Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Interviews, Law, Barack Obama, BHDC, Drugs, Larry Sinclair, David Axelrod, Daniel Parisi, WhiteHouse.com, Robert Braddock
Big Head DC has conducted an exclusive interview with Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who claims he used drugs and had a sexual encounter with Sen. Barack Obama in 1999. We caught up with Sinclair just two days after the Web site WhiteHouse.com posted a statement indicating that Sinclair had been deceptive about his Obama claims during a polygraph test conducted by lie detector expert Ed Gelb. Sinclair, feeling the test’s administrator had been biased and that he couldn’t trust the people who arranged the test, decided to answer several of our questions about his complex situation:
Big Head DC: Do you think that Dan Parisi or anyone else who works for WhiteHouse.com is or has been employed by David Axelrod and/or other members of Sen. Obama’s campaign for president?
Larry Sinclair: I believe Dan Parisi and Robert Braddock were acting as agents of David Axelrod and the Obama camp in making the offer for me to take the polygraph. I believe this to be true as I received a tip via phone at 12:43 a.m. instructing me to find help in obtaining financial records from the Obama camp and Axelrod because an account and communications were accessed in which WH.com and Parisi were having a dispute with Axelrod over the payment of the remaining part of $750,000 to get a polygraph stating I was lying posted fast enough.
BHDC: What do you make of the “deception” finding from WhiteHouse.com’s polygraph conducted by Ed Gelb?
LS: I honestly believe that these results and the claims by Gelb are false, I believe he knowingly accepted money to provide WH.com with the desired results. This is based on the request upon arrival by Gelb’s office for payment of an additional amount that I personally heard a receptionist tell Parisi that Gelb said there was an extra charge and Parisi acknowledged he was advised. I believe this based on all the whispering done while I was present and the amount of time the three spent in closed door discussions before, during and after the exam.
BHDC: There have been several claims that Gelb is not a real PhD — did he present himself as one to you? Did he seem professional?
LS: Gelb did in fact represent himself to me as having a PhD that I found out after returning home was in fact not the case. He did appear somewhat professional with a constant shaking, however he did not control anything about the process and in fact was taking his direction from Robert Braddock of WH.com and Dan Parisi.
BHDC: How did Parisi act toward you throughout the polygraph process?
LS: Parisi did not even look me in the face from the time I met him that Friday morning through the entire visit. He continued to look down toward the floor every time I spoke to him or he was in my presence. He did not at any time produce any ID for me to verify he was who he claimed to be. Not even when he wrote out the checks and I asked for ID, he laughed and said, “I am me.” Mr. Parisi and his assistant Robert Braddock were rude and attitude changed considerably after the exam was done. They met behind closed doors for another hour or so with Gelb.
BHDC: What do you make of all of the false information that is being passed around on the Internet about you?
LS: I find it appalling that most of it is being paid for by Axelrod and the Obama camp by use of paid bloggers who are being fed information that Axelrod and Obama know to be false, know not to be me — but know that these kids will sit up and post it as fact and they (Axelrod and Obama) will not have to answer for it. But I say they will.
BHDC: Would you have come forward with your claims had you known what has happened would happen?
LS: I had put out everything about my past from the start, so I did not worry about what they tried to say about me. I will get vindication against all the knowingly false claims made when this is over because slander and libel is easy to prove when they keep repeating it after being told to retract it.
BHDC: Do you stand by your claims about Barack Obama 100 percent, given the polygraph results?
LS: 1,000 percent, and I have stated from day one, polygraph or not, I will not recant or back down because I am stating truthful claims.
BHDC: Some people will say Big Head DC is biased for even interviewing you. What should we say to those people?
LS: What is biased about trying to get to the truth? The bias is on those media outlets who see the false claims made against a U.S. citizen by a candidate for the president of the U.S., and they still do not report anything. The media knows these attacks against me and the claims made in these attacks are false but they ignore it.
BHDC: What do you make of Obama’s increasing popularity?
LS: Does the phrase “snake oil sales man” give you a hint?
BHDC: Do you think Obama has been well enough vetted on the national political stage?
LS: Obama is not even close to being vetted; everyone says I am a kook, well I am not a kook, and I expect that I am not going to be standing here alone much longer. I expect we will see others come forward before this is over.
BHDC: Have you recently spoken to the limo driver you say was with you and Obama in 1999? What does he think about what you’ve been put through? Has it discouraged him from coming forward?
LS: I placed a call to him Saturday that was not returned. I had spoken with him last week, and he thinks I am crazy for going through this over a lying fraud like Barack Obama and David Axelrod. I truly believe he will come forward, and he knows I am not going to back down.
