Larry Sinclair is scheduled to appear on the following radio show on Friday from 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. (ET).
THE AMERICAN AWAKENING
Host: Michael Herzog
Call In Number: 800-313-9443
He’s also scheduled to be interviewed on The Right Perspective on Friday night.
Could mainstream coverage be soon to follow?
Primary Questions?
Filed by: Steve Ralls
There was a time - not too many election cycles ago - when LGBT families were virtually invisible to politicians, and candidates sat in silence when it came time to speak out on issues important to our community or, even more importantly, when the time came to take action and expand the rights available to us.
Now, with the 2008 race for the White House, much has changed.
As Bilerico reported earlier, Senator Barack Obama recently launched an ad campaign in the LGBT media, reaching out to our community for votes as the Democratic race for the White House tightens. And on February 27, Senator Hillary Clinton sat down for an unprecedent conference call with reporters from LGBT media outlets in the critical, upcoming primary states of Texas and Ohio.
Senator Clinton’s message was clear: She wants lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans to hear directly from her . . . and she wants to take the time to talk with our community about how she will move us forward toward equality.
As the first article from Senator Clinton’s interview with reporters in Texas and Ohio notes, “The Obama campaign declined an interview” with the Gay People’s Chronicle, despite the paper “trying to get live interviews with both candidates after the Wisconsin primary on February 18.”
And while there’s no doubt that a Clinton or Obama presidency would arrive in the Oval Office as being the most pro-LGBT in American history, the courage in speaking up means something, too: Going on the record, explaining your own positions and making a personal, first-hand appeal for the support of our community leaves an impression.
Senator Clinton, surely aware that some tough inquires awaited her, did not shy away from the primary questions that are important to LGBT voters. She met them head-on, and spoke up, once more, for expanding our civil liberties.
Much of the article in today’s Chronicle focuses on recognition of same-sex unions, and Clinton again notes that she, like Senator Obama, supports recognition of our relationships, including federal benefits for same-sex couples.
“[T]he biggest problem is the federal benefits, and I want to change the law,” Clinton told reporter Eric Resnick, adding that the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligation Act is the first thing that needs to be passed. The legislation, which Clinton co-sponsored, would provide benefits to federal employees on par with those offered to married, opposite-sex couples.
Resnick also questioned Senator Clinton about a recent New Jersey report which concluded that civil unions provide a separate, “second class” status to same-sex couples. “I agree with my friend [New Jersey Governor] John Corzine that the report raises some serious concerns,” she said, reiterating that she would support repealing federal law which limits important benefits like Social Security and tax benefits to married, heterosexual couples.
But what struck me about Clinton’s interview was not just that she spoke out, again, in favor of expanded benefits, but that - in the midst of a truly hectic and grueling primary campaign schedule - she made sure that our community heard from her directly. She didn’t send out a campaign aide to tell the LGBT press about her positions, or just issue a press release or place an ad with talking points about the issues. She went directly to the LGBT electorate, via our community’s press, to make her case to gay voters.
That’s significant. It is, as far as I’m aware, the first time a presidential candidate has done so as part of a primary state strategy. And it may mark an important turning point in how the candidates view our community.
In addition to talking with major media outlets like CNN or The New York Times - where our issues rarely come into the conversation - Senator Clinton also talked with our community’s media, too. It’s a credit to the gay press, which has come into its own covering this historic election, and it’s a credit to Senator Clinton, too, who accepted their invitation, took the tough questions and made a case - directly -for our vote.
“No community has been made more invisible than the LGBT community by this administration, and I want to change that,” Clinton noted when talking about the largely silent stance of the Bush administration when it comes to gay issues. “I am committed to the fair and equal treatment of LGBT Americans.”
And as the 2008 race moves on, it’s heartening to know that, this time, we and our families are not invisible. And that’s a significant change in American politics - whether we support Senator Clinton or Senator Obama - that we can all take hope in.
Thanks, we linked in above post.
When you have a good conspiracy story its not that hard to get spots on conspiracy shows.
