nightly@news.nbc.com, msnbcreports@msnbc.com, steve.capus@nbc.com, today@news.nbc.com, MTP@nbc.com, newsmax@reply.newsmax.com, dateline@nbcuni.com, evening@cbsnews.com, mam@cbs.com, evening@cbsnews.com, ajh@cbsNEWS.com, earlyshow@cbs.com, netaudr@abc.com, 2020@abc.com, nightline@abcnews.com, david.westin@abc.com, phil.boyce@abc.com, mcarlson3@bloomberg.net, 60m@cbsnews.com, 48hours@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com, newshour@pbs.org, ombudsman@npr.org, atc@npr.org, rush@eibnet.com, Special@foxnews.com, Foxreport@foxnews.com, Oreilly@foxnews.com, Hannity@foxnews.com, Colmes@foxnews.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com, msilverman@ap.org, opinion@thewire.ap.org, npickler@ap.org, rfournier@ap.org, sjohnson@ap.org,
pr@ap.org, thunt@ap.org, 60II@cbsnews.com, 60m@cbsnews.com, bpc@cbsnews.com, earlyshow@cbs.com, efm@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com, mkx@cbsnews.com, pma@cbsnews.com, rbc@cbsnews.com, sundays@cbsnews.com, aaron.brown@turner.com, am@cnn.com, 360@cnn.com, ea.koppel@turner.com, bill.schneider@turner.com, bruce.morton@turner.com, candy.crowley@turner.com, carol.lin@turner.com, crossfire@cnn.com, daryn.kagan@turner.com, david.ensor@turner.com, daybreak@cnn.com, kurtzh@washpost.com, insidepoliticts@cnn.com, crossfire@cnn.com, jeanne.meserve@turner.com, jeff.greenfield@cnn.com, jim.walton@turner.com, deirdre.walsh@turner.com, kelly.wallace@turner.com, kyra.phillips@turner.com, livefrom@cnn.com, live@cnn.com, livetoday@cnn.com, lou.dobbs@turner.com, loudobbs@cnn.com, miles.obrien@turner.com, newsnight@cnn.com, paulazahnnow@cnn.com, paula.zahn@turner.com, paulazahn@cnn.com, tom.hannon@cnn.com, wam@cnn.com, wolf@cnn.com, world@msnbc.com, robert.kur@nbc.com, countdown@msnbc.com, dshuster@msnbc.com,
norville@msnbc.com, dennis.sullivan@msnbc.com, joe@msnbc.com, jtrippi@msnbc.com, Lesterholt@msnbc.com, countdown@msnbc.com, lester.holt@msnbc.com, msnbcinvestigates@msnbc.com, world@msnbc.com
Did you all notice who his attorney is? Montgomery Blair Sibley is no joke. He is a well known big deal.
ObamaNation continually talk out of both sides of their ass; on the one hand, “Yes we can!” On the other hand, “No we can’t” because everyone in America who doesn’t support Barry and his crackpipe is “obviously” racist.
WELL WHICH IS IT? Those of us who claimed from the very beginning that Obama could never win a general election because America is still racist and rotten to the core, always had it right! “No, you can’t, and you WON’T!”
Now, ObamaNation comes out acting all wounded because reality has set in? What are they going to claim next, that America WAS ready for a black President but all of a sudden, this racism came up out of nowhere, invented by the Clintons and the Clinton campaign?
GET REAL. You’ve got an entire generation of voters who WEREN’T raised on Hiphop, who quite frankly, hate hiphop and ghetto culture, who quite frankly after having twenty years of it shoved in their faces from their kids, have come a lot farther from their tolerant roots than they ever thought they would. And this same generation actually REMEMBERS the Clinton years, and how much better THE ENTIRE WORLD was then.
Barry? He’s got a bunch of college students who weren’t even in middle school in the 90’s, a bunch of utterly clueless white yuppies that showed up to 1, prove they aren’t racist, and 2, join the party becuase it’s “the cover of Rolling Stone” hip, and finally, a bunch of pathetically desperate black people who have been duped into thinking Barry and his crackpipe are going to be their last chance at ever having a black President because of the cadence of his voice during pretty speeches THAT SAY NO-THING.
