HOME     ABOUT     ADVERTISE     DONATE     MEDIA     SUBSCRIBE     tips@bigheadDC.com
BIG HEADLINE NEWS, featuring AP reports

HOT HEADLINERS
Thursday December 20th, 2007 9:09 AM by BHDC Staff  
Filed under: Government

american_indian.jpgSeveral Lakota Indians, tired of having the government not live up to its treaty promises, have decided to withdraw from treaty partnerships with the U.S. altogether, forming a new country that includes parts of the states of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

“We have 33 treaties with the United States that they have not lived by,” Phyllis Young, an Indian rights activist said. “They continue to take our land, our water, our children.”

The new Indian country will issue its own passports and driving licenses, and living there will be tax-free, as long as citizens renounce their U.S. citizenship. The State Department has not yet reacted to the Lakota declaration of independence.

................................................................................................................................................................................................




 

E-mail this post:





e-mail this
facebook
del.icio.us
stumble

  1. 30 Comments to 'Lakota Indians Secede From United States'


  1. 1. Joop Schouten said:


    Great! Lakota are intitled to do this when you look at the way the are treated over the last 150 years (and more). I hope they will succeed. Concerning international law they have all the rights to do so. I am curious how the US administration will handle this.
    The will try to cheat again I think.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 10:59 am | Quote

  1. 2. Mark Jones said:


    Very short sighted commentary by Joop. There is now no way to “cheat” since there are no treaties. What the U.S. can now legally do is deny overflight rights so that the Lakotas will not be able to fly over U.S. territory. That means no flights at all out of their “country”. The U.S. can also require the Lakotas to go through a lengthy Visa process in order to leave their “country” by land if at all. Trade with the Lakotas can be restricted or made illegal. In short, the future for the Lakotas looks very dismal. All of this assumes however that our politicians have any sense and guts and would do what was in the best interest of the United States and we all know that that is not the case.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 11:44 am | Quote

  1. 3. Ron St. said:


    Mark is looking at this from the view that non-Indians own this land. Indians own their own lands and maintain sovereign governments. The U.S. has backed out on treaties, so Lakotas want to have their independence. The U.S. should stand up to its Constitutional obligations and uphold the treaty rights of these sovereign nations, so they don’t feel forced to make political statements such as these. It’s just the right thing to do.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 11:51 am | Quote

  1. 4. Mark Jones said:


    Ron St. I don’t know if there is treaty for the U.S. to uphold anymore. If this group of Indians does represent the Lakota tribe and if they have the authority to unilaterily recind the treaties then your comments are no longer valid. I do feel that the Indians in general were mistreated 100 years ago. But I do believe they would be better off today if they had integrated into American society so that they were Americans first and proud of their native american ancestry second like many of “us” whose forefathers came from other countries. I am an American first, but I am proud of my english/irish heritage.
    If they are truly seceding from the U.S. then the U.S. has the right to not form trade, travel, or communication agreements of any type with them if we do not want to. Since they are land locked within our country. Given time they would beg to be readmitted to the Union and we could do it under our terms. Hopefully, we would do away with this hurtful reservation status and force them to assimilated with the rest of U.S. society.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Quote

  1. 5. Aaron said:


    Trying to play devil’s advocate here. What exactly do they hope to accomplish with this move? The US will surely not recognize their claim. Even if it does, what changes for them? Now instead of some, if very little, aid from the US they get none. They get just about everything a regular American citizen gets, don’t they? (free education, medicare, socail security, tell me if I’m wrong because I’m not sure) Plus they already get to self govern so what is their beef? Do they want to go back to their culture pre-1850 and roam around around the country living in tepees hunting buffalo? I’m guessing that is not it. Or are they looking for a free hand up? Again, I do not think that could be it either. The only thing I can plausibly think of is respect, but this is a very dangerous way to try and get that.

    Also, what specifically is their problem with the treaties. All the google searches I do on the subject only seem to come up with this story, in various forms. All I see is the blanket “white people are taking our things” phrase from the Lakotas. (taking your children? comeon)

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 12:58 pm | Quote

  1. 6. joe coffee said:


    This is an interesting precedent, because let us not forget where MOST of the US oil comes from, it is underneath reservation lands within the Navajo, and other tribes nations. If other nations decide to support this effort, then the US may actually have to really negotiate with Native Americans. But also remember, that the US has made it an ACT OF WAR for any Native American to go against it. It is still on the books and has never been taken off. I can see the us completing its acts of genocide against the Native Americans if they use oil to leverage their position.

