Filed under: Journalism, Scoops, Barack Obama, Sean Hannity, Larry Sinclair, Bill Cunningham
The Larry Sinclair story has caught the attention of Bill Cunningham, a controversial radio host who frequently appears on Sean Hannity’s TV and radio shows. Cunningham drew loads of media attention this past week when Sen. John McCain denounced his noting of Sen. Barack Obama’s middle name during a McCain campaign event.
Sinclair tells Big Head DC he may be soon asked to tell his story to Cunningham’s large “Live On Sunday Night” radio audience.
While the U.S. mainstream media has been slow to cover Sinclair’s allegations to date, the Canadian mainstream media is taking note. Sinclair is scheduled to record an appearance on the the popular “The Standard” interview program on Wednesday, which airs on TV stations throughout Canada. Hosted by journalist Andrew Dawson, recent guests on the program include Salman Rushdie, Clay Aiken and Anne Rice.
Earlier: BHDC EXCLUSIVE Interview With Sen. Obama’s Accuser; Sinclair Discusses Polygraph, Plans
Lovin’ this !!!
MSM here we go!!
Keep up people…
The MSM is near………..
MSMSMSMSMSMSMSMSMSMSMSM!!!!!
Finally!! It is time to bring us the TRUTH! And thank you BigHeadDC for staying on top of this story!! Your reporting is great!!
Cunningham - the guy who McCain even thinks is crazy?
HAHAHAHA
And he’s RECORDING it on Wednesday? What are they waiting for? The Tuesday election?
Whatta bunch of BS.
I think it is sad that Canada’s mainstream media is covering our election news first. What is wrong with America?
Hats off to Big Head DC. You seem to be reporting up to date information about this story. It is too important to merely ignore!
This election is far from over on Tuesday. It has only just begun. Larry spreading the word at any time he can just proves he is telling the truth, and is not motivated by the election schedule.
The Cunningham appearance will be huge. Very smart.
quoted for truth…u.s. american journalism is dead.
Will Larry be on “Live on Sunday Night” tonight? The Canadian show is on Wednesday.
A person named Garrity is a blogger for the Obama campaign, and he has been charged with infiltrating Larry Sinclair discussions on the web. He and other paid Obama staffers have spread false information about Hillary, McCain and even Sinclair. He uses false screennames in many of his postings.
Yes, tonight is Cunningham.
“10. Tip said:
A person named Garrity is a blogger for the Obama campaign, and he has been charged with infiltrating Larry Sinclair discussions on the web.”
By whom?
MSM!!! MSM !!!
Thanks Big Head DC !!
This is getting good !!
…the tip comes and then there is Garrity. Call in to the show tonight, folks. Tell them what we have seen from the Obama llamas.
I predict that even if the mainstream media picked this up and documented that it isn’t true, Larry’s warriors will still claim they were paid off. All of them. Every reporter in the country.
The MSM has the duty to tell the story, and Obama has the duty to respond. This will be picked up. Larry will be vindicated.
Chris Mathews has a new strange felling running up his leg..
She’s gonna blow !!
His leg is going to be radioactive by the time this one is over.
Cummingham interview was recorded before the POLYGRAPH results came public so it doesn’t really matter what Larry said before. Anyone who listens to that nuthead Cummingham is a closet racist anyways. Cummingham is very well-known in Ohio for disliking colored people and he is a friend of David Duke.
We are not that stupid ladies and gentlemen. America is not all racist and cokeheads like Larry. Dan Parisi is a smart millionare himself. You CAN NOT try to defraud a well-known business veteran 20,000 without paying a price. Larry tried to steal 20,000 from Parisi by fabricating this Obama story in the first place, but Parisi was still willing to give Larry the $20,000 if Sinclair honored the terms of the contract which clearly said
1. “YOU WILL ACCEPT THE RESULT OF THIS TEST AS FINAL VERDICT”
2. “YOU CANNOT TAKE ANOTHER POLYGRAPH TEST”
Parisi like all smart millionares wanted the story to be exclusive to him and to his website, but Larry broke that contract when he said in an interview he wanted to take another polygraph test. It made no sense for Parisi to pay this nuthead $20,000. For what?
