Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair, David Axelrod, Daniel Parisi, WhiteHouse.com, Ed Gelb
NOTE: Help Big Head DC’s Investigative Team Grow!
WhiteHouse.com entered into an agreement to pay Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims he used drugs and had a sexual encounter with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999, a certain amount of money before Sinclair agreed to take a polygraph for the site, but now the site has reneged on the deal. This new twist is revealed within an e-mail sent on Tuesday from WhiteHouse.com founder Dan Parisi to Sinclair, which refers to Big Head DC’s Monday interview with Sinclair.
“I saw this interview this morning and posted your response in regards to another polygraph test,” Parisi writes in the e-mail. “It shows that you are doing another polygraph with results in this afternoon in violation of our agreement. I have instructed bank to stop payment on the $20,000 check this morning. The $10,000 in checks going to the charities are not effected (sic) and will be paid.”
Sinclair has vowed to take legal action against Parisi, if the check is not honored. “No polygraph has been done and you changed the terms of the agreement on your own on 2-21-08 so your refusing to honor your payment sheds light on your intent,” Sinclair wrote in an e-mail to Parisi today. “You have no grounds to stop payment on what you think might happen when it has not happened.”
Several claims WhiteHouse.com has made regarding the posting of the Sinclair polygraph, which was administered by controversial polygraph expert Ed Gelb, have not been honored to date. For instance, videos were supposed to be posted showing the administration of the test, but the site now claims the “incident needs to be laid to rest,” and plans to post the videos have apparently been scrapped.
Parisi and others associated with his business have not yet returned multiple requests for comment.
Why isn’t anyone asking Larry why a millionare like Parisi would sell out for $750k? Especially with the Obama campaign brining in 50 million in Feb alone? This payoff thing doesn’t make sense. $750k is a lot for Larry, but for Parisi - not so much.
We’ve asked Parisi for comment on Sinclair’s claim, but Parisi has not returned requests thus far.
From what I can tell, Ed Gelb is a reputable Polygraph Administator. He was the former president of the Polygraph Association, and has been on many TV talk shows, including “Lie Detector” which was on Fox a few years ago.
Mr. Tucker, why doesn’t someone ask Mr. Parisi why the hotel in Los Angeles had me contact Mr. Parisi Friday morning before leaving for the polygraph to inform him the hotel needed another credit card because the one used was declined. Have you seen all these millions? I have forwarded the info on the payoff between Parisi & Obama people to the people best suited to deal with it.
The agreement was that Larry was not to do another polygraph for 4 weeks, which, incidentally, is still well before the Democratic National Convention in August and the general election in November.
But would WhiteHouse.com not following its agreement terms in the first place have voided the terms? These are questions we are trying to pose directly to Parisi, but no comment back yet.
Mr. Sinclair - it’s common knowledge that Parisi has been offered over $2 million dollars for wh.com’s domain name and he has declined. http://www.ethicsscoreboard.com/heroes/0405_parisi.html
Additionally, I find it odd that every time someone refutes a claim by you, you say you have proof (which you never produce to the public) of something you personally heard or saw (with no one else there to corroberate) that you have sent to people (which you never name). Please provide the name of the hotel employee that stated Mr. Parisi’s card was declined. All we ever hear from you is hearsay - and we never see any evidence. Why?
I went to Whitehouse dot com If I enter bigheaddc it comes up in the comment as ***dc
are they doing that on pupose??
wh.com has an aggresive porn filter. Type “cocktail” and see what you get.
There is a conspiracy from whitehouse.com involving someone who works for Obama and/or Axelrod. This is painfully clear. Many lies on that site so far.
I wouldn’t pay Larry either since it appears that he broke the agreement. He should have just waited the agreed amount of time before doing another test. This new claim about $750,000 being paid by Axelrod seems outlandish as well. Someone just came out of the blue who just happened to know about this?