    Aside from that, I find it funny how one of the MOST dis-enfranchised groups in America, has the moral strength to stand against the government for their individual sovereignty, and collective identity when those with the most resources just cower and fear, hoping no one takes their pot o gold.

    I wish the Lakota the best, and pray for their success against the beast the US government has become.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 12:59 pm | Quote

  1. 7. Tina said:


    There is a treaty — hundreds of them, in fact. If the U.S. wants to go to war with Native America, so be it. They can’t desecrate us any more than they already have. And we have won.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 1:00 pm | Quote

  1. 8. bushsux said:


    Can I move there just to get away from Bush?

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Quote

  1. 9. Marcy Fame said:


    bushsux, you can move to any Indian reservation you want — just be sure to bring money to help the people out.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Quote

  1. 10. post man said:


    Native Americas should march on the white house and scalp everybody there.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 1:45 pm | Quote

  1. 11. Greg said:


    Yes they should start a war.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Quote

  1. 12. * mike * said:


    I’ll fight with them. I can get a good job because of outsourcing.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 1:53 pm | Quote

  1. 13. Native&Proud said:


    For a country with such a horrible history, the U.S. leaders sure likes to think they are above everything. It’s nice that they can start wars in other countries, pretend to liberate the countries that want nothing to do with the stars and stripes and ignore treaties with Native American tribes. I wish more tribes would demand the U.S. lives up to the signed treaties or tell them that they are taking a hike, along with their land and resources.

    Some tribes have proven to be successful with casinos that help fund various tribal activities and health care so they don’t even need the greedy U.S. gov’t. Hopefully these tribes with really successful business operations could work with the tribes that are hurting.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 1:54 pm | Quote

  1. 14. Jamey said:


    Bush stole Iraq’s sovereignty just like the Founding Father’s stole the Indians’ sovereignty. History has repeated itself, but everyone says we’re supposed to learn from history. And I know no one who thinks what we did to the Indians was correct.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 2:07 pm | Quote

  1. 15. jason roeber said:


    Very short sighted commentary by Joop. There is now no way to “cheat” since there are no treaties. What the U.S. can now legally do is deny overflight rights so that the Lakotas will not be able to fly over U.S. territory. That means no flights at all out of their “country”. The U.S. can also require the Lakotas to go through a lengthy Visa process in order to leave their “country” by land if at all. Trade with the Lakotas can be restricted or made illegal. In short, the future for the Lakotas looks very dismal. All of this assumes however that our politicians have any sense and guts and would do what was in the best interest of the United States and we all know that that is not the case.

    So what makes you think the US will immediately slap a Cuba style embargo on the country? It’s possible that it can be a nation within a nation. The most likely scenario the US government will do is just ignore the whole damn thing. They’ll treat it as a non-issue and if there are any protests they’ll ignore them and treat any physical acts as crimes or domestic terror.
    I don’t think the US government will even acknowledge it.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Quote

  1. 16. Well they better acknowledge said:


    I have a right to form my own sovereign nation. Look in the Constitution, buddy. I’m a card carrying Indian. You idiots know nothing about Indian law.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 2:34 pm | Quote

  1. 17. Native&Proud said:


    Thanks for calling us all idiots.

    I have a right to form my own sovereign nation. Look in the Constitution, buddy. I’m a card carrying Indian. You idiots know nothing about Indian law.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 2:36 pm | Quote

  1. 18. jason roeber said:


    They do have great wind resources in that region, some of the best in North America. They could set up wind farms all over the place and sell the power to the US!

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 2:45 pm | Quote

  1. 19. Well they better acknowledge said:


    Thanks for calling us all idiots.

    I have a right to form my own sovereign nation. Look in the Constitution, buddy. I’m a card carrying Indian. You idiots know nothing about Indian law.

    I’m sorry — not you. I just get so mad at people who know nothing about Indian rights carrying on like they should rule us again.