Also, how can you attack the polygraph result and then expect to get paid 20,000 for taking it? This borders insanity and Larry is becoming delusional day after day.
Parisi has every right to tell Larry to F** off. It is just commonsense and any intelligent American would do the same thing.
The interview is live, Garrity.
At this point, Larry could go on national TV and say that he made the whole thing up, and you wouldn’t even believe him.
Gary…
Huff and puff.
This ain’t going away..
Garrity is working overtime!!!!
Garrity…
You got any other (two page) spontaneous thought on this???
MSM !!
Gary…
Huff and puff.
This ain’t going away..
Okay if it doesn’t go away. Your point being? A prerecorded Larry Sinclair interview…golly g wilikers? Comeback when this makes real news and/or there is a shred of proof!
I’ll do that Loose…
who is “garrity”?
an obama blogger (see tip above)
Obama supporter? So Obama has only ONE supporter on the net out of the millions who support him?
Okey, this is another claim that doesn’t make sense.
Gary..Garrity… is that YOU??
no he blogs for obama, spreading lies
All of the above are lies and or assumptions. The MSM has the responsible of reporting factual reports (which probably excludes this story), but nonetheless they do not have the responsibility of reporting claims and/or accusations that are not based on factual accounts. Obama does not have an obligation to repond as he is not the assuser he is the accused! As of yet this has not been picked up, so your statement is an assumption. And Larry being vindicated is only an assumption built upon the presumption that he is telling the truth and has facts to back his claims. This as of yet has not been proven. Thanks!
TELL THEM TO LISTEN TO CUNNINGHAM TONIGHT. ASK THAT THEY FEATURE CUNNINGHAM TO TALK TO HANNITY BEFORE SEPTEMBER:
adam.housley@foxnews.com; adam.shapiro@foxnews.com; ainsley.earhardt@foxnews.com; alan.colmes@foxnews.com; alexis.glick@foxnews.com; alicia.acuna@foxnews.com; alisyn.camerota@foxnews.com; allison.costarene@foxnews.com; amanda.walker@foxnews.com; americasnewsroom@foxnews.com; amy.kellogg@foxnews.com; andrew.levy@foxnews.com; andrew.napolitano@foxnews.com; andrew.stack@foxnews.com; angela.mcglowan@foxnews.com; anita.mcnaught@foxnews.com; anita.vogel@foxnews.com; ann.burkart@fox.com; anna.botting@foxnews.com; anna.gilligan@foxnews.com; arthel.neville@foxnews.com; ashley.nix@foxnews.com; ashley.webster@foxnews.com; askfox@fox.com; atlarge@foxnews.com; beltway@foxnews.com; ben.stein@foxnews.com; bill.hemmer@foxnews.com; bill.kristol@foxnews.com; bill.mccuddy@foxnews.com; bill.oreilly@foxnews.com; bill.schulz@foxnews.com; bob.novak@foxnews.com; bob.sellers@foxnews.com; bpfeiffer@fox.com; brenda.buttner@foxnews.com; bret.baier@foxnews.com; brian.kilmeade@foxnews.com; brian.knoblock@foxnews.com; brian.lewis@foxnews.com; brian.peterson@fox.com; brian.wilson@foxnews.com; brigitte.quinn@foxnews.com; brit.hume@foxnews.com; brooke.alexander@foxnews.com; bullsandbears@foxnews.com; cal.thomas@foxnews.com; carl.cameron@foxnews.com; carol.iovanna@foxnews.com; carol.mckinley@foxnews.com