BHDC: Who is your lawyer in the lawsuit against Obama?
LS: The suit will be dismissed, it will be re-filed. It is being dismissed for failing to state a claim in which entitles me to relief, not because as claimed by others I am not credible. I am attaching a copy for your verification of this statement. WH.com leaked that I was in talks with Gloria Allred to discourage her, which they accomplished.
BHDC: Have you heard from anyone in the Obama campaign since you came forward with your claims?
LS: I have not. I received an e-mail via YouTube asking me to confirm or deny claims made by some Ron Allen of the Obama camp, which I stated were false. I will attach. I will forward copy to you.
BHDC: When did you first realize that Obama was a U.S. Senator?
LS: I became aware he was a politician during watching the 2004 DNC speech while residing in Mexico.
BHDC: How is your health? Are you afraid that this publicity is harmful to your health?
LS: I have some very serious heath problems, which I deal with according to decisions that I made. I do not use my health as an excuse for anything. I live alone, I care for myself, I do not reside in any assisted living complex, nor do I receive an assistant in my daily life.
BHDC: What are you going to do next regarding this whole situation?
LS: I will continue to put my story out there. I am getting some assistance in amending the lawsuit for refiling, and please note, it has not yet been dismissed, nor has the recommendation to dismiss been received or written as claimed by the judge identified on the Web. I am not going away, I am not recanting anything, and I am fighting on, especially with the tip I received this date. I will do a polygraph arranged by me, video tape it non-edited and with the findings released before stopping the camera and will post it before Tuesday if all goes well.
OMG, you did it Big Head DC. And is that the first picture of Sinclair revealed from his time when he would have connected with Obama? He looks a lot more like the kind of guy I could envision Obama “being” with.
Sinclair believes his story. That is clear. I’m starting to root for him.
“BHDC: What do you make of Obama’s increasing popularity?
LS: Does the phrase “snake oil sales man” give you a hint?”
QUOTED FOR TRUTH
He sticks to his story like glue. I believe a conspiracy was in effect at Whitehouse.com. For the 1st time in my adult like, I am truly afraid of America.
Is Larry taking another polygraph?
I’m not into conspiracy theories, but good grief does this stink.
This website is a completely worthless piece of &$#$@Q#$!
Why not pimp a story about the Clintons running drugs out of Mina airport or Bush being a reptilian alien? BHDC has no scoops, no reporting - just links to bs stories.
Larry is very persistent and could very well be the biggest liar in the whole world but I still don’t trust Whitehouse - they seem really shady. I doubt he did these things with Obama but politics is a sick game with sick characters. I wish his limo driver would talk but with each day, Larry loses more credibility. This won’t end well for him no matter how you look at it.
Long known that Ed Gelb wasn’t the one to do this:
www.antipolygraph.com/articles/article-036.shtml Gelb has
publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least
1996. I***997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court
in the land — the United States Supreme Court — as a co-signer of
the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists’ amicus brief in U.S. v.
Scheffer, where he is listed as “Ed Gelb, Ph.D.” No, the “LaSalle
University” that awarded Gelb his “doctorate” turns out to be a
defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was
owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson.
I***996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and i***997 Kirk pled guilty
to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle
University, Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop
masquerading as such.
BHDC is airing what Larry believes to be the truth.
Whitehouse.com is a porn site. Parisi framed Larry.
Big Head DC is the only site I’ve seen critically looking at the Obama campaign. Without judging.
Yes, don’t shoot the messenger. I believe Larry, as do many. Letting him air his beliefs is Democratic.
What does it take for Larry to take another polygraph?
He already has one planned, according to the interview.
Fight like hell Larry!
He should go on Maury Povich! It’d be perfect. Larry, you…. did have sex with that man!
Echoing last comment, fight to the death, Larry.
OH sheeshh, I’m blinder than a bat. Thanks, Sandra.
This has Obama’s finger prints all over this.
Why did Barry Sotero become Barack Hussein Obama?
if this whole sinclair BS (that is what it is) was about a republican, the dems would all be high-fiving and making sure this story got play but since it’s precious obama (watch what you say around him people, if u disagree with him, you are a racist) then nothing.
I respect BHDC for honestly publishing my answers without editing them. Thank you
All emails to/from Parisi are posted on myspace for any who are interested.
larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com
OK Larry… where’s your proof… why should I believe you… you have no proof!
Sometimes a man’s truth is his word — not his empty rhetoric.
