Oh, my! Well, you had to figure. The momentum is just too great. Everyone is talking about this all day long.

maybe but it would be better if a major new paper does it first not a smut show like Oreilly

Is the average person talking about the Sinclair stuff, Lexi?

Big Head Rob,

Yes, everyone was talking about it at work today. They were especially comparing this to the McCain non-story and wondering how the McCain non-story, with both people denying an affair or any unusual relationship, could be front page NYT, but Sinclair is all over Youtube, radio, blogs etc. yet the mainstream media closes their eyes.

That polygraph challenge could be the biggest event in internet history for sure.

Lexi

Has the New York Time’s scuttled its own reputation with the McCain story, hoping to lure a “conservative” newspaper to run with the Sinclair story, so that it will also be seen as a “smear campaign”?

Is the NYTime’s attempting to blunt the Sinclair story?

Did Bill Keller fall on the sword?

Or maybe the NYTime’s realizes McCain (who they endorsed) just might win the election, and they want to destroy him and replace him with Huckabee, who would most likely be smoked in the general.

Stay tuned………

Is the average person talking about the Sinclair stuff, Lexi?

The “average” person get their news from the mainstream media, so until the mainstream media fairly reports the story most “average” people won’t know enough to talk about it.

This is all nonsense: I’ve spoken with Serge Kovaleski, a writer with
the NY Times who is highly respected and who Larry claims has
corroborated his story. In fact, Serge says that Larry has not
provided a SINGLE SHRED of evidence to back-up his allegations. Not a
bit. And he’s reminded Larry of this perpetually. Just for all of you
fanatics. It’s also highly possible that Larry will pass the test
because he could very well be a mythomaniac. Nobody should believe
this until he can state where they got the drugs and provide the limo
driver. If Larry can list the types of liquor in the limo that night,
he should be able to give a general idea of where they went to get
the drugs. It’s a sham until he shows otherwise.

Serge Kovaleski is covering the story.

a blog comment proves nothing

This proves that Serge Kovaleski knows the story exists, either because he’s in touch and saw in on youtube or because Larry contacted him himself. I didn’t find out. If you think that the media doesn’t know this guy exists you’re kidding yourself. That’s not the issue. It’s NOT suppression. It’s that Larry provides NO evidence to back up his objectively shaky story to begin with. The Times would love to crush Obama, for circulation sales and to prop up their girl Hillary. It’s that they can’t run with something with ZERO evidence provided by a shady former criminal who, despite his openness about his past, has everything to gain and nothing to lose by getting some attention. THAT is the media’s take on it — NOT this liberal vs. conservative perspective the fringe elements feed the sheep.

i would hope the nytimes knows stuff exists but i am doubting that YOU know anything. but yet you can call out sinclair for having no evidence… funny!

I disagree, X. The NY Times ran with a story on John McCain with very limited “evidence” — there is a vast conspiracy in the media to protect Obama, but the media will end up costing him the election because this WILL inevitably come out. You must know Sinclair has more facts, and is waiting to release. Kovaleski is being kept from writing the story bc his paper already got in so much trouble for attacking McCain.

Kovaleski isn’t being kept from anything.
A paper trail, words from advisors, a LOBBYIST, all these things amount to what we call a STORY. What would you like the Times to write about a man who will give them NO EVIDENCE. “He said so”? That would do it for you, but all the information in the McCain story doesn’t. I think you’ve been exposed as a blinders-wearing hack drone. I was in Sanibel, Florida in summer of 2005. I ran into Jeb Bush that June and we partied with a troop of tranny hookers, in between smack binges. I’ve got the hotel receipts to prove it, and the plane tickets. Hey, and ol’ Jeb was in Florida at the time. If I made a video about it, would you support the Times covering that? Answer that sincerely.

I’ve never met Jeb Bush. But see how easy that would be? I don’t think much of the McCain story. I think he’s a genuinely good person with very few ethical hangups. I’m not even an Obama supporter, but I have such a problem with the insanity of people calling for an expose based on one person’s entirely unsubstantiated allegations. There is a protocol in the media that requires sources and some level of proof — and it’s not a liberal v. conservative thing. The Times has endorsed Hillary and it wouldn’t AT ALL be too late for her to overtake Obama. You all ignore that. Hillary is a hometown senator and friend of the Times. They would be happy to put her in a position to take back the nom. There’s just nothing there.

I’m NOT an Obama supporter, you asshole. I don’t see why anything the applies logic to this hysteria inducing horseshit classifies one as an Obama worshipper. I have NO horse in this race, because anyone I would have supported dropped out or never got in.

Because I use a lot of words, I must support Obama — it says a lot that this is how the outsiders are distinguished from the illiterate, racist, braindead fucks who call for these newspapers to report this myth, yet probably couldn’t build up the courage or stamina to pick up a paper in the first place.

And answer my fucking question. Would you support my story about Jeb Bush being published too? And since I’m sure you wouldn’t; what distinguishes it from Larry, besides that I could actually provide these receipts I mentioned. Larry hasn’t.

What words will I eat? Have I at any point said his story isn’t true? I don’t know it is or not. All I know is he hasn’t provided any reason to believe it. That’s all I’ve said. Look closer, you hack.

You showed me, Y. Why not respond to my point? Because it’s logical?

You people are fucking pathetic. Take my meds? Really; that’s what happens to the discussion when rationality is injected? Keep sucking this fat con-artist’s cock.

Fox is accusing the New York Times of a lack of integrity? This is like Pat Buchanan accusing Ted Kennedy of being a Fascist. Also, if you go to billoreilly.com, guess what? No mention of anyone named Larry Sinclair. O’Reilly needs to put or shut up.

In answer to all the whining that the NY Times, as well as the MSM aren’t carrying the Sinclair story, neither are Limbaugh, FOX ( so far ), nor the NY Post, all of which hate Obama. The story isn’t being carried because, as a blogger named Mau put it: All this guy ( Sinclair ) proves is that he’s a drug-addicted cock-sucker in search of an easy buck’.

Add to this that Sinclair is a Ron Paul operative:
http://dearmurray.com/why-are-ron-paul-supporters-working-so-hard-to-defame-obama/

It was all over my place of work today. A lot of people are up in arms after finding out about how one of Gov. Deval Patrick’s top aides had raped a little boy in Florida last December and that TPTB, including groups like GLAAD and MassEquality were threatening media outlets with lawsuits if they reported on it. We’re also fed up with Patrick’s demands that laws intended to give sexual predators steep sentences and that children be protected from them, be weakened, and that age of consent laws be eliminated. So when this report about Obama who is mighty cozy with the equally corporate tool Patrick, it spread like wildfire.

Regarding the writer Democrat.

Why would anyone believe your story, when you can be a part of the whole attempt to smear Obama. There are people who love Obama, and there are people who hate him, and will do anything to drag him down.

Any person can write anything just like yourself. Well ya know my friend claimed they had gay sex with Ron Paul.

The Neo and Theo-Fascist Right are so desperate to stop Obama, having to rely, so totally, on a individual who is a drug taking and ( likely ) dealing cock-sucker who has a long history of fraud and of mental illness. It’s even more hilarious when these reactionaries claim that Larry Sinclair’s integrity is greater than the New York Times and the MSM. This is the equivalent of stating that Hitler had far greater morality than Roosevelt.

Run the story. Make it public.

I want Obama to respond, run the story

Run the story