HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Tuesday February 19th, 2008 11:40 AM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Internet, Barack Obama, Larry Sinclair

Big Head DC has been alerted that YouTube, which is owned by Google, Inc., has allegedly attempted to suppress the popularity of Larry Sinclair’s online videos. Sinclair says in the videos that he used cocaine with Sen. Barack Obama and performed a sex act on him in 1999.

Suppressing the videos’ prominence would dramatically affect the number of YouTubers who actually see them. The view count of Sinclair’s main video has increased by over 100,000 in the last week, but the video is not listed in the YouTube “Most Viewed List” for this week. Also, the “Daily,” “Weekly” and “Monthly Honors” for “Most Discussed” videos on the site have not been updated in recent days. The Sinclair video has substantially more comments and views (about 350,000 as of this writing) than many other popular news and politics videos.

Google, the parent company of YouTube, has not responded to Big Head DC’s request for comment on this matter, but its founders have said publicly that they are Obama supporters.

Earlier: Larry Sinclair to Take Polygraph In Attempt to Prove Obama Drug & Sex Allegations

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 35 Comments to 'YouTube Suppressing Larry Sinclair’s Obama Video?'


  1. 1. baf said:


    If they are suppressing it on popularity lists that come up on the main pages, maybe its because of concerns about little kids watching it. Politics have unfortunately become R rated, and thats on good day.

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 12:32 pm | Quote

  1. 2. Skeptic said:


    What evidence was provided to Big Head DC to support the contention that YouTube “attempted to suppress the popularity of Larry Sinclair’s online videos?” The article provides no evidence in support of this assertion.

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 12:54 pm | Quote

  1. 3. Skeptic said:


    It’s worth noting that Larry Sinclair’s first video has only a two-star rating (based on over 2,500 user ratings).

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 12:57 pm | Quote

  1. 4. deBUNKED Audacity said:


    Thats because Obama has been suppressing Google by buying search results. Anybody can make things go to the top of search results by paying money to search sites like Google and Yahoo. Anything bad about Obama they bury it under stupid search results. Why does this not surprise me now.

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 1:13 pm | Quote

  1. 5. barry Obmaa said:


    Seems like Obama and his million dollar day donations have hired expesive lawyers to threaten GOOGLE and YOUTUBE. The good thing about Google they were the only ones that did not back down from the federal government when they wanted their records

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 1:15 pm | Quote

  1. 6. Kennedy K said:


    So many of Obama’s rich friends in the media are working overtime to steal the election for him.

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 1:59 pm | Quote

  1. 7. TAS said:


    I didn’t see those videos until yesterday.

    A first-year (hell, first-semester) student of Psychology could tell that this guy is a wingnut

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Quote

  1. 8. jamo don said:


    Cleveland Leader a news paper did an article on Larry Sinclair. I think they are a MSM.

    I think MSM means MAIN STREAM MEDIA

    posted February 19th, 2008 at 10:55 pm | Quote

  1. 9. Typhonsentra said:


    My God, how stupid is the author of this and all the other “Obama Scandal” articles on this site? It’s not getting honors for this month because it doesn’t qualify any longer you morons.

    Youtube honors are broken up into three categories: Daily (Available up to 48-50 hours after upload), Weekly (Up to 7 days), and monthly (30 days). The original Sinclair video was posted over 30 days ago so the only category it can receive honors in anymore is in the “All-Time” category which is much more competitive.

    What’s funny is you nutjobs think it’s all a conspiracy to keep this (Bogus) story out of the national spotlight.

    posted February 20th, 2008 at 10:44 pm | Quote

  1. 10. Zevon said:


    Sinclair says that the limo driver is scared to come out because of threats to his family.

    This is dynamite. Obama is done for if this is true, and I suspect it is. Watch the Rense interview with Sinclair, it’s not good for Obama.

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 2:15 am | Quote

  1. 11. An Noneemuss said:


    My God, how stupid is the author of this and all the other “Obama Scandal” articles on this site? It’s not getting honors for this month because it doesn’t qualify any longer you morons.

    Youtube honors are broken up into three categories: Daily (Available up to 48-50 hours after upload), Weekly (Up to 7 days), and monthly (30 days). The original Sinclair video was posted over 30 days ago so the only category it can receive honors in anymore is in the “All-Time” category which is much more competitive.