If Sinclair’s story doesn’t make sense, it really doesn’t matter what he says on the radio. I hope he is not out accusing Parisi of working for Obama. If he really believes in his own story, get the limo driver out of hiding and supporting his claims.
I never heard of the THE AMERICAN AWAKENING? How can you see it?
The real reason Whitehouse.com won’t post the two videos of the polygraph testing for larry Sinclair … is because they found out we can analyze Larry’s facial articulation along with his microexpressions through a “biometric” facial action coding (FACS) and emotional response mapping visual software … a software that can correctly determine whether Larry was telling the truth or not - while he was taped taking the test. (Google the scientific descriptions above for more details.)
We ran his YouTube video through the software and it completely confirmed that he truly believes he is telling the truth. WH doesn’t want us to contradict their phony reports. Larry is telling the truth as far as he knows it to exist. MSM is letting it the story simmer. They will pick it up once they are indemnified from litigation and backlashing due to the momentum of word-of-mouth … especially when the rest of the story comes out.
Whitehouse.com has lost all credibility.
They sold out. And then they shut down.
Very cowardly.
(Walk like you talk or you will lose the beat…
PEOPLE IN LARRY’s EMAIL CC LIST WHO SHOULD ALL THANK LARRY FOR LINKING HIS NAME TO THEM
Let’s see – bloogers, Sircy, Cao, Rob – right we know who they are.
Blah blah, Globe Magazine, Star Magazine – tabloids that pay cash for stories, ok.
Dan Browning. Hmmm, suppose he is the reporter from the Star Tribune in Minnesota. Hi Dan – having fun? Isn’t Larry a blast? Do you know Mark Stodghill from Duluth News Tribune? Hey aren’t you guys proud of Larry?
Ahhh, Gloria Allred – wasn’t she the Lady who didn’t want to represent you Larry? Why are you still bothering her then? It was nice of Gloria to denote $1000 to Hillary’s campaign in 2007, so probably a good thing she didn’t represent Larry: http://www.newsmeat.com/judicial_political_donations/Gloria_Allred.php
Jeane MacIntosh – could that be the Jeane MacIntosh from NYPost? She seems pretty fairly Obama friendly.
John Crewsdon – he would be from the Chicago Tribune right? Pulitzer Prize Winner? Impressive. Why the heck would he want to hear from Larry? Is Larry Jewish? Hey maybe this is a Mossad-linked hit job on Obama and John is gonna bust it wide open – that would make a great conspiracy story.
Kim Davis. Hard to say who this is – I mean it’s a pretty common name, is she a writer at Spinner.com and if so is she the same Kim Davis who is from Arkansas?
Is that Mary Kay Grasmick of the Wisconsin Hospital Association (WHA)? Apparently WHA really pumped up their lobbying hours in 2007: http://www.wha.org/pubArchive/valued_voice/vv2-8-08.htm They had a lovely business day meeting in Madison on 26th February, with the following keynote speakers: Terry McCauliffe, Chair of the Hillary Clinton for President campaign, and Ken Mehlman, former Chair of the Republican National Committee and former campaign manager for Bush/Cheney ’04: http://www.wha.org/pubArchive/valued_voice/vv1-11-08.htm WHA is part of the American Hospital Association PAC. Whether it is this person or not, I don’t suppose she would really like to see her name appearing on your cc list.
Michelle Lee. I wonder if that is Michelle Lee Kydd, director of CAA. You just never know when you throw people’s names under a CC. Here’s a drudge report of an event she attention run by Harold Ickes, advisor to the Clinton campaign: http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2003/12/01/20031201_160809_matthb.htm
plramirez@mac.com; Now that’s easy – that’s Paul Ramirez, just google the email address. Here’s his linked in site: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/4/817/258 Nice pic of him and his partner Richard here – cute dog too.
Spencer McDonald. This is a pretty common name. I wonder if it is one of these people? Could be a lawyer I suppose. http://www.zoominfo.com/search/PersonQuery.aspx?searchParameters=Spencer+McDonald
Ohhhhhhhh - yeah BIG news - yeah right. Second Right Perspective Interview (like a second Rense interview before that) and now some Ron Paul Supporter. Well I guess the Miniscule percentage of the population who voted for Paul won’t vote for Obama then. Oh deary me.
hahahahhahaa..you guys are funny. MSM. Yup definitely. They love publishing crazy peoples’ stories with no proof just because conspiracy theory, Ron Paul supporting online radio shows put them on.
