HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Thursday February 21st, 2008 10:48 PM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Bill O'Reilly, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair

What Democratic presidential candidate scandal was Bill O’Reilly referring to in this clip:

Referring to the New York TimesJohn McCain story, O’Reilly said he could “just as easily” expose a “longstanding rumor” about an unnamed “powerful Democratic person in this country.” “I could do it tomorrow,” he said.

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 48 Comments to 'A Clue Larry Sinclair Story May Go Mainstream?'


  1. 1. Lexi said:


    Oh, my! Well, you had to figure. The momentum is just too great. Everyone is talking about this all day long.

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 10:53 pm | Quote


  1. […] True or not, it’s done.  It’ll be laughed out of mainstream coverage. […]

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Quote

  1. 3. Big Head Rob said:


    Bill O seems to have something up his sleeve, no?

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 10:56 pm | Quote

  1. 4. Big Head Rob said:


    Is the average person talking about the Sinclair stuff, Lexi?

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 11:04 pm | Quote

  1. 5. hell sam said:


    maybe but it would be better if a major new paper does it first not a smut show like Oreilly

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 11:05 pm | Quote

  1. 6. jjames said:


    Obama needed vetting. Poor Hillary.

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 11:35 pm | Quote

  1. 7. Lexi said:


    Is the average person talking about the Sinclair stuff, Lexi?

    Big Head Rob,

    Yes, everyone was talking about it at work today. They were especially comparing this to the McCain non-story and wondering how the McCain non-story, with both people denying an affair or any unusual relationship, could be front page NYT, but Sinclair is all over Youtube, radio, blogs etc. yet the mainstream media closes their eyes.

    That polygraph challenge could be the biggest event in internet history for sure.

    Lexi

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 11:50 pm | Quote

  1. 8. Anonymous said:


    So if everyone at Fox News is talking about it, why aren’t they running with it? Must not be as conservative as everyone always blames them unlike those liberal bastards at the NYTimes who will do anything to destroy the GOP.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 12:09 am | Quote

  1. 9. DTS said:


    Has the New York Time’s scuttled its own reputation with the McCain story, hoping to lure a “conservative” newspaper to run with the Sinclair story, so that it will also be seen as a “smear campaign”?

    Is the NYTime’s attempting to blunt the Sinclair story?

    Did Bill Keller fall on the sword?

    Or maybe the NYTime’s realizes McCain (who they endorsed) just might win the election, and they want to destroy him and replace him with Huckabee, who would most likely be smoked in the general.

    Stay tuned………

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:19 am | Quote

  1. 10. Barry said:


    How would the Obama crowd respond if Mr. Sinclair IS telling the truth?

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 6:58 am | Quote

  1. 11. Barry said:


    Is the average person talking about the Sinclair stuff, Lexi?

    The “average” person get their news from the mainstream media, so until the mainstream media fairly reports the story most “average” people won’t know enough to talk about it.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 7:08 am | Quote

  1. 12. Cella said:


    It will be interesting to see what agency will drop this bombshell.
    Whoa~ Tony Snow still looks hot!!!

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 10:57 am | Quote

  1. 13. X said:


    This is all nonsense: I’ve spoken with Serge Kovaleski, a writer with
    the NY Times who is highly respected and who Larry claims has
    corroborated his story. In fact, Serge says that Larry has not
    provided a SINGLE SHRED of evidence to back-up his allegations. Not a
    bit. And he’s reminded Larry of this perpetually. Just for all of you
    fanatics. It’s also highly possible that Larry will pass the test
    because he could very well be a mythomaniac. Nobody should believe
    this until he can state where they got the drugs and provide the limo
    driver. If Larry can list the types of liquor in the limo that night,
    he should be able to give a general idea of where they went to get
    the drugs. It’s a sham until he shows otherwise.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 12:52 pm | Quote

  1. 14. this proves said:


    Serge Kovaleski is covering the story.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 12:54 pm | Quote

  1. 15. Anonymous said:


    Serge Kovaleski is covering the story.

    a blog comment proves nothing

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Quote

  1. 16. X said:


