HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Wednesday March 5th, 2008 1:22 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Law, Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair

“At the advice of counsel I have canceled all media interviews at this time,” Larry Sinclair tells Big Head DC. “I am concentrating on getting this case in the courts based on all the facts, including the threats and intimidation, harassment and death threats.”

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 81 Comments to 'Larry Sinclair Postpones Media Interviews'


  1. 1. Kevin said:


    I think Larry has made a wise decision in doing this.

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 1:35 pm | Quote

  1. 2. Listening. said:


    Way to go Larry…all the way to Washington DC!!
    Larry has posted an interesting photo shopped pic. If that doesn’t scream to the MSM, nothing will.

    http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 1:39 pm | Quote

  1. 3. Truth said:


    Smart Move!!! The more Larry talks the greater the opportunities he gives Obama’s defense team to use his own words against him. Remember, Obama is the “word wizzard” and you can bet the people around him, who are giving him these words, know how to dissect and use other people’s words to their advantage. He has almost won the POTUS, just using words. Go get him Larry!!!! He thought he wouldn’t have to deal with Rezko but with our pressure on him and the press, he now is dealing with it. He thinks he doesn’t have to deal with you (Larry) but the pressure will continue just the same. Do your part; we are with you. Don’t give up!!!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Quote

  1. 4. papeehara said:


    FINALLY, THE FIRST BIG STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION LARRY. THIS IS GOING TO BE THE “DAVID AND GOLIATH” BATTLE OF THE CENTURY. OBAMANIA IS SOON GOING TO BE OBAMACEASED!!!! SET UP A LEGAL DEFENSE TRUST FUND LARRY AND I WILL START THE BALL ROLLING BY SENDING YOU MY CONTRIBUTION.

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 1:42 pm | Quote

  1. 5. Duck said:


    YES !!! from Bighead DC to the REAL DC !!
    Hello…MSM… are you listening?? !!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 3:14 pm | Quote

  1. 6. Truthseeker said:


    Nothing spells truth, like a photoshopped pic. Go Larry!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Quote

  1. 7. Duck said:


    Nothing spells truth, like a photoshopped pic. Go Larry!

    It make a great computer screensaver… !!
    THANKS LARRY !!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 3:49 pm | Quote

  1. 8. Duck said:


    Nothing spells truth, like a photoshopped pic. Go Larry!

    It makes a great computer screensaver… !!
    THANKS LARRY !!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 3:49 pm | Quote

  1. 9. JeannieJo said:


    Thank you, Larry for the courage you have displayed. Please know that those of us who just happened to stumble onto this situatio were looking for a sign that the tide would change. I think the voters are taking a second look at the picture in the primaries and are saying “not so fast”
    it is a shame for your your own vocals to be

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 3:52 pm | Quote

  1. 10. Drazx said:


    What ever helps get this story to the mainstream media!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 4:07 pm | Quote

  1. 11. ali said:


    Obamas skeltons need to come out sooner than later. I want Hillary to win but John Mccain will be okay too!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 4:37 pm | Quote

  1. 12. viggo said:


    what is courageous about making up lies about a candidate to profit? if that’s courageous then fine, hillary clinton eats babies. i’ll post a paypal account where you can make donations as i wage the battle to expose this. so does that mean i am courageous now?

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 4:53 pm | Quote

  1. 13. viggo said:


    or is it only being courageous if you are making lies about a black man?

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 4:54 pm | Quote

  1. 14. Drazx said:


    Now we know who has race on there mind…quit trying to turn this in to race. IDIOT

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 4:58 pm | Quote

  1. 15. Truthseeker said:


    Thank you, Larry for the courage you have displayed. Please know that those of us who just happened to stumble onto this situatio were looking for a sign that the tide would change. I think the voters are taking a second look at the picture in the primaries and are saying “not so fast”
    it is a shame for your your own vocals to be

    Doesn’t take much courage to tell lies…watch: You just slobbed my knob and smoked crack in the backseat of my Corolla. WOW…I feel real courageous!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 5:10 pm | Quote

  1. 16. outlawales said:


    keep on keepin on larry,,,,,,,,

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 5:37 pm | Quote

  1. 17. Laughing Really Hard said:


    I imagine his lawyer’s advice was something along the lines of “If you spout your crazy, schitzo, made-up stories on the teevee you’ll get sued for slander.”