Larry revealed the name of the driver on youtube: “P. Multani”. He was supposed to have worked for 5-Star Limousine in Chicago in 1999. You’d think he’d be easy enough to track down, but apparently nobody has been able to verify he existed let alone been able to contact him. Larry claims he’s protecting the driver’s anonymity but why then would he throw out a name? There are just too many inconsistencies in Larry’s story. Two sexual encounters yet Larry cannot describe Obama’s private anatomy. The missing driver. The failed polygraph. Those photos of Larry purported to be from 1998 and 1999 that look like they were taken in the 80’s or early 90s. Swiss cheese wishes it could be so full of holes.
It’s blatantly obvious that the money paid to Sinclair for taking the polygraph test was to be a payoff in return for silence. Why else would they cancel the check when they found out he was going to take another lie detector test, or make him agree not to ever take another one again in the first place? The whole thing stinks to high heaven and is obviously been concocted and financed by Obama’s backers to whitewash the entire incident.
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire, and this is a huge fire obviously not meant to be unleashed until AFTER Obama achieved the candidacy. The Rove/GOP plan from the very beginning was to unleash this all in September to put McCain in office by default after pulling out the rug from Obama who’ve they’ve been backing all the way.
Their biggest nightmare; Sinclair coming out before then and then how to negate him and his story until they needed him.
And even then they pull Nader out of their back pocket as a backup spoiler to Obama. Coincidental timing? Not on your life.
Maybe more of Big Media will pick up the story. PR Newswire carried the WND article & the fact that Larry was taking the polygraph test . .
http://newyorkwhitepride.blogspot.com/2008/02/pr-newswire-reports-larry-sinclair.html
sbjllb, Larry was not to take a polygraph for 4 weeks. That’s still well before both the nominating convention and the general election. So much for your conspiracy theory.
WhiteHouse received Money From Obama to squash this. Or WhiteHouse always supported the Obama CULT. Either way they also backed out on their public deal made on the internet.
Sinclair never said he did take another polygraph. The Obama campaign just doesn’t want him to take another polygraph BEFORE Hillary might be forced to drop out. Then, once she drops out, they may plan to kill Larry. And say he died.
By the way, that 4 week ban on another polygraph would play into Republican not Democratic hands since Hillary will probably drop out before March 4 leaving Obama standing. Imagine how deflated the Democratic Party would be if this came out after March 4. So if anything, Rove paid off WH.com, not Obama/Axelrod. However, in all seriousness, the truth is clearly that Larry has been lying all along. There are just too many holes in his story.
Sandra…
HHAHAHHAHHHAAA. This place is nuttier than a Baby Ruth bar.
Sorry, meant to say Hillary will probably drop out shortly after March 4, not “before March 4.”
Twelve hours to produce a few “typed” sentences; “days,” and no second report; absolutely “no” mention of the promised videos and someone here questions why Whitehouse is deemed suspect in this? Whatever Larry Sinclair is able to do to protect himself from these people (Obama, Axlerod, Whitehouse gang) he should be about that immediately. Staying in touch with the public is the least of what he should continue doing. Now whitehouse says this needs to be shut down. Why? Why would they start it if they weren’t going to complete it? Larry told the truth, someone got to them and we are being played for fools. Don’t give up Larry. Dr. MLK said truth crushed to the ground will rise again. Stand on that. Please, stay safe. Remember Dr. King.
And that makes PERFECT SENSE! The GOP have been backing Obama from the very beginning… Karl Rove sent a PUBLIC MEMO to the Obama campaign telling them how to win against Hillary, and God KNOWS what he’s done for them and with them behind the scenes.
The entire plan WAS to torpedo the man, pull the rug out from Obama with Sinclair as their tool AFTER HILLARY WAS DEFEATED. Then McCain sweeps to the Presidency IN DEFAULT.
They never meant for Sinclair to go public before September, and NOW they are scrambling to pull their second choice spoiler out of the woodwork, NADER.
The timing couldn’t be more highly suspect.
