He looks clean and sane to me.

Thought you might be interested in the new GLOBE story about good ole Larry that came out today dated March 3, 2008. Convicted Felon with no proof–good, grief!

“Although Sinclair has provided no evidence to back up his outrageous Obama stories, the 46 year old man tells GLOBE that he’s spent time in prison in Florida, Arizona and Colorado on credit card fraud and other charges. He also admits to trafficking cocaine and marijuana and “moving” people from Mexico to the United States. He says he’s been disabled since a work related accident in 2001 nad has now been diagnosed with a brain tumor and given a little more than a year to live.”

GLOBE dated 3-3-2008.

My point is that someone should not be able to come out of the shadows and claim these types of things without providing proof! This could happen to you too and would you like your name and family slandered…if it isn’t true? Perhaps your too narrow minded to look at it both ways.

DD,

This information isn’t new and not surprising. Like Rex says, we’re talking about anonymous gay sex and crack cocaine here. This isn’t “Leave it To Beaver”. No pun intended of course.

I dunno whose dumber. You commenters thinking Obama even knows who this crackhead crook is or the people at Whitehouse.com wasting all their money on this crackhead crook.

Obama has no taste in men.

Axelrod is tring to have whitehouse.com taken off the internet. why?

Because Axelrod will be ruined by this story. For one thing, he is nose deep in an attempted cover-up.

WHO ELSE DOESN;T TRUST WHITEHOUSE.COM?

Whitehouse.com is not affiliated with Clinton or any other candidate. This is a real story. Obama is running scared.

Perhaps Larry wants to kill hope for a younger generation because he is angry and bitter about his life, which is soon to end due to the brain tumor. Perhaps he blames the world for his life, instead of blaming himself.

Google Larry Sinclair was a mental patient in 1999. It was verified that he was an admitted mental patient during the alleged meeting with Obama. He couldn’t have been in Chicago. Also, he said he was in Chicago for a relatives graduation,only it has been verified the graduation was in October and not November. Furthermore, mental patients can easliy beat a polygraph. They have no sense of reality.

A family friend also says he dated Obama (and he is supporting Obama’s campaign). Makes me wonder if Sinclair is telling the truth.

While Mr. Sinclair’s polygraph test prove a successful publicity stunt for Dan Parisi’s WhiteHouse.com, the results of this pseudoscientific procedure can tell us nothing regarding whether or not Mr. Sinclair has spoken the truth, as I explain in this YouTube posting.

Warner of the senate arms committe demands Obama release the name of the annymous Captian that Obama uses in his pity war story of Iraq.

Warner of the senate ams committe already knows the answer to the question the question he is asking Obama?

This story Obama uses will be fuel by the Republicans to burn Obama. Becuase Obama wil refuse to release his annoymous name. Just like NYT story on McCain.

This probably will turn into an HUGE senate investigation about Why Obama was told SECRET military information by an annymous military CAPTIAN

Amy, the Obama campaign put Warner in touch with the captain, who has confirmed the truth of Obama’s story. Now, Warner is going to put some hard questions to high-ranking military officials on Tuesday. It’s Bush and his Generals who are in trouble now.

amy, I love your fired up, angry posts. what are you wearing right now?

http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/obama022208.pdf

That is the link to the letter Warner sent to Obama yesterday demanding Obama release the name of the anonymous Captians name.

First off a Officer of the United States is never supposed to make statements about military operations public. 2nd this Captain released Combat military operation information which is classified information.

Wow! Larry’s evidence is really stacking up! This is the real deal!

The Obama apostles can’t even remotely consider that this story may be possible. No-Obama is their Lord. They are just like the neo cons that believed Bush about the WMD in Iraq. It’s easy to see how dictators take control of countries, which is due in part to the closed minds of people on the left or right believing whatever smooth talking men tell them.

And as a follow up–if people are so willing to jump on the LarrySinclairgaveBarackObamaablowjob bandwagon then they better be prepared to educate themselves about this person making the claims. The burden of proof is on Larry!

The reverse is also true: If people are jumping on the Obama bandwagon, they better be willing to accept that he is not God, has flaws, and prepare for his questionable past to surface in the press. The conservatives are already starting to open the flood gate. Obama has had a free ride thus far.

Whitehouse.com is not affiliated with Clinton or any other candidate. This is a real story. Obama is running scared.