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 5:56 pm | Quote

  1. 18. HAHA said:


    What did your lawyer say about posting phoney pics? Thats ok, but doing interviews isn’t?

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Quote

  1. 19. PICTURE: OBAMA KISSING REZCO said:


    posted March 5th, 2008 at 7:15 pm | Quote

  1. 20. Laughing Really Hard said:


    Also, does anybody else think it’s kind of mean for Big Head to be stringing along this obviously sick person who needs medical attention?

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 7:36 pm | Quote

  1. 21. Larry Larry Larry said:


    What else would you expect from a third rate hack site that nobody had heard of before they trawled the gutter and found Larry?

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 8:09 pm | Quote

  1. 22. poorobamaheads said:


    Larry, get it out there man. Gotta do it soon to avoid the riots when the superdelegates hand the nomination to the white witch. Larry you could save lives! The natives are gonna tear shit up if they think their boy got robbed! Squash it now Larry! Get your limo driver and your souvenir obama pube on t.v. quick!

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 8:21 pm | Quote

  1. 23. Voice of Reason said:


    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. He “cancelled his media appearnaces.” Good one. Like anyone was asking him. What court case does he imagine is going to happen, by the way? His civil suit for getting stiffed by whitehouse.com? What does that have to do with Obama? His suit agaoinst obama has already been chicked. There isn’t going to be any “case in the courts” except (at most) a civil suit to get his check from Parisi.

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 9:22 pm | Quote

  1. 24. Jay said:


    You guys are quite happy to try and smear and destroy a fine candidate like Obama eh? I hope you’re not doing it for Hillary - cos she won’t be the next president. So I guess if you are going to do this for any reason it might be to get tax breaks made permanent on the very rich, to continue the war in Iraq and maybe start some new ones. Just don’t be surprised when this comes back to bite you hard in the arse - cos it will.

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 10:38 pm | Quote

  1. 25. Drazx said:


    If Obama is going to go down its better he goes down in the primary so the Dems still have a chance to take the white house. I’m confident he won’t win the general election…the conservative groups will tear him a new one. The post-Karl Rove conservative movement is nothing to laugh at.

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 11:13 pm | Quote

  1. 26. Yo************ said:


    LArry has No Story……………Time to move on….

    Failed Polygraph.
    No Evidence.
    Lomo Driver no where to be found.

    posted March 5th, 2008 at 11:38 pm | Quote

  1. 27. poorobamaheads said:


    You guys are quite happy to try and smear and destroy a fine candidate like Obama eh? I hope you’re not doing it for Hillary - cos she won’t be the next president. So I guess if you are going to do this for any reason it might be to get tax breaks made permanent on the very rich, to continue the war in Iraq and maybe start some new ones. Just don’t be surprised when this comes back to bite you hard in the arse - cos it will.

    you’re highly brainwashed, naive and misinformed.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 12:08 am | Quote

  1. 28. Larry Larry Larry said:


    you’re highly brainwashed, naive and misinformed.

    One thing’s for sure, he’s a far, far better person than you will ever be.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 12:39 am | Quote

  1. 29. Paul said:


    It makes a great computer screensaver… !!

    sweet fucking christ! do you sit in front of your computer screen and fantasize about watching larry suck off obama?

    One thing’s for sure, he’s a far, far better person than you will ever be.

    Gee, what do you have to do to be worse than a drug dealing, mexican smuggling, credit card fraud who made up some story about blowing a complete stranger?

    Larry canceling interviews is the funniest thing I’ve heard for a while in the cesspool. “I’m sorry but I’ll have to cancel the interview with Jesus Hates Jews on WWCR 7410mhz and with Stormfront Radio, too”.

    Exactly which case is going into court? The one where he proves he blew Barack Obama? HAHAHAHA! I just made myself laugh so hard I threw up!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 1:32 am | Quote

  1. 30. Good thing said:


    The good news about baby boomers is that they are not immortal, so eventually they will die.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 5:26 am | Quote

  1. 31. Jay said:


    you’re highly brainwashed, naive and misinformed.

    Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, I’ll be laughing my ass off when Hillary gets BURNED in the general.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 5:29 am | Quote

  1. 32. Jay said:


    And I don’t want to hear a single one of you float the Obama as VP idea here - after you’ve supported this slimeball Larry Sinclair.

    You’d only support it to USE Obama to try and get his voters after you’ve all been abusing him and the supporters.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 5:31 am | Quote

  1. 33. Jay said:


    If Obama doesn’t pull this off - I can’t wait until McCain runs through the list of every dirty thing Hillary did to Obama - pointing out each fix, each discrepancy.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 5:40 am | Quote

  1. 34. Don Thieme said:


    This is probably because the Obama campaign may countersue, and Larry’s “media” appearances give them good grounds for that.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 8:17 am | Quote

  1. 35. outlawales said:


    lets give obama the benefit of the doubt,,,,and say larry’s story is not true,,,,,,what happens if obama’s people paid off whitehouse.com for a rigged polygraph,,,,,are you okay with that,,,and if so,,,i guess then you would be okay with paid obama bloggers that threatened larry’s life,,,,,,,,,you dont think a good attorney couldnt find something actionable for that,,,maybe obama is not as squeaky clean as all his followers would think,,,,,,where there is smoke ,,,,,there is fire

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 8:50 am | Quote

  1. 36. WTF? said:


    You guys are quite happy to try and smear and destroy a fine candidate like Obama eh? I hope you’re not doing it for Hillary - cos she won’t be the next president. So I guess if you are going to do this for any reason it might be to get tax breaks made permanent on the very rich, to continue the war in Iraq and maybe start some new ones. Just don’t be surprised when this comes back to bite you hard in the arse - cos it will.

    I want to know the truth about ALL of our candidates. As far as smearing Obama, he blew this shit storm himself. It’s time for him to shovel out of it, cause I am tired of seeing him hide behind the pile as if it doesn’t exist.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 9:12 am | Quote

  1. 37. Paul said:


    I know you larrytards are so far gone that all you can do is bounce around your own noise machine BUT for the sake of those who still stop to think about things -

    Until Larry produces evidence this is no smoke and no fire. Obama did NOT blow “this shitstorm on himself”. There is no shitstorm except an unfounded claim of a man convicted for drugs and credit card fraud.

    Outlawales recently provided proof that this ISN’T about “the truth” by posting about right-wing whack job Paul Hollrah.

    I’d love to see an editorial from BigHead as to why they continue to promote a charge that hasn’t been proven. Any possibility to see what your thinking is? Do you really trust a white criminal over a black senator?

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 9:42 am | Quote

  1. 38. outlawales said:


    so paul you saying that barack making a speech in which he claims his dad and his mom met at the selma marches is okay,,,when barack was already born,,,,,wow,,,,,,how did that happen,,,,,,,isnt that a lie,,,,,,,isnt obama lying,,,,,,i mean i know he was only giving a sermon,,,,,,,but i think like all sermons after awhile, you start to fall asleep,,,,,,,come on i dare someone to say they havent fallen asleep in church,,,,maybe if obama quit telling the same lies in his sermons,,,,people would listen,,,,,he needs to shake it up a bit,,,,at least tell his followers different lies,,,not the same old ones,,,,,,

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 9:59 am | Quote

  1. 39. Paul said:


    See, this is the completely fucked up thing about larrytards - you say, “show me evidence that larry sinclair blew barack obama in the back of a limo while obama smoked crack” and in response they talk about something else. I don’t know if it’s ADHD or psychosis or just an aversion to actually knowing the truth that they claim to want to uncover, but I DO know that if Larry had gone to the MSM with ANYBODY even if they were lying who would back up Larry’s story, then Obama would most likely be a footnote in history right now.

    But he hasn’t. And he won’t.

    The money he’s scamming of the YouTube Rubes is NOT going toward a private detective to track down the limo driver but toward a private lawsuit against a company that Larry didn’t even think to sign a contract with.

    If you want to talk about how Obama would be a horrible president, I’m willing to talk about that. If you want to talk about his trustworthiness, I’ll talk about that, too. But you cannot your hatred of Obama on an incident that has never been shown to have happened except inside the mind of an ex-con with a brain tumor.