THANK YOU BIGHEADDC FOR DOING THIS!! I, too, am beginning to root for Larry.. his story hasn’t changed at all and he’s pushing this so hard. Because he knows. Isn’t it ironic that he’s not allowed to take another polygraph for another month? Just enough time for Obama to win a few more states and put Hillary out..
this is all becoming so interesting.
If all else fails, this is at least interesting!
Does anyone else wonder why Obama barely mentioned his Columbia U days in his memoirs? Some people say it’s because his male pal ask him not to.
Larry knows the truth. I feel so scared that this has happened to Dems.
Since Parisi broke his contract with Larry, Larry is free to take another polygraph right away.
Obama, I believe, has a dark secret past.
I agree with Clarification.
wait till the obamessiahs get a load of this…
For commentary, see Larry Sinclair and the Polygraph on AntiPolygraph.org. Polygraph results are no substitute for investigation, fact-checking, and honest reporting. To date, Mr. Sinclair has failed to substantiate his claims.
George, if no member of the elite press will even dare to ask Obama the question, how can there be a proper investigation?
Dear Larry,
You are a real inspiration. I have seen the lies and smears about you on different websites. I’ve seen death threats and very ugly name calling, all in an effort to what I believe, is to discredit you and silence you. I can’t imagine what you must be feeling, yet you continue to forge ahead. I think the media outlets should be ashamed of themselves for their silence, and I think the American Public should be outraged at them. When we turn on the news in the evening, we have a right to know about ALL of the candidates, not just some. With the Presidency at stake, I for one would like to know if a Barack Obama has lied about his drug use. If you’re telling the truth, which I happen to believe you are, and Barack Obama smoked crack cocaine, how are we to know if he isn’t still smoking crack?!
And the media doesn’t find this important enough or credible enough to inform the American people? What have we become when our news programs only tell us what THEY think we SHOULD know, or what they want us to know. It looks very communistic when we’re kept uninformed by the media. Thank God for the internet, and thank God for Larry Sinclair’s relentless efforts to expose this media charade.
Oh, and thank you bigheaddc.com for having the courage to do what others haven’t…exposing the media for what they are…useless.
In case others are interested in knowing what changed my mind about you and convinced me that you were sincere and credible, it was this radio interview(rense.com)that made a believer out of me. There are 4 parts to this brutally honest interview.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTz7nojEC80
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQIZSPQ2ilc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watchv=Xz0ZFP87tBw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odzvNZgWp0c&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlnmzp4jomg&feature=related
Ed Gelb is, in fact, a phony Ph.D., a fact that AntiPolygraph.org publicly documented some five years ago. If WhiteHouse.com had done due diligence (for example, by Googling “Ed Gelb” ), it would have discovered this to be the case. But the greater problem with the polygraph is that the “test” simply has no scientific basis to begin with. It’s inherently biased against the truthful, and yet easily defeated using simple countermeasures. See our e-book The Lie Behind the Lie Detector (1 mb PDF) for more on why polygraph results are not to be relied upon.
So, George, does this mean Larry could still be telling the truth?
Sandra, given the fact that Mr. Sinclair has failed to substantiate his allegations, it would be irresponsible for any journalist to report them.
Maybe someone should tell Larry to change the picture on his You Tube video — with this picture, as he is telling his story!
The story will explode!!!
It’s sadly true, but the picture of him younger does make him more credible. People want to believe that Obama would only surround himself with beautiful people.
But they have an obligation to ASK the question, George.
Sandra, you cannot know whether any journalists have asked Barack Obama, or his staff, about Mr. Sinclair’s allegations.
Wow… what a pile of pathetic crap
You people are all totally
I wonder if Barack Obama, and not WhiteHouse.com that wanted a younger picture of Larry to refresh his own memory!
It’s starting to sound more and more as if Parise was a go-between. How many polygraph experts request a younger picture of the individual that they are going to test?
The way the media fawns over Obama every day, I have good reason to believe no one would even risk asking the question to him or Axelrod. Plus, Obama is becoming more scarce to the press by the day, according to new reports. He’s being as quiet as he can to sneak to the finish. God save us.
larrysinclair0926(dot)spaces(dot)live(dot)com
Exactly, Sandra!
I agree, I was speechless, when the You Tube site shut down worldwid, at the exact same time the expert reports and video were due to be posted.
I don’t recall where I read it, but I don’t think there is a record of him attending, and they couldn’t locate anyone that remembered him! It is my next project to figure out how that could be possible.