    This proves that Serge Kovaleski knows the story exists, either because he’s in touch and saw in on youtube or because Larry contacted him himself. I didn’t find out. If you think that the media doesn’t know this guy exists you’re kidding yourself. That’s not the issue. It’s NOT suppression. It’s that Larry provides NO evidence to back up his objectively shaky story to begin with. The Times would love to crush Obama, for circulation sales and to prop up their girl Hillary. It’s that they can’t run with something with ZERO evidence provided by a shady former criminal who, despite his openness about his past, has everything to gain and nothing to lose by getting some attention. THAT is the media’s take on it — NOT this liberal vs. conservative perspective the fringe elements feed the sheep.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm | Quote

  1. 17. Anonymous said:


    This proves that Serge Kovaleski knows the story exists, either because he’s in touch and saw in on youtube or because Larry contacted him himself. I didn’t find out. If you think that the media doesn’t know this guy exists you’re kidding yourself. That’s not the issue. It’s NOT suppression. It’s that Larry provides NO evidence to back up his objectively shaky story to begin with. The Times would love to crush Obama, for circulation sales and to prop up their girl Hillary. It’s that they can’t run with something with ZERO evidence provided by a shady former criminal who, despite his openness about his past, has everything to gain and nothing to lose by getting some attention. THAT is the media’s take on it — NOT this liberal vs. conservative perspective the fringe elements feed the sheep.

    i would hope the nytimes knows stuff exists but i am doubting that YOU know anything. but yet you can call out sinclair for having no evidence… funny!

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:11 pm | Quote

  1. 18. wesawthat... said:


    hi - we added the original clip to youtube thanks for embedding it here but just an FYI to your readers and you:

    Think Progress has a much better clip on their website:

    http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/22/oreilly-unfounded-rumor

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:14 pm | Quote

  1. 19. Sandra said:


    I disagree, X. The NY Times ran with a story on John McCain with very limited “evidence” — there is a vast conspiracy in the media to protect Obama, but the media will end up costing him the election because this WILL inevitably come out. You must know Sinclair has more facts, and is waiting to release. Kovaleski is being kept from writing the story bc his paper already got in so much trouble for attacking McCain.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:15 pm | Quote

  1. 20. billy said:


    hi - we added the original clip to youtube thanks for embedding it here but just an FYI to your readers and you:

    Think Progress has a much better clip on their website:

    http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/22/oreilly-unfounded-rumor

    Think Progress is trolling for traffic on BHDC?

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:17 pm | Quote

  1. 21. X said:


    Kovaleski isn’t being kept from anything.
    A paper trail, words from advisors, a LOBBYIST, all these things amount to what we call a STORY. What would you like the Times to write about a man who will give them NO EVIDENCE. “He said so”? That would do it for you, but all the information in the McCain story doesn’t. I think you’ve been exposed as a blinders-wearing hack drone. I was in Sanibel, Florida in summer of 2005. I ran into Jeb Bush that June and we partied with a troop of tranny hookers, in between smack binges. I’ve got the hotel receipts to prove it, and the plane tickets. Hey, and ol’ Jeb was in Florida at the time. If I made a video about it, would you support the Times covering that? Answer that sincerely.

    I’ve never met Jeb Bush. But see how easy that would be? I don’t think much of the McCain story. I think he’s a genuinely good person with very few ethical hangups. I’m not even an Obama supporter, but I have such a problem with the insanity of people calling for an expose based on one person’s entirely unsubstantiated allegations. There is a protocol in the media that requires sources and some level of proof — and it’s not a liberal v. conservative thing. The Times has endorsed Hillary and it wouldn’t AT ALL be too late for her to overtake Obama. You all ignore that. Hillary is a hometown senator and friend of the Times. They would be happy to put her in a position to take back the nom. There’s just nothing there.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:39 pm | Quote

  1. 22. OBAMMESSIAHS! said:


    Another Obammessiah blindly says a lot of words to make Obama seem like God. Enough!

    Kovaleski isn’t being kept from anything.
    A paper trail, words from advisors, a LOBBYIST, all these things amount to what we call a STORY. What would you like the Times to write about a man who will give them NO EVIDENCE. “He said so”? That would do it for you, but all the information in the McCain story doesn’t. I think you’ve been exposed as a blinders-wearing hack drone. I was in Sanibel, Florida in summer of 2005. I ran into Jeb Bush that June and we partied with a troop of tranny hookers, in between smack binges. I’ve got the hotel receipts to prove it, and the plane tickets. Hey, and ol’ Jeb was in Florida at the time. If I made a video about it, would you support the Times covering that? Answer that sincerely.