    What’s funny is you nutjobs think it’s all a conspiracy to keep this (Bogus) story out of the national spotlight.

    Quoted for truth

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 3:50 am | Quote

  1. 12. ktvkgd2 said:


    did the google kids do drugs with barak to? there all from the midwest arent they? maybe a 3some?

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 9:50 am | Quote

  1. 13. chuckE said:


    Youtube has sucked since Google bought it.

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 9:59 am | Quote

  1. 14. Russell Tupper said:


    Perhaps it’s because media people like Tucker Carlson and John Fund - hardly standard-bearers for the liberal media - were both falsely acccused of sexual improriety by two DIFFERENT crazy people. Look it up.

    Type in either one of their names and the word “rape” into Google and you’ll see it for yourself.

    Any loon can make a charge against someone.

    As Carlson said, it used to be that when a sex scandal broke, if the actual charge wasn’t true, at least something was - the candidate or person accused did something sexual.

    Then he was accused of rape in Louisville by some woman. He spent thousands of dollars not only proving he wasn’t there at the time of the alleged rape - but also that he had never been to Louisville in this entire life!!!!

    Perhaps the standard of accuracy in a major media-story should be a little higher than a self-recorded You Tube video, a self-respresented case filed in Federal Court (which would accept my lawsuit against the moon for shining too bright - if I had the filing fee) and interviews by people who’s blogs make Oliver Stone movies look like recorded bits of actual history.

    Come on!

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 11:19 am | Quote

  1. 15. Jack said:


    The Cleveland Leader is not a mainstream publication. The Cleveland Dealer is. This Sinclair guy is obviously a nut.

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 3:36 pm | Quote

  1. 16. Sgt. John Cleary said:


    Anyone can look at this Sinclair character and tell he is a kook!

    Also, the Cleveland Leader is just a blog

    The Cleveland Plaine Dealer is Cleveland’s newspaper.
    There was once a newspaper in Clevleand called the Cleveland leader, but it was bought up by the Cleveland plaine dealer and it DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE.

    LARRY SINCLAIR’S CLAIMS HAVE BEEN PROVEN A LIE, HE WAS NEVER EVEN ILLINOIS WHEN HE SAID HE WAS!

    He is a toothless kook!

    posted February 21st, 2008 at 10:29 pm | Quote

  1. 17. John Dough said:


    What evidence was provided to Big Head DC to support the contention that YouTube “attempted to suppress the popularity of Larry Sinclair’s online videos?” The article provides no evidence in support of this assertion.

    Evidence? This is Big Head DC. Rob doesn’t need trivial things like evidence or proof or whatnot. He’s not really a journalist, so he doesn’t need to be held to any journalistic ethics. Unless, of course, a story happens to be true, in which case Rob is tots a professional journalist that busted his ass to break that story. Like the Trent Lott/gay hustler story, which Rob will still claim is true, even though no part of the story even remotely panned out. But hey, at the end of the day, he knows what’s important - page views, and whatever kooky stories, true or not, it takes to get more.

    Speaking of Larry Sinclair’s completely unverifiable accusations, did anyone else notice how the Sinclair story was basically ditched for 2 days on this site when Rob thought he had a real, verifiable scandal with the “plagiarism” story? And when that fizzled, Rob’s interest in Sinclair’s nutty claims became renewed. Atta girl.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 11:32 am | Quote

  1. 18. jjames said:


    Evidence will be there in the form of a passed polygraph, but people will ignore that evidence. Sinclair will make Fox soon, i hope, based on the O’Reilly video. Hillary should say in til the convention, so if they raise it any time before september, she will be ready to step in.

    posted February 22nd, 2008 at 11:48 am | Quote

  1. 19. Eddie said:


    The Larry Sinclair story is amazing. I hope to hear more about it soon. Apparently he took the polygraph lie detector test last night. The results will be out Monday or Tuesday. This is going to be big.