The truth is going to come out about all of this, about Obama, the tryst with Sinclair, the Obama campaign’s involvement with WhiteHouse.com, Rove’s involvement, and blow up in their faces.
It’s about time. Rove only left the White House so he could pilot the Titanic Obama campaign without the Press Corps following every move.
xbjllb is my new favorite commenter. TRUTH.
It was overnight to produce the type copy. Not everyone does their day job late at night. Gelb probably got his secretary to type it up the next day. Also, the second report is forthcoming. The second expert, Gordon Barland, has had all of one working day to do the review and I’m sure this is not the only thing he’s working on. We’ll see if the video gets posted, but someone claiming to be Dan Parisi said in a thread on WH.com last night that they were still planning to post the video on Friday.
Since Larry failed the polygraph test why couldn’t he take another test? Might the results be different. If I was Larry I would stop talking and retake that test without anyone knowing about it. You can not trust anyone. We all have skeletons in our closet. So does Obama.You can bet they will come out. Lets hope sooner than later.
Thank god for Nader!!!
Young, do you work for Parisi?
xbjllb, you’ve been reading too many of your own posts.
Occam’s Razor. This could all be a Rove plot…OR…Larry is lying!
Remember:
2 separate sexual encounters, but Larry doesn’t remember Obama’s private anatomy
Photos of Larry from 1998 and 1999 that clearly look like they were taken in the 80s
A failed polygraph
Refusal to put anyone in contact with the limo driver
Think about it.
MF, no I do not work for Parisi nor have I ever communicated with him or anyone at WH.com except through my public posts on their blogs. I also don’t work for any other website, news agency, or political party. I have, however, donated $300-400 to Obama’s campaign.
Go to Larry’s web site. Take a look at his photos and the dates under them. Can anyone here honestly say they look like pictures from 1998 or 1999? He’s dressed 80s style and look at the hair!
The photos look like 90s to me. What are you a fashion expert, too, Young?
WhiteHouse.com has posted the following statement:
“After the events of yesterday and this morning we will no longer be posting the video of the Polygraph testing or the secondary Polygrapher Expert’s results. To be accused of taking a bribe to suppress this story along with all of the hate mail and messages sent by Larry Sinclair supporters who believe we did something to taint the results has been very disturbing.
“No matter what we put up it will never be good enough for his supporters. Mr. Sinclair was also given every opportunity to let us talk to the limousine driver to corroborate his story and he failed to do so. This will be the last post on this matter as this matter needs to be put to bed. We will be going back to regular reporting.”
First, it’s Ockham’s Razor.
Secondly, you ask any admitedly promiscuous man to tell you the private anatomy details of any person he was with twenty years ago, and except for his current partners’, you’re not going to get any details. Especially if the person involved was at the time unremarkable socially and even more unremarkable physically. Now if Obama had 13″ or was even merely spotted like Michael Jackson, that’s something that Larry and almost anyone else would have been inclined to remember.
Don’t think that’s the case. Larry would have to be nuts to lie and go down in flames like this, and that’s not the impression I get of the man. On the contrary, I find him highly credible given the circumstances and very brave and hating the limelight.
One thing to remember; no matter how much money one or both sides might throw around, THE TRUTH IS GOING TO COME OUT.
Especially if Larry takes as many lie detector tests as the MSM is going to be throwing at him. There WILL be a consensus, and a consensus opinion.
Of course, the ObamaNation, along with OJ and Michael Jackson fans, will never believe the truth. But the rest will take care of the country, and the planet.
I’m not a fashion expert, Sandra, but I live through the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s. How old are you?
At any rate, I don’t think anyone will be talking any sense into you anytime soon. This is like talking to 9/11 conspiracy theorists or scientologists. It’s impossible to counter core beliefs with reason.
Fantastic. This is tantamount to a complete rout.
WhiteHouse.com is obviously PETERIFIED that the MSM will do the little digging they need to do to find the path goes right to and through the Obama Campaign straight to the cell phone of Karl Rove.