You do realize that the American people are smarter than you, right?
The coverage will come once Larry returns from his trip to the moon with Elvis and the Easter bunny. They’ll be beating down the doors then. In the meantime, BigHeadDC, I’d encourage you to take note of the post by GettingItStraight, above, pointing out the possibility that Larry has some kind of connection, however peripheral to the Clinton camp. You talk about the desire to do more investigating–there’s some for cheap. Hell, do it and I’ll even “donate” $5 to the Larry Sinclair investigative make-a-wish you posted yesterday.
Also, while we’re talking, BigHeadDC, I would really love to know the answer to some of my questions… Why would Karl Rove be sitting on this, as has been claimed, along with the DNC who Larry has sued? They don’t have a great history of working together… Have they just gotten together to hand John McCain the presidency? Also, why would Parisi take a measly $750k from Obama/Axelrod when he stood to make so much more from a truthful Larry test–or at least could have shaken the camp down for more than that, they did make $50mil this month. Also, how funny is it that Larry decided to change the pay structure to allow him to receive more money if he failed but less if he passed. Larry was later soliciting money from youtube videos, so I don’t think he’s the type to give away $100k unless he knows damn well he isn’t going to pass.
Well, BigHeadDC…Good talk. I look forward to seeing some of that heavy investigation you guys say you love to do…These questions shouldn’t be too hard to answer.
The Big Story Of The Day!
MSNBC is reporting the whole Larry Sinclair/WH.com/David Axelrod Payment to WH.com story tonight at 8:00p.m.
Apperently they have a witness inside the Obama campaign that will testify that David Axelrod himself met with the owners of WH.com two days before the LS polygraph. Also they have a provable connection between Ed Gelb and Axelrod.
This information comes from an insider in the MSNBC advertising office.
I’m sorry it is 9:00 tonight, an interview with LS and said Obama insider is at 8:00 tomorrow night.
Look for this to start hitting the mainstream this afternoon.
I don’t know if this is true or not, but it seems that the days of the media giving Obama the pass are over.
Are you telling the truth? Please don’t be another person with false information.
Robbin, 9 tonight, my TV Guide says MSNBC will have a show called Lockup: Raw. Are you sure?
That was the schedule. Lockup is always on MSNBC when there is no news to report. To the best of my knowledge, there have been no indications on MSNBC or their website that this story will be on. But my friend who works for them says that they may not advertise the story until 5:00 today.
I can’t imagine that it will take long for this to get all over the place. The story I am getting is that this is no rumor! It will be on tonight, and apperently all weekend. They anticipate this to be the story of the election.
Alright thanks. I dont’ want to doubt you but I have heard so much crap so far I don’t know what to believe any more. Thank you for responding!
I hope you are being truthful abou the story finally coming out.
Again, I was very much a skeptic about this whole story until last night when I called my friend to ask what she knew. She in the past has clued me in to some stories before they actually hit the air.
The conversation was mind blowing. She wouldn’t give me details except that regular programming is being cancelled in lieu of this story. She says that the folks at MSNBC DO NOT JUMP UNLESS THEY HAVE PROOF! I have no reason to doubt her.
Oh my god Robbin! I can’t believe it!
No I mean literally, I can’t believe it. Because you’re full of shit. But look at how anonymous was so quick to believe you! AMAAAAAZING! You people are the stupidest fucking shitkicking hicks I’ve ever encountered. At least you gave everybody a window of over 7 hours to stupidly believe this horseshit. What a stupid twat.
Guys, I also heard Katie Couric is running something on this tonight. I know people at CBS who have told me. It’ll be on in the second half of the show. Set your TIVOs, it’s going to be historic. I can see him dropping out tonight over this!!!!!!!!!
Look at how easy that was! And if I’d used a different name, you all would have believed me!!!!