TOM! I was totally blogging when that happened, I read earlier that something happened in Pakistan for it to go out…? Why does that make no sense..
See the email correspondence and more at
http://larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com/default.aspx
Mr Parisi, Mr Axelrod, Barack Obama, and Ed Gelb are NOT above the law and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Barack speaks of 2 Americas…he are part of the problem.
bigheaddc, you guys rock for posting this. If only it would catch on.
The You Tube site, not the entire internet. If you check the WhiteHouse.com comment area, everyone was checking in from each state, including Italy. If I can locate it I will cut and paste some of the comments when it happened.
Yes, I was blogging on there when it went out.. we were all talking about it at the time and naming our states
Oh bum - should have used the comment preview
Jay you have been posting out rightlies about me and my past all over the web, you have been posting using my name on WH.com and you have the nerve to talk about me being a con? Yo are the con, I have release receipts to reporters from valid media outlets, I have always said I had no intention of posting them on the web to be cut and pated as you yourself have engaged in. SO GET OVER YOURSELF already.
As for the tip I received yesterday, have you noticed how silent Parisi and WH.com has been since I exposed their claims of having the results and then claiming they did not have them and then they post an update saying that had a hand written faxed report but would ot post it. Have you seen the over 4 hour video yet, you want to be it has beed edited a great deal?
Stop
sucking your thumb and blogging/spamming outright lies in the name of Obama unity
Checks issued by WH.com are posted at larrysinclair0926.spaces.live.com for public review
I was just there, and first comment starts at approx. 2:34pm on Feb 24, the rest were deleted.
When I returned to you tube, I noticed that the majority of the comments we all posted several hours before on Larry’s site were also deleted. And it seems Larry’s video counter, is the only one that goes down instead of up, with an increase at their discretion.
I don’t post there anymore, because when I tried to post the fact that the test result was available, under the comment box it stated that I had already posted twice and I was requiered to include a verification (similar to e-mail registrations) before I could submit. I saved the page to my files and loged out! It appears they are saving IP numbers.
Let me know if there is a news report about you tube, I would be curious to read it. I did not see anything reported.
I don’t think there is any evidence that the other polygraph examiner, Gordan H. Barland, faked his PhD. If the sole reason for doubting this test is questionable academic credentials, then Gordan should settle that issue.
Gordan did not examine me in any way. I have never met him and did not even know his name until today. WH has posted an update saying they will post “quality control” results and then shut it down. This does not strike anyone as strange when they hyped about the 4+ hours of video to be posted?
Their video shows the exam was completely control and directed by WH, Gelb was a puppet.
Anonymous: Something is seriously going on. I will post anything on here if I find it- I was able to get some screenshots on YouTube the other day, we were all talking about that as well (the counter was like deleting 20,000 comments every hour or so) and was able to catch some comments. I will check to see if those comments are still there..!
Thank you! I knew it wasn’t just me.
Also, notice that messages on page 1, don’t always go to page 2, they are deleted.
Jay, one last thing, when did I say I had passed the exam? I believe the exam is a fraud and I intend to prove it. But keep beating this dead horse with all your blogging lies and claims of this and that, because it gives me the fuel to fight harder
Larry that doesn’t match the public record. You stated on Youtube on Feb 23 “EH the second expert that is reviewing mine is Gordon (something) in Salt Lake City that is the foremost expert on the attempted use of countermeasures. My examiner stated to me yesterday I would be happy to know there are not signs of attempts to use countermeasures in my polygraph.” How could you not know his name until today when you knew his first name (and I would guess were told and forgot about his last name) on Saturday?
Larry on Youtube you stated on Feb 23 “You are not the CEO of the sunshine club and I DID NOT FAIL THE POLYGRAPK TEST. It is just the best place to get this is the MSM over Duluth, Mn.”
Larry you had no problem with procedure until you failed the test. From your youtube page on Feb 23, “No, a second indepndent expert is doing what was explained to me as a blind analysis of the charts. The results will not even be provided to us until Monday at the earliest.”
I was the one from Italy that said youtube was down. I was glued to my computer, waiting for WH.com to post the results, and I was also blogging. Nothing worked on youtube during that time. The videos I had on my blog (not about larry) and nothing on the site. Nada. It was funny in a conspiracy kind of way. But it was very weird…
Larry - I think you need to find a reporter who you can present all your evidence to, and will interview the driver (behind a screen if they want to remain private) and also take a new test, and post the results with Bighead.
Keep fighting Larry!
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5900&Itemid=1
oh…well it was funny at the time. I guess it was a pakistan thing. Or so they say…….