    Is this really the future of American politics? Is BigHeadDC proud to contribute to it?

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 10:18 am | Quote

  1. 40. Paul said:


    Oh, one last thing -

    If you don’t think that Larry is a user, then consider that he won’t even host this conversation on his YouTube page. He’s too much of a pussy to allow open discussion of the issue that he refuses to resolve.

    I could go into the benefits of not banning people on YouTube but who needs to give this piece of shit any good ideas.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 10:20 am | Quote

  1. 41. outlawales said:


    okay paul,,,,,,obama is not ready to be president,,,,,and as far as what larry says,,,,,,i am a firm believer in where there is smoke there is fire,,,,,,i saw darrly strawberry smoke crack,,,i met king hussein,,,,,you probably dont believe either one but its true,,,,,,,,,

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 10:41 am | Quote

  1. 42. Paul said:


    Great! Have Larry prove the charge or stopping talking about it as if it happened. Something is not true just because you believe it to be true. It needs to be proven. For some reason you refuse to hold Larry to account for his charges.

    Get the proof and this will all be over.

    Why is this so hard for you to understand? Seriously - why don’t you want proof? Once Larry proves his case then Obama is finished in politics forever. That’s what you want - right? Then why don’t you insist that Larry bury Obamam once and for all?

    I really want to know the answer to this. Please don’t come back with your smoke-fire shit. If you want Obama politically dead then why aren’t you insisting that Larry deliver the coup d’ grace?

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 10:52 am | Quote

  1. 43. Paul said:


    Funny how outlawales can spout her little larrytard mantra in the little larrytard lunchtable of YouTube…

    Where there is smoke, there is fire, or in the Obama allegations, CRACK COCAINE.
    Also, beware the company you keep.
    And why in the world would we promote the mailroom guy to the CEO position of our mult-trillion dollar corporation.

    but won’t join the adults’ table in the outside world.

    Can ANYBODY tell why those who wish to destroy Obama aren’t putting all of their pressure on Larry to finish the job?

    Bueller?

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 11:52 am | Quote

  1. 44. Paul said:


    Outlawales sez

    look dude,,,,at this point the important thing to me is that true or not,,larry has helped bring to the attention of the world that obama has not been vetted,,,was getting a free pass from the media,,,,and perhaps isnt all that hes says he is,,,,,i love it that people are starting to take a closer look at obama and i dont care what you say,,larry has been part of that,,,,,,too bad for youtrue or not. I guess that sums up America in the 21st century. And no one cares enough to do anything about it.

    Eurasia has always been at war with Eastasia.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 12:09 pm | Quote

  1. 45. outlawales said:


    thank you for posting my youtube comments,,,,it saves me the time paul,,,,you frickin boob,,lol

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Quote

  1. 46. outlawales said:


    obama says his mom and dad met at the selma marches in 1965,,,but guess what paul,,,,,,,,HE’S LYING,,,,,because obama was born in 1961,,,,,,,,,,put that in your pipe and smoke it,,,,,you frickin boob

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 12:20 pm | Quote

  1. 47. outlawales said:


    and another thing if obama wins the nomination,,,,(i hope and dont think he will) i will blame him and his stupid ego solely for giving the presidency to mccain,,,,,,,,obama cannot win the big election,,,,,it will not happen,,,,,,,he should have waited,,,,,he believes his hype and its gone to his head,,,,he would impress me most if he said kum ba ya and ill step aside and be the vp candidate,,,,,,,now that would be impressive,,,,,hes young and can run for president when he has more experience

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Quote

  1. 48. Paul said:


    You know what? I’m done. You’re right about one thing - beware the company I keep. So I’m going to stop hanging out with shit. I still believe in the truth and, stupid as it sounds, the things that America stands for. I’m sorry that you don’t. I can only hope that you and the vultures you consort with somehow find redemption. I’m not holding my breath.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 12:33 pm | Quote

  1. 49. Honestly... said:


    and another thing if obama wins the nomination,,,,(i hope and dont think he will) i will blame him and his stupid ego solely for giving the presidency to mccain,,,,,,,,obama cannot win the big election,,,,,it will not happen,,,,,,,he should have waited,,,,,he believes his hype and its gone to his head,,,,he would impress me most if he said kum ba ya and ill step aside and be the vp candidate,,,,,,,now that would be impressive,,,,,hes young and can run for president when he has more experience