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Quote

  1. 20. Mark said:


    Back in 1991, I traveled across the country with my then girlfriend and her Sioux Indian friend (I couldn’t write a non-fiction book about that trip because noone would believe it as factual). During our journey we stopped in South Dakota to meet his family. There were perhaps 10-15 of all ages living in one small residence. They looked at us (especially my GF, she was a former Miss Kansas) as if we were foreigners, and we felt as if we were in a foreign, impoverished, yet beatiful country. My opinion on the subject is pretty obvious; let them have their own coutry(ies), and allow them to continue with casino operations. It would be a great litmus test for those in Washington as well as the “newfounded” Indian nations as to who can better run a country. Keep in mind the various tribes of indians weren’t exactly “blood-brothers” before the “white man” placed foot on this continent, but they WERE one with nature, not concrete, asphalt, and the almighty dollar. Gonna get off my soapbox, and as a single white male, figure out how much money I owe Uncle Sam come January. Think about it, fellow Indians, I’m doing my best for planetary over-population, yet I get taxed the most. Us whites have our Alamo, you have your Wounded Knee. Fight the good fight!!!

    posted December 20th, 2007 at 6:52 pm | Quote

  1. 21. Joop Schouten said:


    Dear all, my first statement remains. Laws (made after the invasion) by the Founding Fathers are based on european ones. I am interested in history and I believe that I can tell if there is great unjustment done. I think it’s time to pay the interest.
    I also would like to talk ‘with’ native American Lakota, instead talking ‘about’ them!
    When discussions start as if you are in the trenches, ‘open’ discussions will fail.
    Everybody needs a place to be him- or herself. In mind, in deed and on earth.
    I know that most native Americans didn’t know the words for ‘owning land’.
    There philosophy and perspective was/is differend. And what I like most of it: THEIR LACK OF GREED. For me this is a great example. Hope ‘our’ western world didn’t infected there minds too much.
    To find out how Lakota people think, I would like you all to read one of my fafourite books called: ‘Hanta Yo’, written by Ruth Beebee Hill. She’s American. She translated and converted here novel from english to the lakota language with advice of Lakota seniors. The funny thing is that a lot of english words are gone because there are no words for it. And even so they had an respectful way off communicating and being completely individual without being asocial. Their community had an very sophisticated democratic system. I think it is mind blowing!
    By the way, I live in Holland.

    posted December 21st, 2007 at 3:43 am | Quote



  1. We should all applaud them for finally doing this. Imagine the crimes committed to the natives had been done to the rest of us.

    I salute all the proud Native American people and wish you great success!

    posted December 22nd, 2007 at 1:14 am | Quote

  1. 23. I hope for the best for the Lakotas said:


    This statement was done in response to the several decades of the United Stated government refusing to uphold its treaties yet insisting that they were doing the right thing. Remember friends, the entire United States was founded by thieves and English prisoners who were trying to get away from their “civilization.” If the hundreds of treaties that our “forefathers” established with native american nations are able to be broken, then the entire constitution and bill of rights has absolutely no legal or moral standing as well. All of these documents were created with the same intentions, therefore if one of these documents no longer has to be upheld, then NONE of these documents has to be upheld. The Lakota are a brave and extremely peaceful people, this act of freedom will ring throughout America and will cause some sort of change, because if the Lakotas don’t receive the change they deserve (poorest region in the western hemisphere, including Haiti!!), then those Americans who have felt like ants for so many years will raise a feeling of anarchy and will stand up, in unison with the Lakota, against the grasshoppers that are our United States government. May the Lakota be successful in the awareness that they are trying to raise amongst the otherwise blind and deaf American people!!

    posted December 23rd, 2007 at 11:14 am | Quote

  1. 24. irgo said:


    America was vastly UNSETTLED when whites got here, and whites did nothing more or less in taking the land than ANY other people have ever done in warring for land. It’s not a big deal, drop the guilt trip and realize if whites and blacks have to play by the rules and get along so do the reds, yellows and browns. Just be glad the white man brought order to the sector of the earth, the natives were insanely tribalistic and divided by a multitude of languages.

    posted December 26th, 2007 at 5:28 am | Quote

  1. 25. Joop said:


    Hey Irgo, Do you ave an urge to conquer the whole world? What’s wrong with small settlements with it’s own culture, trying to live in peace? In the US today there is more killing than in the day’s before the white tsunami.

    posted December 28th, 2007 at 3:38 am | Quote

  1. 26. thatoneguy said:


    “whites did nothing more or less in taking the land than ANY other people have ever done in warring for land. It’s not a big deal”

    I think we found the idiot.

    posted December 28th, 2007 at 9:27 am | Quote

  1. 27. Piankashaw Princess said:


    Irgo is sadly uneducated thinking that the land here was vastly unsettled when the whites arrived. There where millions of natives who had lived here for thousands of years at that point. Just because they didn’t pave over everything does not mean that the land was not being used by humans. And thinking that the different languages and tribal conflicts justifies the genocide Europeans practiced upon our peoples is a stupid and self-serving point of view. Irgo, you just don’t want to have to give back the things your great-granddaddy stole from “us.”