BULLSHIT! I can think of three men in congress right now who would be better than Obama ever would, one of whom being Jesse Jackson Jr. And there are others all through the Democratic Party, one will soon be the governor of New York!
So get real. Obama is nothing more than Rove’s tool, and will always be Rove’s tool until the bitter end. He made HIS choice when he first took the man and the GOP’s money to run his campaign. Such a man deserves the biggest failure in the history of politics.
No, we DON’T hate Obama because he is black; we hate him because he IS A HILLARY-HATING REPUBLICAN WHORE.
Weather your an Obama supporter or not, you should want the truth about Larry story to come out. If what he says is the truth, the American voters have a right to know befor they cast their vote.
THANK YOU LARRY SINCLAIR..KEEP UP THE FIGHT.
RJ, like I said, Larry may have a claim against the person that wrote those lies. But according to the posts quoted in Larry’s lawsuit, the people were just linking to a site that made this claim. Unless he has evidence that they themselves wrote the website (which they may have), I don’t see how Larry has a case. You can’t sue someone for linking to a website they believe is factual but is in fact not true. You can sue the website creator for posting libel. But once it’s there, it’s not libelous to spread it.
Way to go! I have sent this to all of the news outlets & many MSM. Let’s see IF they have the balls to go with it. Of course supporters like jack & jon are going to fault any & all info against their golden boy god. So be it.I am sure this is the first of the drips. Drip, Drip.
e-mail EVERY fucking journalist you know, folks. i believe in larry. if he looked like Gennifer Flowers, believe me, this story would be everywhere right now.
Jack admitted he works for Obama.
From what I understand from a good source their were cancelled interviews due to people claiming the Washington Article was real
* Washington Post ( the faked article people were claiming was fact)
Listening-
I have personally asked Larry to release his story ASAP so that the truth come out. I have said a million times, I am an Obama supporter, but I am no fool. If this is true, I don’t want him in the White House.
That being said, Larry has completely ignored many requests for him to come clean with every bit of evidence he has. There’s either two possibilities. 1) He has come out with everything he has. In which case, whether it is true or not, he will never be able to prove it. Thus, we might as well assume it is not true. 2) He is withholding evidence in order to make this come out at the right time (after Obama is the nominee, so that it will give McCain the nomination, perhaps?). If this is true, Larry is not as sincere as he says he is.
I have no idea if this is true or not. If it is and Larry has the evidence, I don’t see why Larry hasn’t been able to prove his story yet.
I will eat my words if Larry has direct proof of his accusations. Until then, as an American, I am required to believe that Obama is innocent until proven guilty. Nothing has been proven yet.
yo mama-
The statements “good source” and “cancelled interviews due to people claiming the Washington Article was real” are mutually exclusive.
A good source would have been perfectly able to see that the Washington Post never published such an article, as I did. It’s not that hard. You just call their editor and ask. I did. So why couldn’t this “good source” do the same?
God Bless you Larry!
I have never been an obama supporter.If this is true then it should come out. Obama is no better than the former governor of New York.
Jack, you’re fooling yourelf if you believe things are as easy as you just posted. Larry has put online, ONLY what he can. Not everything he has as evidence. The internet is not the place to do that, and you should no that.
Now, you try to get the media to do their job and investigate this story…good luck.
Now try to find an attorney fearless enough to take on these charges, about the “Messiah.”…good luck.
Just because you don’t know all that Larry has to offer for evidence, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
I know it doesn’t. But if he has the proof to prove he was in the same place as Obama at the same time, at the very least, the SOMEONE WOULD HAVE PICKED THIS UP. Every interview Larry has done has been him stating his case. He never brings in any new evidence. He made this claim 6 months ago for the first time. It happened 9 years ago.
Let me ask you this. When IS Larry going to prove his story? This lawsuit is just another distraction from the main claim. What’s taking so long?
I hope you all read the recent Globe and Enquirer stories about Obama and Larry’s story. Larry has good reason to be in fear for his life.
Listen to the latest rense.com interview. He certainly doesn’t want to end up like Donald Young of Obama’s church.