Just another reason for conservatives to hate the Washington Post:
Ridley Scott won’t say whom he has in mind to play Ronald Reagan in his planned movie about the 1986 Reykjavik Summit — but he urged us to pick your brains for suggestions. Among your ideas: Brendan Fraser (well, maybe in 30 years), Tom Selleck (hmmm . . . ) and Clint Eastwood (we won’t rule it out).
Perhaps the most provocative suggestion? Alec Baldwin. “He has the gravitas, talent and physical characteristics to play President Reagan well,” wrote Mike Blevins of Great Falls. “Of course, Mr. Baldwin couldn’t be more different from Mr. Reagan in terms of political philosophy, but that’s why they call it ‘acting.’”
Political ideology aside, isn’t Baldwin simply way too fat?

Ridley Scott won’t say whom he has in mind to play Ronald Reagan in his
He is absolutely too fat to play Reagan. So why would you run an 18 year old picture of him from “Miami Blues” when he was in the best shape of his life? Doesn’t really bring home the point of the post.
Irony. Also, a gay guy asked we show his hairy chest when we posted this, but there are no fat hairy chest pictures of him.
You’d have been better off using a picture of his puppet from “Team America”. He was the head of FAG, you know.
Go take a look at young Ronald Reagan and then go look at Timothy Daly. Case closed.
In all seriousness, take a look at Michael Richards (Kramer, Seinfeld. Dude looks just like Ronnie.
Post Your Comment:
WordPress database error: [Server shutdown in progress]
SELECT comment_post_ID, post_title FROM (wp_comments LEFT JOIN wp_posts ON (comment_post_ID = ID)) WHERE comment_approved = '1' AND wp_posts.post_status='publish' AND comment_type<>'pingback' AND comment_type<>'trackback' ORDER BY comment_date DESC;WordPress database error: [Lost connection to MySQL server during query]
SELECT cat_ID, cat_name, category_nicename, category_description, category_parent, category_count FROM wp_categories WHERE cat_ID > 0 AND cat_ID <> 34 ORDER BY cat_name ascLegal/Privacy