Your Honor, The People rest.
xbjllb, “Occam” is spelled both ways and my spelling is the more common form.
Secondly, the encounters allegedly occurred 8 and a half years ago, not 20 years ago. Are you saying 20 years ago because those photos of Larry look like they were taken 20 years ago? If so, you may be right. Those photos may have been taken 20 years ago not 8 years ago as he claims.
Thirdly, Larry may well be nuts. Or he may be out for attention or money. Or he may just want to take Obama down for some reasons unknown. Or he may be doing this for some or all of the reasons above.
Virtually every celebrity faces scandalous accusations from profiteers and/or nutcases. This is all too common. Normally, nobody pays them any mind. In this era of youtube, however, even someone like Larry gets his 15 minutes.
Really linking to a site called “newyorkwhitepride”? You have failed at life
I can’t believe whitehouse.com just posted that statement. They are going back on all of their promises. If you can’t stand the heat - get out the kitchen. Clearly, they could not stand the heat of scrutiny. They are not credible. Thank you BigHeadDC for continuing to report fairly and open-mindedly about all of the twists and turns of Sinclair.
Everyone smells the scam here whitehouse, and I’ll bet right now,
this whole operatios being investigated, and you and Obama will be
exposed! Hope its before the elections.
Why I believe Larry:
(1) Basically, it was not because of the people who brought the story to the public attention, it was from the people who were trying to dismiss it. They claimed, nothing to see here… just take my word for it…
(2) The first line of defense was: Larry was not a person of credible character… so what is the moral of the story here? … You can have illicit sex and drugs because anyone who claims they did illicit sex and drugs with you would not be credible because they said they did illicit sex and drugs… the old catch 22…
(3) A Clinton\Paul conspiracy was at work… oh… ok?
(4) Then another defensive rational immerged: everybody started saying; hey I had sex with so-in-so… see how easy it is? But that just proved the point, thousands and thousands of people were obviously mouthing off. But the facts around Larry Sinclair’s story had a degree of plausibility… even if you want to measure it as small.
(5) False stories began to immerge about Larry. He was in a mental institution at the time; he had a brain tumor, etc. There are even fake Washington Post documents posted claiming Larry had tried twice in the past to swindle politicians… blatant lies
(6) Notice the first 5. No defense at all of Obama. You would think it was Larry that was running for President.
(7) Obama would never do cocaine!!! Did anybody actually read his book?
(8) I looked at the video… he didn’t look crazy. I read his email transcripts; again he appears saner than those denying him.
Look at the email BigHeadDC won’t publish!
http://russellrants.blogspot.com/2008/02/mr-larry-sinclair.html
No, I was projecting. But I can tell you, there isn’t a lick of difference between a one night stand of eight years ago versus twenty years ago. Even a two night stand.
The man is dying. He doesn’t need the money. Nor the fame, nor the headache. It’s clear he needs to clear his conscience and try to do something of value for the world before he leaves. By exposing a liar about drugs, in this case. It’s not even about Obama being a hypocrite married guy on the downlow. But the lying about drug use.
Larry’s getting far more than 15 minutes. The WhiteHouse.com backdown is going to bring the MSM bloodhounds running now. They all will want to know what needs to be hid so quickly and abruptly.
And they WILL find out. This is going to make Watergate look like a Britany video (instantly forgettable by comparison).
Come one. Larry claims he had his d*** in his mouth, and Larry remembers other largely irrelevant details of the encounters very well, yet he can’t even say how big it was.
So, do you agree with Sandra’s assessment that those photos of Larry were taken in 1998 and 1999?
There is one way to get this issue resolved, Yell out: LARRY SINCLAIR, during tonights Cleveland debate, or at furture media rally! The press would be all over the story (like flies on… well you know!). Where is Code Pink when you need them!