; caroline.shively@foxnews.com; casey.stegall@foxnews.com; cash@foxnews.com; cash@foxnews.com; catherine.herridge@foxnews.com; cavuto@foxnews.com; cavuto@foxnews.com; cheryl.casone@foxnews.com; chris.knowles@foxnews.com; chris.wallace@foxnews.com; claudia.cowan@foxnews.com; cody.willard@foxnews.com; colonelscorner@foxnews.com; comments@foxnews.com; connell.mcshane@foxnews.com; courtney.friel@foxnews.com; courtney.kealy@foxnews.com; craig.mitnick@foxnews.com; craig.rivera@foxnews.com; dagen.mcdowell@foxnews.com; dan.springer@foxnews.com; dana.blanton@foxnews.com; dana.lewis@foxnews.com; dari.alexander@foxnews.com; dave.ramsey@foxnews.com; david.asman@foxnews.com; david.folk.thomas@foxnews.com; david.lee.miller@foxnews.com; david.macdougall@foxnews.com; david.piper@foxnews.com; dmca@fox.com; domenica.davis@foxnews.com; dominic.di-natale@foxnews.com; donna.fiducia@foxnews.com; doug.kennedy@foxnews.com; dr.georgia.witkin@foxnews.com; dr.manny.alvarez@foxnews.com; e.d.hill@foxnews.com; elizabeth.macdonald@foxnews.com; eric.shawn@foxnews.com; erik.liljegren@foxnews.com; fatherjonathan@foxnews.com; fawn.boyd-vigil@foxnews.com; feedback@foxnews.com; fergus@nhgop.org; fncimag@foxnews.com; fncspecials@foxnews.com; fns@foxnews.com; forbes@foxnews.com; foxaroundtheworld@foxnews.com; foxreport@foxnews.com; friends@foxnews.com; geraldo.rivera@foxnews.com; greg.burke@foxnews.com; greg.gutfeld@foxnews.com; greg.kelly@foxnews.com; greg.milam@foxnews.com; greg.palkot@foxnews.com; gregg.jarrett@foxnews.com; greta.van.susteren@foxnews.com; gretchen.carlson@foxnews.com; hannity@foxnews.com; harris.faulkner@foxnews.com; heartland@foxnews.com; heather.nauert@foxnews.com; hemmer@foxnews.com; housecall@foxnews.com; ian.rae@foxnews.com; ian.woods@foxnews.com; irena.briganti@foxnews.com; jackie.gutfeld@foxnews.com; james.brown@foxnews.com; james.rosen@foxnews.com; jamie.colby@foxnews.com; jamie@foxnews.com; jane.skinner@foxnews.com; janice.dean@foxnews.com; jeff.flock@foxnews.com; jeff.goldblatt@foxnews.com; jenna.lee@foxnews.com; jennifer.griffin@foxnews.com; jenny.percival@foxnews.com; jer@foxnews.com; jill.dobson@foxnews.com; jim.angle@foxnews.com; joe.earley@fox.com; john.gibson@foxnews.com; john.kasich@foxnews.com; john.moody@foxnews.com; jon.scott@foxnews.com; jon@foxnews.com; jonathan.hunt@foxnews.com; jonathan.serrie@foxnews.com; judge.andrew.napolitano@foxnews.com; julian.phillips@foxnews.com; julie.banderas@foxnews.com; julie.kirtz@foxnews.com; juliet.huddy@foxnews.com; katherine.creag@foxnews.com; kathy.ardleigh@foxnews.com; kelly.wright@foxnews.com; kim.mcintyre@foxnews.com; kimberly.guilfoyle-newsom@foxnews.com; kitty.logan@foxnews.com; kris.gutierrez@foxnews.com; kristen.sullivan@foxnews.com; laura.ingle@foxnews.com; lauren.green@foxnews.com; laurie.dhue@foxnews.com; linda.vester@foxnews.com; lineup@foxnews.com; lis.wiehl@foxnews.com; lisa.bernhard@foxnews.com; lisonlaw2@foxnews.com; liz.claman@foxnews.com; lou.aguirre@foxnews.com; louise.pennell@foxnews.com; luanne.sorrell@foxnews.com; lucy.noland@foxnews.com; major.garrett@foxnews.com; malini.bawa@foxnews.com; mancow.muller@