    I’ve never met Jeb Bush. But see how easy that would be? I don’t think much of the McCain story. I think he’s a genuinely good person with very few ethical hangups. I’m not even an Obama supporter, but I have such a problem with the insanity of people calling for an expose based on one person’s entirely unsubstantiated allegations. There is a protocol in the media that requires sources and some level of proof — and it’s not a liberal v. conservative thing. The Times has endorsed Hillary and it wouldn’t AT ALL be too late for her to overtake Obama. You all ignore that. Hillary is a hometown senator and friend of the Times. They would be happy to put her in a position to take back the nom. There’s just nothing there.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 1:47 pm | Quote

  1. 23. X said:


    I’m NOT an Obama supporter, you asshole. I don’t see why anything the applies logic to this hysteria inducing horseshit classifies one as an Obama worshipper. I have NO horse in this race, because anyone I would have supported dropped out or never got in.

    Because I use a lot of words, I must support Obama — it says a lot that this is how the outsiders are distinguished from the illiterate, racist, braindead fucks who call for these newspapers to report this myth, yet probably couldn’t build up the courage or stamina to pick up a paper in the first place.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:01 pm | Quote

  1. 24. Sandra said:


    X will eat his words someday soon. Be they many words, or not.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:06 pm | Quote

  1. 25. X said:


    And answer my fucking question. Would you support my story about Jeb Bush being published too? And since I’m sure you wouldn’t; what distinguishes it from Larry, besides that I could actually provide these receipts I mentioned. Larry hasn’t.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:07 pm | Quote

  1. 26. Y said:


    “I’m NOT an Obama supporter”-X

    Suuure you’re not.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:08 pm | Quote

  1. 27. X said:


    What words will I eat? Have I at any point said his story isn’t true? I don’t know it is or not. All I know is he hasn’t provided any reason to believe it. That’s all I’ve said. Look closer, you hack.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:09 pm | Quote

  1. 28. X's Doctor said:


    Hey X, take your meds.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:10 pm | Quote

  1. 29. X said:


    You showed me, Y. Why not respond to my point? Because it’s logical?

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:12 pm | Quote

  1. 30. Curly X said:


    MOE…LARRY….THE CHEESE!!!!!

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:13 pm | Quote

  1. 31. X said:


    You people are fucking pathetic. Take my meds? Really; that’s what happens to the discussion when rationality is injected? Keep sucking this fat con-artist’s cock.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 2:16 pm | Quote

  1. 32. Z said:


    im with x on this one. you people are out of your fucking minds. sandra - sinclair has been trying to get this story published since october. he absolutely has released every shred of “evidence” that he has on it, i heard him say just that on a radio show. i mean you really make no sense: “Kovaleski is being kept from writing the story bc his paper already got in so much trouble for attacking McCain.” NYT along with mostly every other major media outlet in this country has been sitting on this story since november. The reason they havent ran it is absolutely not do to a “mass conspiracy”. There is no one other than Sinclair to validate any part of the story. If the limo driver is willing to authenticate the introduction as sinclair has claimed, than bring that moterfucker forward. I guarantee you that if the limo driver came forward, the story would immediately be front page. By the way, im with Kucinich to the end so suck it.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 4:55 pm | Quote

  1. 33. Z said:


    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 5:03 pm | Quote


  1. […] Earlier: Obama Supporter Buys LarrySinclair.com And: Bill O’Reilly Alluding to Obama-Sinclair Affair? ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… […]

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 10:29 pm | Quote

  1. 35. John Bryans Fontaine said:


    Fox is accusing the New York Times of a lack of integrity? This is like Pat Buchanan accusing Ted Kennedy of being a Fascist. Also, if you go to billoreilly.com, guess what? No mention of anyone named Larry Sinclair. O’Reilly needs to put or shut up.

    In answer to all the whining that the NY Times, as well as the MSM aren’t carrying the Sinclair story, neither are Limbaugh, FOX ( so far ), nor the NY Post, all of which hate Obama. The story isn’t being carried because, as a blogger named Mau put it: All this guy ( Sinclair ) proves is that he’s a drug-addicted cock-sucker in search of an easy buck’.