Hey Bighead DC can you help to confirm what Robin is saying? Please here me Robin I am not calling you a liar, we have just been a lot of “crap” posted on here and what you have said is HUGE for those of us who have been emailing and calling all the major media outlets. Thanks for the info and I pray that its true.
Exactly, I don’t believe her 100%. I just wanted to find out more info. It is isn’t on tonight, she got bad info/is a liar.
I should also say that I hope this story is bogus. I am the last guy that wants this to be true, BUT, if it is true I want it out now.
This country needs a Liberal in the White House. There will be significant gains in Congress this year and for the sake of our children and ourselves we need a President that will ramrod the liberal agenda through so as to repair what has been done to this country since the days of Reagan.
If it is true, let Hillary run, but the outing of Obama will not help the Dems chances even if it is Hillary.
Let’s pray to the God of your choice that it is a farce!
“12. Robbin Rexroad said:
I’m sorry it is 9:00 tonight, an interview with LS and said Obama insider is at 8:00 tomorrow night.”
Why would a 24-hour news channel wait until 8-9PM to report something? That doesn’t make any sense. News breaks EARLY on 24 hour news channels - with analysis and commentary to follow.
Keith Oberrman would quit if this story, in it’s current BS form, was ran on MSNBC.
I don’t disagree with you.I think its time for a Democrat to have a go at fixing this country. However, I am more inclined to support Hillary because she has posted where she stands and what she wants to accomplish. Obama has talked a lot but really has shown what he will accomplish. If Obama would have answered these allegations sooner, the American people might have been able to forgive him. The fact that he hasn’t and if it turns out to be true, speaks to his character, and that to me is important. I want a president that is honest and open. So, I guess we will see. Would you be willing to talk to Big Head DC privately and give them your insider, so they can check out your story?
You folks out there who don’t believe anything.
Remember the Monica Lewinsky Story?
How about the Ron Paul Racism Story?
How about Iran-Contra?
How about Larry Craig?
How about Jerry Falwell?
How about Valerie Plame?
All of these stories started out just like this, with the fringe news orgs reporting bits and pieces at first before the whole story blew wide open. Don’t be so blind as to naysay everything that you hear on the internet. Yes, there is plenty of s*** on the web, but you may find yourself stepping in your own pile.
“28. Robbin Rexroad said:
You folks out there who don’t believe anything”
Rathergate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rathergate
Well said Robbin!!!!!!
As far as why they aren’t reporting it yet. I believe they are giving the Obama folks time to respond. This is not abnormal for those folks who may know something about the Mainstream Media!
As far as disclosing my source, why would I?
This story is hitting the MSM anyway, the folks here at BHDC have done a good job of investigating, but apperently didn’t get the job done quick enough.
Bravo to BHDC for the reporting they have done.
To 24 Hour News Channel:
Thanks for making my point.
I’ve got work to do folks.
Have a good day and tune in. I believe that I am not the only one she has spoke to, so we probably won’t have to wait until 9:00.
Later.
You’re full of festering shit, Robbin. You clearly know nothing of the media. THERE IS NOTHING TO REPORT. If there were, it would have been reported already. Larry has shown them nothing worth reporting on. That you can confirm with any of the journalists he’s named here. Stop lying to these stupid cows. Time to respond??? If you believe Larry, this has been an issue since early Fall! That seems like plenty of time to respond to me.
I do not believe any of this but I will play along. Why would someone in the advertising office be told about such an explosive story? Why would someone in the Obama campaign testify about this? Why would Axelrod tell everyone in the campaign that he is doing this? Why would they pay anyone off when Larry Sinclair is a complete moron who know one would believe? Why would Obama admitt to anyone that the story is true since most of his staff would quit over it? Why would MSNBC sit on a story like this and allow CNN etc… to beat them to the punch? Why would MSNBC risk a multi million dollar law suit and total destruction based on one man’s story? Most of all, why am I giving this the time of day.