    *************************************************************************

    Obviously you are one of the middle aged women who think that this election is somehow owed to Hillary. Well hate to break it to you, but the majority of the people disagree! I hope that you gain a little ensight on who is actually winning this race…OBAMA! So why would the winner take a backseat to the presumptive loser! She is mathematically disqualified already, by her staying in the race it is only fueling the fervent vitriol from middle aged women that won’t be happy unless she is the nominee, regardless of whether she deserves the nomination or not. As far as experience, stop using her talking points and actually state facts. What experience does she really have? She was first lady then what? How many bills have her name on them? What foreign policy expertise does she have? NONE People like you will only be happy when you see the entire country painted red with a McCain victory if she gets the nomination. The only way I will regain an ounce of respect for her is to drop out of the race let go of the ego trip and take the VP slot, and then let this futile, malicious battle go since she can’t win…even with FL and MI seated. In MI, especially she didn’t get but 50% of the vote when she was the sole candidate on the ticket! She is the weaker candidate and needs to bow out gracefully and stop all the mudslinging so we can actually have a chance in Nov!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 2:42 pm | Quote

  1. 50. outlawales said:


    obama cant win big vote,,,sorry but he cant and wont,,,,,

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 3:12 pm | Quote

  1. 51. outlawales said:


    obama has less experience,,,,,period,,,,

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Quote

  1. 52. FANCY said:


    LETS TRY TO KEEP THIS EVENT DIGNIFIED..ALL THAT IS PUBLISHED WILL BE HELD TO ACCOUNT..AND ALL U NEED IS THE TRUTH ..TO SET U FREE!…AND ONCE AGAIN…GET THAT LIMO DRIVER TO STAND UP FOR HIMSELF..AND DAM!..TO BAD OBAMA WAS NOT WEARING A BLUE DRESS THAT NIGHT!…..HEHEHE!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 3:15 pm | Quote

  1. 53. LMAA said:


    obama cant win big vote,,,sorry but he cant and wont,,,,,

    Sorry to break it to you, but what democrat can’t win CA and NY and the other typically blue states in the general? Keep spinning the big state talking point, but the reality is that he has MORE delegates and more states, and more popular votes! Those are facts! He has 27 states she has 14…FACT! He has approximately a 150 point pledge delegate lead…FACT! He won more delegates in TX than she did…FACT! Stop spinning and state facts! See how facts trump assumptions and assertions.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 3:18 pm | Quote

  1. 54. LMAA said:


    obama has less experience,,,,,period,,,,

    Name her experience! Name it! If she has so much you should have no problem naming some of her accomplishments! She has more experience in scandals that is true, but what valuable experience does she bring to the table…NOTHING! Hence why she is losing…period!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 3:20 pm | Quote

  1. 55. Chu said:


    posted March 6th, 2008 at 3:24 pm | Quote

  1. 56. Don't Bother said:


    Chu - don’t bother. Talking sense to them is a sucker’s game

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Quote

  1. 57. LMA) said:


    Hillbots,

    Read here:

    http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1719614,00.html?imw=Y

    The reason she should withdraw!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 4:01 pm | Quote

  1. 58. LMAO said:


    Hillbots,

    Read here:

    http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1719614,00.html?imw=Y

    The reason she should withdraw!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 4:01 pm | Quote

  1. 59. outlawales said:


    obama cant and wont win the big vote,,,,,,get over it,,,,,,,

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 4:18 pm | Quote

  1. 60. Honestly... said:


    Appears that Hill won’t get the opportunity to prove she can win the big states in the general.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 4:27 pm | Quote

  1. 61. outlawales said:


    obama will fall on his face,,,,,,,,no way he can win the big vote,,,,,,sorry but its true,,,wish all you want,,,,,he will not be president,,,

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 4:36 pm | Quote

  1. 62. Dana said:


    GOD BLESS YOU LARRY SINCLAIR!!! KEEP FIGHTING TO TAKE AMERICA BACK!!!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 4:42 pm | Quote