The whitehouse offer had a smell from the very begining. Instead of helping the ‘truth’ come out, it has raised more doubts about Obama in general.
There’s a figure of speech that fits right in here, but because of pc and overly sensitive humans I will leave it out.
Maybe T-shirts with the saying—Ask Obama about Larry Sinclair—should be made. Or something in reference to Larry.
Young, have you ever had someone’s d*** in your mouth?
How about 10? 20? 30? 50?
Until you do, and it was nothing out of the ordinary for you, you merely expose your own undeniable ignorance.
As far as photos and apparent age, one word; Photoshop. Everyone is a retoucher nowadays, and everyone is vain. You’ve got children on myspace making themselves look ten years younger.
Was Larry ever provided a copy or given a breifing on the polygraph results himself?
SOMEONE — PLEASE YELL LARRY SINCLAIR’s NAME DURING THE DEBATE TONIGHT.
Wouldn’t that be great!! I would love to see the media and the candidates respond to that!! Go OHIO! Please someone yell it out!
LARRY SINCLAIR ON JEFF RENSE TONIGHT 7 PM PST TALKING ABOUT HIS RIGGED POLYGRAPH TEST!
Usually channel three. 4 PM EST.
I’m still stunned by Whitehouse.com’s decision. Maybe I am just too trusting - but I did believe that they would get to the bottom of this. Now, I am putting my faith in BigHeadDC - please keep pushing and finding out what is ACTUALLY going on. Thank you!!
Hmm, wonder why my posts aren’t showing up.
xbjllb - Thanks for the info!!
Yell “Larry Sinclair” during the debate. PLEASE!
check out mrsircy.blogspot and see the history of whitehouse.com
they are shady
Please someone any one in Cleveland going ot the debate… YELL to the top of your lungs…. LARRY SINCLAIR!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL..and get reading for the deer/headlight look.
Why has whitehouse become so thin-skinned that they can’t take the response of the public that they created? Who believes that? These people are dangerous. They should be made to release those tapes to the public some how. (Wishful thinking, I know better) They are blatant in their disregard for any intelligence any of us might have. Know this, Larry Sinclair is telling the truth. That makes him dangerous to the powers behind Barack Obama. Obama is a pawn. Stopping Hillary is definitely the objective and there is no telling to what lengths they will go to stop this story.
check out: http://www.rense.com/
The picture of Senator Obama is funny as hell!
xbjllb, I do claim ignorance about d**** in mouth. How about you?
As for the photos, my claim is not about apparent age, which itself is suspicious, but about how he’s dressed and his hair style. Looks 80s or early 90s to me.
I will agree, Whitehouse.com was so bold in the being. After the test has been done, now they are backing down. This really does smell! They have gone from Cocky to Puurrrrr in just a few days!
Young, I was talking about the picture of Senator Obama at http://www.rense.com.
That happens to be none of your business. Nor how my parents taught me to have empathy for those unlike myself as well as those like myself.
If, on the other hand, you’d like it to be your business and you’re looking for a date, hit me up offline and see what happens.
I haven’t changed my hairstyle nor my clothing since the early 70’s. Does that make a photo taken of me last week current to that time? How about elderly women? Does a photo taken of the Queen of England last week really mean it was taken in the early 50’s because the woman hasn’t changed an iota in hair or dress since then?
You’re really grasping at straws here.
REPEAT!!!
LOL… I agree 100%, to get this story to become in MSM, Yell Larry Sinclair at tonights debate. Anyone know someone in Cleveland… call them! Fox will have “BREAKING NEWS!”
It would would damn sure make the debate more exciting! Yell Larry Sinclair!
In 1997, the Clinton administration sent Dan Parisi a cease and desist letter stating, “… we do not challenge your right to pursue it or to exercise your First Amendment rights, but we do challenge your right to use the White House, the President, and the First Lady as a marketing device. For adult internet users, that device is, at the least, part of a deceptive scheme. For younger Internet users, it has more disturbing consequenc