foxnews.com; marianne.silber@foxnews.com; marny.cavanaugh@foxnews.com; martha.maccallum@foxnews.com; martha@foxnews.com; martin.brunt@foxnews.com; mary.cavanaugh@foxnews.com; mbonnot@watchfox.com; megyn.kelly@foxnews.com; meredith.whitney@foxnews.com; mike.emanuel@foxnews.com; mike.gallagher@foxnews.com; mike.jerrick@foxnews.com; mike.norman@foxnews.com; mike.straka@foxnews.com; mike.tobin@foxnews.com; molly.henneberg@foxnews.com; molly.line@foxnews.com; myword@foxnews.com; neil.cavuto@foxnews.com; neil.sean@foxnews.com; newswatch@foxnews.com; nicole.petallides@foxnews.com; oliver.north@foxnews.com; ontherecord@foxnews.com; orlando.salinas@foxnews.com; page.hopkins@foxnews.com; pat.sajak@foxnews.com; patti.ann.browne@foxnews.com; peter.barnes@foxnews.com; peter.johnson@foxnews.com; phil.keating@foxnews.com; rachel.amatt@foxnews.com; ray.hennessey@foxnews.com; rebecca.gomez@foxnews.com; rebecca.santana@foxnews.com; redeye@foxnews.com; reena.ninan@foxnews.com; rich.edson@foxnews.com; rick.folbaum@foxnews.com; rick.leventhal@foxnews.com; rick.reichmuth@foxnews.com; robert.gray@foxnews.com; rudi.bakhtiar@foxnews.com; sandra.smith@foxnews.com; sarah.hughes@foxnews.com; scott.grogin@fox.com; sean.hannity@foxnews.com; shannon.bream@foxnews.com; shepard.smith@foxnews.com; shibani.joshi@foxnews.com; special@foxnews.com; steve.brown@foxnews.com; steve.centanni@foxnews.com; steve.doocy@foxnews.com; steve.harrigan@foxnews.com; stuart.varney@foxnews.com; studiob@foxnews.com; suzanne.sena@foxnews.com; terry.keenan@foxnews.com; theticker@foxnews.com; thom.bird@foxnews.com; thomas.tyrer@fox.com; tiki.barber@foxnews.com; todd.ciganek@foxnews.com; todd.connor@foxnews.com; tom.sullivan@foxnews.com; trace.gallagher@foxnews.com; uma.pemmaraju@foxnews.com; ursula.errington@foxnews.com; wendell.goler@foxnews.com; william.la.jeunesse@foxnews.com; yourcomments@foxnews.com; yourwordlive@foxnews.com
I have never heard of this “Garrity” character. As a matter of fact I don’t write much on blogs.
But here is the challenge. If I was “Garrity”, why would I name myself Gary?
I am not Garrity or whatever character larry is battling on the net. I sometimes read BigheadDc and I found this MSM story to be just ridiculous. If MSM wasnted to pick this story up, it would have done so before Larry was found to be lying by the polygraph. WHy would they do it now?
How did Larry Sinclair “breach” his contract? He didn’t. He mentioned taking ANOTHER polygraph, but he never did. This story is BEYOND news. It has move twists, turns, and scandals that would make any day time soap opera jealous. Canada has always impressed me in many ways. Maybe it’s time to move? I hope this hits MSM by Tuesday, but the damage is done as far as I’m concerned. I WILL NEVER SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEWSPAPER EVER AGAIN. All the people involved in the MSM cover-ups need a reality check. See how they like being unemployed. THEY AREN’T DOING THEIR JOBS. Thank you LARRY SINCLAIR, thank you BIGHEADDC.COM, thank you RENSE.COM, etc. Larry Sinclair is very brave, tough, and smart. THANK YOU AGAIN MR. SINCLAIR.