    Europeans wouldn’t have even gotten a toehold here if the natives on the coasts hadn’t saved their stupid asses!!! Maybe we shouldn’t have.

    I am the product of the melting pot we call America and my tribal heritage has been stolen from me. So much so that the crazy whites here who call themselves Miami Indians make ignorant remarks such as “We are glad you think you are Piankashaw.” (I can verify my piankashaw heritage, but I can’t verify the Cherokee - go figure!)They don’t even know the history of the relationship of my tribe to theirs! At least I still look Native to those with eyes to see, unlike the vast majority of the people who claim to be Miami.

    The US Government has been violating the treaties it signed with my ancestors for hundreds of years. I read them and there is no expiration date on them, so the US Gov’t MUST abide by them, and because they haven’t I do not feel bound to live by their other laws either.

    I want the Lakota to succeed. Even if the Piankashaw tribe is almost totally destroyed, it makes my heart glad to see the Native peoples fighting for their rightful legacy. And I will gladly give up my US citizenship to live in a desolate country with people whose heartsong is more similar to my own, Cuba style embargo or no. The natives didn’t need the whites back then and we don’t need them now. We need to teach the old ways again, and much love to those who are doing this important work.

    The sky is red. The time has come!

    posted December 31st, 2007 at 12:30 am | Quote

  1. 28. q said:


    I feel that the treaties should be upheld, but the sad truth is that if the US wants to it can crush this new country (as previosly stated)

    posted January 1st, 2008 at 2:33 am | Quote

  1. 29. JJ Wallace said:


    Then let the US crush them and see how that plays to the rest of the world.

    posted January 1st, 2008 at 1:34 pm | Quote

  1. 30. bla said:


    The native Americans deserve all their former lands back after the way the US gov has been treating them for the past 200 years

    posted May 21st, 2008 at 10:09 pm | Quote

Post Your Comment:

Quicktags:                





................................................................................................................................................................................................







Syndication
Subscribe Subscribe to BHDC


Anonymous Tips

Recent Comments
Larry Sinclair Hires Richard R. Wier Jr., Former Delaware Attorney General  (291)
Shannon Sparks, xbjllb, Curioso, xbjllb [...]

Hairspray's a Hit, Despite Washington Blade Boycott; Editor Spotted Drinking With the Film's Cast  (4)
sHiNe, TY, Mr. Marsden, Amy

Blacks Angered By Harold Ford Jr.'s Bride Choice  (434)
sarah, Josh, Marie, OH WELL [...]

Hillary's Huma Abedin NOT Dating Rep. Weiner  (6)
massage parlour, Big Head Rob, shannon sparks, GG [...]

A Picture from Spring Break  (23)
Kazelbuk, Kazeldpv, Kazelxmz, Kazelzot [...]

Flashback: Gennifer Flowers Always Said Hillary's Gay  (8)
wow, Kenny, xandme, Big Head Rob [...]

Update on Larry Sinclair  (857)
xbjllb, smoker, Hypocrisy Buster, Hypocrisy Buster [...]

Larry Sinclair Claims New Obama Drug & Sex Scandal  (51)
brainondrugs, Nuqueen1, MAXIBRUTIS, peaches1 [...]

Shock: Politico Covers Larry Sinclair  (458)
NURSERATCHET, typical white person, James, James [...]

Tipsters Aching for a Blog War to Leak into Real Life  (14)
EricaB is Stupid, Felicia, bonnie, MochaMommy [...]

Larry Sinclair Takes Polygraph Test Early; Results Soon  (52)
Arturo Sierra, Anonymous, Nickname, David Howard [...]

Obama Covered Up Desire to Legalize Marijuana  (37)
wes, LEO, Fred, Jason [...]

Source: Christopher Hitchens Has NOT Quit Smoking  (4)
will, RedSonja2000, Marcy Fame, Anonymous


BHDC Files