The kids at Radar are deducing things again (wrongly). It’s cute.

Alternative, longer title after the jump:

Why did a couple of notoriously fickle Radar workers (they wear a lot of hats) get mad after Big Head DC correctly reported (by Radar’s own admission) that Sam Donaldson’s phone number appears multiple times in the “DC Madam’s” records? Was it because they falsely and foolishly thought that Big Head DC was obligated to share scoops with them since Big Head DC’s editor sometimes threw tidbits of juicy gossip their way? Or was it because they hadn’t developed the connections in D.C. necessary to procure the information themselves and then expected once Big Head DC’s editor spent hours gathering and researching information on his own that he was somehow betrothed to them? Or do they believe that Donaldson’s number just happened to get in those records by mistake, time after time, and that the story was a non-story, as, it seems, the Huffington Post believes (even though the Huffington Post falsely reports that a “single telephone call” took place)? And that ABC News didn’t try to cover up that mistake?

Guess we’ll never know.