    If you want to see the Larry Sinclair video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

    His interviews with a radio station:
    Intro:www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTz7nojEC80
    Part1:www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQIZSPQ2ilc
    Part2:www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz0ZFP87tBw
    Part3:www.youtube.com/watch?v=odzvNZgWp0c
    Part4:www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlnmzp4jomg

    posted February 23rd, 2008 at 1:01 pm | Quote

  1. 20. Yvonne said:


    Why do you all want to destroy Obama so badly that you are willing to believe a liar?! FYI - results of the first test are posted at www.whitehouse.com and deception was noted. In other words, SINCLAIR LIED!

    posted February 24th, 2008 at 2:33 pm | Quote

  1. 21. KG said:


    Why do you all want to destroy Obama so badly that you are willing to believe a liar?! FYI - results of the first test are posted at www.whitehouse.com and deception was noted. In other words, SINCLAIR LIED!

    You are an idiot. That was posted on this site already.

    posted February 24th, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Quote

  1. 22. hill 08 said:


    We don’t know what is on the polygraph they haven’t said, I do beleive there is some truth to this. Obama is going to be hit on all ends as the knew front runner, wait tell McCain gets him and all the reps. I can’t wait tell Mr. perfect has to answer for his mistakes, mean while Hillary can go forward we all know her dirt. GO HILLARY!

    posted February 24th, 2008 at 6:47 pm | Quote

  1. 23. Jutin said:


    We don’t know what is on the polygraph they haven’t said, I do beleive there is some truth to this. Obama is going to be hit on all ends as the knew front runner, wait tell McCain gets him and all the reps. I can’t wait tell Mr. perfect has to answer for his mistakes, mean while Hillary can go forward we all know her dirt. GO HILLARY!

    You Hillary supporters are so precdictable. I’m sure you all were salivating at the thought of an Obama scandal, but it turns out that this is just another lie. LARRY SINCLAIR TOOK THE POLYGRAPH TEST AND FAILED. (See link: http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=&NewsID=116#comments) Too bad for camp Hillary. Looks like they will need to find another way for their sorry ass candidate to win. This is truely pathetic.

    posted February 25th, 2008 at 3:17 am | Quote

  1. 24. Agent Mulder said:


    Anyone who believes there is a conspiracy to suppress Larry’s video is an idiot. If Youtube were payed off to sabotage Larry’s video they could easily delete his videos, ban his account and give plausible reasons without a trace that Obama was involved. Everything with this Larry character and his cult of supporters is a conspiracy. He fails his polygraph test, the test takers must have been payed off by Obama to rig it. Some people on a Democratic message board make fun of him, he tries to sue Obama, Axelrod and the DNC for hiring people to slander him. His video doesn’t get ranked as high as he wants, Youtube must be payed by Obama to suppress it. The guy is a joke.

    posted March 11th, 2008 at 12:19 pm | Quote

  1. 25. Scott said:


    You tube is now suppressing some Ron Paul comments too, also some thumbs up #s, when you are logged on and refresh every thing is fine, but when you log off and go back my post about Ron Paul or gone or listed as spam automatically, and the thumbs up are not counted on the thumbs up I hit, You tube sucks and has sold out.

    posted May 10th, 2008 at 10:38 am | Quote

  1. 26. Anonymous said:


    You Obama people crack me up–so confessed drug addict,Barack Obama, is accused of doing drugs and having sex in a car–Oh, my, that just can’t be because drug addicts are such upstanding and moral people that they would never do anything like that. You people need to have your heads examined!! Drug addicts do all kinds of disgusting things, what makes you think that Obama is a “special kind” of drug addict? You are a bunch of idiotic morons to believe any drug addict.

    posted May 13th, 2008 at 12:21 pm | Quote

  1. 27. Anonymous Asshole said:


    ^^You “Anonymous” people crack me up (not really). You think a crack smoking “drug addict” could get this far in a presidential campaign? You are the idiotic moron. Yeah, right before he goes to a town hall meeting, he likes to freebase. Oh, and crack is what got him through Columbia and Harvard Law (magna cum laude). I think YOU are on crack Anonymous.

    posted May 13th, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Quote

  1. 28. no obama said:


    The old saying goes (TELL THE TRUTH AND IT WILL SET YOU FREE)we all know Hillary (she’s the best ) I dont understand when bill decided to slip out door on Hillary that made news why is the Larry’s story not even mentioned. This reminds me of a town i lived in if you was big you never got in any trouble but if you was a normal hard working person they tried to take you down . i guess thats whats happening with Hillary. Go Girl Hillary 2008

    posted May 13th, 2008 at 8:28 pm | Quote

  1. 29. HilLIARy said:


    The old saying goes (TELL THE TRUTH AND IT WILL SET YOU FREE)we all know Hillary (she’s the best ) I dont understand when bill decided to slip out door on Hillary that made news why is the Larry’s story not even mentioned. This reminds me of a town i lived in if you was big you never got in any trouble but if you was a normal hard working person they tried to take you down . i guess thats whats happening with Hillary. Go Girl Hillary 2008

    There is a story about Hillary being a lesbian…do you want that one to come out too, no obama? Didn’t think so. Only what is good for you.