Also, I just realized, Robbin, who knows so much about media…IT’S A FUCKING FRIDAY!! Nobody watches TV on Friday nights. You would know this since you know about media… Fucking idiot. I work with the media, not that that’s an issue here — THERE IS NO FUCKING WAY ANY NEWS AGENCY WILL REPORT ANYTHING ON A FRIDAY. That’s why every celebrity breakup and political resignation and anything else humiliating is ALWAYS announced on a Friday. But you can get these sheep to believe that a major news agency will preschedule a block of time on a Friday night to break the biggest political story in years, a story that would change the landscape of the American political scene. You’re a stupid bitch.
And to all the believers…just remember that I’m telling you now, you’ll get a post from this asshole later saying that she heard from her friend they’re waiting til Monday because of some silly issue, despite supposedly blocking out this hour of programming. Saturday too! You know NOTHING of the mainstream media and you’ve proven it handily right here, with your ideas for massive breaking stories on weekends when normal people unlike yourself are out DOING THINGS AND NOT WATCHING!
You are an idiot Exactly. Do you really expect us to believe you work with the media, when you just realized it was Friday. Grow the fuck up, nimrod.
What is your stake in this? Are you an Obama supporter? Which is fine if you are because I like the guy.
Again, many of the stories I have listed above, as well as many more all started this way. With idiots on both sides, you Exactly, are one of those idiots.
I’m Brick Tamblyn. People seem to like me because I’m polite, and I’m rarely late. I like to eat ice cream, and I really enjoy a nice pair of slacks. I’m the President of News and I will be running with this story tonight on my show “San Diego PM Magazine”.
San Diego PM Magazine is a hard hitting investigating journalising show about the toughest and most hardest things on the minds of San Diegoians today - and tomrrow!
I’ll have an exclusive interview with Larry Sinclair - the man some say is the man behind the Man. Or most likely “under” the Man. Larry’s going to talk about hotel receipts, payoffs, nameless limo drivers and a certain body part that may be headed to the WhiteHouse.
We’ll take your calls halfway through the show - but be warned internet warriors, Larry has lawyers on the stand-by - so no “asking questions” about “things” like “proof” and “evidence”.
All that and Carl Hackler with movie reviews tonight on San Deigo PM Magazine.
By the way,
What do you propose that MSNBC do, wait until Monday when people are watching?
How about they just got their ducks in a row, and it happens to be a Friday. Ever think of that, nimrod?
AND also why not break it Friday because of early voting???? DUHHHHHHHHHH
“Robbin Rexroad said:
By the way,
What do you propose that MSNBC do, wait until Monday when people are watching?
How about they just got their ducks in a row, and it happens to be a Friday. Ever think of that, nimrod?”
If that were the case, they’d break it really EARLY.
Your first post on this was:
posted February 29th, 2008 at 9:11 am
If you heard it from some one in “advertising” today, that means it was on some final “go or no go” meeting agenda at least YESTERDAY. Meaning that all confirmation have been done and the Obama campaign had been given every opportunity to respond. The story was finalized and it was given to advertising for promo. So there would be no reason to WAIT until no one was watching at 9PM.
Secondly - if MSNBC had scheduled an interview with Larry - he would be ON THIS SITE SCREAMING ABOUT IT!!!!! He would release a YOU TUBE video about it. It would be ALL OVER THE COMMENTS.
Are they going to run the story and then, just CALL him live with no pre-interview? He’s having BigHeadDC advertise his appearances on Conspriracy Radio - ya thing they’d advert some interview he has on MSNBC - just maybe?
No, they shouldn’t wait at all. They should report this immediately!
How’s it going, larry? Is this the best idea yopu could come up with for keeping the suckers on the string today? It appears to be working on some of them.
Test
By the way, Exactly, I’m a guy.
A guy who has no motive, who does not particularly like confrontation, but who does now, and has always paid attention to the news and politics.
You on the other hand, sound like a 14 year old kid who has skipped school for the day to jerk-off, put out misinformation on the internet, and claim to work with the media (even though you do not know what day it is). Who do you work for, your High School newsletter?
As evidence that this is BS:
“Upcoming Larry Sinclair Media Appearances
Friday February 29th, 2008 2:13 AM by BHDC Staff
Filed under: Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair
Larry Sinclair is scheduled to appear on the following radio show on Friday from 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. (ET).
