Filed under: Sex, Scandals, Barack Obama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair, David Axelrod, WhiteHouse.com
Larry Sinclair, the Minnesota man who is suing Sen. Barack Obama for issues stemming from Sinclair’s accusations that he did drugs and had a sexual encounter with Obama in the late-1990s, has agreed to take a polygraph test in an effort to prove his allegations.
The mainstream media has largely ignored the story to date, but an acquaintance of the infamous Robert Novak insisted to Big Head DC on Monday that a November column penned by Novak was referring to the Sinclair allegations.
Sinclair has maintained since at least last fall that he used cocaine with Obama and performed a sex act on him in 1999. Sinclair has thus far released several YouTube videos to back up his claims.
Big Head DC has learned that the results of the polygraph are expected to be released before the March 4 primaries.
This has not been a good day for Obama.
Obama is going to get the Nomination. But when this hits the major NEWS he will resign his senate job and Drop out of the Presidential race
God bless Big Head DC for getting this information out while the mainstream press is paying attn to the plagiarism scandal. Larry Sinclair clearly believes he is telling the truth. And I believe him now, too.
Obama better hope he wins tomorrow because it’ll be the last time he wins anything once this comes out.
Polygraph testing can’t answer the question of whether Larry Sinclair has spoken the truth. The test has no scientific basis, is inherently biased against the truthful, but can easily be passed by liars. For a thorough debunking of the lie detector, see http://antipolygraph.org
FBI and other law enforcement agencies use the POLYGRAPH.
[…] Earlier: Larry Sinclair to Take Polygraph In Attempt to Prove Obama Drug & Sex Allegations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… […]
“Sinclair has thus far released several YouTube videos to back up his claims.”
How does videotaping yourself repeating allegations aloud “back up” any claim? This has to be the lamest statement I’ve seen on this site yet. I suppose I could post a YouTube video of myself saying that I slept with Brad Pitt, but how would that “back up” any claim I made? But hey, who needs to have journalistic ethics when there is traffic to be generated.
Speaking of journalistic ethics, how’s that Trent Lott/gay escort story panning out?
“How does videotaping yourself repeating allegations aloud “back up” any claim?”
Ummm, it’s called slander (or libel, if he writes it down). All Obama needs to do is sue him in court if he’s lying - of course, this assumes he is actually lying.
By the way, how’s that cool-aid panning out today?? Not too sweet, I assume.
Ron, you’re missing my point. My point has absolutely ZERO to do with whether or not Sinclair is lying. My point is that repeating a claim on YouTube that was made last fall doesn’t “back up” that claim. That makes no sense whatsoever. The sentence in this post should have said something to the effect of “Sinclair has thus far released several YouTube videos to reiterate his claims.” If I say I was raped by the Pope, and then make a video of myself repeating this claim, it in NO WAY backs up my claim. This is just an example of sloppy writing.
P.S. - I don’t like Kool-Aid. I believe in Crystal Light, ’cause I believe in me.
I lie detector test is only as accurate as the one administering it. That is why it is not admissable in a court of law. I’m not saying that what Larry Sinclair is saying isn’t true, I’m just saying that a lie detector doesn’t hold much weight with most people.
What I found to be most surprising about this “story” is that Larry Sinclair was in a limo? Are you serious? This guy looks like he could barely afford a bus ticket.
Well here’s a novel idea. Present, pictures, receipts, eye witnesses from the lounge,DNA evidence even. Anyone can make up a good story; let’s say like in the Duke Lacrosse scandal.
We’re all just anxious to get out a story to stop this train wreck never mind malicious intent or the lack of evidence. Pay me $10,000 I’ll take a polygraph too and take my chances on passing it for the big 100K.
[…] Earlier: Larry Sinclair to Take Polygraph In Attempt to Prove Obama Drug & Sex Allegations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… […]
Draft Pat Buchanan for President 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLlW309V_mw
This is a disgrace just as the John mcCain story the Times reported this should be given front page coverage as soon as the man passes the lie dectector the man has posted 3 new video’s with a mexican flag in the back why would a mexican want to attack a democrat who will give blanket amnesty to millions of illegal mexicans
This is so wrong. The media has refused to cover Edwards until he got 4% in Nevada(except to call him gay and talk about his haircut), demonized Hillary(said she could only run because people felt sorry for her because Bill had affairs), made a joke of Guiliani (brought Guiliani’s affair with his wife before they were married as a possible reason for loss and called him a transsexual for wearing a dress on Saturday Night Live,) now they are questioning John McCain’s alleged relationship with a woman (I’m sure they will go into his divorce from his first wife next) - yet- no one will mention Obama’s alleged sex/drug connection with Larry Sinclair.
Is this racially biased? I mean the media is not afraid to call a white candidate “a faggot” - that’s what Ann Coulter said of Edwards. Bill Mahr called Guiliani a transsexual. Those are bold statements with no real proof. We can suggest Hillary “pimps out” Chelsea.