    Add to this that Sinclair is a Ron Paul operative:
    http://dearmurray.com/why-are-ron-paul-supporters-working-so-hard-to-defame-obama/

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Quote

  1. 36. Democrat said:


    This story caught my eye because a family friend who lives in Palo Alto (who supports Obama’s candidacy) is an openly gay man and says that he dated Obama at Columbia (and that other friends knew about it). I believe the family friend. Why would he lie? He doesn’t generally even tell people about it.

    Normally I would doubt a story like the Sinclair one, but wonder if my story adds credence to the other, or is it just coincidence? I am not in any way affiliated with a campaign, but I am a dem and would rather the story come out now then in two months.

    posted February 23rd, 2008 at 2:29 am | Quote

  1. 37. JPerry said:


    It was all over my place of work today. A lot of people are up in arms after finding out about how one of Gov. Deval Patrick’s top aides had raped a little boy in Florida last December and that TPTB, including groups like GLAAD and MassEquality were threatening media outlets with lawsuits if they reported on it. We’re also fed up with Patrick’s demands that laws intended to give sexual predators steep sentences and that children be protected from them, be weakened, and that age of consent laws be eliminated. So when this report about Obama who is mighty cozy with the equally corporate tool Patrick, it spread like wildfire.

    posted February 23rd, 2008 at 2:42 am | Quote

  1. 38. Jenn said:


    Polygraphs are not used to build cases, because the test can be beat… and if you have someone who is mental and believes the charges then they will pass. That’s why courts require factual evidence.

    The media wont touch the Larry Sinclair story because they know he’s a fraud with no evidence.

    Obama Accuser Larry Sinclair has a Criminal Record

    The current issue of the supermarket tabloid Globe (March 3,2008)) devotes two full pages to the lurid drug and sex allegations of Larry Sinclair. The Globe notes that “Sinclair has provided no evidence to back up his outrageous Obama stories.”

    Although Sinclair has provided no evidence to back up his outrageous Obama stories, the 46-year old man tells GLOBE that he’s spent time in prison in Florida, Arizona and Colorado on credit card fraud and other charges.

    He also admits trafficking in cocaine and marijuana and “moving” people from Mexico to the United States.

    He says he’s been disabled since a “work-related” accident in 2001 and has now been diagnosed with a brain tumor and given “a little more than a year to live.

    This is just an attempt to smear Obama, who has been known to be pretty square and always has loved woman. In fact Obama is smarter than that.

    Funny as to who was pushing this story… well the fanatic conspiracy theorist (ron paul supporters) not directed at the sane Ron Paul supporters, just the nutty ones.

    Mad they can’t find dirt on Obama, who they have been bashing forever. Keep searching craigslist and offering money for dirty on Obama.

    http://dallas.craigslist.org/pol/575878984.html

    posted February 23rd, 2008 at 8:41 am | Quote

  1. 39. Jenn said:


    Regarding the writer Democrat.

    Why would anyone believe your story, when you can be a part of the whole attempt to smear Obama. There are people who love Obama, and there are people who hate him, and will do anything to drag him down.

    Any person can write anything just like yourself. Well ya know my friend claimed they had gay sex with Ron Paul.

    posted February 23rd, 2008 at 8:43 am | Quote

  1. 40. John Bryans Fontaine said:


    The REAL story about Larry Sinclair:

    http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Is_Larry_Sinclair_Obama_s_dark_secret_2

    Posted by tubesocktedd:

    FYI#1: CNN, MSNBC & FOX all know about this, and others. They have researched this story and will not air it because it is libelous, inaccurate, and fraud based on the ranting of a very sick man with a self-admitted mental disorder and self-admitted criminal history where he says, “…I actually revealed some things about myself that could put me away for quite a bit of time…”

    (more)

    posted February 23rd, 2008 at 11:09 am | Quote

  1. 41. John Bryans Fontaine said:


    The Neo and Theo-Fascist Right are so desperate to stop Obama, having to rely, so totally, on a individual who is a drug taking and ( likely ) dealing cock-sucker who has a long history of fraud and of mental illness. It’s even more hilarious when these reactionaries claim that Larry Sinclair’s integrity is greater than the New York Times and the MSM. This is the equivalent of stating that Hitler had far greater morality than Roosevelt.

