Um, observer here, how would Radar know what information Big Head DC has gathered? As far as I can tell, Big Head DC has been in communication with Palfrey for months. My analysis is that Radar wanted this scoop so bad, but the only way they could get it would be to rely on a reporter from Big Head DC. However, why would Big Head DC share an independent scoop with Radar?

One of you might want to check out Radar’s relationship(s) with Sam Donaldson and/or ABC News. This scandal is about a married man dicking an escort, and ABC covering for him.

Seems that Radar wanted the scoop more than Rob wanted Radar’s money. How much do they pay, anyhow?

Radar is playing a dangerous game, and they know it. Editors there are in an uproar. They even had to issue a correction to the piece that knocked the Big Head DC scoop that they had earlier trumpeted. Someone remind me what Jeffrey Epstein has to do with this, too.

Why did Radar think it could kill a story that wasn’t on their site?

I’m referring to their orgin al post about Donaldson. The one that links to BHDC’s post and quotes BHDC at length.

This one: Still up there!

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2007/11/sam-donaldsons-number-in-dc-madams-records.php

My point, exactly! Clearly this “John Cook” of Radar has it in for Rob. If you’re going to be petty and personal, fine. But don’t pretend you’re a real journalist or turn your nose up while you’re doing it!!!!

So, Rob, why couldn’t you call John Cook from Radar???

So is “Ugh” actually “John J. Cook” or did John post these emails somewhere? Either way = tacky, tacky, tacky.

Wow, Rob’s sock-puppets are out in force today.

I like to think of myself as a fan. I hope Big Head DC will sell logo T-shorts for Xmas.

The attention this episode gave BHDC alone must pay a good deal in ad revenue. How he keeps on creating these controversies is beyond me. But he manages. And I am awed every time.

No, but I have been known to work out near Rob’s office.

I’ve known Deborah Jean Palfrey for a few years now and I know the whole story. Here it is: Sam Donaldson WAS a client of her escort service. He was also very good and generous and kind to Deborah and her girls. Sam called Debora after the BHDC story hit and BEGGED her to retract. Deborah, the hooker with a heart of gold, complied. End of true story.

Rob,

I’m calling you now. Let’s discuss this. I acted hastily and shouldn’t have been so nasty to you. Standby your phone.

John J. Cook

My husband of 41 years cheated on me with a cheap prostitute. Not as cheap as one of Palfrey’s gals, but cheap nonetheless. The police are still trying to find his body.

Name and address, please.

[…] Gossip | LOTT’s ESCORT, REVEALED | Hastert Resigns | Lott’s Odd Resignation | Craig’s Cowboy BREAKING: Flynt Confirms Sam Donaldson # Appears In “DC Madam’s” Records, But Chose Not to Reveal It   Tuesday November 27th, 2007 7:40 PM by BHDC Staff     Filed under: Journalism,Sex, Scandals, Scoops, Deborah Jeane Palfrey, Shocking, Radar, Larry Flynt, ABC, Sam Donaldson A press release sent this evening by Hustler publisher Larry Flynt confirms that a phone number belonging to ABC newsman Sam Donaldson appeared in the records of the alleged “DC Madam” Deborah Jeane Palfrey, as Big Head DC first revealed some time ago. Radar magazine and the Huffington Post have both falsely claimed that the Big Head DC story was somehow factually inaccurate. We have long claimed that the existence of Donaldson’s number in Palfrey’s records, combined with the existence of phone records of other network news personalities from the ABC network in the records, prevented ABC News from revealing a fuller report on the spectrum of politicos and others in Palfrey’s records when they released their exclusive interview with Palfrey in May of this year. In essence, there was a cover-up by ABC News. Palfrey has confirmed as much to Big Head DC. […]