I don’t understand…….
Susan -
1. Since when does Ann Coulter represent “the media”? Last I checked, many publications (i.e. the media) dropped her syndicated column after she made that remark.
2. Since when does Bill Maher represent “the media”? He’s a comedian with his own show on a premium cable channel where he’s free to make jokes and express his own personal views. In fact, when he had his show on network TV and made a controversial remark regarding 9/11, the media took him off the air, which is what precipitated his move to HBO.
3. David Shuster of NBC, who suggested that Hillary’s campaign was “pimping out” Chelsea, was subsequently suspended from all NBC broadcasts because of that remark. That’s right - the media removed him from the air.
If anything, all of these people you point to are perfect examples of the media punishing people for making offensive remarks. So, congratulations, you’ve just undermined your own point.
4. You don’t understand because you’re not well-informed.
[…] Huckabee speaks, lobbying firm defends itself: The New Repu.. http://tinyurl.com/yrl7fk Site Offers Vicki Iseman 100K For Polygraph Thursday February 21st, 2008 2:40 PM by BHDC Staff Filed under: Barack Obama, John McCain,Larry Sinclair, Vicki Iseman Just as they have done for Sen. Barack Obama’s accuser Larry Sinclair, WhiteHouse.com is now offering Vicki Iseman $100,000 if she will take a polygraph and it proves that she did not have an affair with Sen. John McCain. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… […]
IF BARACK WAS INNOCENT HE WOULD HAVE GONE OUT AND SAID THIS GUY IS ALLEGING I AM GAY….AND DEBUNKED HIM…INSTEAD HE HAS KEPT SILENT…WELLL THAT SHOULD RAISE SOME EYEBROWS…THEY HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THIS FOR ALONG TIME THEN WHY NOT GO TO THE MEDIA AND SAY THIS IS NOT TRUE…I THINK THIS IS TRUE..THIS GUY WOULD NOT SACRIFICE HIS LIFE…..
This story, and most of you people (except some like John Dough) should be ashamed of yourselves. Has this nation become so dumbed down, that all one has to do is make an allegation in a Youtube video for something to become a “fact?” Is there virtually no critical thinking left? This person makes a video, and says “on such and such a date, in a limo.” He never provides a real club name, a real hotel, a witness, a tape, a receipt, NOTHING. Not a single shred of evidence. But, like most liars in every high school argument, he screams “I will take a polygraph.” Gosh, well that makes it more credible, doesn’t it?
Who will administer that polygraph? How credible is that examiner? Does a candidate have to respond to every crackpot with a cheesy story on YouTube who provides virtually no other evidence that the story is remotely credible? If you think he does, then you’re doing more crack than Larry. Anyone can make a video alleging anything. And sure, they can be sued for it, drawing attention to it, and thus, themselves. And if that person hasn’t a pot to piss in, and going after an award would be meaningless, who would know or care, 18 months later, when it went to trial (presuming it was not first thrown out, which is likely). The intended damage was already done. Some gullible Americans who claim the are upstanding people with values, have already sunk deep into a gutter and soiled themselves, a good candidate, and their nation.
Here’s the last word on this idiotic person and his scurrilous, undocumented smear: http://larrysinclair.com. Pass it on.
[…] up Dem race : Good morning. Lots of focus this morning about the .. http://tinyurl.com/32bcet Sinclair Will Use Polygraph Money to Help Charities Friday February 22nd, 2008 12:19 PM by BHDC Staff Filed under: Sex, Scandals, tk, BarackObama, Drugs, Larry Sinclair Larry Sinclair, who agreed to take a $100,000 polygraph challenge administered by WhiteHouse.com in an effort to prove his allegations against Barack Obama , has negotiated a reduced payout that will bring $10,000 to the Duluth Salvation Army Housing Loan Program and the Girls and Boys Club of Duluth, both charities in his home state of Minnesota. He will also use money to help his mother pay off debt. […]
You’re blatantly wrong here… anyone running for political office automatically cedes any right to sue for slader or libel. Anything can (and will) be said about the candidate, true or untrue. Look it up.
Anyone that thinks Sinclair has a shred of credibility is either drunk, stupid, or has zero aptitude for judging character. He instantly sticks out like a sore thumb at a desperate man convention.
slander not slader
Question: Why or why isn’t this story hitting the t.v. networks already?!
Post Your Comment:
WordPress database error: [Server shutdown in progress]
SELECT comment_post_ID, post_title FROM (wp_comments LEFT JOIN wp_posts ON (comment_post_ID = ID)) WHERE comment_approved = '1' AND wp_posts.post_status='publish' AND comment_type<>'pingback' AND comment_type<>'trackback' ORDER BY comment_date DESC;WordPress database error: [Lost connection to MySQL server during query]
SELECT cat_ID, cat_name, category_nicename, category_description, category_parent, category_count FROM wp_categories WHERE cat_ID > 0 AND cat_ID <> 34 ORDER BY cat_name ascLegal/Privacy