  1. 63. Honestly... said:


    obama will fall on his face,,,,,,,,no way he can win the big vote,,,,,,sorry but its true,,,wish all you want,,,,,he will not be president,,,

    Maybe…but NEITHER will Hillary. Go McCain 08′

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 5:14 pm | Quote

  1. 64. outlawales said:


    i can easily vote for mccain,,,,got no problem with that,,,,,,

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 5:28 pm | Quote

  1. 65. mb said:


    If obama gests the nomination I will vote Nadar or Mccain. I don’t trust obama. When my state had its primary, obama won. There was an area in which more votes were counted than people who voted.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 5:37 pm | Quote

  1. 66. Honestly... said:


    i can easily vote for mccain,,,,got no problem with that,,,,,,

    Well, I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. I guess either way McCain wins! Oh, well!

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 7:02 pm | Quote

  1. 67. Honestly... said:


    If obama gests the nomination I will vote Nadar or Mccain. I don’t trust obama. When my state had its primary, obama won. There was an area in which more votes were counted than people who voted.

    ******************************************************************
    Just vote for McCain if you don’t like Obama. Nader is a wasted vote. I will be voting for McCain myself if Hillary gets the nomination. I won’t waste that vote on Nader.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 7:04 pm | Quote

  1. 68. Democrat said:


    If Obama is the nominee, I believe he will win if he chooses Hillary as his VP. If he doesn’t choose her, I believe he will lose because many Democratic women would consider it a slap in the face and would vote for McCain or not at all.
    Likewise, if Hillary is the nominee, I believe she would win with Obama as her VP. Without him, I think it’s a tossup. It would depend on how many African-Americans choose to stay home. She might still eke it out, however, because I believe that many moderate Republican women would vote for her with or without Obama. When she ran for the US Senate in New York in both 2000 and 2006, Republican women voted for her in droves, and I think they would do it in the general election against McCain — especially with his 100-year war plan in Iraq.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 7:15 pm | Quote

  1. 69. outlawales said:


    very well put democrat,,,,,,love it

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 9:02 pm | Quote

  1. 70. poorobamaheads said:


    One thing’s for sure, he’s a far, far better person than you will ever be.

    Why? Because he doesn’t know that 70K/yr isn’t “the very rich”? Because he doesn’t realize that you don’t tax the “very rich” and you don’t tax wealth? Because he doesn’t realize that the “very rich” know how to hide income? (which is what you actually do tax) Because he doesn’t realize who picks up the tab when “tax the very rich” doesn’t work? Because he doesn’t realize that small business owners are not the “very rich”? Because he doesn’t realize that if we pull out of Iraq precipitantly, we’ll be shortly sending troops right back in, only into a more unstable environment? Because he apparently doesn’t care what happens to the people of Iraq?
    This makes him a better person? You have no idea what constitutes a good person, Larry Larry Larry.

    posted March 6th, 2008 at 11:24 pm | Quote

  1. 71. Larry Larry Larry said:


    Ah I see, America the nation with the highest prison population (by far), the the highest number of people without health coverage (by far), with the highest number of drug users, with the largest number of people under the poverty line, and with the largest poverty gap when compared with the “liberal” democracies of Western Europe. Yes, conservatism (and America is by far the most conservative nation around) has served the poor of the America well.

    Yes, it is such a crime that Obama believes we should try a system that has been proved to work far better in terms of equality, opportunity, and quality of life for the whole population instead of just those who happened to find themselves on the right side of the fence.

    Did you know that Americans pay four times as much for their private healthcare system than do Canadians and Brits? And yet, those countries don’t leave 10% of their population in the cold (until they’re at death’s door when we taxpayers still end up footing the bill). Fancy that! Universal healthcare is cheaper and more efficient than the dog’s breakfast we have here in the US. And wouldn’t you know, those wealthy enough to afford their own healthcare *still* have the choice (despite the Rudy’s lies last year), and will even be more likely be able to afford the bills since they would not be forking over thousands of dollars a month in premiums.

    Of course, I don’t expect you to understand the basic economics and benefits involved, since you and your kind are so ideologically hidebound, but you never know.

    posted March 7th, 2008 at 2:24 am | Quote