    She will burn the village to save herself.

    Put a fork in her.

    posted May 13th, 2008 at 10:13 pm | Quote

  1. 30. Tia said:


    I believe Sinclair.

    Obama has stated that he used to be a crackhead, so who knows that he did when he was high on drugs?

    posted May 14th, 2008 at 2:41 pm | Quote

  1. 31. JayfromJersey said:


    Listen up people, stop with the lies! This shit isn’t true and why are you all so intent on destroying a man who only wants to help you. If you don’t want Senator Obama to be president then that’s one thing. It’s another thing to repeat vicious lies by a mentally unstable fabricator like Larry Sinclair.

    posted May 17th, 2008 at 11:16 am | Quote

  1. 32. Tia is a loser said:


    I believe Sinclair.

    Obama has stated that he used to be a crackhead, so who knows that he did when he was high on drugs?

    Please dear Tia, where did Obama “state that he was a crackhead?” It’s clear that you are a complete idiot, why do you post to prove it to everyone?

    posted May 18th, 2008 at 4:38 pm | Quote

  1. 33. LarryTheLiar said:


    Sinclair’s claims have been analysed by the controversial forensic technique known as Reverse Speech, the practice of playing speech in reverse to reveal unconscious thoughts of the speaker.

    In some stunningly clear reversed statements, Sinclair confirms his claims by saying, “The man buys dope,” and “Seen his thing, you know.” These and other speech reversals verify that Sinclair is telling a true story. He did indeed share drugs with Obama and performed a sex act on him in 1999.

    posted June 24th, 2008 at 1:45 pm | Quote

  1. 34. LarryTheLiar said:


    The sensational findings of the Reverse Speech analysis of Larry Sinclair’s allegations were presented on the Jeff Rense Program, Monday, February 18th, on GCN at www.rense.com. Startling Reversals of Barack Obama himself were also presented for the first time ever. Both the Sinclair and Obama speech reversals can be heard now at Reverse Speech.com and Rense.com, for your entertainment. You can also hear the entire one hour Rense-Sinclair radio interview in MP3 format at rense.com.

    Reverse Speech is the brainchild of Australian Hypnotherapist, David John Oates, whose controversial technique has been used in the past by law enforcement officials. Oates pioneered the Reverse Speech technique in 1984 and devotes most of his time working in the therapeutic arena and training Reverse Speech students.

    It is important to note that David John Oates has been pioneering and researching Reverse Speech for 24 years now and states, unequivocally, that he has never once come across a single example of someone lying in reverse. “It simply can’t be done,” says Oates (who has reversed tens of thousands of recordings) “because people can’t talk backward, even unconciously. In fact, if Mr. Sinclair had been lying, his subconscious would have exposed him in the Reversals as plain as day. The bigger the lie in forward speech, the more intensely the subconscious will correct that lie in reverse, unless the person really doesn’t have any morals or conscience.”

    posted June 24th, 2008 at 1:46 pm | Quote

  1. 35. LarryTheLiar said:


    Oops, fixed it:

    On January 23rd 2008 on the Jeff Rense radio program, a man named Larry Sinclair made stunning claims about Senator Barack Obama. Sinclair claimed that in 1999 he met Barack Obama and Obama purchased and supplied him with cocaine. Sinclair also claims that he performed a sex act on the Senator and the Senator smoked crack cocaine during the evening.

    Sinclair’s claims have been analysed by the controversial forensic technique known as Reverse Speech, the practice of playing speech in reverse to reveal unconscious thoughts of the speaker.

    In some stunningly clear reversed statements, Sinclair confirms his claims by saying, “The man buys dope,” and “Seen his thing, you know.” These and other speech reversals verify that Sinclair is telling a true story. He did indeed share drugs with Obama and performed a sex act on him in 1999.