    posted February 23rd, 2008 at 11:13 am | Quote


  1. […] The mainstream media to date has been slow to cover the Sinclair allegations, although several respected journalists from newspapers including The New York Times are believed to be investigating. FOX News personality Bill O’Reilly, without mentioning Sinclair’s name, has hinted about possibly covering the story at a later date, and the Globe tabloid has already featured an interview with Sinclair. […]

    posted February 24th, 2008 at 2:12 pm | Quote

  1. 43. Mary said:


    Run the story. Make it public.

    posted March 1st, 2008 at 3:13 pm | Quote

  1. 44. Ann said:


    I agree run the story

    posted March 1st, 2008 at 3:15 pm | Quote

  1. 45. Bonnie said:


    I want Obama to respond, run the story

    posted March 1st, 2008 at 3:16 pm | Quote

  1. 46. Rita said:


    Yes, run the story, people want to know the truth.

    posted March 1st, 2008 at 6:29 pm | Quote

  1. 47. Duck said:


    Run the story

    posted April 6th, 2008 at 12:21 am | Quote

  1. 48. Duck said:


    This story caught my eye because a family friend who lives in Palo Alto (who supports Obama’s candidacy) is an openly gay man and says that he dated Obama at Columbia (and that other friends knew about it). I believe the family friend. Why would he lie? He doesn’t generally even tell people about it.

    Normally I would doubt a story like the Sinclair one, but wonder if my story adds credence to the other, or is it just coincidence? I am not in any way affiliated with a campaign, but I am a dem and would rather the story come out now then in two months.

    _______________________________________________________________
    Interesting…
    The plot just seems to thicken…
    What DID Donald Young know ??

    posted April 6th, 2008 at 12:27 am | Quote

Post Your Comment:

Quicktags:                





................................................................................................................................................................................................







Syndication
Subscribe Subscribe to BHDC


Anonymous Tips

Recent Comments
Larry Sinclair v. Barack Obama  (108)
Gino, Patty, unknown, [...]

Larry Sinclair Hires Richard R. Wier Jr., Former Delaware Attorney General  (1054)
Lori Tab, James, Interested Bystander, James [...]

Trent Lott Fallout: The Gay Escort Who Knew Too Much  (75)
jujube, mr. Twink, Tina5959, marcos [...]

John Edwards Caught Visiting Rielle Hunter  (13)
Jim Treacher, xbjllb, typical white person, IgotGumbyOnMyHighHeelShoe [...]

Blacks Angered By Harold Ford Jr.'s Bride Choice  (834)
, Know Our Shared History, ladybug, To: All Harold Jr Stans [...]

Enquirer Update: The Rielle Strange Confrontation -- And Her Odd Denials  (9)
Billy, Phil nyc, Phil from NYC, Big Head Rob [...]

Obama Covered Up Desire to Legalize Marijuana  (42)
Wow guys wake up, valley boy, Coffee, [...]

Obama: 'Why Can't I Just Eat My Waffle?'  (39)
Lisa, Josh, typical white person, Harpo [...]

Michelle Obama Fears Barack Will Be Killed  (5)
christian anders, Ariane, Marianne, Mike K [...]

Rielle Hunter (aka Lisa Druck), Contact Us  (8)
HAHAHA, Zachery Michael, Mark, K [...]

Edwards Hedges On Importance of Fidelity Question   (10)
tina59, jef wallace, Blank Stairs, Rand [...]

Snicker Alert for Rep. Loretta Sanchez  (5)
dogger7, La Bloguera, ANON, Cindy [...]

A Lead in the Disappearance of Chandra Levy  (24)
typical white person, Salman Khan, Baron, typical white person [...]

Cindy McCain: Bush Spread Rumors That John Fathered Black Child Out of Wedlock  (14)
NotaBetty, Sarah, Subterra, MO [...]

Sinclair Scheduled to Appear at National Press Club  (179)
JoAnn Bjorkman, xbjllb's mother, sickoflarryslies, democratista [...]

Matt Sanchez Weighs In on Obama's 'Gay Problem'  (14)
JoAnn Bjorkman, Douche, A;wayssearching, Beth Anne [...]

FOX News Blamed for Ron Paul Forum Exclusion  (21)
Mirliodirulty, Anonymous, floydculpin, Masked Blogger [...]

The White House Boys Are Ready for Some Tricks!  (3)
, masons are evil, love doctor


BHDC Files