Whitehouse.com is the property of Dan Parisi who made his millions in the online pornography business. He’s probably just trying to generate web traffic and ad revenue. Paying Sinclair was a brilliant business move.

I find it telling with all attention to Obama - and all the folks that seem so determined to take him down - that a crack user is the best they can come up with. That speaks much more credibily to Obama’s strength of character than a 3 minute YouTube video from someone nobody every heard of before.

People keep saying he was a mental patient. Don’t you think if the Media had proof of this, it would have been blown wide open. The guy is adamant that he has no history of mental illness. I know that does not make it true. We shall see…..

FYI. I am a Federal Agent (in the DEA). We had to take a RIGOROUS lie detector before we were even considered to be a candidate. If you failed - you were not accepted - PERIOD.

Funny how you want proof about one thing but not another.

A polygraph only indicates if the person believes they are telling the truth.

IF Larry passes the test then it could be because it is true. It could also be because he had sex and did drugs with a tall black man he believed to be Obama. I doubt he asked for ID - and, if he had already was high, I doubt he would qualify as a credible witness. It could also mean he’s mentally ill. If the story about him having brain cancer is true then I would think anything the poor many says is highly suspect.

Lastly, keep in mind that while Whitehouse.gov may not be affiliated with any candidate, they are motivated by generating advertising revenue and will see considerable profits if they can report a positive polygraph.

My last post on this site.

From the Wikipedia’s entry on the Polygraph:

Reliability
There is little scientific evidence to support the reliability of polygraphs. Despite claims of 90% - 95% reliability, critics charge that rather than a “test”, the method amounts to an inherently unstandardizable interrogation technique whose accuracy cannot be established. A 1997 survey of 421 psychologists estimated the test’s average accuracy at about 61%, a little better than chance.[15] Critics also argue that even given high estimates of the polygraph’s accuracy a significant number of subjects (e.g. 10% given a 90% accuracy) will appear to be lying, and would unfairly suffer the consequences of “failing” the polygraph. In the 1998 Supreme Court case, United States v. Scheffer, the majority stated that “There is simply no consensus that polygraph evidence is reliable” and “Unlike other expert witnesses who testify about factual matters outside the jurors’ knowledge, such as the analysis of fingerprints, ballistics, or DNA found at a crime scene, a polygraph expert can supply the jury only with another opinion…”.[16] Also, in 2005 the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that “polygraphy did not enjoy general acceptance from the scientific community”.[17] In 2001 William G. Iacono, Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience and Director, Clinical Science and Psychopathology Research Training Program at the University of Minnesota, published a paper titled “Forensic “Lie Detection”: Procedures Without Scientific Basis” in the peer reviewed Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. He concluded that “Although the CQT[clarify] may be useful as an investigative aid and tool to induce confessions, it does not pass muster as a scientifically credible test. CQT theory is based on naive, implausible assumptions indicating (a) that it is biased against innocent individuals and (b) that it can be beaten simply by artificially augmenting responses to control questions. Although it is not possible to adequately assess the error rate of the CQT, both of these conclusions are supported by published research findings in the best social science journals (Honts et al., 1994; Horvath, 1977; Kleinmuntz & Szucko, 1984; Patrick & Iacono, 1991). Although defense attorneys often attempt to have the results of friendly CQTs admitted as evidence in court, there is no evidence supporting their validity and ample reason to doubt it. Members of scientific organizations who have the requisite background to evaluate the CQT are overwhelmingly skeptical of the claims made by polygraph proponents.”[18] Polygraph tests have also been criticized for failing to trap known spies such as double-agent Aldrich Ames, who passed two polygraph tests while spying for the Soviet Union.[19] Other spies who passed the polygraph include Karl Koecher,[20] Ana Belen Montes,[21] and Leandro Aragoncillo.[22] Noted pseudoscience debunker Bob Park recently commented, “The polygraph, in fact, has ruined careers, but never uncovered a single spy.”[23]

google: Stoelting Ultrascribe polygraph

Why are you guys talking about whitehouse.gov? It’s whitehouse.com, and has no affiliation with the US government.

ruleta americana portales web

En el primer caso juego linea juegos apuestas paginas internet juegos de poker gratuitos ruleta portales jouer au poker en reseau

Free teen tranny porn videos.

Free teen tranny porn videos.