    Sinclair’s claims have circulated widely on the YouTube internet site and Senator Obama has yet to comment on these claims, yet have thus far fallen on deaf ears.

    The sensational findings of the Reverse Speech analysis of Larry Sinclair’s allegations were presented on the Jeff Rense Program, Monday, February 18th, on GCN at www.rense.com. Startling Reversals of Barack Obama himself were also presented for the first time ever. Both the Sinclair and Obama speech reversals can be heard now at Reverse Speech.com and Rense.com, for your entertainment. You can also hear the entire one hour Rense-Sinclair radio interview in MP3 format at rense.com.

    Reverse Speech is the brainchild of Australian Hypnotherapist, David John Oates, whose controversial technique has been used in the past by law enforcement officials. Oates pioneered the Reverse Speech technique in 1984 and devotes most of his time working in the therapeutic arena and training gullible Reverse Speech students.

    It is important to note that David John Oates has been pioneering and researching Reverse Speech for 24 years now and states, unequivocally, that he has never once come across a single example of someone lying in reverse. “It simply can’t be done,” says Oates (who has reversed tens of thousands of recordings) “because people can’t talk backward, even unconciously. In fact, if Mr. Sinclair had been lying, his subconscious would have ignored him in the Reversals as plain as day. The bigger the lie in forward speech, the more intensely the subconscious will do absolutely nothing in reverse, because the person really doesn’t have any morals or conscience.”

    posted June 24th, 2008 at 1:56 pm | Quote

Post Your Comment:

Quicktags:                





................................................................................................................................................................................................







Syndication
Subscribe Subscribe to BHDC


Anonymous Tips

Recent Comments
Larry Sinclair v. Barack Obama  (108)
Gino, Patty, unknown, [...]

Larry Sinclair Hires Richard R. Wier Jr., Former Delaware Attorney General  (1054)
Lori Tab, James, Interested Bystander, James [...]

Trent Lott Fallout: The Gay Escort Who Knew Too Much  (75)
jujube, mr. Twink, Tina5959, marcos [...]

John Edwards Caught Visiting Rielle Hunter  (13)
Jim Treacher, xbjllb, typical white person, IgotGumbyOnMyHighHeelShoe [...]

Blacks Angered By Harold Ford Jr.'s Bride Choice  (834)
, Know Our Shared History, ladybug, To: All Harold Jr Stans [...]

Enquirer Update: The Rielle Strange Confrontation -- And Her Odd Denials  (9)
Billy, Phil nyc, Phil from NYC, Big Head Rob [...]

Obama Covered Up Desire to Legalize Marijuana  (42)
Wow guys wake up, valley boy, Coffee, [...]

Obama: 'Why Can't I Just Eat My Waffle?'  (39)
Lisa, Josh, typical white person, Harpo [...]

Michelle Obama Fears Barack Will Be Killed  (5)
christian anders, Ariane, Marianne, Mike K [...]

Rielle Hunter (aka Lisa Druck), Contact Us  (8)
HAHAHA, Zachery Michael, Mark, K [...]

Edwards Hedges On Importance of Fidelity Question   (10)
tina59, jef wallace, Blank Stairs, Rand [...]

Snicker Alert for Rep. Loretta Sanchez  (5)
dogger7, La Bloguera, ANON, Cindy [...]

A Lead in the Disappearance of Chandra Levy  (24)
typical white person, Salman Khan, Baron, typical white person [...]

Cindy McCain: Bush Spread Rumors That John Fathered Black Child Out of Wedlock  (14)
NotaBetty, Sarah, Subterra, MO [...]

Sinclair Scheduled to Appear at National Press Club  (179)
JoAnn Bjorkman, xbjllb's mother, sickoflarryslies, democratista [...]

Matt Sanchez Weighs In on Obama's 'Gay Problem'  (14)
JoAnn Bjorkman, Douche, A;wayssearching, Beth Anne [...]

FOX News Blamed for Ron Paul Forum Exclusion  (21)
Mirliodirulty, Anonymous, floydculpin, Masked Blogger [...]

The White House Boys Are Ready for Some Tricks!  (3)
, masons are evil, love doctor


BHDC Files