- I do not endorse any candidate at this time.
Canada broadcasting is awesome. They know there’s a story here.
Actually, the PolyScore showed Larry was truthful.
You’ll never subscribe to a newspaper again? Get with the times. Most people started reading papers on the internet 8 years ago.
The report said the computer said he was being truthful on the drug accusation. But the two humans said he was lying on both. The polyscore agreed that he was lying on the sex claims. So, you have six scores (three for each) and one score said he was being truthful on one of the claims. So he failed 5 out of 6 polygraph scores, if you’re looking at it that way.
lool@ Truthful. Don’t lie about the test. It is there, it is on video, it is on paper.
Larry failed the test. Period.
Now, he is claiming Obama paid Parisi 750,000. Now isn’t that real insanity? How can you actually claim that figure without seeing the paper work, telephone conversations, email between Obama and Parisi and all the rest of the goodies?
Ok, I get it now. It is Larry saying whatever he wants as always.
Good luck Larry (Sandra).
I am an Obama supporter. I want this to hit the mainstream so that Larry is FORCED to finally provide more proof than just his hotel statement. Millions of people were in the Chicago area at the same time that Sinclair was, so the hotel statement alone is not proof. Get the limo driver to come forward and then you’ve got a real story. Until then, it’s Larry’s word and Larry’s word alone. That’s not enough to prove anything. But I do want the truth of this to come out because knowing the Republicans, they are trying to keep this suppressed until the general election so that they can get an easy victory when this is “suddenly” reported in October. I’d rather this come out now, get the real truth of the matter out there — whether it be Larry is being truthful or he’s lying — so that the Dems do not nominate such an easy target in Obama.
Quoted for truth.
Don’t forget the Reverse Speech Analysis.
Excellent point..
this is gonna be a new interview with cunningham tonight right,,,,why are some people talking about prerecorded stuff,,,,,i dont get it,,,who cares about the prerecorded interview ,,,i listened to it,,,and yes it was before the test,,,,but still informative,,,,,,,,,won’t tonight’s interview be live,,,,,,hence the name cunningham live,,,,,,help out anyone
the limo driver will come forward
I’d put the chances at about 80% that Cunningham doesn’t run an interview, and it’ll become the center of the latest conspiracy claim.
Tip,
Then he needs to do so soon. It’s gotta happen before the Democratic Convention so that the delegates, even the pledged ones (they are not bound to the popular vote as many people think) can change their support. Larry needs to speed up the process on this, otherwise I am convinced he’s being paid by the Republicans to string this out until September or October.
It’s unfortunate that we have to rely on the Canadian press to inform Americans about what’s going on here. They were also the ones who disclosed the Obama campaign shenanigans regarding NAFTA.
I don’t believe this story, and I’m still voting for Romney, even though he dropped out.
It’s also unfortunate that the MSM will not report on Bill and Hillary’s screwjob of a big donor during her 2000 Senate campaign. They used the old “bait and switch” on the guy, got big time support from him, and then screwed him over after agreeing to help with his comic book company. He sued them and it’s still in the courts in California.
Daniel, are you referring to Peter Paul? That was reported by the MSM in the past, that’s how I know about it. He’s suing Hillary’s 2000 campaign and she will probaly have to testify, but she will not be a defendant in the case. Although he tried to name her as one, the California courts said no.
Yes, that’s who I’m referring to. There’s video of her and Bill hanging out with him, video of her saying thank you to Peter Paul at a big dinner. Somehow, she and Bill were dropped as defendants but a whole bunch of her aides got thrown under the bus and are defendants in the case. She and Bill are pretending that they don’t know him, even though there’s video of them with him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQDA9KKs0ZY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGdhCmCuRhk&feature=related
Daniel, I don’t know all the nuances of the relationship, but I do recall that even the CA Supreme Court rejected Paul’s appeal to make her a defendant. Apparently, Mr. Paul was not able to prove his case in this matter. And this was reported in the MSM.