THE AMERICAN AWAKENING
Host: Michael Herzog
Call In Number: 800-313-9443″
If Larry had an interview with MSNBC he’d be SCREAMING ABOUT IT HERE!
Well being that MSNBC is who they are…they could be getting all their facts straightened out before breaking them. I am not saying that Robbin is telling the truth, I he is, but it would make sense if they are trying to get everything gathered.
Voice of Treason,
I don’t care to start another pissing match with someone who has blind faith in anybody.
You are right, I am Larry Sinclair, you are so smart.
“44. Concerned said:
Well being that MSNBC is who they are…they could be getting all their facts straightened out before breaking them. I am not saying that Robbin is telling the truth, I he is, but it would make sense if they are trying to get everything gathered.”
Perhaps because you don’t release a story to advertising for PROMO if you’re still getting the story put together. It has to be “in the can” and ready to go.
Anyway,
I will say it again, I hope it is all BS. I, like you, will have to wait and see.
Never shut your mind, just shut your mouth.
Comment, you are an absolute idiot. You must have never heard of a leak before.
MSNBC would be the last MSM - I would think - to do a hit on Obama. They love him there.
This is hilarious. So MSNBC is going to have a special show tonight AFTER Olbermann’s show (not during it) just to breathlessly report on Larry Sinclair’s esoteric Axelrod/Parisi conspiracy theory. As if anyone in the world would give a shit.
There isn’t going to be any MSNBC report, folks. “Robbin Rexroad” is just Larry himself, jerking you around again. After 9:oo EST comes and goes and MSNBC airs [i]Lockup[/i] as normally scheduled, I’m predicting that Larry (or one of his pseudonyms) will come back and say that the Obama campaign paid MSNBC to spike the story. We might even see another copy of another deluded, babbling email from Larry to MSNBC being posted as yet more evidence of how the “plot continues to thicken.”
“47. Robbin Rexroad said:
Anyway,
I will say it again, I hope it is all BS. I, like you, will have to wait and see.”
WHY? On post 16 you said “THIS IS NO RUMOR”. Why do you have to wait and see? You should know it and not have to wait - since you know it’s not a rumor.
Sorry Larry, Trix are for kids.
to 46.
I agree with that. I guess we will have to wait and see what it is going to happen. I wish Big Head DC could get the inside scoop. They have been doing a great job with all of this.
I have wasted enough time on this, you folks keep going on thinking the world is flat.
I wanted to post what I knew on here to be factual, not to talk to bozo’s with the intelligence of George Bush.
This election has been quite different, people are watching news channels 24/7 now. Especially since the writers srtike and even now with the writers back, you feel that if you are not watching you are missing something.
So, news could break at anytime, don’t you think? I believe at some point this is going to break, they can’t contiue to sit on it, or is the rumor true, that he is being used to get Clinton out of the race, and then once he is the nominee, the Republicans will use this against him.
I was talking about waiting to see if LS’s story is BS, not wait to see if it will be on or not.
Also, you media mogul you, who is to say that Olberman is not doing the reporting? I have no idea, nor do I expect to talk to my friend again to know. Go to work and stop obsessing on it.
Robbin I want to believe you but like I said, we have been jerked around before. However, I do know you are right about past scandals coming out at “inopportune” times so I am gonna believe you until you or I are proven otherwise. Thanks for being willing to put info out there to share with the rest of us.
“48. Robbin Rexroad said:
Comment, you are an absolute idiot. You must have never heard of a leak before.”
Dear Larry - I have heard of a “leak” and no - not the slow one in your brain.
A “leak” needs to be confirmed JUST LIKE a real live person going on the record. Even if they are interviewed on BACKGROUND the reporter-person needs to CHECK THE STORY with people - ask them to confirm or deny. Please see the movie “ALL THE PRESIDENT’S MEN” for evidence of this.
Then, once everything is confirmed, the reporter-person takes it to their editor (who will usually be played by Jason Robards). Then the editor weights the pros and cons of running a story with no one “on the record”. Once the editor agrees to run the story, it’s all wrapped up in a big red bow and sent to advertsiing for promo.
See?